InnerLight

Burzynski's Antineoplastons: A Cure for Cancer Suppressed And Ignored For 45 Years. A documentary by Eric Merola About Burzynski: PART I The first in the series, "Burzynski, the Movie," is an internationally award-winning documentary originally released in 2010 (with an Extended Edition released in 2011) that tells the true story of a medical doctor and Ph.D biochemist named Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski who won the largest, and possibly the most convoluted and intriguing legal battle against the Food & Drug Administration in American history. His victorious battles with the United States government were centered around Dr. Burzynski's gene-targeted cancer medicines he discovered in the 1970's called Antineoplastons, which have currently completed Phase II FDA-supervised clinical trials in 2009 and has been given permission by the FDA to begin the final phase of FDA testing–randomized controlled clinical trials. . When Antineoplastons are approved, it will mark the first time in history a single scientist, not a pharmaceutical company, will hold the exclusive patent and distribution rights on a paradigm-shifting medical breakthrough. https://www.burzynskimovie.com/watch-burzynski/ video source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_7LZ8GLerI - https://www.burzynskiclinic.com/ https://www.burzynskimovie.com/ https://www.burzynskipatientgroup.org/antineoplastons - How a Little-Known Therapy Called Antineoplastons Can “Switch Off Cancer Cells” Without Destroying Normal Cells What if there were a safe, effective cure for cancer? One that’s…been proven effective in clinical trials…has many documented success stories…has been in use since 1967…comes with none of the harrowing side effects of chemotherapy and radiation…was featured in a high-profile, award-winning documentary…commands the interest of many of the world’s leading alternative practitioners and media superstars, including Dr. Mehmet Oz and including Oprah Winfrey? The truth is, such a treatment does exist. It is being administered to select patients right now. If you or someone you love has reason to worry about cancer, this is information you must have. A Startling Discovery Stanislaw R. Burzynski, M.D., Ph.D., is an internationally recognized physician and scientist. He has devoted his entire career to cancer research, and for more than 40 years he has treated cancer patients from all over the world at his Houston, Texas clinic (called The Burzynski Clinic). Dr. Burzynski is renowned known for discovering antineoplastons, substances in the body that naturally acts as “molecular switches” to turn off cancer cells without destroying normal cells. Antineoplaston therapy may very well be the most effective gene-targeted cancer therapy the world has ever seen. Antineoplaston What are Antineoplastons…and How Did Burzynski Discover Them? Antineoplastons are peptides and amino acid derivatives contained in human blood and urine. According to Dr. Burzynski, they are also components of a “biochemical defense system” that controls cancer without destroying normal cells. Dr. Burzynski first discovered antineoplastons in 1967. His discovery was monumental, because at that time researchers assumed they’d already identified and documented every substance in human blood and urine. As Dr. Julian Whitaker stated in the award-winning 2010 documentary about Burzynski’s life and work (Burzynski, The Movie), “discovering something in the urine (and blood) at that time, that had never been discovered before—is like finding a whole bunch of new islands ten miles off the coast of Miami, it came as a big surprise.” source https://undergroundhealthreporter.com/antineoplaston-cancer-therapy/

Wake The Dead podcast with host Sean McCann on December 7, 2022. Topics included Solipsism, Satanism, Mind Control, Collectivism, and more. Mark Passio returns to Wake the Dead to discuss solipsism & how it is used by the controllers of this world to keep mankind powerless, confused & consenting to evil. Solipsism is a divorce from the truth. This neuters people's will & makes them unable to apply their will in reality. It makes them perfect slaves. The biggest weapon in the arsenal of Satanism. Solipsism opens the door to all the other tenets of the satanic philosophy. It leads to self worship & the ego being of primary importance, which leads to moral relativism, then social darwinism, & ultimately eugenics. The satanic control structure pushes solipsism into the minds of the public so as to turn the entire society satanic, & it’s working folks. The key to this modern day solipsism is that people are encouraged to not even trust their own senses, only the television brings truth. This entrains all the people to treat the ‘mass formation’ as the self. The pinnacle of a collectivist society, denying the individual even exists. This nightmare is in effect today. This ideology makes the State the arbiter of truth. What follows is always genocide. The current culling of mankind would never be possible without solipsism. Find all of Mark’s work here: https://whatonearthishappening.com/ Mark’s podcast: https://whatonearthishappening.com/podcast Mark’s documentary & presentations: https://whatonearthishappening.com/videos Please donate to Wake the Dead: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/wakethedead https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/seanmccannabis Or visit Wake the Dead’s online store: https://www.storefrontier.com/wakethedead source https://rumble.com/v1zu7ni-wtd-ep.73-mark-passio-solipsism.html https://whatonearthishappening.com/news/838-mark-passio-interviewed-on-wake-the-dead-podcast-december-7-2022 ______________________________ Mattias Desmet - ‘Mass Formation’ Hypnosis and the Rise of Technocratic Totalitarianism https://rumble.com/v1nun7s-mattias-desmet-mass-formation-hypnosis-and-the-rise-of-technocratic-totalit.html - MASS CONTROL: Engineering Human Consciousness (pdf) - Jim Keith https://odysee.com/@RunningOverTheSameOldGround:6/Mass-Control-Jim-Keith:3 - The Human Condition (pdf) - Hannah Arendt http://www.sduk.us/afterwork/arendt_the_human_condition.pdf

Doctors and Scientists with Brian Hooker Ph.D Dr. Brian Hooker invites some of the leading voices in science and medicine to break down the studies and weigh in on the controversies so the rest of us have an opportunity to understand the science that drives public health policy and medical progress. Nancy Tarlow, D.C. returns to ‘Doctors & Scientists’ for another critical conversation. This time, she and Brian Hooker, Ph.D. discuss the science behind natural immunity, sharing helpful information about microbiota, lymphoid systems and more. They speak to the relationship between vaccination, chronic conditions and virus mutation as well as provide simple solutions for a compromised, weakened immune system. https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/doctors-and-scientists-with-brian-hooker-phd/the-immune-system-as-nature-intended/

Conspiritus: The Satanic Illuminati Conspiracy – Complete Film

American Thought Leaders JAN JEKIELEK I sit down with two leading cardiologists from two sides of the Atlantic, Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Aseem Malhotra, to understand how the COVID-19 vaccines impact the body, especially the heart. “There has been a suggestion—and I think this is probably subterfuge from the PR industry of pharma—that mild COVID may be causing all the sudden cardiac deaths. And the evidence is just not there for that at all,” says Malhotra. Once an outspoken advocate of the COVID-19 genetic vaccines, Malhotra changed his mind after the sudden death of his father compelled him to take a closer look at the data. “Roughly 15 percent of people who have taken the vaccines are damaged by them,” says McCullough, one of the most published cardiologists in America and the Chief Scientific Officer of The Wellness Company. McCullough says the risk of adverse effects from the mRNA vaccines is particularly high for those who were previously infected with COVID-19. “There are patients who are triple vaccinated, and then they get COVID. So they have a fourth exposure now of the spike protein. There is a cumulative risk here,” he says. In this episode, the two doctors break down the data on the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, bias in the scientific literature, and what people should do if they are concerned about their health. source https://www.theepochtimes.com/dr-peter-mccullough-and-dr-aseem-malhotra-how-the-covid-19-vaccines-impact-the-heart_4929815.html - FULL TRANSCRIPT Jan Jekielek: Dr. Aseem Malhotra, Dr. Peter McCullough, such a pleasure to have you on American Thought Leaders. Dr. McCullough: Thank you. Dr. Malhotra: Great to be here again. Mr. Jekielek: The topic of our episode today is going to be COVID-19 and the heart. We are sitting in front of two esteemed cardiologists from different backgrounds, from different countries, different medical systems, and we’re going to find out what you think. Dr. McCullough, let’s start with the basics of COVID-19 and the heart. And you can expand as far as you would like. Dr. McCullough: Looking back, there’s been a published history of the coronaviruses, specifically the betacoronaviruses, and the heart. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill published in 1992 that he could create animal models with coronaviruses that would damage the heart and cause cardiomyopathy and heart failure. That was in 1992. So, it was well known that there were models, given enough of the virus in the right routes of administration, and the right experimental conditions, to cause this. The part of the virus that causes the heart damage is called the spike protein. This was well known in 1992, well known ahead of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. When the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak occurred in the United States in 2000, within a few months, multiple entities were aware of this possibility. The U.S. military had a screening program for myocarditis with COVID, the respiratory illness, so did the Big Ten NCAA athletic league. And so, people were on alert to look for myocarditis in SARS-CoV-2, the respiratory infection. Mr. Jekielek: Dr. Malhotra, your thoughts. Dr. Malhotra: One of the things that became quite apparent early on in the pandemic is that the people who had risk factors for heart disease, who even also had underlying heart disease, were actually at higher risk for adverse outcomes from COVID-19. The issue with the heart and COVID isn’t just about the vaccine, clearly, which we’ve discussed in detail before. It’s about the fact that one was also potentially in a worse off position from having a bad outcome from COVID if you had underlying heart disease. Mr. Jekielek: Would that extend to potentially bad outcomes from the vaccine? Do we know that? Dr. Malhotra: It could be. Certainly the four bits of data that the WHO put out in terms of potential adverse effects from the vaccine were based upon COVID itself, animal studies on the vaccine, and the technology that was being used in previous harms from vaccines. But the fact that COVID itself was part of that as a problematic issue with the vaccine suggests that was just building on what we already knew with heart disease and COVID. Mr. Jekielek: The typical thing that we hear about is myocarditis, and we know that because that’s probably the most developed of the cardiac issues when it comes to vaccination with these genetic vaccines. Why don’t you just give me an overview? Dr. Malhotra: First and foremost, there’s been a lot of debate about whether COVID increased myocarditis itself. The totality of the evidence, and I’m sure Peter will agree with me, doesn’t suggest that compared to any other viruses it’s particularly more prevalent. We’ll talk about the vaccine in a second. Myocarditis in general, viral myocarditis, pre-vaccine, is something we learn in medicine as a rule of third. A third of people are going to get worse and die when they get myocarditis, and it’s essentially thought to be an autoimmune type of phenomenon. It can happen to anybody. In fact, my elder brother died from viral myocarditis. Either a third will die and get very sick, a third will have impairment of the heart muscle pump function and will live with that for a long time but not die, and a third will be sick momentarily and then they will get back to normal. That’s what we know about viral myocarditis. With the COVID-19 myocarditis, it’s a slightly different kettle of fish. In some ways, there are not obvious or apparent death rates from myocarditis that we see with viral myocarditis. But of the people admitted to hospital, MRI scans show that about 80 per cent of them are left with some kind of myocardial scar, which means that is potentially a problem moving forward as a substrate for arrhythmias, or even deterioration of heart muscle pump function over time. Mr. Jekielek: Are we just talking about the virus itself? Dr. Malhotra: No, sorry, this is with the vaccine. Mr. Jekielek: This is with the vaccine. Okay, great. Dr. McCullough: With the virus, if we just stay on the virus, there was a big paper that was published out of the Veterans Administration. They used ICD codes, but it was a huge study. The first author, Xie, (X-I-E), showed that virtually every cardiovascular event that was serious enough to be in the hospital was elevated after a COVID infection. The risks were giant for those who were in the hospital with COVID. With outpatient COVID, the risks were much less, but they included traditional myocardial infarction, the decompensation of heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias, atrial arrhythmias, and myocarditis. Myocarditis in the inpatient studies is a problem because it’s not adjudicated. And a blood test is commonly done in almost all hospitalized patients called troponin. Troponin is the most abundant protein in the human heart, and it’s a reliable indicator of heart damage. But a troponin being elevated in COVID-19 respiratory illness doesn’t establish a diagnosis of myocarditis, because it’s elevated because of bacterial sepsis and other ICU conditions. The literature, and there’s some papers written on this, says that COVID-19 itself causes more myocarditis than the vaccine. Those papers are not valid, because they’re not adjudicated cases of hospitalized patients developing myocarditis. But here’s something of interest on community outpatients. The Big Ten had a screening program. A paper by Daniels and colleagues published in JAMA looked for myocarditis in thousands of athletes, and 30 per cent of them got COVID. They found a handful of cases that would’ve met a definition by multiple testing, and there were no hospitalizations and deaths. And then, a paper by Joy and colleagues did very prospective cohorts, with detailed screening of patients who developed COVID, and no evidence of heart injury. I agree with Dr. Malhotra, that with the respiratory illness as it all settles out, there is a risk for traditional cardiovascular events, because of this big inflammatory insult that the body gets with COVID respiratory illness. But this is a small, negligible risk of myocarditis with COVID, the respiratory infection, probably because the body doesn’t get this massive exposure to the spike protein that it does with the vaccines. Mr. Jekielek: But once the disease is allowed to progress, and once someone is in the hospital, now we’re seeing big issues. Is that right? Dr. Malhotra: Yes, absolutely. As Peter said, as to the cardiovascular event rates, certainly in the people with severe COVID—and we’re going back in time to the ancestral strain really, because that’s what we saw at the very beginning, the Wuhan strain—it does seem to, through an inflammatory mechanism, increase cardiovascular events. However, this is something we have known in cardiology anyway, with all sorts of infections. If you’ve got predisposition to cardiovascular disease, if you have an infection or pneumonia, it’s going to exacerbate all these cardiovascular problems. It’s going to increase the likelihood of plaque rupture and heart attacks, that kind of thing. In that sense, it’s not that new. The point that has been made more apparent recently is that there has been a suggestion, and this is probably subterfuge from the PR industry of pharma, that mild COVID may be causing all these sudden cardiac deaths. The evidence is just not there for that at all, actually. People shouldn’t be distracted by this false narrative that mild COVID may be causing a massive surge in cardiac arrests. Dr. McCullough: There’s a paper by Singer and colleagues that’s notable. Again, Singer used this unadjudicated troponin elevation in the hospital by ICD codes, and proclaimed that COVID-19, the respiratory illness, has a many-fold higher risk of myocarditis than taking a vaccine. Therefore, you should take a vaccine and risk myocarditis, in order to avoid myocarditis later on with the respiratory illness. That type of logic should be flawed to anybody listening to this. It’s built on a house of cards. We never administer a product to cause a problem, to later on prevent a problem. It just doesn’t work that way. With the vaccines, there’s quite a history of myocarditis with the vaccines. The smallpox, monkeypox vaccine clearly causes myocarditis, well-published cases of myocarditis. Viral infections can cause it, parvovirus and others. In a paper from Arola and colleagues from Finland, published in one of the best cardiology journals before COVID, they established a rate. It’s very important. They studied everybody in the entire country, and they had very solid case identification. Four cases-per-million is the background rate of myocarditis before COVID. With the very first number of the CDC came out with, the CDC was dividing safety events by the total number of people that took the vaccine, assuming other people didn’t get it. That is a flawed statistical approach. But even doing that, the first CDC estimate was 62 cases-per-million, and then it rapidly escalated. Tracy Høeg at UC Davis did different data analysis with 250 cases-per-million. Sharff at Kaiser Permanente found 527 cases-per-million. And now the two prospective cohort studies, Mansanguan and colleagues and Le Pessec and colleagues, two separate papers, when they finally do all the measurements before and after vaccination, Mansanguan was on the second shot of Pfizer in children age 13 to 18, Le Pessec was in healthcare workers on the third shot of messenger RNA vaccines, they find together, their estimate now, 25,000 cases-per-million. Mr. Jekielek: Has this basically accelerated as the vaccine rollout or the number of boosters, or how do you understand this? Dr. Malhotra: Yes. Myocarditis itself, absolutely. All cardiovascular conditions have gotten worse because of the vaccine. And anything and everything that can go wrong with the heart has gone wrong with the heart as a result of these mRNA vaccines. There’s no doubt about it. That’s why Peter and I both separately had essentially said if doctors are not aware of a possible diagnosis, they’ll never diagnose it. Unfortunately, many doctors, including cardiologists, are still not even conceiving of the possibility that the mRNA vaccine can cause these problems. But the list is there, it’s endorsed by the WHO—cardiac arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, heart attacks, myocarditis, and heart failure. I’ve managed all of these people in the community who have been vaccine injured. Their doctors have missed it, but I picked it up. Mr. Jekielek: Fascinating. Let’s pause for a moment. I’m remembering this video that I watched that someone had put together online. You both came up with a particular phrase, which was “until proven otherwise.” Some of the viewers might be familiar with this. I want to figure out, what does it mean, number one? And two, did you both come up with it independently? And third, I’m going to ask you how you know each other and when you started talking to each other, because you’ve come to some similar conclusions. Dr. Malhotra: Yes. In terms of, “until proven otherwise,” we came up with it independently. It was trying to capture people’s attention, and for cardiologists and doctors to understand that these so-called unexplained events that were happening where it doesn’t fit, in the case of a cardiac issue, then you have to include the side effect of the vaccine as part of your differential diagnosis. It’s trying to just shift the discussion. Until you’ve got another clear explanation why someone suffered a sudden cardiac death, or had a heart attack or an arrhythmia problem, you have to consider it being the vaccine, until you’ve proven that there’s another more likely cause. And I’m sure Peter probably did the same thing. I can’t remember, Peter, when we started actually speaking to each other. Dr. McCullough: It’s been a while. He uses texting a lot. He’s younger, so he’s in the text generation. I have really a substantial experience on data safety and monitoring boards for the NIH, and for Big Pharma. I’ve done this for decades. When people are in a study, or it’s in a post-marketing period in a brand-new drug, when someone dies within a few days, or certainly within 30 days of any new drug or injection, it is that drug until proven otherwise. If this was in a regulatory dossier, it could even be something that’s seemingly disconnected. Believe it or not, in clinical trials, if someone’s taking a drug and they have a car accident, it’s attributed to the drug, because the drug may have made them dizzy or foggy or what have you. To be conservative, we actually put it on the new drug or the new injection or the new vaccine. That’s just good regulatory science. When the deaths started to come in after the vaccine, unless we had something very obvious, a drug overdose of something else, a suicide attempt, or just something obvious… Mr. Jekielek: A very clear cause. Dr. McCullough: Yes. Or if there was an autopsy that said they died of a perforated appendix or something, it is the vaccine until proven otherwise. Then once we learned that the vaccine causes myocarditis in June of 2021, and the FDA said it causes myocarditis, the WHO anticipated this, and the NIH anticipated this. Then, the myocarditis cases started coming in, with the publication of fatal cases. If there are fatal cases, they undergo an autopsy, and the pathologists agree they died of fatal myocarditis. Now it’s in the peer-reviewed literature, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine, by Verma and colleagues from Washington University in St. Louis. We had Choi in Korea, Gill from Connecticut and Michigan and Minnesota, that trio published on two boys who died of Pfizer vaccine. It’s clear now in Circulation, our best cardiology research journal, with Patone and colleagues from the UK, there were 100 fatal cases where the UK doctors put fatal vaccine-induced myocarditis as the number one diagnosis on the death certificate. We have it now. The next person who dies out there, and there’s no explanation, it is the vaccine, until the family comes out and tells us they didn’t take the vaccine. With every family that remains silent, the assumption is they took the vaccine. Now, that family is in a spiral of regret, remorse, and feeling guilty about what happened. That’s probably what’s going on. Families can clear this up. Anybody listening to this tape, if the families come out and say they did not take the vaccine, then we can take the spotlight off the vaccine. Mr. Jekielek: It seems to make perfect sense as you’re describing this right now, but I feel like I’ve been programmed to believe otherwise. Dr. Malhotra: Yes. The other thing to add in, which we haven’t discussed yet as well, is the element of people almost accepting to some degree that these side effects, which they wrongly believe are rare, are acceptable. It’s because they also have a false perception of benefit of the vaccine. Here’s one of the discussions I’ve even had with doctors who are, in normal circumstances, good critical thinkers, “Hold on a minute, Aseem. Haven’t we ended the pandemic because of the vaccine? How about all these lives that are saved? How come COVID is not killing people anymore?” No. COVID mutated independently of the vaccine. It’s become milder. That’s what happens to these viruses. Somebody asked me the question the other day, “If we didn’t have the vaccine at all, would we be in a better or worse position than we are now?” The honest answer is we don’t know, but I think we’d be better off if we didn’t even have the vaccine at all. We would have had probably less harm to the population. Mr. Jekielek: Okay. That’s a big statement. Why? What is the data that supports this? Dr. Malhotra: You go back to the very basics of the original randomized control trial. The vaccine showed you were more likely to have a serious—and this is in a healthier subgroup population, which were chosen by Pfizer and Moderna—you were more likely to suffer a serious adverse event from the vaccine than to be hospitalized with COVID. And that is during the original ancestral Wuhan strain. Think about that. You’ve got the same effect of harm from the vaccine, and even in the worst possible wave, it was still more harmful. The virus has mutated to become less harmful, and you’ve still got the same level of harm with the vaccine. It’s a no-brainer. You can make a very strong case that societies would have been much better off without this mRNA technology. AstraZeneca, that was in effect suspended in the UK, even though it wasn’t made public, they slowly phased it out. But when you look at the Yellow Card reporting, and this is in a country of a population of 60 million, we had 1 million Yellow Card reports from AstraZeneca, which is just extraordinary. It was publicized in news reports as a rare clotting effect or a rare issue. We now know it wasn’t rare at all. These vaccines have had a hugely negative impact on society and on health. And of course, everything that’s gone on with this has eroded trust in medicine as well. Mr. Jekielek: Just to add to what you were saying, these vaccines were designed for this original variant. So basically, they would’ve been most efficacious, if they were efficacious, on those early variants than the ones today. Dr. Malhotra: Yes, absolutely. And another thing that we talk about are the psychopathic determinants of health. What was most criminal is telling people who had natural immunity to take the vaccine. Because some evidence suggests you were three times more likely to suffer a serious adverse event if you had COVID and then you took the vaccine, certainly within the first few months after it. It’s beyond criminal. Let’s just call it out for what it is. Mr. Jekielek: Let’s talk about this. Natural immunity, since time immemorial, has been known to be effective. Basically, if you’ve had the disease, chances are that you’re going to be in a much better situation with respect to disease. In many cases, you just won’t get it anymore. You’re immune. So, what is the deal with natural immunity today? Dr. McCullough: The biggest question I get from my patients is, “Doctor, if I get COVID, how can I avoid being hospitalized and dying?” Those are the two bad outcomes. Listen, if I can get through it at home, I’m good. The only factors that have been consistently related to reductions in hospitalization and death by risk is early treatment. Every study looking at early treatment, it doesn’t matter what drugs were tested, or what drugs in combination, they always take an edge off the illness and reduce the proclivity to be hospitalized. An analysis by [inaudible] and colleagues, a mathematical analysis, demonstrated that we actually knew that with a P value of less than 0.01, that forms of early treatment were stopping hospitalizations by December of 2020. Very important. There were multiple studies across the world. And then natural immunity. Early on, the FDA and the vaccine manufacturers, when they were actually working on the registrational trials, they strictly excluded anybody who had previously had COVID, even suspected patients with COVID, they were excluded. They couldn’t even receive a vaccine. Also, pregnant women and women of childbearing potential. When we have exclusion criteria in clinical trials, the exclusions must be justified. The rationale to justify the exclusion was that they did not have an opportunity for benefit, but they had an opportunity for harm. A golden rule in medicine is, once people are excluded from the original randomized trials, we never immediately start applying this in practice. In the first week of the U.S. vaccine program, we saw people who had already recovered from COVID were told they should take it, and our CDC, NIH, and FDA and hospital systems and others all agreed. This included pregnant women and women of childbearing potential. Those breaches are breaches of regulatory science, breaches of medical ethics, and are completely off the rails. That was December 10th of 2020. At that moment, we knew things were off the rails. We had never done that before. We had never done that before. Papers by Raw, Krammer, and Mathioudakis clearly showed that if one had natural immunity, there was an explosion of risk afterwards, including going to the hospital. One of the reasons why the adverse event profile is so bad on the vaccines, even way worse than the original trials, is because people with previous COVID have actually been taking these vaccines. Mr. Jekielek: Yes. Let’s look at that data. People that have had COVID and then took the vaccines, versus people who hadn’t had COVID and took the vaccines. You mentioned it was a three time increase. Dr. Malhotra: An almost threefold increase in systemic side effects. Yes. If you take the vaccine after having natural immunity. Absolutely. Dr. McCullough: Everything was worse. There’s a paper from the UK, from Raw, I specifically remember that paper. Everything was worse. The reactogenicity, the pain in the arm, lymph node swelling, fever, and events that landed people in the hospital were worse. Now, we have data from the V-safe data which is extraordinary. The CDC did not want to release that to the public. V-safe is a cell phone app where people were told, if you have side effects, fill it out on the cell phone app, in terms of something happened to you. 10 million Americans did it. The CDC wanted to withhold it. They were forced under court order to release it to the NGO, ICAN, and the results are bombshell. 25 per cent of people who take the vaccine are incapacitated the next day. They can’t go to work or school the day after. 7 to 8 per cent are hospitalized or go to the ER. This is the most toxic vaccine by the CDC data that we’ve ever seen in clinical medicine. My hunch is that a large number of those individuals previously had COVID. I’ve mentioned this on national TV, and I’ve reported events through the VAERS system, a separate system, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. In the VAERS system, there’s no checkbox to indicate if they’ve previously had COVID. It is a massive oversight, when the data were clearly showing us recovered people were excluded from clinical trials. If they were going to have side effects with the vaccine, you’d think the CDC would at least want to capture that information, so they could mitigate risk with new recommendations. Mr. Jekielek: How does this compare with the UK data? Dr. Malhotra: Yes, it’s similar. For me, there is always going back to trying to make sense of this kind of behavior when the evidence is so clear. There was no precautionary principle applied. It still comes back to these regulatory bodies failing in their duty to protect the public from the excesses of and manipulations of industry who were there just wanting to mass vaccinate as many people as possible, irrespective of the consequences and irrespective of the harm. People need to understand that. With the regulators in our country, the MHRA, and the FDA in the U.S., people don’t realize that as long as they’re captured by industry funding, they are not going to be independent. They’re not rigorous, and they cannot be trusted. It’s very simple. Let’s just call it out for what it is. They have acted as essentially sock puppets or slaves to the psychopath. This is the only explanation, Jan, I have for this behavior. It’s psychopathic. Mr. Jekielek: We’ve talked your understanding of the psychopath or psychopathic entities in the past. Briefly, for the benefit of our audience who don’t know about that conversation, please tell me what you mean. Dr. Malhotra: Sure. The evidence-based forensic psychologist, Robert Hare, was the preeminent expert in the original international definition for the DSM criteria for psychopath. He consistently describes that with pharmaceutical companies and many big corporations, the way they carry out their business is psychopathic. For example, callous, unconcerned for the safety of others, cunning, and deceiving others for profit. These several criteria they fulfill, which you would normally give as a definition of a psychopath in psychiatric definitions, are terms you can apply to these big corporations. For me to try and explain this kind of behavior, many of the people that have been propagating misinformation on the COVID vaccines, who have been callous in terms of not regarding and understanding the safety concerns, are really slaves to the entity that’s driving it, and that entity is psychopathic. For example, the FDA, effectively captured by industry as well, by promoting and not stopping this vaccine being rolled out when they knew there was significant harm, is behaving like a slave or a puppet to the psychopath. Mr. Jekielek: It’s still hard to fathom. Is it just simply this mania with making sure that every single person gets vaccinated, and it’s just too complicated to test for natural immunity? Is that what you think? Dr. Malhotra: No, I don’t think so. I can’t see any rational reason for them doing it. I know this from direct conversations with people linked to the FDA. One of the things that’s been used is a surrogate marker of antibodies. But the FDA themselves in May 2021 on their website actually put out a statement saying the public and doctors need to understand that current SARS 2 COVID antibody tests do not give any indication of protection from or immunity to COVID-19, especially after receiving vaccination. They knew that it was essentially a useless marker. And yet, that’s all they have used to justify the perpetuation of vaccines or use studies where they’re showing slightly high antibody titers with people who had natural immunity and then had the vaccine. It is the worst possible science. Dr. McCullough: The term is called surrogate. A surrogate in the field of cardiology is actually a bad word. Surrogate means we trust something that’s not a real clinical outcome, in hope that this is actually going to improve something meaningful, like reducing hospitalization and death. The FDA put out that warning, in fact I think it was in June of 2020 when they said, “We should not measure antibodies. Don’t do it to try to assess for immunity. Don’t try to do this.” And the antibody manufacturers were correct. If you actually read their package labels, it says the purpose of measuring this test is to ascertain prior infection. That’s the whole reason to do it. The knowledge of prior infection is a very useful piece of information. And we now know, there’s a recent paper, one of the ones I quote the most, by Chin and colleagues, in the New England Journal of Medicine at the end of October 2022, with 59,000 prisoners and 17,000 staff, all in a closed setting. They know everybody who’s getting COVID, they know everybody who’s being hospitalized and died. If someone’s had any prior version of COVID, and they now get the Omicron strain, there is zero risk of hospitalization and death. Zero. It doesn’t matter if you took a vaccine or not. The vaccine had no impact. Even with those where it was not clear if they had prior COVID, there were very, very low risks—very low risks across the board, and no difference whether or not someone took a vaccine. That’s a massive sample size, but it gives reassurance. When people know they’ve had prior COVID, we can operate on that. As a doctor, I get called all the time. “Dr. McCullough, I have COVID.” My first question is, “Is this your first episode or a second or more episode?” “It’s my second episode.” Okay. I know that that patient has a negligible risk of hospitalization and death. I behave differently. When it’s the first episode, it could be more severe. But as Dr. Malhotra said, we’re now in the Omicron era where we have very, very few serious cases. The current estimate right now is in the United States, and we’ve heard Rochelle Walensky say this, that there are 300 Americans “dying per day who are COVID positive.” From our CDC data, we know that with 90 per cent of that something else is contributing to death, like a hip fracture, or pneumococcal pneumonia. They’re just testing positive probably from a prior COVID infection months earlier, and 10 per cent really have adjudicated COVID. Now, we’re down to 30 deaths per day. 30 deaths per day. Let me give you an idea. In the United States, there are 2,000 cardiac deaths per day from heart attacks, heart failure, and fatal arrhythmias. So, for the last year, with COVID-19 in the Omicron era, there has been a negligible public health threat. There are absolutely no criteria for President Biden to declare this to be a continued health emergency. Mr. Jekielek: Yes. That’s interesting. Is that how you assess the death data now? Dr. Malhotra: Yes. Absolutely. It’s very mild now. It’s very, very mild. So, it’s not an issue. It’s not a public health issue. It shouldn’t be. The pandemic is over. We’re dealing with a cold. We’re dealing with a cold. In fact, I got COVID early on this year. I’ll be honest with you. Fine, I’m in my forties, and I’ve had worse colds. Effectively, by that stage, I was unvaccinated, because it was more than a year since I’d had two doses. People need to be told the truth. We need to stop scaring people. Mr. Jekielek: Some of the criticisms that I’ve heard about your respective work is that you both cherry pick your studies. You basically pick the studies that will give you the outcomes that you want. I would like each of you to respond to that criticism because it’s a common one. Dr. McCullough: I have 60 peer reviewed publications on COVID-19. That’s a pretty solid performance over the last three years. People have said, “Dr. McCullough, you’re not an infectious disease specialist.” I said, “I am now. I’ve done three years of dedicated study on this. I have studied my patients, I have received grants, I have investigational drug applications. I have done everything I could to apply my scholarship to this topic, and I’m all in on it.” We’re at 300,000 papers on COVID-19. We’re at 300,000. There is a clear-cut bias in the medical literature coming from the major publishers, Elsevier, Taylor & Francis, and others, all the way down to the editorial offices, to promote mass vaccination. We’ve seen a clear and present trend. For those reasons, we have to look at less prominent journals and evaluate that data to see what’s out there. We have to rely on the preprint literature right now. What really matters are the data, it’s tables and figures. I’m at the point now where I just ignore what the authors write. A typical paper on myocarditis, for instance, will start out like this. “COVID-19 vaccination has saved millions and millions of lives, and it’s the most valuable thing that’s ever come in human medicine. Now we want to describe all these fatal cases of myocarditis. Conclusion. This justifies COVID-19 vaccination.” It doesn’t. You’re laughing because it doesn’t add up right now. We just simply look at the data, and many times we have to look in the supplemental tables. Mr. Jekielek: I’ve read a number of these papers as you describe them right now, and I wonder if people aren’t subversively putting good data into the system, while including those paragraphs at the beginning and the end, because it’s the only way they can get them published in these journals. What do you think? Dr. Malhotra: Yes, absolutely. But to be honest, that’s just cowardice as far as I’m concerned. Absolute and total cowardice. Let’s call it out for what it is. The medical profession, the people who are doing that, they might as well be complicit in the problem, to be honest, if they’re not being clear with what they want to say. The second thing I would say, Jan, in terms of the cherry picking, is that I’ve been involved in this advocacy space for a long time. I’ve had attacks from the food industry, from pharma on statins, and that kind of thing. I’ll quote a tweet from John Cleese, the comedian, in response to the accusations of cherry picking, which I haven’t done. One of the old rules of the KGB is to accuse your enemy of exactly what you are doing. Mr. Jekielek: There’s something called the ironclad law of woke projection. It reminds me of what you just said. Dr. Malhotra: Yes. Dr. McCullough: Jan, in medicine, if we take any major therapeutic, like a blood pressure lowering drug, or a certain class of cholesterol-lowering drugs, there will be papers written that say the risk of this drug far outweighs the benefits. There will be other papers that are written that say the benefits far outweigh the risks. It’s a debate. It’s a battle. And we go through this, we go to our meetings, and we revel in these debates. With the COVID-19 vaccines, there isn’t a single paper in the New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA, or Lancet, where the conclusion is, that the risk of the vaccines outweighs the benefits. There is an absence of balance in the literature. That tells me as a former editor, and as one of the most published people in the world in history in my area, that there is a deep-seated bias to only promote the vaccines in their peer reviewed literature. Because otherwise, we would have balance. We would have papers that come in and share a different viewpoint. Dr. Malhotra: Yes, and to come back to the cherry picking issue as well, what I try to do with my paper is just break it down. What are the absolute benefits, and what are the absolute harms? I’ve not had a single rebuttal. I’ve had a few character assassination attempts in blogs. I’ve been involved in publications for a while, and there’s not been anything effective in combating it. So for me, these accusations of cherry picking don’t really stand up to scrutiny. And we’re talking about very good level of data quality to make those conclusions. The other thing that was thrown out around there, and you may have heard this as well, Peter, there was a paper not so long ago that made news headlines that claimed the vaccine has saved 20 million lives globally. It was the lowest quality level of evidence, extrapolations from a modeling study. It’s basically bull. Let’s just call it for what it is, bull. It’s science fiction, it’s marketing, and it’s fraud. Dr. McCullough: Any paper that assumes the vaccines are beneficial and then multiplies at times large numbers is basically committing fraud. They’re defrauding the readership. We should look at the data at hand. The letters to the editor, by the way, speak volumes. He’s published part one and part two in a very well-respected journal, and the letters to the editor have not come in with any serious threats to validity. When I published the very first paper on treatment in the American Journal of Medicine, and then the second one in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, I watched the letters to the editor come in very carefully. Not a single one provided any threat. In fact, it was a wonderful discussion. I’d say, “I’m really glad you wrote this letter to the editor. Now here’s even more data that we have to treat patients, and here’s another.” At the end I was inviting them to overcome their fear, and let’s start treating patients. And those letters to the editor just went away. Dr. Malhotra: Another thing that’s really important that we are also missing out on without the acknowledgement. We’ve got to remember; a lot of people aren’t even walking. But we’re running in terms of understanding vaccine injuries are real and they are common. Without even acknowledging that this exists as a major issue, we are losing out on dedicating time, resources, and research towards helping people who are genuinely vaccine injured. We are in complete dereliction of our duty as doctors by not acknowledging this is a problem. And the longer we go on, the worse the problem’s going to get. Mr. Jekielek: Just to be clear, this data that we saw that you mentioned to me earlier, it was just like seven or eight out of 100 people who had taken the vaccine had a serious outcome. That’s the number, right? Dr. McCullough: That’s V-safe data. Mr. Jekielek: That is astounding. That is a whole different ball game. Dr. McCullough: Currently in the United States, 90 per cent of Americans are not taking any more vaccines. They’re not taking any boosters. That’s the CDC COVID tracker data. There’s only a 10 per cent take rate now. Remember, the vaccines run out of any theoretical effectiveness after a few months. One has to keep taking boosters. In terms of people taking boosters, we’re down to about 10 per cent of Americans. So, how do 90 per cent of Americans, how did they know to stop taking vaccines? I don’t think it’s by watching CNN. This is where it’s coming from. It’s coming from the fact that 7 to 8 per cent of people end up in the ER or in urgent care, and then family members talk to each other. There’s a Zogby survey, a representative survey, that asked people about the vaccines. Two thirds of Americans in the Zogby survey said they took a vaccine. And they asked them, “What happened?” 15 per cent of people have some new medical problem that they’re now seeking care after taking the vaccine. Those 15 per cent talk to other people. There’s a Michigan State survey, 22 per cent of Americans know somebody who’s either died or been seriously injured after a COVID-19 vaccination. That 22 per cent talks to other people. So, it’s rare now that you would ever encounter anybody who says that they haven’t heard something. Dr. Malhotra: Yes. That’s a really interesting point, because prior to this, historically when it comes to side effects of drugs, people are more likely to trust the experiences of their friends and family to influence whether or not they take a drug than their doctor, when it comes to side effects. We’re seeing this now with the vaccine. Mr. Jekielek: This has always been the case, you’re saying. Dr. Malhotra: This is even pre-COVID vaccines. So, the truth is getting out. It’s obviously there under the surface. There’s clearly a disconnect now between what the government authorities are telling people to do and what’s really happening. In the UK, every week I’m getting a message for the last several months from my general practice, my surgery where I’m a patient, to come and have the booster. Every week I’m getting a text message, come and have your booster. I’m just ignoring it. And I’m a low-risk guy in his early forties. People are not turning up, people are not going. That’s potentially a really bad situation. In some ways I’m glad, because people are being saved, but it’s also not good where we are having a great disconnect now between what authorities are telling people to do, people who should be trusted in those roles and those guardianship roles, and the public ignoring that advice. What’s going on with the trust? Mr. Jekielek: It’s a complete breakdown of trust in public health. This type of trust is very hard to earn back, especially if the breakdown of trust is warranted, as you’ve been telling me today. Dr. McCullough: Can you imagine if things were different? Pfizer was approved December 10, 2020. Moderna was approved on December 18. J&J comes out in February. But you can imagine if early on when Pfizer knew about 1,223 deaths worldwide when their product was released? Can you imagine if Pfizer, after about 5, 10, 15, no more than 50 deaths said, “Wait a minute, we got to stop. We got to stop.” They probably knew about that even before Moderna came out and said, “We have to analyze these deaths. We’re just going to pause the program, and let’s analyze how people are dying after the vaccine.” There could have been a deep investigation saying, “People who have polyethylene glycol allergies, and there’s anaphylactic deaths that are occurring right in front of us. There’s reactogenic deaths or people dying with a fever and shortness of breath in nursing homes. There are people dying within a few days of heart inflammation, myocarditis. There are fatal blood clots.” There could have been risk mitigation. High quality science could have delivered an answer that. “For these groups here, this is unsafe, but we’re going to continue with these other groups.” And then, this idea of only applying the vaccine in the highest risk individuals. People have asked me, “Dr. McCullough, were you against the vaccines before they came out?” I said, “I published a cautionary paper regarding it in The Hill.” But what I said was, “Maybe 2.7 million Americans at the most should consider a vaccine initially.” That would have been nursing home residents, nursing home workers, and very, very frail people. The patients in my practice who I know couldn’t survive two hours of COVID. I have had patients in my practice die of COVID, those are the ones who should have potentially considered the risk of a vaccine. But we saw it being widely applied to young people, and before you knew it, the newsreels were off of the senior citizens and they were onto children. There has been this incredible training of the public eye on children, even down to infants six months of age. It seems so out of proportion to risk. The risk has always been in the ultra-frail and elderly. Dr. Malhotra: Yes. So again, coming back to it, the only explanation, or the best explanation so far for this type of behavior is an entity, an organization that is not behaving in a moral or scientific way. They’re behaving in a psychopathic way. That for me is the most likely explanation behind this behavior, until proven otherwise. Dr. McCullough: The thing that really worries me is, it’s not just pharmaceutical marketing. It can’t just be Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, AstraZeneca, and Novavax. It can’t. The Department of Health and Human Services and the White House poured billions of dollars into an effort starting in April of 2021, four months into the campaign. It was called the COVID-19 Community Corps—billions of dollars. It went to churches, community groups, medical societies like the American College of Pediatrics, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, to the NFL, to the media companies, and all the Hollywood production. Hundreds and hundreds of entities received cumulatively billions of dollars. Why did HHS send money to the American College of Pediatrics before it ever came up for pediatric review? Think about that. Our government was basically monetarily preparing the American College of Pediatrics to be in line with pediatric vaccination before the studies were even done. Mr. Jekielek: It speaks to what you just said. And in the UK is it a similar reality? I don’t know what the spending looked like, but it sounds from what I’ve read in that ballpark. Dr. Malhotra: Yes. Not the same kind of scale of the U.S., but the same sort of thing. Absolutely. Mr. Jekielek: Because there was this whole government effort to nudge the population and basically it used fear to elicit the behavior of taking vaccines. Is that what happened? Dr. Malhotra: Yes, it was. We were a little bit luckier in the sense that we didn’t push or mandate it for everybody, at all. In fact the closest we came, which was unprecedented in the UK, was this initial announcement mandating it for NHS staff, even though it went against traditional British Medical Association policy, but we overturned that. So that’s a good thing. But this level of coercion should never have happened. Mr. Jekielek: But what about the vaccination rates? How do they compare, the U.S. to the UK? Dr. Malhotra: Still pretty high. Still very high. Mr. Jekielek: It’s interesting to see. Dr. Malhotra: They’ve gone down massively, though, in the last six months to nine months. In fact, we’re actually seeing, which is more concerning, that other safe, traditional vaccines like MMR, the uptake is down there. There is clearly good evidence of decreasing trust, and that’s not good at all. It’s not good at all. Mr. Jekielek: We started talking about COVID-19 and the heart, and vaccination related to the heart. We talked about myocarditis and about heart disease. What are the other effects that exist? Dr. Malhotra: Yes. Electrical disturbances of the heart are quite common. I’ve been managing people who, for no clear reason, are having conditions like atrial fibrillation, irregular heartbeat, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, which could potentially be fatal if it becomes sustained ventricular tachycardia. A number of patients have cardiomyopathy, a condition affecting the heart muscle’s ability to pump blood around the body. There was a lady in her fifties, I wrote about her, who was very fit and well, and developed progressive breathlessness after a few months of having the vaccine. She wasn’t unwell enough to go to hospital, but she didn’t feel right, and a heart scan showed that her heart muscle was severely impaired in terms of its ability to pump. Awful. And again, she didn’t have COVID. The most likely explanation was a vaccine. Unfortunately, anything and everything that can go wrong with the heart is being caused by the mRNA vaccines. Many people are not aware. There are people coming to me where, as a doctor, I make a diagnosis for the likely cause. They have risk factors for atrial fibrillation and whatever, but they haven’t got any of that. The clear common denominator is they’ve had the Pfizer vaccine. It’s a real problem. It’s massive. It’s huge. And most people don’t know about it. That’s the worst part. Most people are not getting diagnosed. They don’t realize that the vaccine is causing them a problem. Mr. Jekielek: I just want to reiterate also that we discussed earlier how, because this is a yet untested product, you have to assume that’s involved. Dr. Malhotra: Absolutely. Dr. McCullough: In a real hierarchy of safety, cardiovascular safety is typically number one on the list of being very cautious. In the paper by [inaudible] and colleagues from Bangkok, Thailand, with the first prospective cohort study of children ages 13 to 18 with the second shot of Pfizer, 29 per cent had cardiovascular symptoms. 29 per cent of the kids, when they carefully assessed, had cardiovascular symptoms. 2.3 per cent had bona fide myocarditis. Two children hospitalized. That’s out of 333 children. So this gives you an idea. Usually with 333 children, that’s not going to be enough to even find a signal. In fact, the signal was quite loud. There are some signature syndromes with the COVID-19 vaccines. One of them is what’s called POTS, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. People feel their heart rate being elevated inappropriately at times, and blood pressure being labile. There was a paper published in the journal Hypertension, one of our best circulation family of journals, showing skyrocketing of blood pressure in some people who received the vaccine, to the point where it could put them at risk of stroke. And then, [inaudible] and colleagues published in JAMA a paper from three small Nordic countries, and it’s stunning. There were 7,750 intracranial hemorrhages or blood clots within 28 days of taking the vaccine. And in those countries, it’s Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca. They strictly excluded anybody who had COVID during this time period. This is a stunning number. There were thousands of neurologically devastated people within 28 days of taking the vaccine, with hypertension playing a role. I’ll tell you another one. Aortic dissection. It’s been well described now that the major blood tube in the body, with this surge of blood pressure can actually rip. This has been published in the peer reviewed literature. Dr. Malhotra mentioned all the different arrhythmias, including young people with atrial fibrillation who shouldn’t have it. There’s been a study of people with defibrillators in. A defibrillator is great because you can actually measure what’s going in the heart before and afterwards, and sure enough, there is a burst of ventricular tachycardia and other arrhythmias with the vaccine. This is undeniable. This big broad brush of cardiovascular disease falls into the area of thromboembolic disease and blood clots. This was a big feature in that recent documentary about sudden death. With blood clots, and the FDA agrees, and the peer-reviewed literature is loaded with every permutation of blood clots possible—intracranial hemorrhages, deep venous thrombosis going in lungs, and pulmonary embolism. We’ve heard about ESPN, my favorite collage announcer Herb Kirkstreit, and our favorite weatherman, Al Roker. Deion Sanders had an arterial emboli syndrome. These are public figures now. Hailey Bieber has had a thromboembolic event. These are public figures now, where they’ve either come out and said they’ve taken the vaccine, or we have enough information to suggest they probably did. They certainly have not refuted they didn’t take the vaccine, and have had these blood clotting events, both on the arterial and the venous side. What I’m finding out in my practice, and the literature supports this, if somebody has a family history of a tendency towards blood clotting or they themselves have a tendency, then watch out. Any other factor that promotes blood clotting like supplemental estrogen, birth control pills, immobilization, smoking, all of those up the risks that someone who takes a vaccine is going to get a blood clot. The alacrity that we need to have in clinical medicine is extraordinary. In my practice, I’ve seen two blood clots that have occurred in the arm. There’s a common syndrome called thoracic outlet obstruction syndrome in athletes, and so a blood clot can form in the arm because of some stasis and flow. The second-best golfer in the world, Nelly Korda, had blood clot in her arm. She needs to have surgery. She said she took the vaccine, and sent out a cryptic message, “Well, I think I know what caused this,” but didn’t come right out and say it. For my patient who had it, it was an emergency. She had to have her first rib removed and then we physically get out the clot, but the arm is not the same. I can tell you, these cardiovascular syndromes are real. We’re both cardiologists. This is right in our wheelhouse. And I’m not having anybody come up to me and give me any other explanation outside of the fact that indeed it’s due to the vaccines. The literature agrees, the regulatory agencies agree, and at this point in time these injuries and problems don’t stop until the vaccines stop. Dr. Malhotra: Yes. And what’s the conclusion from this? I recently got a text message from a very well-known cardiologist in the UK who doesn’t want to be named. He summarizes everything Peter just said. In his view, he said, “We are dealing probably with the biggest crime against humanity since World War II. Mr. Jekielek: As we finish up, I want to do a couple of things here. You just mentioned a crime against humanity. That’s some of the strongest language you can possibly have. I want to get you to reiterate for me what the real risk is to people who have taken these genetic vaccines, who might feel concerned, and what they can do personally. Then also, we’ll round that out with what we need to do as a society to move forward. Dr. Malhotra: First and foremost, people should be reassured that most of these issues appear to be apparent in the first few weeks to months after taking the vaccine. I would say one exception to this is corona artery disease. For example, my father had a sudden cardiac death six months after the second dose. We’ve seen case studies explaining vaccines can even do that several months later. The acceleration of coronary artery disease is definitely one thing which may be more long term, and we may see more and more heart attacks play out over the next few years because of that. Having said that, as a cardiologist that focuses on heart disease reversal, this is a great opportunity for people to really get themselves in shape. That means eating properly, cutting out ultra-processed foods and low quality carbs and sugar, getting moderate exercise, and getting stress levels in check. Optimizing one’s health through lifestyle is going to be a good antidote to reduce a risk of complications from the vaccine. That’s what I would say for sure. And then, we need to think about a campaign. Was it Nancy Reagan who launched this Just Say No campaign against drugs in the ’80s? We need to have a Just Say No campaign to drug companies and their excesses, certainly in terms of what needs to happen on a political and government level. First and foremost, it should be the end of drug companies testing their own products and holding onto the raw data. That should never happen ever, ever again. We should never allow this situation to ever happen again. FDA should not be taking money from industry. They need to be independent of industry funding. Party political donations should not come from Big Pharma. Governments cannot do their job properly if they’re taking money from pharma, when it comes to the health of the population. It’s a no-brainer. I believe in true democracy, Jan. Any person, any citizen, any good citizen you may ask in the United States or the UK or Europe, or whatever else, and if you put this to them, all of them, 99 per cent of those people would agree that these links, these cozy relationships with pharma and regulators and government shouldn’t exist. That means you need to change the law through democratic means. Dr. McCullough: You remember the Big Tobacco settlement, in the end when there’s finally a recognition that smoking caused all these problems, the tobacco industry had to pay, and a lot of that payment went to research. We should have a vaccine settlement where there’s a massive amount of money that comes back from the vaccine manufacturers, as well as the HHS who actually promoted this, to fund vaccine injury research. We need strategies for screening, detection, diagnosis, prognosis, management. We need an approach, an agreed upon approach, for the serious syndromes, the cardiovascular, neurologic, immunologic syndromes. We need a complete overhaul of the peer-reviewed literature. We can’t have vaccine injury papers being blocked from publication. How can doctors possibly learn to manage them if we can’t publish a paper on how to manage vaccine-induced myocarditis or vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura? We need this immediate about-face, and an understanding that the vaccines themselves have caused a public health crisis. A public health crisis. The V-safe data, and the Zogby survey are consistent. Roughly 15 per cent of people who have taken the vaccines are damaged by them. With most of them, the damage starts early, within the first few days. Some of these syndromes extend. And I would say the one wildcard that I’ve seen in my clinical practice is subsequent COVID infection. There are patients who are triple vaccinated and then they get COVID, so they have a fourth exposure now of the spike protein, and then here we go. That recently happened with Al Roker, the weatherman, and he’s in the hospital with blood clots. I’ve seen this in my practice where it’s been 18 months since someone’s taken a vaccine, but they end up with blood clots, pulmonary emboli. What’s happened in between? They’ve gotten COVID because the vaccines don’t work, and so they end up getting COVID on top of it. With the vaccines, the farther we get away from the vaccines in time, the better we can manage what’s going on. If people continue to take shots every six months, we’re in trouble. There is a cumulative risk here, where we could get deep into it. There are blood clots that we can’t dissolve with blood thinners. There’s heart damage that we can’t recover, we can’t get it back. My fear is that COVID is still out there. The vaccines haven’t ended the pandemic. The fact is that vaccinated people are getting COVID, then taking more vaccines. And we’ve seen public figures, we’ve seen President Biden, Walensky, Fauci, Bill Gates and others who have had COVID, they’ve had shots, and they still keep taking more shots. When Anderson Cooper and Bill Gates got together, I’ll never forget when Anderson asked Gates, he goes, “Hey Bill, we got COVID. You took three shots. I’ve taken two or three shots. Should we take more shots?” And Gates says, “We got to be safe, we should take more shots.” I would say, as a cardiologist, “No. Stop taking more shots. You’ve already taken an enormous risk.” Remember, people who’ve taken one, two, or three shots and nothing’s happened, doesn’t mean they’re risk-free. That fourth shot can be the one that precipitates a cardiovascular event. Dr. Malhotra: Peter makes a very good point. There is an accumulative risk. One of the things is, we don’t want to scare people too much, but what we need to tell them is just say no right now. Make sure they tell everybody, their kids, their family, their parents, do not take any more of these shots. It’s all risk and no benefit. Mr. Jekielek: Dr. Aseem Malhotra and Dr. Peter McCullough, it’s such a pleasure to have you on. Dr. McCullough: Thank you. Dr. Malhotra: Thank you. Mr. Jekielek: Thank you all for joining Dr. Aseem Malhotra and Dr. Peter McCullough and me on this episode of American Thought Leaders. I’m your host, Jan Jekielek. Subscribe to the American Thought Leaders newsletter so you never miss an episode. * Click the “Save” button below the video to access it later on “My List.” Follow EpochTV on social media: Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVus Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTV Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTV Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtv Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVus Gab: https://gab.com/EpochTV Telegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

As 2022 draws to a close, Dr. Mercola and Polly Tommey look back on all that the year had to offer. From pandemic treaties to boosters for kids, news corruption to lifted mandates – a lot happened in 12 months. Stay to the end to hear how to prepare for what lies ahead. - Statin Drugs - The Oiling of America and Heart Disease https://rumble.com/v1dlsrh-statin-drugs-the-oiling-of-america-and-heart-disease.html - References: Dr. Mercola Website - Mercola.com https://www.mercola.com/ How the Pandemic Became a ‘Golden Egg-Laying Goose’ for Pfizer https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-annual-revenue-covid-vaccine-paxlovid-cola/ US Life Expectancy Falls Again in ‘Historic’ Decline https://drjosephmercola.com/us-life-expectancy-falls-again-in-historic-decline/ Who Is Purposely Sabotaging Power Plants All Over America? https://www.zerohedge.com/political/who-purposely-sabotaging-power-plants-all-over-america Nearly 70% of Americans struggling to pay grocery bills, survey finds https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/nearly-70-percent-americans-struggling-pay-grocery-bills-survey-finds Statement by Dr. Rajiv J. Shah, President of The Rockefeller Foundation, and Nancy Brown, CEO of the American Heart Association, on New Food Is Medicine Research Initiative https://02xl.com/statement-by-dr-rajiv-j-shah-president-of-the-rockefeller-foundation-and-nancy-brown-ceo-of-the-american-heart-association-on-new-food-is-medicine-research-initiative Trends and Disparities in Cardiometabolic Health Among U.S. Adults, 1999-2018 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35798448/ Long Covid may be ‘the next public health disaster’ — with a $3.7 trillion economic impact rivaling the Great Recession https://www.cnbc.com/2022/11/30/why-long-covid-could-be-the-next-public-health-disaster.html Melatonin in Mitochondria: Mitigating Clear and Present Dangers https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/physiol.00034.2019 source https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/2023-with-dr-joseph-mercola/

The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in partnership with the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, conducted another pandemic tabletop exercise in Brussels, Belgium, on October 23, 2022. The same people behind Event 201, which took place almost three years ago to the day, just completed a desktop simulation for a new Enterovirus originating in Brazil. The exercise, dubbedCatastrophic Contagion,simulated WHO emergency health advisory board meetings addressing a fictional pandemic that spreads from Brazil to the rest of the world. https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/exercises/2022-catastrophic-contagion/ In addition to Bill Gates, 10 current and former Health Ministers and senior public health officials from Senegal, Rwanda, Nigeria, Angola, Liberia, Singapore, India, Germany participated in the simulation, which involved pre-recorded news broadcasts, live “staff” briefings, and moderated discussions. The virus in this simulation, called the Enterovirus, has a higher fatality rate than COVID-19 and disproportionately affects children and young people. The phenomenon is dubbed SEERS (Severe Epidemic Enterovirus Respiratory Syndrome 2025). Enteroviruses are any of a group of RNA viruses (including those causing polio and hepatitis A) which typically occur in the gastrointestinal tract, sometimes spreading to the central nervous system or other parts of the body. Event 201was a simulation involving a coordinated global response to a coronavirus that was conducted just months before COVID-19 was declared a global pandemic in early 2020. From the Johns Hopkinswebsite: Event 201 was a 3.5-hour pandemic tabletop exercise that simulated a series of dramatic, scenario-based facilitated discussions, confronting difficult, true-to-life dilemmas associated with response to a hypothetical, but scientifically plausible, pandemic. 15 global business, government, and public health leaders wereplayersin the simulation exercise that highlighted unresolved real-world policy and economic issues that could be solved with sufficient political will, financial investment, and attention now and in the future. As such, the fact the same globalist organizations who conducted that exercise are also behind the Catastrophic Contagion simulation is both alarming and foreboding, especially with the inclusion of the specific year 2025 as the start date. Speaking of 2025, another coronavirus pandemic exercise preceding COVID-19 that also involved Johns Hopkins was calledSPARS 2025-2028, which examined the global pandemic response to a respiratory virus that spread from the Philippines to St. Paul, Minnesota. https://ia801800.us.archive.org/1/items/the-spars-pandemic-2025-2028-a-futuristic-scenario-for-public-health-risk-communication/2017-10_The_SPARS_pandemic_2025-2028-a_futuristic_scenario_for_public_health_risk_communication.pdf source https://yournews.com/2022/12/12/2471623/bill-gates-johns-hopkins/ video source https://rumble.com/v208e3u-the-next-pandemic-seers-2025-catastrophic-contagion-the-event-201-sequel.html __________________ The Threat From the WHO Pandemic Treaty Should Make Our MPs Sit Up and Pay Attention https://dailysceptic.org/2022/12/14/the-urgent-need-for-mps-to-properly-scrutinise-the-who-pandemic-treaty/

“Okay. Yes. We’re Bored Now. We’re All Bored. But Has It Ever Occurred to You, Wally, That the Process Which Creates This Boredom That We See in The World Now May Very Well Be a Self-Perpetuating Unconscious Form of Brainwashing Created by A World Totalitarian Government Based on Money? And That All of This Is Much More Dangerous Than One Thinks? And That It’s Not Just a Question of Individual Survival, Wally, But That Somebody Who’s Bored Is Asleep? And Somebody Who’s Asleep Will Not Say No?” - Released on Oct. 11, 1981, this seminal art-house flick invited us to eavesdrop on 110-minutes of dialogue between two people who deliver hot takes and profundities that nobody asked for. And yet, “My Dinner With André” is just as fresh 40 years later. Directed by Louis Malle and written by the then little-known Wallace Shawn and André Gregory, playing themselves, the two-hander cooked up a singular premise — a conversation cherry-picked from fragments of years of taped discussions between the two, meticulously rehearsed and deftly framed — that never leaves the dining table. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/11/movies/my-dinner-with-andre-anniversary.html - Screenplay https://fliphtml5.com/dyfu/uedt/basic video source https://rumble.com/vvgxem-my-dinner-with-andre-self-perpetuating-unconscious-form-of-brainwashing-cre.html _____________________ 1984, by George Orwell https://ia601300.us.archive.org/28/items/GeorgeOrwells1984/1984.pdf Animal Farm, by George Orwell https://ia600905.us.archive.org/25/items/AnimalFarmByGeorgeOrwell/Animal%20Farm%20by%20George%20Orwell.pdf

Good Morning CHD - Children's Health Defense Solve the intentionally confusing puzzle about what the WHO’s 2023 plans are regarding the ‘zero draft’ for a new and potentially legally binding pandemic treaty, International Health Regulation amendments, recent Intergovernmental Negotiating Body Meetings and more. Learn all about the corrupt public health organization ‘with teeth’ with James Corbett & Meryl Nass, M.D. - References: The Corbett Report https://www.corbettreport.com/ Who is Bill Gates? Corbett Report Documentary https://www.corbettreport.com/gates/ WATCH: Latest WHO Intergovernmental Negotiating Body Meetings https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/e/e_inb-3.html Reclaimthenet.org https://reclaimthenet.org/ Smith Mundt Act https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/5736/text IHR Amendments Text https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_18-en.pdf Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/covid-19-public-health-emergency-of-international-concern-(pheic)-global-research-and-innovation-forum#:~:text=COVID%2D19%20Public%20Health%20Emergency,Regions IHR (2005) Text https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_18-en.pdf Ebola Newsweek Article https://www.newsweek.com/what-happens-if-who-declares-ebola-emergency-international-concern-263434 Wayback Machine — April 2009 Definition of ‘Influenza Pandemic’ http://web.archive.org/web/20090418032343/http://www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/pandemic/en/index.html Wayback Machine — May 2009 Definition of ‘Influenza Pandemic’ http://web.archive.org/web/20090531221455/http://www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/pandemic/en/index.html Peter Doshi H1N1 Response https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2988536/ Peter Doshi ‘The Elusive Definition of Pandemic Influenza’ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3127275/pdf/BLT.11.086173.pdf - source https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/the-weaponization-of-the-who-with-james-corbett/ ______________________ The Threat From the WHO Pandemic Treaty Should Make Our MPs Sit Up and Pay Attention https://dailysceptic.org/2022/12/14/the-urgent-need-for-mps-to-properly-scrutinise-the-who-pandemic-treaty/

www.xtremerealitycheck.com https://rumble.com/c/XtremeRealityCheck

Good Morning CHD - Children's Health Defense Original antigenic sin, Molecular mimicry, Apoptosis. What do these scientific terms, COVID and vaccines have in common? Join Jessica Rose, Ph.D. and Steven Pelech, Ph.D. for an intriguing conversation on today’s ‘Good Morning CHD’ - References: Canadian Covid Care Alliance https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/ Kinexus Bioinformatics http://www.kinexus.ca/ 'This is playing with fire - it could spark a lab-generated pandemic': Experts slam Boston lab where scientists have created a new deadly Omicron strain with an 80% kill rate in mice https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11323677/Outrage-Boston-University-CREATES-Covid-strain-80-kill-rate.html Great Barrington Declaration https://gbdeclaration.org/ Doctor Confined In Psychiatric Clinic and Forced to Take Psychotic Medication for Mentioning Vaccine Injuries https://thewhiterose.uk/tag/dr-mel-bruchet/ - source https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/antibody-deception-with-steven-pelech-phd/

First Contact is the true story of Darryl Anka’s close encounter with a UFO, after which he became a trance channel for an extraterrestrial entity named Bashar, to deliver empowering messages to humanity. The film presents a deeper investigation into the nature of reality, mankind’s place in the cosmos and the potential impact of ET contact on our society. Narrated by Golden Globe-winning actor James Woods. source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-CoNQm5hjc

Children's Health Defense, The Defender Show video source https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/the-defender-show/cia-whistleblower-john-kiriakou/ - https://john-kiriakou.square.site/ https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/3233234.John_Kiriakou - “There are some things we should not do, even in the name of national security.”– John Kiriakou John Kiriakou is a former CIA analyst and case officer, former senior investigator for the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and former counterterrorism consultant. While employed by the CIA, he was involved in critical counterterrorism missions following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, but refused to be trained in so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques.” and Kiriakou never authorized or engaged in these techniques: After leaving the CIA, Kiriakou appeared on ABC News in an interview with Brian Ross, during which he became the first former CIA officer to confirm that the agency waterboarded detainees and label waterboarding as torture. Kiriakou’s interview revealed that this practice was not just the result of a few rogue agents, but was official U.S. policy approved at the highest levels of the government.john kiriakou The government started investigating Kiriakou immediately after his media appearance. Five years later, the government finally succeeded in piecing together enough information to criminally prosecute him. He became the sixth whistleblower indicted by the Obama administration under the Espionage Act – a law designed to punish spies, not whistleblowers. When Kiriakou came to GAP for help, we began acting as his legal counsel on whistleblower issues and started a public advocacy campaign on his case. Eventually, in order to avoid a trial that could have resulted in separation from his wife and five children for up to 45 years, he opted to plead guilty to one count (not Espionage) in exchange for a 30-month sentence. Kiriakou is the sole CIA agent to go to jail in connection with the U.S. torture program, despite the fact that he never tortured anyone. Rather, he blew the whistle on this horrific wrongdoing. Kiriakou’s Service To His Country Kiriakou worked at the CIA from 1990 until 2004, risking his life on several occasions. He began his career at the CIA as an analyst, and later served as a counterterrorism operations officer overseas. abu zubaydahAfter the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Kiriakou became the chief of counterterrorism operations in Pakistan. CIA officials offered to train Kiriakou in “enhanced interrogation techniques,” but he refused. While serving in Pakistan, Kiriakou led the CIA team in the March 2002 raid and capture of Abu Zubaydah, who was considered al Qaeda’s third-ranking official at the time. Kiriakou sat with Abu Zubaydah for days after his capture, but did not witness the agency waterboarding him. The CIA distributed disinformation internally that Zubaydah had been waterboarded one time, and that as a result, he had “cracked.” It was later revealed that the CIA waterboarded Abu Zubaydah 83 times, and the waterboarding had not resulted in any actionable intelligence. Although Zubaydah’s interrogations were videotaped, the CIA later destroyed the videos despite a judicial order to preserve them, claiming it was done to protect the identities of agents shown in the footage. Following Zubaydah’s capture, Kiriakou became Executive Assistant to the CIA’s Deputy Director for Operations, where he served as the Director of Central Intelligence’s principal Iraq briefer. Kiriakou left the CIA in March 2004. He later served as a senior investigator for the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and as senior intelligence advisor to Committee Chairman Senator John Kerry. Kiriakou also authored a book and worked as an intelligence consultant. Throughout his career, Kiriakou received 10 Exceptional Performance Awards, the Sustained Superior Performance Award, the Counterterrorism Service Medal, and the State Department’s Meritorious Honor Award. Kiriakou’s Disclosures In the 2007 interview on ABC News, Kiriakou became the first CIA officer to publicly confirm that the CIA had waterboarded prisoners, and that such an action was torture. He also confirmed that torture was an official U.S. government policy, rather than wrongdoing by a few rogue agents. abs news intervieweeImmediately after Kiriakou’s 2007 interview, the CIA submitted a crimes report to the Department of Justice (DOJ), a step typically taken to alert the authorities to an improper disclosure of classified information. The DOJ declined to prosecute Kiriakou. But in the following years, and as Kiriakou’s public statements continued, the CIA sent at least six more crime reports to the DOJ. In August 2008, Kiriakou, in a discussion with an individual who claimed to be writing a book on the CIA’s rendition practices, confirmed the name of an agent (Officer A) who had been involved in the agency’s rendition and detention program. Despite the individual’s claims that he was working as a reporter, the name of Officer A, though never published, eventually wound up in a January 2009 sealed defense filing at the military commission trials in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Despite the fact that Officer A’s name was well known in the human rights community, the Justice Department argued Kiriakou had violated the law by confirming it, a claim that a member of Kiriakou’s criminal defense team said “criminalized routine conduct between journalists and their government sources.” (The public did not know Officer A’s name until four years later, well after Kiriakou had been charged). Also in 2008, a New York Times reporter writing a story on interrogations contacted Kiriakou and asked him about CIA agent Deuce Martinez. Kiriakou shared Martinez’ business card, which identified Martinez as working at a private government contractor known for its involvement in torture. Martinez had not been an undercover agent, and his contact information and past job as an intelligence officer was listed on the Internet and available to the public. But the FBI later alleged that information was classified, despite the fact that at the time Kiriakou was charged (approximately 10 years later), the story of Abu Zubaydah’s capture and interrogation was well known. https://whistleblower.org/bio-john-kiriakou/

After watching this video you will understand why they didn't let you see this footage in state TV "documentaries". This is a remake and an improved version of the one released in 2018 with similar title. Bill Cooper's full prediction: - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLHVQUTrgvM - https://rumble.com/v1z1tnq-911-bill-coopers-full-prediction-the-illuminati-creating-one-world-governme.html Bill Cooper was one of the best researchers and historians in the world. - source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kex4drApk8Q

James Lyons-Weiler - Dec 5, 2022 Does everyone remember Drs. Gatti and Montanari? We flew them in from Italy in 2017 to the IPAK Vaccine Safety Conference in Pittsburgh, PA? 24 feb 2018 - Two Italian researchers have found nano-particles are polluting almost all vaccines. The small size of these particles allow them to enter our cells and have a permanent inflammatory effect. Mrs Gatti was about to testify in parliament inquiry on vaccine damages of Italian military courses but both researches have been raided by police and all their material has been taken away. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bvtz3iNTx60 European Medicines Agency Confirmed Gatti and Montanari Findings Last Year in BMJ Attack https://www.ageofautism.com/2018/02/the-european-medicines-agency-attacked-gatti-and-montanari-last-year-in-british-medical-journal.html - Pollutants in Human Plasma Found via Double-Filtration Plasmapheresis Plasma Exchange Studies in toxicology usually study urine, feces, and other secretions and measure indirectly. Dr. Gatti, whose lab was raided for reporting detection of nanoparticles in vaccines, has a new study. The new study, by Dr. Gatti and Dr. Felix Scholkmann, is entitled: Particles in the Eluate from Double Filtration Plasmapheresis — A Case Study Using Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy/ Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Article: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-6918/2/4/30 PDF: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-6918/2/4/30/pdf By using plasmapheresis, they found “aflatoxin B1, chromium, lead, cadmium, arsenic, lindane, cobalt, polycyclic-aromatic-hydrocarbons, disulfoton and aluminium (listed in descending concentration).” - text source https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/pollutants-in-human-plasma-found video source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bvtz3iNTx60

The Cabal’s torture strategy had worked brilliantly. People had become lethargic and simply failed to notice the insane amount of cases of thrombosis, pulmonary embolisms, strokes, serious heart problems, and miscarriages. People dropped dead live on TV, but all that was taken in was the ever repeating slogan: “The Covid vaccines are safe and effective…” In reality, the Covid vaccines contained a deadly poison, killing some people immediately, others within weeks or months. The combination of graphene, spike proteins, and nano-bots had been perfectly adjusted to kill millions of people, as confirmed by international tenders, alarming VAERS predictions, and the Liquefying “Bio-Sludge” Bill, legalising the spreading of human remains over crops as fertilizer. In this final episode about the Covid tragedy, we wrap up what will referred to (in future times) as the most heinous genocide in the history of mankind. Can mankind be saved? Of course! But first, let’s take a look at the shocking facts as presented in this final Covid episode... https://www.bitchute.com/channel/fallcabal/ _______________________ https://www.deagel.com/forecast https://web.archive.org/web/20210417071519/https://www.deagel.com/forecast - Deagel organization predicts massive global depopulation of 50 to 80% by 2025 https://archive.org/details/httpsastediscovery.comcoviddepopulation.htm/mode/2up?q=deagel Projected World Depopulation By 2025 According To Deagel https://archive.org/details/projected-world-depopulation-by-2025-according-to-deagel-note-the-higher-losses- - The 'New World Order' https://thenwwrdor.blogspot.com/ - But What About Deagel? - Questions For Corbett #080 - 10/22/2021 https://www.corbettreport.com/qfc080-deagel/ - SPARS Pandemic 2025 - 2028 Scenario https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/Center-projects/completed-projects/spars-pandemic-scenario.html - Pfizer: 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports (HERE IS THE QUICK TAKEAWAY IT'S A BOMBSHELL: By February of 2021, Pfizer had already received more than 1,200 reports of death allegedly caused by the vaccine and tens of thousands of reported adverse events, including 23 cases of spontaneous abortions out of 270 pregnancies and more than 2,000 reports of cardiac disorders.) https://phmpt.org/document/5-3-6-postmarketing-experience-pdf/ https://archive.org/details/cumulative-analysis-of-post-authorization-adverse-event-reports-of-pf-07302048-bnt162b2

This the best version of Bill Cooper's "9/11 NWO prediction" about a coming attack that would be blamed on Osama bin Laden. The Illuminati killed him 2 months later on November 5th. Just like they killed the Director of "Gray State" who was making a movie about the Illuminati police state. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLHVQUTrgvM - Bill cooper wrote a book (1991) ''Behold a pale Horse''. In his book he wrote who is the Elite (illimunati). In his book you can find ''the silent weapon report''. This is a war report. Everything what now happens you can find in that report. Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars Original Document Copy https://archive.org/details/SilentWeaponsForQuietWarsOriginalDocumentCopy Behold a Pale Horse - PDF https://www.docdroid.net/oSSjjeB/william-cooper-behold-a-pale-horse1991-pdf https://archive.org/details/beholdapalehorsebymiltonwilliamcooper1991_202003 Silent Weapons for a Quiet War | Blueprint For Totalitarian Control https://www.thebernician.net/silent-weapons-for-a-quiet-war/

Odessa Orlewicz · October, 6 2022 Links for this episode- https://librti.com/view-video/dr-carrie-madej-the-covid-vaccine-why https://lifeoftheblood.com/videos/ Don't lose track of my shows go to my website https://LibertyTalkCanada.ca bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/Ujmy8wOgWc18/ rumble: https://rumble.com/user/Libertytalkcanada - source https://librti.com/view-video/darpa ______________________________________ https://silview.media/2022/10/01/literally-mindblowing-we-can-aerosolize-nanobots-to-clump-your-blood-or-neuromodulate-masses-darpa-expert-lectures/ https://rumble.com/v1m6x4i-neurotechnology-in-national-defense-darpas-dr.-james-giordano-mad-scientist.html https://ussanews.com/?s=darpa

Truth Over News - December 1, 2022 Jeff Carlson and Hans Mahncke On July 27, 2020, Kristian Andersen wrote to Dr. Anthony Fauci regarding their Feb. 1, 2020, secret teleconference that took place at the onset of the COVID pandemic. Andersen’s reach-out to Fauci was prompted by an email Andersen received from Science’s writer Jon Cohen, who had been provided with an insider’s whistleblower tip regarding important details of Fauci’s secret teleconference. On the face of it, Andersen’s email appears almost benign. But when combined with what we know of that February teleconference, a very different picture emerges—one that highlights a coverup of the initial coverup. Interestingly, it was Cohen who inadvertently prompted Fauci’s secret teleconference in the first place. On Jan. 31, 2020, the journal Science published an article written by Cohen that indirectly linked to a 2015 research paper that held proof that Fauci’s NIAID had funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Cohen’s article, which appears to have been based on input from scientists who would later be part of Fauci’s teleconference group, took pains to discount the lab leak theory, noting that the viral sequences “knock down the idea the pathogen came from a virology institute in Wuhan.” Source: https://www.theepochtimes.com/a-newly-revealed-email-details-a-coverup-of-faucis-initial-coverup-truth-over-news_4898098.html - https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23316408/fauci-andersen-comms-unredacted.pdf - https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/anthony-fauci-covid-lab-leak-theory-et/

Rairfoundation - November 29, 2022 A disturbing interview given by KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov in 1984 describes today’s America and outlines the four stages of mass brainwashing used to destroy a free society. In 1984 former KGB operative Yuri Bezmenov exposed the insidious operations of the Soviet Union and how the Communist apparatus viciously overtakes the conscience of a country during an interview with G. Edward Griffin. To understand current events taking place in the world, it is helpful to look through the eyes of our enemy, which many believed to have been defeated: the Soviet Union. He suggested the head of the USSR was not its instigator, but the communist system was itself the enemy. By inference, that meant the fall of the USSR would not end the threat. “Educate yourself, and understand what’s going on around you. You are not living at a time of peace. You are in a state of war and you have precious little time to save yourself.” “And the initiator of this war is not Comrade Andropov, of course. It’s the system. However ridiculous it may sound, [it is] the world Communist system or the world Communist conspiracy. Whether I scare some people or not, I don’t give a hoot. If you are not scared by now, nothing can scare you.” Bezmenov, a former KGB agent who defected to Canada in 1970, specialized in the fields of Marxist-Leninist propaganda and ideological subversion; 38 years ago, he tried to warn Americans about the silent war being waged against their country as part of a long-term plan put in play by Russia (all communists) to defeat America, and by extension all Western democracies, through psychological warfare and “demoralization”. It’s a long game that takes decades to achieve, but it may already be bearing fruit. The collapse of a free society occurs in four stages: demoralization, destabilization, crisis, and normalization. He explains the four basic steps to socially engineering entire generations into thinking and behaving the way our enemies want. Bezmenov described this process as “a great brainwashing” and explains that the collapse of a free society occurs in four stages: demoralization, destabilization, crisis, and normalization. Four stages Demoralization – (15-20 years) The first stage is called “demoralization,” which takes 15 to 20 years to achieve. But, according to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is usually exposed to the ideology of its country. In other words, the time it takes to change people’s thinking. Demoralization is a process that is “irreversible.” Bezmenov actually thought (back in 1984) that the process of demoralizing America was already completed. It would take another generation and another couple of decades to get the people to think differently and return to their patriotic American values, claimed the former KGB agent. In what is perhaps the most striking passage in the interview, here’s how Bezmenov described the state of a “demoralized” person: “As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore,” said Bezmenov. “A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures; even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it until he [receives] a kick in his fat bottom. When a military boot crashes his balls,thenhe will understand. But not before that. That’s the tragedy of the situation of demoralization.” Destabilization (2-5 years) Once demoralization is completed, the second stage of ideological brainwashing is “destabilization.” During this two-to-five-year period, asserted Bezmenov, what matters is the targeting of essential structural elements of a nation: economy, foreign relations, and defense systems. Basically, the subverted, in this case, Russia, would look to destabilize every one of those areas in the United States, considerably weakening them. “Once a society is demoralized, its weakness and unwillingness to defend itself are exploited to undermine the military, economy & foreign affairs,” explains journalist Benjamin Carlson. Stage 3-4: Crisis & Normalization (6 weeks) The third stage would be “crisis.” It would take only up to six weeks to send a country into crisis, explained Bezmenov. A weakened society is easily brought to crisis, causing a “violent change of power, structure, and economy.” A benevolent dictator who makes grandiose promises could then be installed to bring things back to the last stage, “normalization.” That’s when your country is basically taken over, living under a new ideology, communism, the new reality. This will happen to America unless it gets rid of people who will bring it to a crisis, warned Bezmenov. What’s more, “if people fail to grasp the impending danger of that development, nothing ever can help the United States,” adding, “You may kiss goodbye to your freedom.” After the Final Crisis, Killings Begin After the final crisis, he adds that all those who helped in the subversion will have no further use, as they have become disillusioned and obstacles.They are eliminated, banned, or detained, as we saw in Grenada, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and China.“The pattern is the same everywhere,” said the KGB agent. “They will be lined up against the wall and shot.” Bezmenov’s haunting prophecy is still relevant almost 40 years after his interview with G. Edward Griffin.Polls show that not only in the US but in all Western countries, support for socialism and Marxism among the youth is increasing.Meanwhile, globalist bodies such as the World Economic Forum and their “Great Reset” scheme correspond to the second stage: destabilization. Thevehiclefor the Great Reset, conceived by Klaus Schwab of the WEF, has been the coronavirus pandemic. The globalist aims “to drastically reduce the global population, dismantle the free market, erase all borders.” Their scheme has been a success as more and more westerners are feelingdemoralized, depressed, exhausted, and less willing to examine the machinery at work, causing changes to their everyday lives. That is demoralization. Our society has been destabilized, and we remain in constant economic, moral, spiritual, and financial crises. Meanwhile, our leaders are telling us that we must adjust and obey their “new normal” of unconstitutional edicts, medical testing, contact tracing, isolation/quarantining, digital ID, and receiving an “immunity passport” to show we are “OK,” and follow whatever other demands they concoct. Westerners have lost so many freedoms,and their enemy’s plans for “Ideological Subversion”have gone almost unchallenged. So, when Bezmenov said in 1984 that the communists would take down the free society of America without firing a shot, he knew exactly what he was talking about. It was not a warning just to America but to every sovereign democratic nation that was at risk of falling prey to a Communist takeover. source https://rairfoundation.com/great-reset-warning-we-ignored-kgb-defectors-haunting-prophecy-from-1984-video/

Dr. Mercola - November 30, 2022 In this video, I interview Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology1 (the original platform, not to be confused with the current mRNA COVID shots), and author of "Lies My Government Told Me: And the Better Future Coming." https://gettr.com/user/rwmalonemd Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology (the original platform, not the current mRNA COVID shots), has published a new book, “Lies My Government Told Me: And the Better Future Coming,” in which he analyzes the tyranny we currently face, and how to get out from under it. The first part of the book reviews the reality of censorship of medical and scientific truth during the COVID pandemic, and the emergence of global totalitarianism. The second part tries to answer the question, “Who or what is behind it all?” Malone believes it’s a combination of bad actors with nefarious intent, and opportunism. The last part of the book is focused on how to create a better future. A major part of the answer lies in creating decentralized, local intentional communities, and to create the potential for networking between them on a national and international level, while remaining independent and self-governed. A good way to avoid groupthink that results in policy fiascos is to establish completely separate problem-solving groups that do not interact with each other. Only after each group has independently come up with their own ideas do they come together to share, analyze and find common ground. - Article link: https://media.mercola.com/ImageServer/Public/2022/December/PDF/lies-my-government-told-me-pdf.pdf website: http://bit.ly/2KhnpuS - The Pfizer Inoculations For COVID-19 – More Harm Than Good – VIDEO https://rumble.com/vqx3kb-the-pfizer-inoculations-do-more-harm-than-good.html The Pfizer Inoculations For COVID-19 – More Harm Than Good – PDF https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/The-COVID-19-Inoculations-More-Harm-Than-Good-REV-Dec-16-2021.pdf video source https://www.bitchute.com/video/ptZR7sCocLct/

Children's Health Defense - December 1, 2022 Today, on ‘Good Morning CHD,’ viewers watch an interview with scientists and physicians on the COVID paradigm. They summarize science on vaccination and the ingredients in the vials, share perspectives on the silencing of dissent and offer insight into the effects of the pandemic on children. https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/scientists--physicians-against-mrna/

THE END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT… The Fall of the Cabal is a Documentary of nearly 3 hours made by award-winning author and researcher Janet Ossebaard, about the downfall of the 1%, often referred to as the Cabal: a small group of people who run the world through their excessive wealth and power. They concocted an evil master plan to completely dominate and submiss humanity … a plan in which corruption, secret services, secret societies and high treason reign supreme. Yet, the 1% did not take into account the following two things: the people started waking up and were helped by an ally at the top: the mysterious Q. The revolution that followed is the focus of this documentary. The Great Awakening, mentioned in every source text, is happening NOW. The Plan to Save the World is happening NOW. Who is Q? What is Trump’s role? What is the role of the MSM? What was the real Russian conspiracy? How is it possible that Q predicts things from the future to the minute and even second, precise as predicted in the Q clock and the Q posts? Who are the real rulers of the world, beyond political leaders, kings and queens? What role do the banks play? What is the true identity of the Vatican? What will be their downfall? What is the role of the people? Of you and me? How can we deal with this great transformation that we are going through right now? How can we experience the Great Awakening to the fullest, filled with inner strength and confidence? 0:00:00 Part 1: THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO HMMMMM 0:13:08 Part 2: DOWN THE RABBIT HOLE 0:28:07 Part 3: THE ALIEN INVASION 0:44:28 Part 4: CHILDLOVERS EVERYWHERE 1:00:43 Part 5: CHILDREN, ART & PIZZA (BANNED from YouTube) 1:20:14 Part 6: MAJOR MEDIA MANIPULATION 1:37:10 Part 7: WITCHES & WARLOCKS 2:00:50 Part 8: BEYOND KINGS & QUEENS 2:19:52 Part 9: THE DAWN OF A NEW WORLD 2:39:33 Part 10: THE RETURN OF THE KING https://www.bitchute.com/channel/fallcabal/ source https://www.bitchute.com/video/0LKfvhpdzfLO/

What happens when a real journalist speaks to a real scientist? Financial crimes, COVID, con artists and more with Whitney Webb and Jessica Rose today on “Good Morning CHD.” Children's Health Defense - November 25, 2022 - Jessica Rose on Substack https://substack.com/profile/40349025-jessica-rose The foreign data set was gutted this week in VAERS and the cancer signal was halved, the myocarditis dose 3 response signal was lost and 994 spontaneous abortions/still births were dropped - Nov 19, 2022 https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-foreign-data-set-was-gutted-this?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2 - Whitney Webb Unlimited Hangout - Uncensored Investigative Journalism https://unlimitedhangout.com/ source https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/financial-crimes-covid--con-artists-with-whitney-webb--dr-jessica-rose/ ________________________________________ The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Organized Crime - Sep 18, 2022 https://articlefeed.org/the-sordid-union-between-intelligence-and-organized-crime/ Effective altruism solved all the problems of capitalism⁠—until it didn't - Nov 25, 2022 https://qz.com/effective-altruism-solved-all-the-problems-of-capitalis-1849820390?utm_source=YPL How effective altruism went from a niche movement to a billion-dollar force - Aug 8, 2022, https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2022/8/8/23150496/effective-altruism-sam-bankman-fried-dustin-moskovitz-billionaire-philanthropy-crytocurrency Jane Street and DRW Traders Made Billions in Pandemic Markets - Jun 18, 2021 https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/jane-street-and-drw-traders-made-billions-in-pandemic-markets-1.1618875 “Effective altruism is about doing good better” https://www.effectivealtruism.org/

New York Press, January 26,1909 publishes a report by W.B. Clark which states, “Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I’ve had to deal with at least 200 cases of cancer,and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.” Dr.W.B Clark (Indiana,USA) William Barnard Clarke (1807–1894), was an English physician text source: http://whale.to/m/quotes18.html video source https://truthtube.video/watch/i-never-saw-cancer-in-anyone-unvaccinated-says-a-doctor-in-1936-and-by-many-doctors-since_yU6EAABZPARQexg.html - THE VACCINATION RACKET http://whale.to/vaccines.html