InnerLight

Dr. Robert Malone on the flu shot at the Florida COVID Summit. "It's wrapped around the idea that we should coerce the population to take a product on an annual basis so that we can maintain warm base manufacturing in case something like 1918 ever happens again. And it's all built basically on a lie." source: https://odysee.com/@jch24:8/Dr-Robert-Malone-The-Annual-Flu-Vaccine-Program-Is-Built-on-a-Lie:0 ________________________________ FLCCC in the News The Future of Medicine in Post-Covid America: Florida Summit on Covid II - Published On: October 22, 2022 https://covid19criticalcare.com/stream-live-the-future-of-medicine-in-post-covid-america-florida-summit-on-covid-ii/ __________________________________ Florida Summit on Covid II: The Future of Medicine in Post-COVID America - Sat Oct 22, 2022 Last November, in Ocala Florida, almost 1,000 physicians, nurses and patients gathered to hear leading experts on Covid-19 exchange ideas and come up with solutions to the crisis which was then facing our nation: the failure of our health care system to recognize and utilize the many available options for preventing and treating Covie-related illness, and the need to exercise great caution before rolling out universal vaccination vs Covid with the yet-untested mRNA "vaccines". One year later, we see the results of this immense failure: increasing numbers of patients afflicted with vaccine-related illness and injury; ongoing vaccine mandates (despite the clear evidence that the mRNA "vaccines" do little or nothing to prevent the transmission of Covid); refusal to utilize proven preventive and therapeutic regimens for Covid; and the continued, unnecessary use of mass testing, masking and quarantining with little or no evidence of net benefit. Consequently, increasing numbers of Americans - refusing to wear masks or get 'vaxxed' - have rejected "traditional" or "mainstream" medicine in favor of more "natural" and "holistic" options. Will Americans ever again trust hospitals and physicians who denied appropriate treatment for their loved ones dying from Covid? Will Americans ever again trust hospitals and physicians who needlessly isolated their loved ones during the last days and weeks of their lives? Will Americans ever again trust hospitals and physicians who punished those health care workers who courageously and tirelessly advocated for the appropriate treatment of patients under their watch? These and other questions will be addressed at the upcoming Florida Summit on Covid II. Please join us in this interactive and educational forum which will again bring together many of the most learned and articulate physicians in our country - as well as an enthusiastic audience of highly informed critical thinkers. Covid19: Virology, Vaccines and Emerging Threats Dr. Ryan Cole, MD, board -certified pathologist, CEO of Cole Diagnostics, Boise, Idaho. Dr. Steven Hatfill, MD, Physician, Virologist and Bio-Weapons Expert. Dr. Robert Malone, MD, PhD, gene therapy, bio-defense, vaccines and immunology; discoverer of in-vitro and in-vivo RNA transfection and architect of mRNA vaccine platform. source: https://allevents.in/the%20villages/florida-summit-on-covid-ii-the-future-of-medicine-in-post-covid-america/10000410177771757

“How many more children are we going to put at risk for a shot they don’t need for a virus that no longer exists.” RAIR Foundation USA - October 27, 2022 In an exclusive long-form interview for RAIR Foundation USA, Dr. Sam Dubé hosts a panel that includes a funeral home director, an embalmer, a pathologist, and a pediatric cardiologist as they bear witness to the death and misery that they are witnessing, first-hand, following the gene therapy covid-19 shot. Discussing the theme, Sudden Death of Youth, Ryan Cole MD, an American, Mayo Clinic trained pathologist; John O’Looney, a U.K.-based funeral home director and early whistle-blower; Kirk A. Milhoan MD, Ph.D., a pediatric cardiologist with a specialty in cardiac inflammation and Glen Macko, co-host, activist and retired software engineer investigate the sudden death phenomena of people aged 10 to 40 years old. The speakers share personal stories of vaccine-injured patients and others who have died “so that you can better understand and better see what’s happening, in the hopes that you can save lives, and help people who have been so affected,” says Dr. Dubé. “And these are real people that we are describing, with real tragedy.” Dr. Milhoan, a 20-year pediatric cardiologist who has an academic interest in heart-related adverse health events, has treated close to 700 patients with covid. “I’ve been seeing an increase in adverse events in teenagers from the boosters and vaccine recently,” he says. “And now I’m seeing a much worse course with covid for those who have been vaccinated and boosted, as opposed to those who haven’t.” Dr. Cole has been speaking out from the early days of the covid scare. “As a clinical pathologist, we are the quality control of medicine; we see when patterns change in tissues as well as blood,” he says. “So I’ve been trying to sound the alarm throughout the pandemic. Not only for covid, obviously, we knew it was harmful. But at the same time, once the shots rolled out, we started seeing all sorts of conditions that increased, and now recently, we’ve seen a big increase in the youth of sudden death since the rollout of not just the shots but the boosters as well. Folks, we have a problem.” Richard Hirschman is a U.S. embalmer in Alabama with over 20 years of experience. He has noticed a huge change in sudden deaths in those under 40 and the regularity of abnormal blood clotting, with stringy, rubber-like protein clots appearing in bodies. “What started happening is the blood started to look different; something was wrong with the way the blood looked. We started noticing it in 2021, early on, and the clotting just seemed to get worse and worse in the first few months,” he explains. “We were finding clots in the arteries as well as in the veins. The veins are typically where we find clots. But we would hardly ever see a clot in the artery itself.” As athletes collapse and die on sports fields worldwide, “We know the mechanisms of action,” says Dr. Cole. “We have a toxic lipid nanoparticle that causes inflammation. And we also have this spike protein that has been proven to now cause clotting. So to introduce a clotting agent into the body, into these young individuals with a statistically zero risk from covid really is concerning. And we know now that these shots that can form these clots don’t even cover the variants of the virus that are now present. So, we have expired shots, making an expired protein causing all sorts of pathology in the body.” From the story of a 28-year-old fit and healthy girl who died just 90 minutes after being coerced into accepting the shot before undergoing minor surgery in the hospital to that of a fit 30-year-old man who suddenly dropped dead. He was found to have severely blocked arteries, but the coroner showed no interest in getting to the bottom of his death. Another case mentioned in this interview touches on the story of a young mother to two girls under 40. Her husband woke up in the night, and she was making strange noises. She stopped, they went back to sleep, and in the morning, she was gone. This was a sudden death. There were no comorbidities. And a 15-year-old boy who dropped dead at sports practice. The stories are endless. These brave doctors, funeral home directors, and embalmer are sharing their first-hand experiences so that you might be saved from the pain of death and disabling vaccine injuries. Watch the full-length interview here, and forward it to your friends. It might just save a life. This is a call to action. https://rairfoundation.com/exclusive-top-physicians-and-embalmers-reveal-patients-shocking-vaccine-injuries-video/

The Epoch Times - September 2, 2022 Richard Hirschman, an embalmer of 20 years from Alabama, told The Epoch Times that usually he sees blood clots in the deceased between 5 to 10 percent of the time. But somewhere around 2021, maybe even earlier, some embalmers across the United States have been noticing a change in the blood of the deceased. Hirschman said he now sees abnormal clotting 50 to 70 percent of the time. “In 20 years of embalming, I had never seen these white fibrous structures in the blood, nor have others in my field,” he said. Embalming is a unique profession that prepares the body of a deceased person for the funeral. Part of this process involves draining the blood from the corpse and replacing it with embalming fluid to preserve the tissues. While draining the blood, embalmers sometimes come across blood clots in the veins and arteries. In this episode of Frontline Health, we examine the photos of the mystery clots and have doctors weigh in on the possible causes. video source https://rumble.com/v1jji5j-mystery-clots-appear-in-5070-percent-of-deceased-funeral-director.html _________________________________ https://www.theepochtimes.com/embalmers-have-been-finding-numerous-long-fibrous-clots-that-lack-post-mortem-characteristics_4696015.html

A Film with John Ioannidis from Patricia Marchart, Georg Sabransky & Despina Contopoulos-Ioannidis https://www.out-to-see.com/ There are a lot of frightening developments in the world, but I want to take a step back and think positive, think about the good things in our world. Think about the good things, about what we can achieve, about the younger generations, about our future, about our dreams, about our creativity, about how much we can do, how much we can change our world for the better. There are threats all over the place. Of course, we have climate change, we have war, we have pandemics, we have disease, we have inequalities, we have hunger, we have poverty, we have all sorts of things to worry about. But the worst thing would be to just keep threatening people, and putting that ghost of disaster that is coming to us. Because if we do that, disaster will come to us sooner or later. And we will just create it with our own hands. John Ioannidis John P.A. Ioannidis, MD, DSc is Professor of Medicine, of Epidemiology and Population Health and by courtesy, of Statistics and of Biomedical Data Science at Stanford University where he leads the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS). His scientific work has been at the forefront of epidemiology, clinical medicine and biomedical research, and he has pioneered the field of meta-research, i.e. the scientific discipline of research on research. Meta-research tries to improve the methods, transparency, reliability, ethics, and research practices of science at large. His work has had wide impact across very diverse biomedical fields and the social sciences. The number of recent citations to his scientific work (6,000 per month) places him among the 6 currently most-cited scientists worldwide. He has been elected a member in the US National Academy of Medicine, the European Academy of Sciences and Arts and many other academies and he has received a large number of prizes and honors. He states in his Stanford website: “I consider myself privileged to have learned and to continue to learn from interactions with students and young scientists (of all ages) from all over the world and I love to be constantly reminded that I know next to nothing.” He is also an author of 9 literature books (8 in Greek and 1 in English), three of which have been finalists for the Anagnostis best book the year awards in Greece and he has also written libretti for operas and poetry set to music. John Ioannidis Stanford Web page: https://profiles.stanford.edu/john-ioannidis COVID-19 scientific publications: listed In his Stanford Web page, under the "Research and Scholarship" tab in the section "COVID-19 published work" John Ioannidis literature webpage: https://sites.google.com/view/johnpaioannidis Latest book (e-book, in English): Variations on the Art of the Fugue and a Desperate Ricercar: https://www.kedros.gr/product/9146/variations-fugue-desperate.html?language=en https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmErXFRKAOo

A new study shows that nearly everyone getting the mRNA COVID vaccines are experiencing some amount of heart damage. Steve Kirsch - October 22, 2022 https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-study-shows-that-pretty-much A new study out of Switzerland shows that vaccinated people have uniformly higher troponin levels than their unvaccinated peers. In the graph shown at 6:21, we see that the 777 people who got the booster in this study have uniformly higher troponin levels than their matched unvaccinated peers. That is not supposed to happen. If the vaccines are safe, the troponin levels should be nearly identical between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. Here are Professor Prasad’s exact words: “It's not just the tip of the distribution that has elevated high sensitivity troponin, it's that the entire distribution is right shifted. Everybody's having a little bit of elevation in high sensitivity troponin. That's what this graph would have you infer.” You get a troponin elevation when there is damage to your heart: “Troponin is a type of protein found in the muscles of your heart. Troponin isn't normally found in the blood. When heart muscles become damaged, troponin is sent into the bloodstream. As heart damage increases, greater amounts of troponin are released in the blood.” What the study shows is that nearly everyone is getting a little heart damage when they get the COVID vaccine, some get a lot more damage than others. Even more important is that it’s not just a little. They are measuring on day 3 and 4 and the slope was going down (See 5:47). So it was presumably much higher before day 3. In other words, the actual damage is likely greater than the curves would indicate. Furthermore, the rate of sub-clinical myocarditis in boys in the Thailand study (summarized at 2:47 in the video) is 3.5%, i.e., 1 in 28 boys will have subclinical or overt myocarditis. It appears that most of the rest are having heart damage that is below the threshold to be classified as subclinical myocarditis. Although other conditions can cause a troponin elevation, these conditions are all rare and would be unlikely to be coincident with the shot. We are left with the inescapable conclusion that the vaccine is injuring the heart muscle in nearly everyone who gets the shot. The study was well done. Professor Christian Mueller is well respected and has authored many publications on cardiac injury in the scientific literature. So it’s not likely that anyone will have success attacking the study. But people will try because they don’t like the result. The Canadian solution to the troponin problem: don’t allow the doctors to order the troponin test before the shot In Canada, the medical community is very smart about this: they don't let doctors measure troponin levels before you are vaccinated so nobody’s the wiser. According to a physician in Canada, after the COVID vaccines rolled out, they changed the rules. They only allow troponin to be measured when you are in the hospital. That way, doctors can’t compare your troponin before getting the shot to the level after the shot. It’s a clever technique to make sure nobody finds out how dangerous the shots are. I’d expect other countries to adopt this policy so that the data isn’t out there (not that it would matter anyway). Summary The data is showing the shots are causing some amount of heart damage in nearly everyone who gets the shot. Doctors and public health authorities are simply turning a blind eye to the data. video source: Subclinical Myocarditis - NEW Report from Switzerland - Vital Findings https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vveMHtVk_mY more: https://christine257.substack.com/p/mrna-vaccines-injure-the-heart-of https://esc365.escardio.org/presentation/255414 https://palexander.substack.com/p/stunning-development-more-women-than ________________________________ Major shortcomings of the first WHO-recommended RT-qPCR to “detect” SARS-CoV-2 and to “diagnose” Covid-19 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364756963_Major_shortcomings_of_the_first_WHO-recommended_RT-qPCR_to_detect_SARS-CoV-2_and_to_diagnose_Covid-19_NGS_provides_evidence_that_successive_waves_of_SARS-CoV-2_variants_lack_genomic_relationship

Dr. Stanley Plotkin is questioned under oath, about conducting a study comparing health outcomes between children receiving vaccines, and children receiving no vaccines. https://odysee.com/@FreshlyMinted:1/comparing-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-dr.:e _____________________________________ Autistic Brains Have High Aluminum Levels http://vaccinepapers.org/high-aluminum-content-autistic-brains/ Dr. James Lyons-Weiler + Dr. Paul Thomas – Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8674 The Vaccine "Placebo" Pyramid Scheme - full lenght video - The Highwire with Del Bigtree https://rumble.com/v1dlwtt-the-vaccine-placebo-pyramid-scheme-full-lenght-video-the-highwire-with-del-.html Activation of the maternal immune system alters cerebellar development in the offspring NIH-PA Author Manuscript: http://vaccinepapers.org/wp-content/uploads/Activation-of-the-Maternal-Immune-System-Alters-Cerebellar-Development-in-the-Offspring.pdf Autism: a novel form of mercury poisoning PDF: http://www.worldwidehealthcenter.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/autism-a-novel-form-of-mercury-poisoning.pdf __________________________________ Stanley Alan Plotkin developed vaccines in the United States during the mid to late twentieth century. Plotkin began his research career at the Wistar Institute in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where he studied the rubella virus. In pregnant women, the rubella virus caused congenital rubella syndrome in the fetus, which led to various malformations and birth defects. Using WI-38 cells, a line of cells that originated from tissues of aborted fetuses, Plotkin successfully created RA27/3, a weakened strain of the rubella virus, which he then used to develop a rubella vaccine. Plotkin's rubella vaccine has prevented birth defects due to congenital rubella in developing fetuses and newborns. Plotkin was born 12 May 1932 in New York City, New York, to parents Lee and Joseph Plotkin, who had immigrated to the United States from England. Plotkin's father worked as a commercial telegrapher while his mother cared for Plotkin and his younger sister, Brenda. As an adolescent, Plotkin attended the Bronx High School of Science in New York City, New York. When Plotkin was fifteen, he read two books, Arrowsmith, a novel by Sinclair Lewis, and Microbe Hunters, a non-fiction science drama by Paul de Kruif. Both books told stories of scientists striving to discover the causes of diseases and to create vaccines against them. Plotkin later credited those books as his inspiration for studying science and medicine. After graduating from the Bronx High School of Science in 1948, Plotkin enrolled at New York University in New York City. Plotkin graduated with his bachelor's degree from New York University in 1952 and applied to the State University of New York Medical School at the Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, New York. While at the Downstate Medical Center, Plotkin worked in the lab of Robert Austrian, who studied infectious diseases like pneumonia and meningitis caused by the bacteria, streptococcus pneumoniae. One classmate recalled that Plotkin had an insatiable curiosity and emphasized finding practical solutions to human health problems through rigorous experimentation, traits that Plotkin later attributed to his time spent working with Austrian. After Plotkin received his medical degree from the State University of New York Medical School in 1956, he moved to Cleveland, Ohio, where he spent a year as a pediatric intern at Cleveland Metropolitan General Hospital. In 1957, Plotkin planned to volunteer for the US Air Force rather than be drafted for military service in the Vietnam War. According to Plotkin, he wanted to join the Air Force to learn to fly planes. But because of his medical training, Plotkin instead served for three years in the Epidemic Intelligence Service of the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, Georgia. As an officer of the Epidemic Intelligence Service, Plotkin studied anthrax at the Wistar Institute. Plotkin later revealed that he requested that specific appointment because he hoped to work with the new director of the Wistar Institute, Hilary Koprowski, who had developed a preliminary oral polio vaccine. Polio was a common childhood disease that caused flu-like symptoms and sometimes affected the central nervous system, paralyzing some children. In addition to studying anthrax, Plotkin also studied the poliovirus in Koprowski's lab. He researched alternative, experimental polio vaccines and tested the new polio vaccines in the Belgian Congo, later called the Democratic Republic of the Congo. During his initial research at the Wistar Institute, Plotkin taught at the School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in 1959. To obtain credentials as a pediatrician, Plotkin worked as a resident physician at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in 1961. In 1962, he left Philadelphia and transferred his pediatric residency to the Hospital for Sick Children in London, England. Plotkin later stated that he enjoyed his residency there because he believed the hospital attracted some of the most difficult medical cases and some of the best pediatric consultants in England. After obtaining his pediatric credentials, Plotkin returned to Philadelphia in 1963 where he resumed teaching in pediatrics as an assistant professor at the University of Pennsylvania. He also resumed research at the Wistar Institute with institute director Koprowski. Upon returning to the Wistar Institute in 1963, Plotkin began studying the rubella virus. The rubella virus caused a common but often mild disease that caused rashes and flu-like symptoms in those infected. However, pregnant women infected with the rubella virus could pass the virus to their fetuses, who got congenital rubella syndrome. Congenital rubella syndrome can lead to miscarriage or birth defects in the heart, brain, eyes, and ears of the fetus. In 1963, an epidemic of rubella and congenital rubella syndrome broke out in Europe. In 1964 and 1965, the epidemic spread to the United States, causing birth defects in thousands of infants. After that epidemic, many researchers, including Plotkin, accelerated the development of a vaccine for rubella. According to Plotkin, he realized the importance of preventing rubella in pregnant women to prevent congenital rubella in their fetuses and the subsequent birth defects in infants. Throughout the 1960s, Plotkin strove to develop a vaccine for rubella at the Wistar Institute. Plotkin built upon work conducted by virologists Thomas Huckle Weller and Franklin Allen Neva as well as Paul Douglas Parkman, all of whom isolated strains of the rubella virus in 1962 in the US. In the early 1960s cell biologists Leonard Hayflick and Paul Moorhead at the Wistar Institute developed the WI-38 strain, a human cell strain created using aborted fetal tissue. WI-38 cells, named after the Wistar Institute where they were developed, were among the first non-cancerous human cells that could be maintained for long periods of time without substantial degradation, making them well-suited for laboratory research. Using WI-38 cells, Plotkin cultured a new strain of the rubella virus called RA 27/3, a weakened strain of the rubella virus, which he and his research team then used to create a rubella vaccine in 1969. However, Plotkin was not the only one to create a rubella vaccine. In 1968 at a National Institutes of Health conference, several rubella vaccine developers debated which of four possible vaccines was the best candidate for further production. Of the proposed vaccines, only Plotkin's had used diploid human cells while other laboratories had used cells from ducks, dogs, and rabbits. Diploid human cells, like the WI-38 cells Plotkin used, have the same number of chromosome pairs as typical human body cells. Plotkin argued that diploid human cells were a better medium for growing weakened virus strains for vaccines because they better represented the human cells to be vaccinated. Plotkin's primary opposition at the conference was Albert Sabin, who had successfully created an oral polio vaccine, similar to Koprowski's, that was widely used in the Soviet Union. Sabin objected that vaccines developed with human cells, like WI-38, contaminated vaccines with cancer causing viruses, a common theory at the time. Plotkin countered that there was not sufficient evidence to indicate such danger. He further asserted that Sabin's objections came from religious, not factual, reasons due the origins of the WI-38 cells in aborted fetal tissues. Plotkin's arguments convinced his colleagues of the benefits of his RA 27/3 rubella vaccine, eventually convincing Sabin himself. In 1969, Plotkin published his experimental results about his rubella vaccine, which became available for public use shortly thereafter. After advocating for his rubella vaccine, Plotkin continued to balance his study of viruses and vaccines with his medical career. In the late 1960s, Plotkin collaborated with Koprowski and Tadeusz Wiktor at the Wistar Institute to create a vaccine for rabies, which became licensed for public use beginning in 1980. Plotkin also continued teaching pediatrics at the School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania where he remained a professor until 1991. In 1972, Plotkin became the director of the infectious disease department as well as a senior physician in pediatrics at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, where he remained for decades to follow. In addition to his vaccine research, Plotkin became a professor of virology at the Wistar Institute in 1974. In 1980, Plotkin married Susan, the coordinator of the pediatric AIDS Program at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. The couple had two children, Michael and Alec. Throughout the 1980s, Plotkin continued to develop vaccines for infectious diseases. In the early 1980s, Plotkin created several experimental vaccines for chickenpox, caused by the varicella virus, though those vaccines never made it to public production. In 1988, Plotkin published the first edition of Vaccines, a textbook detailing the history, theory, and creation of vaccines. The US National Foundation for Infectious Diseases in Bethesda, Maryland, considered Vaccines, in its sixth edition as of 2013, to be the authoritative textbook in the field of vaccinology. Plotkin continued to seek out new vaccines, and in 1988, he published a paper for a preliminary vaccine for rotavirus, which causes severe diarrhea in infants and young children. In 1991, a private vaccine company, Pasteur Mérieux Connaught Vaccines, offered Plotkin a position as the company's medical and science director. Plotkin accepted and relocated to Paris, France, with his family later that year. In 1997, he returned to the US as a consultant for the multinational vaccine producer, Aventis Pasteur, later called Sanofi Pasteur, headquartered in Lyon, France. In 2006, Plotkin, collaborated with vaccine researchers Fred Clark and Paul Offit in the US to create a rotavirus vaccine, which they called RotaTeq, based on research Plotkin had started nearly twenty years earlier. Also that year, at the age of 74, Plotkin learned to pilot an airplane, fulfilling his earlier ambition. Plotkin received many awards for his work as a physician and medical researcher. For his contributions to preventative medicine, in 1987, the American College of Physicians awarded Plotkin the Bruce Medal, and in 1993, the Pan American Group for Rapid Viral Diagnosis presented him with the Clinical Virology Award. In 1998, Plotkin also received the French Legion Medal of Honor. To honor his scientific work in vaccines and combatting infectious diseases, Plotkin received the Sabin Foundation Medal in 2002, the Maxwell Finland Award in 2009, and the Hamdan Award Medical Research Excellence in 2014. Although retired, in the second decade of the twenty-first century, Plotkin consulted on issues of vaccines and remained involved with infectious disease and vaccine research, particularly for cytomegalovirus, which can cause infants to be born with abnormalities. He was a professor emeritus at the University of Pennsylvania and at the Wistar Institute. Sources 1940 U. S. Census, Bronx County, New York, population schedule, Assembly District 7, Bronx, New York City, enumeration district (ED) 3-1189, sheet 9B, family 181, Joseph Plotkin household. http://1940census.archives.gov/search/?search.census_year=1940&search. city=&search.county=Bronx+County&search.page=2&search.result_type= image&search.state=NY&search.street=178th+E#filename=m-t0627-02490- 00479.tif&name=3-1189&type=image&state=NY&searchby=location&searchmode =browse&year=1940&index=18&pages=22&bm_all_text=Bookmark (Accessed May 20, 2016). Arbeter, Allan M., Stuart E. Starr, and Stanley A. Plotkin. "Varicella Vaccine Studies in Healthy Children and Adults." Pediatrics 78 (1986): 748–56. Austrian, Robert. "Bacterial Transformation Reactions." Bacteriological Reviews 16 (1952): 31–50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC180727/pdf/bactrev00008- 0036.pdf (Accessed May 23, 2016). Clark, H. Fred, Frances E. Horian, Louis M. Bell, Karen Modesto, Vera Goueva, and Stanley A. Plotkin. "Protective Effect of WC3 Vaccine Against Rotavirus Diarrhea in Infants During a Predominantly Serotype 1 Rotavirus Season." Journal of Infectious Diseases 158 (1988): 570–87. Clark, H. Fred, Paul A. Offit, Stanley A. Plotkin, and Penny M. Heaton. "The New Pentavalent Rotavirus Vaccine Composed of Bovine (Strain WC3) – Human Rotavirus Reassortants." Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 25 (2006): 577–83. de Kruif, Paul. Microbe Hunters. San Diego: Harvest, 1926. de Santis, Marco, Anna Franca Cavaliere, Gianluca Straface, and Alessandro Caruso. "Rubella Infection in Pregnancy." Reproductive Toxicology 21 (2006): 390–8. "Dr. Stanley A. Plotkin to Receive the Hamdan Award for Medical Research Excellence in the Field of Vaccines." The Wistar Institute. 14 November 2014. http://wistar.org /news-and-media/press-releases/dr-stanley-plotkin- receive-the-hamdan-award-medical-research-excellenc (Accessed May 20, 2016). Hayflick, Leonard. "The Limited in Vitro Lifetime of Human Diploid Cells." Experimental Cell Research 37 (1965): 614–36. Hayflick, Leonard and Paul S. Moorhead. "The Serial Cultivation of Human Diploid Strains." Experimental Cell Research 25 (1961): 585–621. Katz, Michael. "Tribute to Stanley A. Plotkin, M.D." Speech Given at the Albert B. Sabin Gold Medal Address, Baltimore, Maryland, May 7, 2002. http://www.sabin.org/sites/sabin.org/files/Plotkin_medal_speech. pdf (Accessed May 20, 2016). Koprowski, Hilary, Thomas W. Norton, George A. Jervis, Thomas L. Nelson, David L. Chadwick, Doris J. Nelsen, and Karl F. Meyer. "Clinical Investigations on Attenuated Strains of Poliomyelitis Virus: Use as a Method of Immunization of Children with Living Virus." Journal of the American Medical Association 160 (1956): 954–66. Lewis, Sinclair. Arrowsmith. San Diego: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1925. National Foundation for Infectious Diseases. "Stanley A. Plotkin, MD: Recipient of the 2009 Maxwell Finland Award for Scientific Achievement." National Foundation for Infectious Diseases. http://www.nfid.org/ awards/plotkin.pdf (Accessed May 20, 2016). Parkman, Paul D., Edward L. Buescher, and Malcom S. Artenstein. "Recovery of Rubella Virus from Army Recruits." Experimental Biology and Medicine 111 (1962): 225–30. "Plotkin, Stanley Alan." American Men & Women of Science: A Biographical Directory of Today's Leaders in Physical, Biological, and Related Sciences. 5 (2007): 1147. Plotkin, Stanley A. "The History of Rubella and Rubella Vaccination Leading to Elimination." Clinical Infectious Diseases 43 (2006): 164–8. http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/43/Supplement_3/S164.full.pdf+ html (Accessed May 20, 2016). Plotkin, Stanley A. "Remarks upon Acceptance of the 2002 Albert B Sabin Gold Medal." Speech Given at the Albert B. Sabin Gold Medal Address, Baltimore, Maryland, May 7, 2002. http://www.sabin.org/sites/sabin.org/files/Plotkin_medal_speech. pdf (Accessed May 20, 2016). Plotkin, Stanley, A. and Susan L. Plotkin. "The Development of Vaccines: How the Past Led to the Future." Nature Review Microbiology 9 (2011): 889–93. Plotkin, Stanley A., Walter A. Orenstein, Paul A. Offit. Vaccines. 6th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier, Inc., 2013. Plotkin, Stanley A., John D. Farquhar, Michael Katz, and Fritz Buser. "Attenuation of RA 27/3 Rubella Virus in WI-38 Human Diploid Cells." American Journal of Diseases of Children 118 (1969): 178–85. Sabin, Albert B. "Strategies for Elimination of Poliomyelitis in Different Parts of the World with Use of Oral Poliovirus Vaccine." Review of Infectious Diseases 6 (1984): S391–6. Salwen, Martin J. "Downstate at 150: A Celebration of Achievement Folio." SUNY Downstate Medical Center. http://www.downstate.edu/sesquicentennial/documents/AchievementFolio- web.pdf (Accessed May 20, 2016). Weller, Thomas H. and Franklin A. Neva. "Propagation in Tissue Culture of Cytopathic Agents from Patients with Rubella-Like Illness." Experimental Biology and Medicine 111 (1962): 215–25. Wiktor, Tadeusz J., Stanley A. Plotkin, and Hilary Koprowski. "Development and Clinical Trials of the New Human Rabies Vaccine of Tissue Culture (Human Diploid Cell) Origin." Developments in Biological Standardization 40 (1978): 3–9. https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/stanley-alan-plotkin-1932

Stanley Alan Plotkin developed vaccines in the United States during the mid to late twentieth century. Plotkin began his research career at the Wistar Institute in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where he studied the rubella virus. In pregnant women, the rubella virus caused congenital rubella syndrome in the fetus, which led to various malformations and birth defects. Using WI-38 cells, a line of cells that originated from tissues of aborted fetuses, Plotkin successfully created RA27/3, a weakened strain of the rubella virus, which he then used to develop a rubella vaccine. Plotkin's rubella vaccine has prevented birth defects due to congenital rubella in developing fetuses and newborns. Plotkin was born 12 May 1932 in New York City, New York, to parents Lee and Joseph Plotkin, who had immigrated to the United States from England. Plotkin's father worked as a commercial telegrapher while his mother cared for Plotkin and his younger sister, Brenda. As an adolescent, Plotkin attended the Bronx High School of Science in New York City, New York. When Plotkin was fifteen, he read two books, Arrowsmith, a novel by Sinclair Lewis, and Microbe Hunters, a non-fiction science drama by Paul de Kruif. Both books told stories of scientists striving to discover the causes of diseases and to create vaccines against them. Plotkin later credited those books as his inspiration for studying science and medicine. After graduating from the Bronx High School of Science in 1948, Plotkin enrolled at New York University in New York City. Plotkin graduated with his bachelor's degree from New York University in 1952 and applied to the State University of New York Medical School at the Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, New York. While at the Downstate Medical Center, Plotkin worked in the lab of Robert Austrian, who studied infectious diseases like pneumonia and meningitis caused by the bacteria, streptococcus pneumoniae. One classmate recalled that Plotkin had an insatiable curiosity and emphasized finding practical solutions to human health problems through rigorous experimentation, traits that Plotkin later attributed to his time spent working with Austrian. After Plotkin received his medical degree from the State University of New York Medical School in 1956, he moved to Cleveland, Ohio, where he spent a year as a pediatric intern at Cleveland Metropolitan General Hospital. In 1957, Plotkin planned to volunteer for the US Air Force rather than be drafted for military service in the Vietnam War. According to Plotkin, he wanted to join the Air Force to learn to fly planes. But because of his medical training, Plotkin instead served for three years in the Epidemic Intelligence Service of the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, Georgia. As an officer of the Epidemic Intelligence Service, Plotkin studied anthrax at the Wistar Institute. Plotkin later revealed that he requested that specific appointment because he hoped to work with the new director of the Wistar Institute, Hilary Koprowski, who had developed a preliminary oral polio vaccine. Polio was a common childhood disease that caused flu-like symptoms and sometimes affected the central nervous system, paralyzing some children. In addition to studying anthrax, Plotkin also studied the poliovirus in Koprowski's lab. He researched alternative, experimental polio vaccines and tested the new polio vaccines in the Belgian Congo, later called the Democratic Republic of the Congo. During his initial research at the Wistar Institute, Plotkin taught at the School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in 1959. To obtain credentials as a pediatrician, Plotkin worked as a resident physician at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in 1961. In 1962, he left Philadelphia and transferred his pediatric residency to the Hospital for Sick Children in London, England. Plotkin later stated that he enjoyed his residency there because he believed the hospital attracted some of the most difficult medical cases and some of the best pediatric consultants in England. After obtaining his pediatric credentials, Plotkin returned to Philadelphia in 1963 where he resumed teaching in pediatrics as an assistant professor at the University of Pennsylvania. He also resumed research at the Wistar Institute with institute director Koprowski. Upon returning to the Wistar Institute in 1963, Plotkin began studying the rubella virus. The rubella virus caused a common but often mild disease that caused rashes and flu-like symptoms in those infected. However, pregnant women infected with the rubella virus could pass the virus to their fetuses, who got congenital rubella syndrome. Congenital rubella syndrome can lead to miscarriage or birth defects in the heart, brain, eyes, and ears of the fetus. In 1963, an epidemic of rubella and congenital rubella syndrome broke out in Europe. In 1964 and 1965, the epidemic spread to the United States, causing birth defects in thousands of infants. After that epidemic, many researchers, including Plotkin, accelerated the development of a vaccine for rubella. According to Plotkin, he realized the importance of preventing rubella in pregnant women to prevent congenital rubella in their fetuses and the subsequent birth defects in infants. Throughout the 1960s, Plotkin strove to develop a vaccine for rubella at the Wistar Institute. Plotkin built upon work conducted by virologists Thomas Huckle Weller and Franklin Allen Neva as well as Paul Douglas Parkman, all of whom isolated strains of the rubella virus in 1962 in the US. In the early 1960s cell biologists Leonard Hayflick and Paul Moorhead at the Wistar Institute developed the WI-38 strain, a human cell strain created using aborted fetal tissue. WI-38 cells, named after the Wistar Institute where they were developed, were among the first non-cancerous human cells that could be maintained for long periods of time without substantial degradation, making them well-suited for laboratory research. Using WI-38 cells, Plotkin cultured a new strain of the rubella virus called RA 27/3, a weakened strain of the rubella virus, which he and his research team then used to create a rubella vaccine in 1969. However, Plotkin was not the only one to create a rubella vaccine. In 1968 at a National Institutes of Health conference, several rubella vaccine developers debated which of four possible vaccines was the best candidate for further production. Of the proposed vaccines, only Plotkin's had used diploid human cells while other laboratories had used cells from ducks, dogs, and rabbits. Diploid human cells, like the WI-38 cells Plotkin used, have the same number of chromosome pairs as typical human body cells. Plotkin argued that diploid human cells were a better medium for growing weakened virus strains for vaccines because they better represented the human cells to be vaccinated. Plotkin's primary opposition at the conference was Albert Sabin, who had successfully created an oral polio vaccine, similar to Koprowski's, that was widely used in the Soviet Union. Sabin objected that vaccines developed with human cells, like WI-38, contaminated vaccines with cancer causing viruses, a common theory at the time. Plotkin countered that there was not sufficient evidence to indicate such danger. He further asserted that Sabin's objections came from religious, not factual, reasons due the origins of the WI-38 cells in aborted fetal tissues. Plotkin's arguments convinced his colleagues of the benefits of his RA 27/3 rubella vaccine, eventually convincing Sabin himself. In 1969, Plotkin published his experimental results about his rubella vaccine, which became available for public use shortly thereafter. After advocating for his rubella vaccine, Plotkin continued to balance his study of viruses and vaccines with his medical career. In the late 1960s, Plotkin collaborated with Koprowski and Tadeusz Wiktor at the Wistar Institute to create a vaccine for rabies, which became licensed for public use beginning in 1980. Plotkin also continued teaching pediatrics at the School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania where he remained a professor until 1991. In 1972, Plotkin became the director of the infectious disease department as well as a senior physician in pediatrics at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, where he remained for decades to follow. In addition to his vaccine research, Plotkin became a professor of virology at the Wistar Institute in 1974. In 1980, Plotkin married Susan, the coordinator of the pediatric AIDS Program at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. The couple had two children, Michael and Alec. Throughout the 1980s, Plotkin continued to develop vaccines for infectious diseases. In the early 1980s, Plotkin created several experimental vaccines for chickenpox, caused by the varicella virus, though those vaccines never made it to public production. In 1988, Plotkin published the first edition of Vaccines, a textbook detailing the history, theory, and creation of vaccines. The US National Foundation for Infectious Diseases in Bethesda, Maryland, considered Vaccines, in its sixth edition as of 2013, to be the authoritative textbook in the field of vaccinology. Plotkin continued to seek out new vaccines, and in 1988, he published a paper for a preliminary vaccine for rotavirus, which causes severe diarrhea in infants and young children. In 1991, a private vaccine company, Pasteur Mérieux Connaught Vaccines, offered Plotkin a position as the company's medical and science director. Plotkin accepted and relocated to Paris, France, with his family later that year. In 1997, he returned to the US as a consultant for the multinational vaccine producer, Aventis Pasteur, later called Sanofi Pasteur, headquartered in Lyon, France. In 2006, Plotkin, collaborated with vaccine researchers Fred Clark and Paul Offit in the US to create a rotavirus vaccine, which they called RotaTeq, based on research Plotkin had started nearly twenty years earlier. Also that year, at the age of 74, Plotkin learned to pilot an airplane, fulfilling his earlier ambition. Plotkin received many awards for his work as a physician and medical researcher. For his contributions to preventative medicine, in 1987, the American College of Physicians awarded Plotkin the Bruce Medal, and in 1993, the Pan American Group for Rapid Viral Diagnosis presented him with the Clinical Virology Award. In 1998, Plotkin also received the French Legion Medal of Honor. To honor his scientific work in vaccines and combatting infectious diseases, Plotkin received the Sabin Foundation Medal in 2002, the Maxwell Finland Award in 2009, and the Hamdan Award Medical Research Excellence in 2014. Although retired, in the second decade of the twenty-first century, Plotkin consulted on issues of vaccines and remained involved with infectious disease and vaccine research, particularly for cytomegalovirus, which can cause infants to be born with abnormalities. He was a professor emeritus at the University of Pennsylvania and at the Wistar Institute. Sources 1940 U. S. Census, Bronx County, New York, population schedule, Assembly District 7, Bronx, New York City, enumeration district (ED) 3-1189, sheet 9B, family 181, Joseph Plotkin household. http://1940census.archives.gov/search/?search.census_year=1940&search. city=&search.county=Bronx+County&search.page=2&search.result_type= image&search.state=NY&search.street=178th+E#filename=m-t0627-02490- 00479.tif&name=3-1189&type=image&state=NY&searchby=location&searchmode =browse&year=1940&index=18&pages=22&bm_all_text=Bookmark (Accessed May 20, 2016). Arbeter, Allan M., Stuart E. Starr, and Stanley A. Plotkin. "Varicella Vaccine Studies in Healthy Children and Adults." Pediatrics 78 (1986): 748–56. Austrian, Robert. "Bacterial Transformation Reactions." Bacteriological Reviews 16 (1952): 31–50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC180727/pdf/bactrev00008- 0036.pdf (Accessed May 23, 2016). Clark, H. Fred, Frances E. Horian, Louis M. Bell, Karen Modesto, Vera Goueva, and Stanley A. Plotkin. "Protective Effect of WC3 Vaccine Against Rotavirus Diarrhea in Infants During a Predominantly Serotype 1 Rotavirus Season." Journal of Infectious Diseases 158 (1988): 570–87. Clark, H. Fred, Paul A. Offit, Stanley A. Plotkin, and Penny M. Heaton. "The New Pentavalent Rotavirus Vaccine Composed of Bovine (Strain WC3) – Human Rotavirus Reassortants." Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 25 (2006): 577–83. de Kruif, Paul. Microbe Hunters. San Diego: Harvest, 1926. de Santis, Marco, Anna Franca Cavaliere, Gianluca Straface, and Alessandro Caruso. "Rubella Infection in Pregnancy." Reproductive Toxicology 21 (2006): 390–8. "Dr. Stanley A. Plotkin to Receive the Hamdan Award for Medical Research Excellence in the Field of Vaccines." The Wistar Institute. 14 November 2014. http://wistar.org /news-and-media/press-releases/dr-stanley-plotkin- receive-the-hamdan-award-medical-research-excellenc (Accessed May 20, 2016). Hayflick, Leonard. "The Limited in Vitro Lifetime of Human Diploid Cells." Experimental Cell Research 37 (1965): 614–36. Hayflick, Leonard and Paul S. Moorhead. "The Serial Cultivation of Human Diploid Strains." Experimental Cell Research 25 (1961): 585–621. Katz, Michael. "Tribute to Stanley A. Plotkin, M.D." Speech Given at the Albert B. Sabin Gold Medal Address, Baltimore, Maryland, May 7, 2002. http://www.sabin.org/sites/sabin.org/files/Plotkin_medal_speech. pdf (Accessed May 20, 2016). Koprowski, Hilary, Thomas W. Norton, George A. Jervis, Thomas L. Nelson, David L. Chadwick, Doris J. Nelsen, and Karl F. Meyer. "Clinical Investigations on Attenuated Strains of Poliomyelitis Virus: Use as a Method of Immunization of Children with Living Virus." Journal of the American Medical Association 160 (1956): 954–66. Lewis, Sinclair. Arrowsmith. San Diego: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1925. National Foundation for Infectious Diseases. "Stanley A. Plotkin, MD: Recipient of the 2009 Maxwell Finland Award for Scientific Achievement." National Foundation for Infectious Diseases. http://www.nfid.org/ awards/plotkin.pdf (Accessed May 20, 2016). Parkman, Paul D., Edward L. Buescher, and Malcom S. Artenstein. "Recovery of Rubella Virus from Army Recruits." Experimental Biology and Medicine 111 (1962): 225–30. "Plotkin, Stanley Alan." American Men & Women of Science: A Biographical Directory of Today's Leaders in Physical, Biological, and Related Sciences. 5 (2007): 1147. Plotkin, Stanley A. "The History of Rubella and Rubella Vaccination Leading to Elimination." Clinical Infectious Diseases 43 (2006): 164–8. http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/43/Supplement_3/S164.full.pdf+ html (Accessed May 20, 2016). Plotkin, Stanley A. "Remarks upon Acceptance of the 2002 Albert B Sabin Gold Medal." Speech Given at the Albert B. Sabin Gold Medal Address, Baltimore, Maryland, May 7, 2002. http://www.sabin.org/sites/sabin.org/files/Plotkin_medal_speech. pdf (Accessed May 20, 2016). Plotkin, Stanley, A. and Susan L. Plotkin. "The Development of Vaccines: How the Past Led to the Future." Nature Review Microbiology 9 (2011): 889–93. Plotkin, Stanley A., Walter A. Orenstein, Paul A. Offit. Vaccines. 6th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier, Inc., 2013. Plotkin, Stanley A., John D. Farquhar, Michael Katz, and Fritz Buser. "Attenuation of RA 27/3 Rubella Virus in WI-38 Human Diploid Cells." American Journal of Diseases of Children 118 (1969): 178–85. Sabin, Albert B. "Strategies for Elimination of Poliomyelitis in Different Parts of the World with Use of Oral Poliovirus Vaccine." Review of Infectious Diseases 6 (1984): S391–6. Salwen, Martin J. "Downstate at 150: A Celebration of Achievement Folio." SUNY Downstate Medical Center. http://www.downstate.edu/sesquicentennial/documents/AchievementFolio- web.pdf (Accessed May 20, 2016). Weller, Thomas H. and Franklin A. Neva. "Propagation in Tissue Culture of Cytopathic Agents from Patients with Rubella-Like Illness." Experimental Biology and Medicine 111 (1962): 215–25. Wiktor, Tadeusz J., Stanley A. Plotkin, and Hilary Koprowski. "Development and Clinical Trials of the New Human Rabies Vaccine of Tissue Culture (Human Diploid Cell) Origin." Developments in Biological Standardization 40 (1978): 3–9. https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/stanley-alan-plotkin-1932

Aluminum is a toxic metal that damages your brain, accelerating Alzheimer’s and dementia. In combination with mercury, another potent neurotoxin, aluminum ravages the brain, causing permanent brain damage that’s quite literally leading to the vaccine rage wave of insanity and mental illness now sweeping our society. - Autistic Brains Have High Aluminum Levels http://vaccinepapers.org/high-aluminum-content-autistic-brains/ - Vectors of aluminum exposure include vaccines, over-the-counter medications (antacids are often loaded with aluminum), cookware and even deodorants which are typically made with aluminum salts. Aluminum is a fascinating metal: light, rustproof and easy to work with. Just 100 years ago it was so exotic that aluminum was presented at world exhibitions. Now the metal has become an indispensable part of our daily life. We drink out of aluminum cans, use aluminum-based deodorant and sunscreen, and it increases the effectiveness of vaccines. However, aluminum is not as harmless as manufacturers have been emphasizing for decades. Oncological studies in England have shown that aluminum chloride from deodorants can be absorbed through the skin and cause cancer. Other researchers suspect that aluminum from medicines can accumulate in the brain and promote the development of Alzheimer's. Large amounts of raw materials and energy are required for production, and production can lead to environmental disasters of considerable proportions. Bert Ehgartner takes a critical look at a metal that no longer seems dispensable in our everyday life. Director: Bert Ehgartner https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5F0u54gs0iU https://langbein-partner.com/videolibrary-en/?start=0

During the past 20 years, the frequency of autism occurring in children has skyrocketed from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 68, and the scientific community is no closer to determining a cause. Trace Amounts is the true story of Eric Gladen’s painful journey through mercury poisoning that he believes resulted from a thimerosal-loaded tetanus shot. His discoveries led him on a quest for the scientific truth about the role of mercury poisoning in the Autism epidemic. After recovering from a sickness that would bring him to the edge of despair, Eric Gladen began researching the science behind what had made him so sick. His research led him straight into one of the biggest medical debates of all time, the question of whether or not childhood vaccines are causing Autism. He would end up quitting his career, moving into an RV, and traveling the country interviewing experts and piecing together thousands of studies and leaked documents. But Eric wasn’t focused on the vaccines themselves, he was focused on something that belongs nowhere near vaccines — mercury. From the Mad Hatter Syndrome in the late 1800s to Pink Disease in the first half of the 20th to the Iraqi Grain Incident in the early 1970s, humans have learned time and again of the debilitating neurological and physical damage that mercury can cause. Then why and how did it end up in our childhood vaccines? Trace Amounts explores the origin of the use of mercury in the vaccines and exposes the continued greed-based decision to keep mercury in the vaccines through several decades. Trace Amounts is the result of nearly a decade of research and travel, in which top scientists, government officials, parents of children with Autism, and the average Joe unravel the truths, secrets, and tragedies, of the skyrocketing Autism rates. https://rgstair.com/trace-amounts-ethyl-mercury-documentary/ _________________________________________ more: https://odysee.com/@RunningOverTheSameOldGround:6

https://odysee.com/@RunningOverTheSameOldGround:6/TheRealAnthonyFauci-Part-I:d https://odysee.com/@RunningOverTheSameOldGround:6/TheRealAnthonyFauci-Part-II:4 - You have 2 copyright strikes We have received DMCA takedown notices in concern to the following videos so we have removed them. For additional information please see our Copyright and DMCA page. Reference ID Content 8-104243726 The Real Anthony Fauci - Part I (2022) Acknowledged on October 27, 2022 Expires on Apr 25, 2023 8-104232736 The Real Anthony Fauci - Part II (2022) Acknowledged on October 27, 2022 Expires on Apr 25, 2023 If you believe a mistake as been made please contact dmca@rumble.com. Upon receiving your 4th strike within a 180 days period, your account will be disabled. re-uploaded at Odysee: https://odysee.com/@RunningOverTheSameOldGround:6

Dismantling COVID-19 Deceptions: Why are Quantum Dots in the COVID-19 Injections? Why did a Chinese-born, US Army engineer perfect a nanotechnology to deliver quantum dots in humans? A nanoweapon technology that’s owned by the Chinese military and used in the COVID-19 vaccines. It is evident that the COVID-19 injections contain nanotechnology that can host electromagnetic fields and receive signals. Interview starts at 4:10 Intermission at 27:14 to 29:08 https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/part-5-dismantling-the-covid-19-deceptions September 12, 2022 Executive Order: Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe, and Secure American Bioeconomy https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2022/09/12/executive-order-on-advancing-biotechnology-and-biomanufacturing-innovation-for-a-sustainable-safe-and-secure-american-bioeconomy/ Video source: https://www.brighteon.com/d5c2ee45-15ae-4099-a006-0ea03f134782 ___________________________________ More: https://rumble.com/user/Libertarian99

“What we don't understand we call coincidence” Kaypacha first began the study of astrology over forty years ago. Since then, he has explored the synchronistic relationship between the cosmos and earthly phenomena and our internal human experience of Self / Soul, offering astrology and yoga workshops to thousands on every continent in the world. His diverse background includes knowledge of evolutionary, shamanic, and Uranian astrology, cosmobiology, and esoteric studies. He has been practicing and teaching kundalini yoga for more than ten years and has combined his knowledge of the Sabian symbols, tarot, meditation, breathwork, and yoga to create his own unique, heart-centered astrological methods for healing and growth. Since 2010 he has shared a weekly astrological update and has over 128,000 subscribers on YouTube. He has taught workshops worldwide and regularly offers online events to his international followers. He is the founder of the New Paradigm School of Astrology, with over 500 students worldwide. He does online seminars, guest appearances, interviews, teaches classes, and writes articles regularly. https://newparadigmastrology.com/about-kaypacha/ __________________________________________ The New World TV is a platform that brings people from different disciplines together to think about major changes that are coming due to a combination of rapid technological developments and globalization. It is an initiative philosopher Ad Verbrugge in collaboration with Jelle van Baardewijk, Marlies Dekkers, and Thomas Bollen. The New World TV is made in collaboration with Centrum Ethos on the VU and Philosophical School Netherlands. source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WrqaP2cPOY ____________________________________ Pluto in Aquarius: the Evolution of Society and Technology: https://jessicadavidson.co.uk/2021/06/07/pluto-in-aquarius-the-evolution-of-society-and-technology/

“The Netherlands wants to ban David Icke from speaking in Amsterdam at a meeting for PEACE on November 6, 2022. These are the tyrants trying to ban Icke worldwide - so what does he say that makes them so terrified of one man while the authorities are destroying the country and using the media as their spineless echo chamber? – the TRUTH Of course…” https://samenvoornederland.nu/evenement/samen-voor-nederland-amsterdam-2/ CIDI wants to prevent the arrival of David Icke because of anti-Semitic statements he is said to have made. Mordecai indicates that he has not been able to find such statements and talks about this with David. https://odysee.com/@Viruswaarheid2.0:9/2022-10-21-Mordecha%C3%AF-Krispijn-in-gesprek-met-David-Icke:f video source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYW1lgwVUXc _____________________________________ Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness - Jim Keith “What luck for rulers that men do not think.” — Adolf Hitler [first five chapters] Chapter 1 - Origins of Control Agents of the world’s elite have been long engaged in a war on the populace of Earth. Greed is the motivation for this war, a greed so pervasive that it encompasses the planet and all of the beings on it, but in recent times a philosophy has been used to justify that greed. It is the philosophy of mass control, that ultimately aims at dictating every aspect of human life—even remolding man’s perception of reality and himself. Although the lust for control can be discerned since the beginning of recorded history, a nexus of particular importance arose in Germany in the latter half of the 19th century. As the country increased in military and industrial might, becoming the strongest power in Europe, a revolution simultaneously took place in German philosophic and scientific thought that paradoxically would spread through the world to create positive technological change as well as to birth innumerable toxic children. According to one source: “The sudden change from relative political weakness to world power and from economic insecurity to prosperity proved to be a great strain on the German character and public life. The spread of materialistic philosophy of life was world-wide in this age, and the idolatry of power was not confined to Germany, but its corrosive effect was particularly strong in a country that was not inured to power.”1 One aspect of this transformation, this “idolatry of power” was a negative transformation of the psychological sciences. In the late 19th century, earlier more humanistic approaches to understanding mankind were replaced by a scientific philosophy that would be employed less as a measure for the understanding of man than as a justification for a new feudalism and a mechanism of pure control. The materialist overhauling of psychology was in great part ushered in by the work of the German psychologist Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt. Wundt was a professor of philosophy at the University of Leipzig, and in 1875 established the world’s first psychological laboratory there, a move that would eventually turn the world of more humanistic-oriented psychology on its head. Interesting, but Wundt’s grandfather is documented as having been a member of the Illuminati secret society, making it not unreasonable to imagine that herr professor may also have been a member of that group. Wundt, in reflection of a powerful materialistic groundswell in German thought that began with Schopenhauer at the beginning of the 19th century and that was to be later epitomized by Karl Marx, rejected in cavalier fashion the notion that man might have a soul or deeper significance than the merely physical, that he was in fact anything more than an animal. Following this line of reasoning, an approach that came to be known in psychology as Structuralism, Wundt insisted that all psychological studies should depend entirely on the study of body reactions. The truth of man, Wundt insisted, could be determined solely through mechanistic means: measurement, analysis, and dissection of bodies. After Wundt had thoroughly infused the psychological sciences with his materialist approach, many scientists—and the members of the ruling class that employed them—believed that they were justified in treating human beings as if they were pieces of meat, and as an overall plan of action, proceeded to do so. The materialist psychological doctrine spread rapidly with at least twenty-four laboratories established by Wundt’s students between the years 1883 and 1893, with more of the German’s acolytes fanning out to infiltrate related fields, such as education. Wundt’s materialistic approach would infect the thinking of most of the influential psychologists, psychiatrists, educators, and social planners who would follow in the 20th century.2 One man who marched to Wundt’s dirge was the Russian, Ivan Petrovich Pavlov. Pavlov conducted a wide-ranging research into techniques of control, primarily using dogs for his experimentation. In the now-famous experiment, Pavlov fed his dogs, stimulating salivation, while at the same time ringing a bell. After doing this many times, Pavlov was able to stimulate salivation in reaction to the sound of the bell alone. Other of Pavlov’s experiments involved rewarding dogs with petting, or punishing them with pain. Using these kinds of approaches, Pavlov developed his theory of the conditioned reflex, demonstrating that animals are motivated by patterns of conditioned response, and that conditioning can be artificially induced. The results of Pavlov’s experiments did not escape the social planners of his day, nor those who would follow. 1. “Germany—History Since 1850,” Encyclopedia Americana. New York: Americana Corporation, 1963 2. Lionni, Paolo. The Leipzig Connection. Sheridan, Oregon: Delphian Press, 1988; “Germany—History Since 1850”; Wood, Samuel and Ellen Green. The World of Psychology, third edition, at www.prenticehall.ca/wood; Weiten, Wayne. “A New Science is Born: The Contributions of Wundt and Hall,” Psychology: Themes and Variations. 3rd edition, at http://psychology.wadworth.com/book Chapter 2 Perfecting Inhumanity A time-dishonored approach to the manipulation of man kind is through the philosophy and techniques of eugenics. This is the attempted ‘perfecting’ of humanity through genetic means: selective breeding, sterilization, biological manipulation, and even murder for those considered unfit. The study of eugenics has its beginning in Germany, sometime after the mid-19th century mark, stimulated by volkish concerns for Aryan racial purity. Rudolf Virchow, pathologist and politician, began a study of national ethnic statistics in 1871, convinced that the majority of Germans would prove to be of relatively pure Nordic descent. The results of his studies proved otherwise. According to Virchow, the obvious solution was to set about Nordicizing the debased German stock.1 The popularity of eugenics theories was given a jump-start in England by Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin. In 1869 Galton published his book Hereditary Genius, that Cornell University anthropology professor Davydd Greenwood has called “an impassioned brief for hereditary aristocracy that became the first modern document of the modern eugenics movement.” Galton was the man who launched the ‘nature vs. nurture’ debate that quietly rages today, arguing for the domination of innate rather than acquired human abilities. It was Galton’s opinion that the human race could be improved by selective breeding and the extermination of the unfit. Galton once said that he hoped that eugenics would become “the religion of the future." In the latter part of the century, with endeavors like the Human Genome Project that seeks to map the entirety of human DNA, his hope seems to be moving toward fulfillment. Galton’s theories were influenced in part by his examination of the family trees of eminent stuffed shirts in England. He noted that most persons of accomplishment were related to each other—an aristocratic theory of intelligence—thus theoretically putting the aristocracy on a genetic pedestal and rationalizing a stratified society, or caste system, in Britain and the world. Even the name of the subject betrays something of its orientation. Galton derived the word eugenics from the Greek ‘eugenes’ meaning ‘well born.’ This aggrandizement of the privileged class was one of the reasons why eugenics research found ready support from the monied in both America and Europe; it justified their disdain for and parasitism of “the masses.”2 Chairs in Eugenics and Eugenics in Working Society were established at the University College in London in 1904, with the Galton Laboratory for National Eugenics founded in 1907. In 1905, in the United States, the Rockefellers and Carnegies constructed the Eugenics Records Office at Cold Springs Harbor, New York, where genetic research (none dare call it eugenics) is still being done in 1999.3 In 1912 the first International Congress of Eugenics was convened at the University of London, presided over by its president, who also happened to be Charles Darwin’s son. Vice Presidents of the Congress included the First Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill; M. von Gruber, Professor of Hygiene at Munich University; Dr. Alfred Ploetz, President of the International Society for Race Hygiene; Charles W. Eliot, President Emeritus of Harvard, and the inventor of the telephone, Alexander Graham Bell. The second International Congress of Eugenics was held in 1921, sponsored by U.S. Secretary of Commerce Herbert Hoover and the presidents of Clark University, Smith College, and the Carnegie Institution. Other prominent supporters of eugenics of the period—who will loom large in the history of control to follow—included many members of the American Eastern establishment, particularly of the Eastern Establishment Dulles and Harriman families. From 1907 to 1960 more than 100,000 persons were eugenically sterilized in over thirty states in the United States. It is unlikely that the well-known and horrific Nazi approach to eugenics, brutally carried out in laboratories and concentration camps during World War II and reportedly claiming hundreds of thousands of victims, would have taken place without eugenics theory having been earlier popularized by British and American scientists and media, and funded by American and British money interests.4 German eugenics studies were organized and bankrolled by the family-run Rockefeller Foundation and its allies in medicine, industry, and politics, with large grants provided to the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry and the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics, and Human Heredity, in Munich. The latter facility was run by the fascist Swiss psychiatrist Ernst Rudin and his underlings Otmar Verschuer and Franz J. Kallmann. In 1932, Ernst Rudin was named president of the worldwide Eugenics Federation. Rockefeller funding for eugenics research in Germany would continue during World War II, the stated justification being that the war should not impede scientific research. The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute’s eugenics studies were initially endowed by Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach, the head of the Krupp munitions monolith, and James Loeb, of the Kuhn-Loeb banking family. Loeb’s relatives, the Warburgs, were banking partners of William Rockefeller, and both families were responsible for setting up the American Harriman family—also movers and shakers in eugenics—in business. 5 Although we know little about what took place in German laboratories researching mind control and brainwashing during this period, there are some hints. In 1933, the German Reichstag building was burned. In the time-honored tradition of “the patsy,” a Dutchman, a mental patient named Marinus Van der Lubbe, was arrested and charged with the crime. Psychiatric reports called Van der Lubbe an unstable but happy man, who lived as a vagabond and entertained notions of changing the world. In court, however, Van der Lubbe seemed nothing of the sort, appearing almost completely apathetic, responding dully to questions. On the forty-second day of the trial, Van der Lubbe suddenly made a remarkable change. Now he began excitedly talking about “inner voices” that commanded him. He demanded that he be put to death, and then just as suddenly slumped back into apathy. Van der Lubbe was convicted by the court and executed. Subsequent events made it clear, however, that it was members of the Nazi party itself who had burned the Reichstag. It is not outside the realm of possibility that Van der Lubbe had been brainwashed to take the fall, as many other patsies have been programmed to do in the years that have ensued.6 After Hitler took control in Germany, Rudin’s organizational structure was internalized as part of the Nazi political machine. Rudin was appointed head of the Nazi Racial Hygiene Society, with he and his staff joining the Task Force on Heredity, chaired by Himmler, the group that was to institute the infamous Nazi sterilization laws. One of Rudin’s employees was Josef Mengele, also known as “the Angel of Death,” who was to become the medical commandant of Auschwitz and perform his own horrific experimentation upon inmates of the camp. In 1936, the direct predecessor of the CIA’s more famous MKULTRA mind control operation was launched at the New York State Psychiatric Institute, funded by the Freemasonic Scottish Rite Northern Supreme Council, and supervised by Dr. Nolan D.C. Lewis, the Masonic Field Representative of Research on Dementia Praecox. The program was directed by Winfred Overhulser, a prominent Freemason and the superintendent of St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in Washington, D.C, where much CIA mind control experimentation would later take place. In 1943, Overhulser went on to become the chairman of the “truth drug” committee for the OSS, among the earliest mind control research programs instituted by American intelligence. In 1936, Ernst Rudin’s assistant Dr. Franz Kallmann, after being exposed in Germany as being half-Jewish, emigrated to America where he established the Medical Genetics Department of the New York State Psychiatric Institute, an operation also funded by the Scottish Rite. In the preface to his Masonic-funded study of schizophrenics, Kallmann wrote that schizophrenics were a “source of maladjusted crooks...and the lowest types of criminal offenders. Even the faithful believers in liberty... would be happier without those.” He added, “I am reluctant to admit the necessity for different eugenics programs for democratic and fascistic communities... There are neither biological nor sociological differences between a democratic and a totalitarian schizophrenic.”7 After World War II, Otmar Vershuer—who had procured funds for Mengele’s experimentation at Auschwitz—was hired by the Rockefeller-funded Bureau of Human Heredity in Denmark, and Rudin, Vershuer, and Kallmann participated in founding the still-active American Society of Human Genetics. Kallman was elected director of the organization and would hold that position until 1965. The American Society of Human Genetics is primarily responsible for the current $3 billion Human Genome Project—headquartered at Cold Springs Harbor, the historical center of American eugenics study that is in the forefront of the news today. The relation of eugenics to British psychiatry bears examination. The primary controlling body for psychiatry in England is the British National Association for Mental Health (NAMH), formed in 1944, and initially run by the mentally-unstable Montagu Norman, previously of the Bank of England. The group originally met at Norman’s London home, where he and Nazi Economics Minister Hjalmar Schacht had met in the 1930s to arrange financing for Hitler. NAMH is a renaming and public relations sanitization of the National Councils of Mental Hygiene, earlier one of the primary proponents for eugenics programs worldwide, and a group that broadly collaborated with Nazi eugenics practitioners prior to World War II. It can be seen that the current British psychiatric establishment proceeds in a direct line from the earlier eugenics establishment, much the same as the majority of movers and shapers in American politics have come from eugenics pro-active families. In 1948, NAMH joined forces with the United Nations and the Tavistock Institute, a long term collaboration between British military intelligence and psychiatry. NAMH and Tavistock convened an International Congress of Mental Health at the Ministry of Health in London. A World Federation of Mental Health was formed there to coordinate planetary psychological operations. The head of the World Federation was chosen: Brigadier General Dr. John Rawlings Reese, who was also the head of Tavistock. Co-director was Frank Fremont-Smith, the chief medical officer of the Macy Foundation, an organization that was later to be a primary funding source for the CIA’s MKULTRA mind control projects. Vice presidents of NAMH included Tavistock psychiatrist and eugenics activist Professor Cyril Burt; Dr. Hugh Crichton-Miller, a founder of Tavistock; psychiatrist Sir David Henderson, author of Psychiatry and Race Betterment; Lord Thomas Jeeves Horder, the president of the Eugenics Society of Great Britain and the Family Planning Association; pro-Nazi psychiatrist Carl G. Jung, who was also the psychiatrist for the Dulles family; Dr. Winfred Overhulser, representative of the Scottish Rite Masons; and Dr. Alfred Frank Tredgold, of the British Ministry of Health’s Committee on Sterilization. Although eugenics organizations and activists sought deep cover after the defeat of Hitler, something of the stench of the death camps clinging to the subject, the same programs to weed out the “inferiors” from mankind would continue, with the same personnel or their successors in charge of the programs. Working out of the family offices of the Rockefellers in the United States, the Eugenics Society now metamorphosized into the Society for the Study of Social Biology.8 Although it has been a carefully guarded secret by the watchdogs of the mainstream media, eugenics programs were never discontinued worldwide, with involuntary sterilization programs continuing in many countries to this day. Information has only recently surfaced that sterilization programs for those considered to be unfit because of genetics or behavior continued to exist in Scandinavia and in France until the 1970s. At the same time, massive involuntary sterilization programs continue to be implemented in the third world. Eugenics practice has continued in Australia, where more than one thousand “intellectually disabled” women have been illegally sterilized since 1991. The Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission discovered that 1,043 sterilization operations—only 17 of them approved by the court, as mandated by Australian law—had been performed. The number of such operations may in fact have been “several times” as high, since only operations performed using medical insurance were registered.9 In 1974 Federal District Court Judge Gerhard Gesell estimated that ‘over the last few years’ between 100,000 and 150,000 low-income persons had been sterilized under federally funded programs in the United States. Gesell stated ‘an indefinite number’ of those sterilized were ‘improperly coerced’ into accepting sterilization.10 One of the prime target groups for sterilization in the United States has been the Native American population. According to Ruthann Evanoff, in an article titled “Reproductive Rights and Occupational Health” states that, “Overall, at least twenty-five percent of the Native women of childbearing age have been sterilized, although the total population numbers less than one million. Recent reports estimate that the percentage sterilized in one tribe alone, the Northern Cheyenne, is eighty percent.”11 An oft-cited justification for current eugenics practice is the elimination of violence in society. At this time millions of dollars are being spent on research into the control of violence through genetic means. In 1992, a report was produced jointly by the National Academy of Science and the National Research Council, titled “Understanding and Preventing Violence.” Among the groups funding the report were the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. Justice Department, and the National Science Foundation. The report suggested that more studies should be done on “biological and genetic factors in violent crime,” and suggested that the higher crime rates among black males might come from a genetic predisposition.12 In England, concerns are similar. The Department of Health has recently commissioned research into a “delinquency gene” called “Fragile X.” According to the London Sunday Times, it is believed by some scientists that one in every 259 women carry the defective Fragile X, which causes a lack of brain protein, resulting in anti-social behavior. Health officials are planning to engage in mass screenings so that women who carry the defective gene can be alerted and induced to abort their children.13 1. Hillel and Henry. Of Pure Blood. New York: Pocket Books, 1975 2. Tweedy, Michael, “Francis Galton: The Man and his Science,” University of Calgary Course Notes; Reilly, Phillip R. “A Look Back at Eugenics,” The Gene Letter, Volume 1, issue 3, at www.geneletter.org/; Lapon, Lenny. Mass Murderers in White Coats (From Harvard to Buchenwald: A Chronology of Psychiatry and Eugenics); Kuhl, Stefan. The Nazi Connection—Eugenics, American Racism, and German National Socialism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994 3. Chaitkin, Anton, “British Psychiatry: From Eugenics to Assassination,” EIR, October 7, 1994. 4. Lapon 5. Chaitkin 6. Meerloo, Joost A.M. The Rape of the Mind: The Psychology of Thought Control, Menticide, and Brainwashing. New York: World Publishing Company, 1956 7. Chaitkin 8. Chaitkin; Reisman, Phd., Judith A. Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences. Arlington, Virginia: The Institute for Media Education, Inc., 1998; “Editorial: Ernst Rudin, 1874-1952,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, Volume 67, number 4; Chaitkin, Anton, “Population Control, Nazis, and the U.N.!” 9. “More Than 1,000 OZ Girls/Young Women Illegally Sterilized” by Michael Perry, December 15, 1997, Reuters news service 10. Mehler, Barry, “In Genes We Trust: When Science Bows to Racism," Center for the Study of Psychiatry and Psychology, The Public Eye, March 1995 11. Evanoff, Ruthann, “Reproductive Rights and Occupational Health,” WIN magazine, undated clipping 12. “Recent FDA Decision Highlights Ethical Issues in Drug Research On Children,” Peter R. Breggin, M.D., otherwise unattributed clipping 13. Neill, Patricia, “Mass Testing for ‘Delinquency’ Gene,’ Parascope, at www.parascope.com/main.htm Chapter 3 Dumbing Us to Death An ideological Fifth Column subverted American education in the early days of the twentieth century, with the leader of the movement Daniel Coit Gilman, the first president of Johns Hopkins University and the Carnegie Institute. Gilman studied at the University of Berlin in 1854-55, at the same time that Wilhelm Wundt taught there. After Gilman, Wundt’s materialist spin on the subjects of the mind and soul—or lack thereof—would dominate the thinking of the most influential of American educators. The result was that children would soon after be viewed as something akin to lab rats, to be put through mazes, their characters molded at the whims of the “educational” totalitarians. Another form of Germanic thinking informed Gilman’s views: he was a member of the Skull & Bones society. Skull & Bones is a highly secret, ritualistic society based at Yale University that has been called “The most powerful organization in America.” Incredibly, Skull & Bones may be a front for that most mysterious of secret societies, the Illuminati. The German organization from which Skull & Bones obtained its charter appeared within a year after the outlawing of Adam Weishaupt’s group in Bavaria and, additionally, an inscription found in the sanctum sanctorum of the Bonesmen at Yale is nearly identical in wording to that of a ceremony cited in Proofs of a Conspiracy, an early condemnation of the Illuminati by Robison. Like the Illuminati, Skull & Bones initiates refer to the group as “the Order.”1 Since the formation of Skull & Bones about 2,500 persons have been inducted into the secret group, with a small group of Eastern Establishment families forming the core of the group. These families include the Allen, Bundy, Gilman, Perkins, Wadsworth, Phelps, and Lord families. Other families who rose to wealth in the 18th and 19th century have been added to this group, including the Harriman, Davison, Rockefeller, Payne, Pillsbury, and Weyerhauser families. A third group—not Bonesmen—have acted as intermediaries between Skull & Bones and the financial hub of London. This group includes the Warburg, Schiff, Guggenheim, and Meyer families. Undoubtedly the most important influence that Skull & Bones has had on the world is through the world of politics. Since the turn of the century the direction of American statecraft has been largely steered by prominent Bonesmen from the Harriman, Bundy, Taft, Stimson, Bush, and other families, although I do not recommend that you hold our breath waiting for the establishment media to avail you of this fact. According to accounts of the time, members of Skull & Bones took over the administration of Yale University in the late 1800s while Daniel Coit Gilman was employed there, and it is reported that all presidents of Yale since that time have been either Bonesmen or closely affiliated with the group. Yale and Skull & Bones have provided fertile recruiting grounds for American intelligence agencies, with an in-house club for Bonesmen existing in the CIA, according to Covert Action Information Bulletin. The term “spook,” CIA jargon applied to spies, in fact was a Yale expression designating a member of a campus secret society.2 After becoming head of Johns Hopkins University, Daniel Coit Gilman hired another Wundt-trained specialist who not-coincidentally happened to be a Bonesman. This was G. Stanley Hall, who took over the psychological lab at the university. Hall also founded the American Psychological Association and the American Journal of Psychology, and mentored the career of Fabian Socialist and New World educator John Dewey. Dewey, who went on to become the most influential teacher of this century, also studied under George Sylvester Morris, an Hegelian philosopher who had taken his doctorate at the University of Berlin under the same teachers as Gilman. Dewey was among the first to promote school as a mechanism for the creation of a Socialist world order, and as a forum for enforcing “conformity” of the masses rather than as a place to learn the three ‘R’s. In 1899 Dewey said, “Children who know how to think for themselves spoil the harmony of the collective society which is coming where everyone is interdependent.” One reason for the success of Dewey’s “progressive education” is that it was backed to the hilt by Rockefeller and Carnegie money. Dewey for many years was the honorary president of the National Education Association, founded in 1857. The group was founded as a lobbying organization for teachers but soon aligned itself behind a scarlet psycho-political banner of “progressive education”—a delightful-sounding term that conceals the brainwashing modus operandi pioneered by the Soviets. By the turn of the century the NEA was working in full support of Dewey’s plans, advocating the dumbing down of the masses into a malleable unit, as well as a one world Fabian Socialist view. A 1934 NEA report avowed, “A dying laissez-faire must be completely destroyed and all of us, including the ‘owners,’ must be subjected to a large degree of social control.” This one-worldly view persists in current NEA literature, but it has been re-contextualized in recent times as a “liberal” viewpoint. The group now issues the following pronunciamento in its NEA journal: “The teacher ...can do much to prepare the hearts and minds of children for global understanding and cooperation... At the very top of all the agencies which will assure the coming of world government must stand the school, the teacher, and the organized profession.”3 Another American student of Wundt was James McKeen Cattell, who was Wundt’s assistant in Leipzig in the years 1883-86. Cattell was also deeply influenced by Francis Galton, the founder of eugenics. In 1891 Cattell took over the psychology department at Columbia University, and spent the rest of his life disseminating Wundtian/eugenics doctrine through an abundance of magazines and reference works he edited and wrote.4 These and other materialist Wundtians and Fabian one-worlders, funded by the Rockefellers, the Carnegies, and others intent on the suppression and pacification of the populace of the world, completely remade the face of American education in the twentieth century. The agenda that they pursued has culminated in the all-too-familiar situation of American education today in which the majority of persons graduated from high school are functionally illiterate and ill-prepared for doing anything else than saying “yes” to Big Brother and his tele-screens. From the standpoint of the social controllers there are many advantages to keeping the populace stupid, not the least being that the less intelligent a person is, the more susceptible he is to exterior control. Currently, one of the primary thrusts in American educational brainwashing goes by a variety of names, including Mastery Learning, World Class Education, Common Core of Learning, and Outcome Based Education, but which is most commonly referred to as Goals 2000. Written into law by Bill Clinton in 1994, Rockefeller monies have launched literally hundreds of books into the educational market pushing Goals 2000. Promoted by the National Education Association, the literature describes Goals 2000 as “an Academic/Behavior Modification Plan based on control theory/reality therapy.” The simple purpose of Goals 2000 is populace control and promotion of the totalitarian world order. Instead of teaching children the academic skills that most parents favor, Goals 2000 and its educational offshoots emphasize “life adjustment skills,” “family-life education,” and “environmental stewardship.” Academic study is de-emphasized while “cooperative” attitudes are mandated, including attitudes which significantly seem to bolster a eugenics agenda in the mind of the child, such as the attempted normalizing of homosexuality and playboyism, and abortion as a form of birth control. Providing a hint of what the future of American ‘education’ is going to be like is a Goals 2000 program that has been adopted in forty states: the “Parents as Teachers” (PAT) program. It is a program that would be more aptly termed the “Teachers as Parents” program. Under this plan children are given a personal computer code number by which they can be tracked for the entirety of their life, and a “parent educator” visits the homes of students a minimum of eight times a year to see that Mom and Dad are giving Junior his tranquilizers and doing their bit in programming a good little robot. Another offshoot of Goals 2000 is ‘the Oregon Option,’ which was signed into being on December 5, 1994 by the entire Clinton cabinet and members of the Oregon Congressional delegation. This program was developed by the administrations of former Oregon governors Mark Hatfield and Neil Goldschmidt, and was drafted under the direction of Goldschmidt, a member of the Trilateral Commission. Persons backing the plan include members of the Council on Foreign Relations, the World Bank, the Carnegie Foundation, and the RAND Corporation. One of the main thrusts of the Oregon Option is to seamlessly transition children from school into the industrial workforce, with apprenticeships provided by large corporations. Again, under the Oregon Option all children conceived in Oregon are entered into a huge database. All expectant parents will be required to attend parenting classes. Once the child is attending school, home visits will be undertaken by school teachers and administrators to determine if the family is fit for rearing the child. Those families deemed to be unfit, or offering “developmental neglect,” can be ripped asunder, with children shunted into foster homes or state-run facilities.5 Furthering the goals of the social planners, perhaps the most destructive current trend of the educational establishment is the wholesale drugging of students. Drugs, especially amphetamines and Ritalin, are commonly used to dose school-children throughout America. Ritalin is a highly dangerous stimulant that is, according to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, more addictive than cocaine. It also has a wide variety of other negative side effects, including nausea, insomnia, the inhibition of growth, nervous tics, and potential brain damage. A current estimate of the number of U.S. schoolchildren being drugged with Ritalin is three to five percent, or in excess of two million kids! Since most of the children to whom the drug is given are male, it has been estimated that 10 to 12 percent of all male school children in the U.S. between the ages of six and fourteen are being zombified with Ritalin. This drugging is being done because of alleged brain malfunctions that cause the children to be “hyperkinetic” or “hyperactive.” In most cases the children have been diagnosed by their teachers, almost none of whom who have the medical credentials to do such an assessment. The main problems that drugs are supposedly used to handle are classed as Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD), and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). These conditions have in fact never been proven to exist outside of the imagination of medicos and sociatrists, but instead are catchalls that include a wide variety of common childhood problems including inability to concentrate, nervousness, fidgeting, interrupting people, and disciplinary problems. No consistent brain abnormalities have been demonstrated to be linked to ADD or ADHD, although brain disorders including cortical atrophy have been shown to have been caused in some cases by long term treatment with Ritalin and other drugs commonly-prescribed for children. The symptoms that ‘educators’ are treating with drugs may in fact have nothing to do with congenital brain defects, as they have argued, but with a number of other less mysterious factors including: • Poor nutrition, fostered by parents either too poor, irresponsible, or dumbed down themselves to provide decent food for their kids; encouraged by a criminal food production industry more intent on moving cheap, sugar-coated, chemically-dyed, pesticide-poisoned swill than in providing healthy food. Sugar, pesticides, and chemical additives may be a key factor in causing what is termed ADD and ADHD. • Television and other media. Kids are estimated to watch six hours per day of an electronic medium deliberately designed to foster a short attention span, with quick three-to-five second visual cuts purposely stimulating the kind of artificial agitation that induces a child to respond to commercials. Is it any wonder that these kids have a short attention span? • Another negative aspect of the pop media is the abundance of sexual and violent images disseminated via TV, movies, hyper-violent video games like Mortal Kombat, and music with violent/sexual ‘gangsta’ ghetto rap. There are many studies showing that when television is introduced to a community that violent acts double over the course of a few years. As an example of the character of current media that is aimed at children, while waiting in an office recently I was surprised to find a depiction of full female nudity when I picked up a “Batman” comic for the first time in many years. Far be it from me to put down female nudity, but such images are certain to provide a potent distraction to children entering puberty, as well as to encourage a eugenics-friendly “Playboyism,” of the kind advocated by Hugh Hefner, himself an admitted acolyte of eugenicist Alfred Kinsey. • Families who have taken the Dr. Spock or New Age amalgam to heart are another source of problems in childhood discipline. For a kid whose role model is Tupac, Ice-T, KISS, or Marilyn Manson, and whose fantasies are fed by the quick-cut, toxified kink of M-TV, ‘Time out’ is not going to be an effective disciplinary action. • Little parental contact with kids at all. The prevailing economy, regardless of the praises of Rapegate Bill, is designed so that both parents usually have to slave full time, leaving very few moments for contact with the kids. The situation of the single parent family is usually worse. Finally, there is a problem with the nature of public schooling itself, which does not challenge children to learn or to think creatively, but instead indoctrinates them to conform to their prison-like surroundings. I personally would not like to endure again the circumstances of regimentation and immobilization—sitting at an uncomfortable desk with hands folded and mouth clamped shut for hours every day—that children are forced to put up with in public schools. I would also not relish again being forced to drag my eyes over and memorize deadly-dull texts that no sane adult would ever read if given a choice in the matter. In circumstances like these, it is no surprise that any child with an ounce of wit or energy would rebel and begin to longingly ogle his father’s gun cabinet.6 These are some of the real causes of ADD and ADHD in school, symptoms for which children are being treated with Ritalin and other addictive drugs. A dramatic example of the results of drugging children may have been played out on April 20, 1999, in Littleton, Colorado, when two young men in black trench coats systematically killed 12 of their schoolmates, and then themselves. Eric Harris, one of the shooters, had been turned down from joining the Marines a scant five days prior when they were informed that he was being prescribed the psychiatric antidepressant drug fluvoxamine maleate, or Luvox, a chemical relative of Ritalin. The American Journal of Psychiatry reports that “Our observations confirm the efficacy of fluvoxamine [Luvox] in the treatment of depression but suggest that this drug can induce mania in some patients when it is given at a normal dose.” The coroner’s report showed that Harris had therapeutic levels of Luvox in his bloodstream at the time of the shooting, and friends of Harris state that the young man was attempting to quit using the drug in the days prior to the shooting.7 There is no indication that the drugging of children is going to diminish in the near future. Quite the contrary. In an address by James Basco at the National School Boards Association, he said,“In my crystal ball, I see that the teacher of the 21st century will not be trained in schools of education as we know them today but rather will be trained in a school which is an amalgam of contemporary schools of education, medicine and pharmacy. A considerable portion of the teacher’s training will be devoted to understanding physiology and psychopharmacology, which will equip the teacher to administer drugs which affect learning and learning-related behaviors.”8 Nor should we be surprised. Since the advent of “progressive education” schools have not been intended to educate, but simply to regiment. 1. Sutton, Antony C. America’s Secret Establishment. Billings, Montana: Liberty House Press, 1986; Lionni, Paolo. The Leipzig Connection. Sheridan, Oregon: Delphian Press, 1988; Millegan, Kris, “The Order of the Skull & Bones,” Parascope, at www.parascope.com/main.htm; Robison, John. Proofs of a Conspiracy. Los Angeles: Western Islands, 1967 2. Goldstein and Steinberg, “George Bush, Skull & Bones and the New World Order: A New American View,” International Edition White Paper; Millegan, Kris, “The Order of the Skull & Bones,” Parascope at www.parascope.com/main.htm 3. Samuelson, Eric, “A Brief Chronology of Collectivism,” October 1997; Sutton; Lionni; Stormer, John. None Dare Call It Treason... 25 Years Later. Liberty Bell Press: Florrisant, Missouri, 1992; Allen, Gary. The Rockefeller File. Seal Beach, California: ’76 Press, 1976 4. Sutton; Lionni 5. “Sinister Oregon Plan Underway to Control Children & Families,” Paul Richmond—Sightings at www.sightings.com 6. Scanlon, Dana S., “Menticide Against the Children of America,” The New Federalist, May 13, 1996 7. Weller, Robert, “25 May Be Dead in School Shooting,” Associated Press, April 20, 1999; American Journal of Psychiatry, September, 1991; KCNC News 4, Denver, Colorado, May 4, 1999; Reuters news service. May 6, 1999 8. Basco, James, cited in Packard, Vance. The People Shapers. New York: Bantam Books, 1977 Chapter 4 Tavistock One prominent locus of world control—its influence spreading through the media, the scientific establishment, corporations, governments, and the military—is the Tavistock Institute. Tavistock, a collaborative effort of British military intelligence and the psychiatric establishment, was created in 1921 reportedly on the orders of members of the Royal Institute of International Affairs (also known as Chatham House). The RIIA is an arm of the British Rhodes Round Table group, founded by British imperialist and Freemason Cecil Rhodes. The Round Table, functioning through a myriad of offshoots, has been this century’s most effective proponent for the creation of a one world government. Tavistock relies on grants for its operations from the Rockefellers, Carnegies, the British Home Office, and large anonymous grants. Initially run by British military intelligence officer Major John Rawlings, from its inception Tavistock was intended as a coordinating center for planetary social control using “psychological shock troops,” a term coined by Reese. These shock troops in white lab coats have farmed out across the planet, infiltrating organizations in order to implement policies deemed productive by the organization’s strategists. At core Tavistock consists of Freemasonic British intelligence agents collaborating with the hydra heads of world psychiatry to achieve two goals: 1. A one world order where the nation state has been abolished and a single totalitarian control center established. 2. The simultaneous psychological control of the world or, using their term, “societry.” Even the official literature of Tavistock is candid in admitting its broad world mind control orientation.1 In 1932 German psychologist Kurt Lewin, one of the creators of the American OSS intelligence network, precursor to the CIA—took over the steering of Tavistock from Reese. Lewin was an early proponent of the use of trauma for reprogramming both individuals and societies, his modus operandi possibly more than merely an analog of the Freemasonic dictum “Ordo Ab Chao,” meaning “order out of chaos.” Lewin’s theory was the origin and definition of the concept of Future Shock, written by Tavistock-associated Alvin Toffler, although Toffler promotes the idea that current cultural deconstruction and leveling is an accident. It is not. This Tavistock signature approach, this “Future Shock” deprogramming of the subject to a vegetative state through torture and trauma, for subsequent reprogramming—is the recurring methodology for world mind control as well as cultural programming in the 20th century. Dr. William Sargent of the Tavistock Institute, reported to have been at the time working in the CIA’s MKULTRA mind control program, in his 1957 book Battle for the Mind—A Physiology of Coversion and Brain-Washing elaborated on Lewin’s theories by stating: “Various beliefs can be implanted in many people after brain function has been sufficiently disturbed by accidentally or deliberately induced fear, anger, or excitement. Of the results caused by such disturbances, the most common one is temporarily impaired judgement and heightened suggestibility. Its various group manifestations are sometimes classed under the heading of ‘herd instinct,’ and appear most spectacularly in wartime, during severe epidemics, and in all similar periods of common danger, which increase anxiety and so individual and mass suggestibility.” During World War II, Tavistock ran the British Psychological Warfare Directorate, and the group maintained its military orientation after the war. Tavistock agents have penetrated American intelligence agencies, psychiatric institutions, industry, media, and political organisms, firmly guiding those bodies in alignment with the purposes of the Tavistock controllers.2 Spreading out from Tavistock, agents have been present at the creation of institutional centers such as the Stanford Research Institute’s Center for Advanced Behavioral Sciences, the Sloan School at MIT, the Wharton School of Finance and Business Administration at the University of Pennsylvania, the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan, and other locations. The Tavistock network has also influenced and penetrated such groups as Esalen, the RAND Corporation, the Hudson Institute, and the Heritage Foundation. A key thrust of Tavistock has been accomplished by the National Training Laboratories, sponsoring group “encounter” or “sensitivity” programs involved in breaking down an individual’s personality and reconstructing it along lines agreeable to the group—a microcosmic intervention intended to gradually bring about the macrocosm of the New World Order. It is estimated that millions of persons have been put through this type of “processing,” including most of America’s corporate leaders and officials from the State Department, the Navy, the Department of Education, and the National Education Association. Although touted as a tool for personal and organizational liberation, sensitivity programs are also an effective tool for control along the lines the group leader desires, as has been effectively demonstrated through the use of similar methods in cubic groups such as those of Charles Manson and Jim Jones.3 Tavistock is invariably portrayed in its literature as being a non-political organism, but the lie is apparent. As an example, one recent Tavistock project is SMARTCARDS, a pilot program done in collaboration with Manchester Metropolitan University on behalf of the European Commission. This project for putting a person’s work history and skills including academic accreditation onto a single ID card is being carried out in Europe and America, and is intended to gradually facilitate the creation of a universally-policed and regulated world economic system.4 1. Dicks, Henry Victor. Fifty Years of the Tavistock Clinic. London, England: Routledge & K. Paul, 1970; Wolfe, L., “The Tavistock roots of the ‘Aquarian Conspiracy’,” EIR, June 5, 1987; Coleman, Dr. John. Conspirator’s Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300. Carson City, Nevada: America West Publishers, 1992; “Tavistock—The Best Kept Secret in America” at tavinstitute.org/index.htm 2. Chaitkin, Anton, “British Psychiatry: From Eugenics to Assassination,” EIR, October 7, 1994; Steinberg, Jeffrey, “‘Anticipatory democracy’ : Britain’s Tavistock Institute brainwashed Newt." EIR, January 12, 1996 3. “Will You Allow Your Child to Be Spiritually Molested?,” The New Federalist 4. EDRU, Educational Development and Review Unit white paper of the Tavistock Institute Chapter 5 Injecting Ideology We are only being told what they want us to know. Probably the most effective method of control ever discovered is simple information management. This technique consists of withholding information, disseminating lies (disinformation) or providing misdirection so that we cannot fully comprehend the reality that we deal with, and the forces that shape our lives. These deceptive views are projected to the populace through various communications media, but primarily by television, radio, motion pictures, newspapers, magazines, and the Internet. A gauge of elitist thinking on the topic of media control is provided in the work of Edward Bernays, a close friend of New World Order mastermind H.G. Wells. Bernays wrote Crystallizing Public Opinion (1928), Propaganda (1928), and The Engineering of Consent (1955). In Propaganda, Bernays wrote: “As civilization becomes more complex, and as the need for invisible government has been increasingly demonstrated, the technical means have been invented and developed by which public opinion may be regimented. With printing press and newspaper, the telephone, telegraph, radio and airplanes, ideas can be spread rapidly, and even simultaneously, across the whole of America. “We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. What ever attitude one chooses to take toward this condition, it remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by a relatively small number of persons, a trifling fraction of our hundred and twenty million, who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, and who harness social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world.” Far from disapproving of this manipulation, Bernays felt that it was vital for the masses to be controlled by propaganda: “The conscious and intelligent manipulation of organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in a democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power in our country.” Bernays also participated in the crafting of American psychological warfare programs. It is hardly surprising that he was put in charge of the CBS communications network in its early days. The single factor that most enables control of the media and its use as a tool of propaganda is monopolistic ownership. Ninety-eight percent of the 1,700 daily newspapers in America are owned by fewer than 15 corporations, with Time, Inc. taking in about 40% of the total revenues. The three major TV networks, ABC, CBS, and NBC still have the majority of the television watching audience.1 Monopolistic ownership is reinforced through additional interlocking controls and failsafe systems. These include the membership of media bosses and workers in such conclaves as the Council on Foreign Relations; Skull & Bones; the Trilateral Commission; and the Bilderbergers, among other groups. Many of the members of these organizations hold memberships in other related elitist social, political, and business groups, insuring coherent action amongst these ruling classmates. Membership in one or more of these groups is virtually required to obtain entree to the highest levels of success in the Western world. One is reminded of the statement of ex-CIA director William Colby, although he was speaking specifically of the American intelligence community: “Socially as well as professionally they cliqued together, forming a sealed fraternity. They ate together at their own special favorite restaurants; they partied almost only among themselves; their families drifted to each other, so their defenses did not always have to be up. In this way they increasingly separated themselves from the ordinary world and developed a rather skewed view of that world. Their own dedicated double life became the proper norm, and they looked down on the life of the rest of the citizenry.”2 According to author G. William Domhoff in The Higher Circles: “[T]he power elite have created and developed that wonderful field of public relations on an incredible scale. Some of the early practitioners of this art helped scrub up the images of the ‘Robber Barons’ families; others specialized in the corporate image and the corporate conscience. Functionally speaking, the public relations departments of large corporations, in conjunction with the giant public relations firms that service many corporations, have become the early warning system of the upper class, picking up and countering the slightest remark or publication that makes funny lines on their sensitive radar. Thanks to them public opinion is well-monitored, with an assist of course from the alert social scientists in certain university institutes financed by the big corporations and foundations. Wayward opinions, once detected, are duly corrected by a barrage of printed matter and public pronouncements...”3 Intelligence agency penetration of the media began at the same time as the forming of the American media conglomerates in the first half of this century. One of the first and most successful control operations of the media was launched in 1919 with the creation of RCA by Westinghouse, Morgan Guaranty and Trust, General Electric, and the United Fruit Company. In 1929 David Sarnoff, a close associate of Tavistock, was appointed head of RCA. Shortly afterward, British Intelligence set up the “Black Chamber” intelligence operation in the RCA building in New York, under the direction of Sir William Stephenson (Code name: “Intrepid”) and General Marlborough Churchill, a relative of Winston Churchill. General Churchill would later be instrumental in founding the Macy Organization, which would be used as a funding conduit for CIA MKULTRA mind control operations. All three major American television networks were offspring of RCA.4 The information war entered a new realm of effectiveness in the 1930s when the Rockefeller Foundation launched “secret psychological war projects” to shape public opinion. According to Christopher Simpson, author of Science of Coercion: “[They were] a remarkably tight circle of men and women who shared several important conceptions about mass communications research. They regarded mass communication as a tool for social management and as a weapon in social conflict, and they expressed common assumptions concerning the usefulness of quantitative research—particularly experimental and quasi-experimental effects research, opinion surveys, and quantitative content analysis as a means of illuminating what communication ‘is’ and improving its application to social management.”5 At about the same time that the Rockefeller’s media manipulation programs went into overdrive, the Office of Strategic Services and the Office of War Information began recruiting “the best and the brightest” from American intelligentsia for initiation into the ranks of spookdom, as well as inserting their agents into powerful positions in the mass media, in politics, and in the universities. A survey of Office of War Information alumni working in the media in the early 1950s included: “The publishers of Time, Look, Fortune and several dailies; editors of such magazines as Holiday, Coronet, Parade, and the Saturday Review, editors of the Denver Post, New Orleans Times-Picayune, and others; the heads of the Viking Press, Harper & Brothers, and Farr, Strauss and Young; two Hollywood Oscar winners; a two-time Pulitzer prize winner; the board chairman of CBS and a dozen key network executives; President Eisenhower’s chief speech writer; the editor of Reader’s Digest international editions; at least six partners of large advertising agencies; and a dozen noted social scientists...chief of the U.S. government’s overt psychological warfare effort from 1950 to 1952 and later dean of the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism and founder of the Columbia Journalism Review.”6 During the 1950s American mass media interlocked directly with the CIA, the Agency feeding information to journalists in exchange for their own intelligence developed domestically and abroad. Reporters were employed by the CIA to deliver communiques as well as money to contacts, and to tow the Agency line in their own dispatches. The CIA even ran a training program teaching reporting skills to agents. It is virtually impossible to determine the exact number of American journalists who are currently on the CIA or other intelligence agency payrolls—much less who are informally slipped information—but in 1977 Carl Bernstein, in an article for Rolling Stone, guessed the number at that time to be about 400. • Bernstein noted a longstanding relationship of the Agency with the CBS network, and former CIA director Allen Dulles’ friendship with CBS’ president, CFR member William Paley. The president of CBS News from 1954 to 1961, CFR member Sig Mickelson, acted as Paley’s liaison with the CIA, using a direct telephone line that bypassed the network switchboard and connected directly with the Agency. The chief directors and news anchors of CBS have also been CIA-connected, according to Bernstein. The journalist wrote that, “Over the years the [CBS] network provided cover for CIA employees, including at least one well-known foreign correspondent and several stringers; it supplied outtakes of news film to the CIA; established a formal channel of communications between the Washington bureau chief and the agency, and allowed reports by CBS correspondents...to be routinely monitored by the CIA.” • The New York Times and its publisher, CFR member Arthur Hays Sulzberger, frequently liased with the CIA, providing cover for at least ten CIA agents during the 1950s and 60s. • The publisher of The Washington Post, CFR member Katherine Graham, was close friends with CIA directors Dulles and Casey, and employed a number of reporters who worked with the CIA. • Henry Luce, the founder of Time and Life, was a friend of CIA Director Allen Dulles, and looked the other way when some of his reporters attended CIA briefings. C.D. Jackson, a leading exec at Time-Life lived a double life as a mover and shaker in American psychological warfare efforts. • According to CIA files, ABC news was used as a cover by agents during the 1960s. • Bernstein also noted the following news organizations as having also provided cover for CIA agents: the New York Herald-Tribune, the Saturday Evening Post, Scripps-Howard Newspapers, Hearst Newspapers, the Associated Press, United Press International, the Mutual Broadcasting System, Reuters and the Miami Herald. • Another means of CIA control over the media is through outright ownership. The New York Times in 1997 reported that the CIA owned more than fifty radio stations, wire services, magazines, and newspapers, with the majority of them being overseas. Many foreign news agencies were also infiltrated with CIA agents, and more than one thousand books that had been subsidized or produced outright by the CIA had been put in print by American publishers. Given these extensive involvements, would it be too much to venture that the American media, that bastion of freedom and independence, holds CIA credentials?7 Another means of influencing public opinion has been through the Advertising Council, a tax-exempt non-governmental agency whose membership is heavily weighted with members of the Council on Foreign Relations. Among the projects that the Advertising Council has furthered are ones aimed at the creation of a one world government, including “World Peace Through World Law” and various “public service announcements” promoting the United Nations. A technique for influencing public opinion is polling organizations which have demonstrably been shown to slant their public opinion questions in order to achieve desired results, but which may also be engaged in outright deception and alteration of statistics in the service of whomever is paying them. During the recent bloody American intervention in Yugoslavia public opinion pollsters placed approval of the war by the public at 73 percent, while an informal poll that I and some friends conducted determined exactly the opposite, that only one-third of Americans supported the bombing. I know that we are not lying. Probably the most infamous example of media manipulation took place after the assassination of American President John F. Kennedy. A CIA memorandum dated April 1, 1967 was issued on the use of Agency “assets” in the media in “Countering Criticism of the Warren Report” on the assassination of John F. Kennedy, a murder that many researchers have in fact laid at the doorstep of American intelligence itself. Among the ways to “answer and refute” those critical of the Warren Whitewash the CIA suggested, were a variety of ploys including saying that a critic’s research was faulty, that they had a financial interest in writing negatively on the Warren Report, and that “Conspiracy on the large scale often suggested would be impossible to conceal.” Of course, this was in the horse-and-buggy days before the expediency of calling someone a “conspiracy nut” existed.8 Within the last year another example of media manipulation may have saved President Bill Clinton from impeachment, due to an incident that has come to be known as “Rapegate.” During the impeachment trial of Clinton, Juanita Broaddrick, referred to as “Jane Doe #5” in the Starr Report, was interviewed at length by NBC correspondent Lisa Meyers. Broaddrick alleged that in 1981 Bill Clinton had raped her in an Arkansas motel room when she had been working for his campaign for governorship. This is not an incredible allegation, since Clinton has been accused of rape and forcing his sexual attentions on women on numerous occasions in the past, the first time that we know of during his studies at Oxford University in England in the 1960s. There were several reliable witnesses to corroborate Broaddrick’s story, including a nurse who treated her for injuries inflicted during the alleged rape. NBC completed the interview with Broaddrick prior to the end of the impeachment trial, but the network suppressed airing the story until the trial was over, after the story had been picked up by the Wall Street Journal, and other media outlets. Thus Congress and the American public were prevented from making a fully informed decision about the suitability of Clinton as president. Media management does not always have to be so dramatic. Simple distraction—the “circuses” part of the historic “bread and circuses” formula—is another effective technique. The dissemination of entertainment—“popular culture”—and useless factoids has channeled public attention away from far more important issues such as poverty, human rights abuses, the equitable distribution of the wealth of the world, true political representation for the vast majority of humans—and media control by the elite. This is one of the main functions of the television, which is in essence a propaganda box spewing out the “positive” drug-like reinforcements of sex, violence, and simulated social interaction. As an example of distraction by the media, the political struggle of black Americans for economic and political wellbeing has been effectively derailed by the safe-to-the-Establishment energetics of “gangsta rap” culture, drugs, and sports, preparing black youth to take their place in the world as drug addicts and latterday Steppin’ Fetchits struggling in grinding McPoverty. Journalist John Swinton—one of the most respected of the breed at the time—described the situation succinctly when he gave a toast at the New York Press Club in 1953. Swinton said, “There is no such thing at this date of the world’s history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. “The business of journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know i

“Many of the beams were twisted and distorted as though made of rubber or wax. Some beams were over 6 [inches] thick and bent like pretzels. Structural engineers, who are experts in steel structures that have suffered earthquakes and explosions claimed to have seen nothing like this before and could not imagine the kind of pressure and heat required to do this kind of damage.” https://911conspiracy.wordpress.com/2010/01/24/molten-steel-extreme-temperatures-at-wtc/

"..surprisingly so little rubble." Why? Sure the towers were only half occupied, but.. Evidence of extreme ruin: https://911conspiracy.wordpress.com/2010/01/24/molten-steel-extreme-temperatures-at-wtc/ - by Anthony Lawson and Nick Irving -- watch "9/11: The Towers of Dust" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPJUP-Ry7d0 '120 Dumptrucks' of Debris, Priority Info for Press Conference "We were able to move 120 dumptrucks out of the city last night, which will give you a sense of the work that was done overnight. So, some of the debris has already been removed." - Mayor Rudy Giuliani, 9/12 press conference seen on NBC LIVE at 9:52 a.m. Peter Tully of Tully Construction, while speaking about the operation as a whole, not his firm alone: "We had 75 trucks leaving a day during the first few days." (Debra K. Rubin and Gary Tulacz, with Thomas F. Armistead, "Crews Mobilize To Remove Debris But Painstaking Work Takes Toll," Engineering News Record, 9/24/2001. Online at http://old.911digitalarchive.org )

What happened to the Twin Towers? Source notes in App. 1 of the 2017 free e-book at https://ia800201.us.archive.org/1/items/911DebrisAnInvestigationOfGroundZero/9-11_Debris_An_Investigation_of_Ground_Zero_by_Matt_Nelson.pdf Evidence for extreme ruin: https://911conspiracy.wordpress.com/2010/01/24/molten-steel-extreme-temperatures-at-wtc/ At Fresh Kills Landfill, debris sorting site, NYPD Deputy Inspector and lead investigator on-site (working with FBI), James Luongo, when asked if there were one particular artifact of interest, replied: "I think the lack of artifacts stands out to me quite a bit. I think the fact that I haven't seen a door, I haven't seen a phone, I haven't seen a computer. I haven't seen a doorknob. I think that stands out." - "Relics from the Rubble" This misunderstood pulverization and melting was the consequence of something other than gravity and jet fuel, it would seem. Demolition. quote: "In no instance did NIST report that steel in the WTC towers melted due to the fires. The melting point of steel is about 1,500 degrees Celsius (2,800 degrees Fahrenheit). Normal building fires and hydrocarbon (e.g., jet fuel) fires generate temperatures up to about 1,100 degrees Celsius (2,000 degrees Fahrenheit). NIST reported maximum upper layer air temperatures of about 1,000 degrees Celsius (1,800 degrees Fahrenheit) in the WTC towers (for example, see NCSTAR 1, Figure 6-36)." https://www.nist.gov/world-trade-center-investigation quote: "Think of the thousands of file cabinets, computers, and telephones in those towers - I never saw one - everything was pulverized,' he said. 'Everything that was above grade - above the 6th and 7th floor - disintegrated...it was like an explosion." - Peter Tully of Tully Construction, contractor responsible for the eastern quadrant of the pile-- the South Tower, WTC 4 and 5, and underground text source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnnXTrw88P4

SGT report micro-doc In the years leading up to 9/11, a group of "artists" were living in the north tower. Their temporary 'construction' passes gave them full access to the entire WTC complex. methodical deception: https://www.methodicaldeception.com/resources - https://www.gelitin.net/projects/b-thing/ - https://www.antiwar.com/rep/DEA_Report_redactedxx.pdf - https://www.npr.org/transcripts/4785888 - http://www.antiwar.com/rep2/MemorandumtotheCommissionandSelectCommitteesbold.pdf - http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?geopolitics_and_9%2F11=israel&timeline=complete_911_timeline https://www.littelfuse.com/products/fuse-blocks-fuseholders-and-fuse-accessories/dead-front-fuse-holders/powr-busbar/bb18.aspx https://www.winterwatch.net/2021/09/world-trade-centers-infamous-91st-floor-israeli-art-student-project-2/

“The greatest conspiracies are not actually hidden, just fragmented into different pieces, like a puzzle, right before our eyes.” — Judith Morant https://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wrh_9-11_index.php http://911truthnews.com/ray-mcgovern-bloodied-and-arrested-at-clinton-speech/ https://covertactionmagazine.com/2021/09/11/the-twenty-year-shadow-of-9-11-u-s-complicity-in-the-terror-spectacle-and-the-urgent-need-to-end-it/ https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/12768362.five-israelis-were-seen-filming-as-jet-liners-ploughed-into-the-twin-towers-on-september-11-2001/ https://www.winterwatch.net/2021/09/world-trade-centers-infamous-91st-floor-israeli-art-student-project-2/

“If the American people ever found out the truth, Israel would be wiped off the map” Dr. Alan Sabrosky source: https://rumble.com/v17awck-if-americans-new-that-israel-did-9-11-it-would-be-wiped-off-the-planet.html

Known worldwide as “Miracle Maker”, Dr. Roy Martina M.D. is a Holistic Health Expert & leader in the field of Transformational Change and Brain Training. He has over 30 years experience in his field and has taught more than 250,000 people from the public to specialists and scholars about the most innovative methods, techniques, and practices that lead not only to health and wellness, but transform lives fundamentally. Learn more about Dr. Roy Martina: https://quantummultiverse.world/ https://www.roymartina.com/ source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KLDntmx_fA

Drs. Karen Hamaker-Zondag is an internationally renowned speaker in the field of astrology and Jungian psychology. Karen has written more than 30 books and writes articles and columns for various magazines. She received the prestigious Regulus Award for her work in the field of astrology education. “Zbigniew Brzeziński's book Between Two Ages explains the world will develop towards a Technological Marxist society with a One World Government as final stage.” “David Rockefeller loved the book and they initiate the Trilateral Commission to implement this One World Government.” “Technocrats see human beings as Dogs of Pavlov” “For 2,500 years (Plato and Aristotle) there is a polarity between matter and spirit, in this time those who dive deep into matter arrive at the quantum level and conclude that there is metaphysics in science.” (The books The Tao of Physics and Dancing Wu Li Masters) “We can not go on with a society holding a paradigm that keeps matter and spirit separate, it's going to come together in this time, this is the birth of the merging between Feminine and Masculine, between spirit and matter.” “We have to shift to a holistic approach.” source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dxuMEonzUI _____________________________________ website Karen Hamaker-Zondag: https://www.karenhamakerzondag.com Trilateral Commission: https://togetherwewin.com/new-world-order/secret-societies/trilateral-commission/ The importance of Jungian shadow work: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/what-is-shadow-work

Mark Passio joins The Alex Jones Show to de-occult the secret of secrets behind the globalist struggle for power. The COVID vaccine campaign “is nothing more than a new eugenics operation being waged against humanity to degrade and eventually wipe out the human immune system and eventually thin the population,” “And I think they’ve gotten a lot of people on that hook, unfortunately, and a lot of people are going to suffer as a result of buying into their propaganda and taking those poison shots.” https://www.whatonearthishappening.com/news/826-mark-interviewed-by-alex-jones-on-infowars-october-7-2022 https://www.infowars.com/posts/must-watch-learn-the-secret-of-secrets-with-mark-passio/ https://rumble.com/c/markpassio

The Matrix Trilogy Decoded, given at the first Free Your Mind 2 fundraiser in Philadelphia, in which Mark decodes the spiritual allegory contained within The Matrix movies. This presentation describes many of the key elements from the trilogy and how they relate to the world we live in today. Mark Passio is insightful and successfully lays out the meanings of the Matrix story in clear details. Recorded September 15, 2012 by Tim Smith at Liberties Pub, Philadelphia, PA. Source: https://odysee.com/@woeih:e/Matrix-Trilogy-Decoded:e?r=3HGctJcNbS3nZSZhaiwrqCcQn2WpjDVy https://www.markpassio.com/news/343-watch-mark-s-presentation-the-matrix-trilogy-decoded Mark Passio WOEIH https://www.whatonearthishappening.com - Notes/condensation by Seth Bailin https://www.sethbailin.com/uploads/1/0/1/9/101901806/the_matrix_trilogy_decoded.pdf

Why did large swaths of society suddenly buy into masking toddlers or restricting people from visiting their loved ones, even as they lay on their deathbeds? Jan Jekielek sat down with Mattias Desmet, a professor of clinical psychology and author of “The Psychology of Totalitarianism.” Desmet is one of the world’s leading experts on the phenomenon known as “mass formation,” which can occur when people are isolated from one another and free-floating anxiety is prevalent. “The real reason why they buy into the narrative is always because it leads to this new social bond, because it frees them from their anxiety, because it enables them to direct their frustration and aggression at something,” Desmet says. source: https://rumble.com/v18s60r-mattias-desmet-mass-formation-hypnosis-and-the-rise-of-technocratic-totalit.html

Voice for Science and Solidarity - October 11, 2022 https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/ Transcript: Hello everyone. My name is Geert Vanden Bossche. I'm a seasoned vaccinologist with background in veterinary medicine, in biology, immunology, microbial diseases. I have been sending out video messages before and this is probably the last one I'm going to do. I will still write articles, I will still do interviews. But this is my last video message. And the reason why I'm sending out this video message is because I can no longer stand it. For me, it has become unbearable to see how our health authorities, our experts and governments are still trying to make people believe that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe and that they will be able to control the pandemic. In this presentation I made a few PowerPoint slides. I will show you that, as I have already been saying in the past, this is an unbelievable blunder. It is an insult to the science. It is unbelievable how scientists can still support this kind of strategy, whereas there is overwhelming evidence that the mass vaccination and the upcoming or updated omicron vaccination will just make things much, much worse. So, this news is sobering, but I have no choice. I have to share it because we have a passion for the truth and we believe that the truth will prevail. But let me share my screen to show you some slides that I have been presenting to, again, trying to make my case or trying to make the case. So what I'm saying in this first slide is that it is five past twelve. In fact, we are already too late to intervene in a way that could prevent humanitarian crisis. It is really my last and desperate call for action as Omicron is now causing a fast and large-scale immune escape in vaccines. So, this is simply accelerating. Immune escape is accelerating. It is really escalating and for me it is really unbelievable. I cannot understand how it is possible that all these researchers that are studying these mutations and this mutational escape of the virus are not ringing the alarm bell. So I don't know, I really don't know. Is it stupidity or is it really willful blindness? The scientists who are analyzing all these new mutations that are simply accumulating, we have seen them accumulating even over the last days, over the last weeks. For the scientists, this doesn't seem to be a reason for panic really. I mean, they see this fulminant immune escape as in fact a great opportunity for making publications. So I call them the variant spotters. Seems like they are enjoying this because this is now providing so much food for publications in peer review journals. And it is really about molecular stamp collection, identifying all these mutations, doing the deep mutational scanning, the neutralization assays, the ACE2 binding essays. All this to study the impact of amino acid substitutions, mutations, recombinations on the receptor binding affinity (this is a proxy for infectiousness) and to see how these changes can escape from the potentially neutralizing antibodies. But we can do an analysis of course, on sera, sera from people who got vaccinated a single time, or triple vaccinated, who got boosted, who got first infected and then vaccinated, who got first vaccinated and then had breakthrough infections, you name it. And of course, they have whole series of monoclonals that they can test and see to what the extent the virus can resist these monoclonal neutralizing antibodies, or even the antibody drug cocktails. And I think if you do all this, given the fact that we are on the brink of a humanitarian crisis, and you do all things by matter of surveillance and just to document and just to try to understand what happened without any predictive value, I think this is a complete nonsense. It is a waste of time. When humanity is on the brink of humanitarian crisis, we need to gather information that is able to predict with a high level of fidelity, with a high level of confidence what is going to happen. And they are not able to do this simply because they don't see the forest for the trees. And why is this? And here comes the thing. It is simply because they don't understand the underlying immune interaction between the virus and the immune system. They all agree that the convergent evolution of what they call themselves worrisome variants and the resulting immune escape, that all this is due to immune selection pressure that is placed on the virus. But on the other hand, none of these researchers dares to mention that this huge immune selection pressure that they're finding out about, and that has become more and more obvious as the vaccine coverage rates were growing, that this could be due maybe to the mass vaccination, and that the changes to the mutational landscape are now only escalating. All this is very, very clear to them. But nobody dares to mention that this huge immune selection pressure has to do with the mass vaccination. I cannot believe this. And it's even worse: On the contrary, these scientists who are excelling in what I call molecular stamp collection, these are the guys who are now also advocating for the development of broad-spectrum vaccines and antibody drugs. So continuation, please, with the vaccine program. And so, when I'm talking about the molecular stamp collection, I'm showing here a graph. They like to do representations, cartographic representations, where you see, of course, all the different variants, the family tree, genealogy tree, and then also the kind of monoclonals that are resistant to the BA2, BA4, -5 derived descendants of those variants, et cetera, et cetera. And you can expand this like almost every week, we have additional variants that spread faster, that are more resistant to the neutralizing antibodies, you name it. So, the stamp collection is eternal. And to an extent that we see now in many publications how people are documenting this and with all the ramifications from the different predecessor strains or variants, and we have to document all the different mutations in the amino acids and where you then see how they are classified as different sublineages, subvariants, et cetera, et cetera. And as a matter of fact, some people are already making fun of this because, you know, they want to put names on all these variants. Initially we had the alpha, Gamma, delta, etc. So why not continue? Why not continue this kind of Greek names or nicknames as some people have been doing. So, this is a kind of list of some of the most recent variants. And I've highlighted these two in yellow because they are right now (but tomorrow it could be just a different situation) the two strains, or variants I should say, that grow fast, grow faster than the others and that spread more rapidly and that are also the most resistant towards the neutralizing antibodies. So, it's a BQ.1.1 and the XBB. The latter is even a recombination of two already existing subvariants. So, it's a lot of fun doing the stamp collection, obviously. But as I was saying, what does it bring us in terms of predictive value and where is this circus going to end? And here comes the key name, which is immune refocusing. You hear about imprinting and memory cells that get reactivated, etc. But I will tell you that none of these molecular epidemiologists or these variant watchers are really understanding the immunology that is now driving the fulminant expansion of these immune escape variants. So, I will try to explain you what is the driving force behind this. And I can already tell you it's called immune refocusing. And immune refocusing, before I explain the mechanism, the effect of immune refocusing is that it expedites immune escape in vaccines. So, it accelerates it. And how does it do that? It does that by reorienting the immune response to antigens or part of antigens which we sometimes call epitopes, reorienting the immune response to antigens that basically recall previously vaccine primed antibodies that have lower neutralizing capacity. So in fact, the new refocusing is redirecting the new response to antigens that have a poor potential of inducing neutralizing antibodies. So how does that work? Well, let me first tell you when this happens. When does this happen? This happens when an immune system is confronted with an antigen in the presence of preexisting antibodies against a similar antigen that is however not identical. That is one possibility. And the nicest example of that one is of course when we get breakthrough infections ... because when we have breakthrough infections, very clearly the preexisting antibodies were unable to prevent the new variant (so the new antigen) from causing an infection or even causing disease. So very clearly the preexisting antibodies are not recognizing the new antigen. So the immune system is confronting an antigen in the presence of preexisting antibodies that are not directed against that new antigen, but that are directed against a kind of similar antigen, namely for example, the Wuhan spike protein in the vaccine. In another situation, and it's very similar, the immune system is confronted with an antigen that has two different forms. So it is in fact confronted with an antigen in the presence of antibodies that are directed against a different form of the same spike antigen. I don't know whether this has been proven, but it's very likely that this could be the case when the spike protein is produced by mRNA vaccines if the first spike protein comes in a different conformation, for example in a monomeric form; in that case, antibodies will be built against this monomeric form and then those antibodies will recognize the full-fledged spike protein in the circulation which however is trimeric. So you see it's the same antigen but a different form. Antibodies have been formed against a monomeric spike and then those antibodies are confronted with the same antigen as a spike protein which has a different conformational state, namely the trimeric form. Especially for coronaviruses there have been lots of publications about, the transport and the presentation in virus-infected cells of the monomeric spike protein versus the trimeric. But apparently when it comes to mRNA vaccines and production of the spike protein in our own body cells, this doesn't seem to be important (to investigate). But it is likely that this happens especially with mRNA vaccines that first of all antibodies get elicited against the monomeric spike protein and those are of course not the antibodies that optimally recognize the circulating spike protein in the blood. So, what happens with immune refocusing? Well, in regard of immune refocusing, I’m just going to present the example of a breakthrough infection, that was the first case I was talking about. Well, obviously the pre-existing antibodies from the vaccine do not recognize very well the new antigen. This is the variant, the antigen of the variant that caused a breakthrough infection. So, these antibodies cannot neutralize the virus, this is the spike protein with different epitopes, but it can of course bind to that epitope. And by binding to this epitope, this preexisting vaccinal antibodies can hide this epitope. What happens when it hides this epitope is that other epitopes will benefit from that. In a sense, these other epitopes were previously outcompeted by these stronger neutralizing epitopes that have now been masked by the preexisting antibodies. So that is why we call these epitopes ‘subdominant’. They are most likely less exposed to the immune system than the stronger neutralizing antibodies. So by hiding the stronger neutralizing epitopes, the subdominant epitopes now gain, immunologically speaking, a competitive advantage. However, these less exposed domains of spike are less potent inducers of neutralizing antibodies. Now, in case somebody has been vaccinated and that is what we are talking about in case of breakthrough infections, , these subdominant epitopes now gain a competitive advantage and will be able to recall previously primed B memory cells that are producing antibodies which have a lower neutralizing capacity. So the subdominant epitopes that gain a competitive advantage because the strongest neutralizing epitopes have now been hidden by the existing preexisting vaccinational antibodies, are now going to be able to recall in a pre-primed, i.e., a vaccine-primed individual, previously primed antibodies or memory cells that are producing antibodies that have less neutralizing capacity. That is what I'm calling here the ‘hidden antigenic sin’. Why hidden? Because they are not promoting the stimulation, so to say, of the original vaccinal antibodies, despite reinfection. No, they are eliciting antibodies that were not previously elicited or that were only elicited in very, very low quantities because the antigens that were inducing them were dominated and outcompeted by the stronger neutralizing epitopes. So now we get to a situation where these subdominant epitopes are recalling antibodies with less neutralizing capacity. Of course, because these antibodies have now lower neutralizing capacity, they can put this epitope under huge immune pressure. And because of that huge immune pressure that these antibodies with low neutralizing capacity exert on this subdominant epitopes immune escape will be promoted. It will promote natural selection of mutations of this epitope that are capable of escaping those antibodies. And of course, when these new mutants or new variants are now going to reinfect people, one will have a kind of similar situation as the one that I described above, where this preexisting antibodies (see arrow: these are now the preexisting antibodies) do not recognize very well this mutated epitope and they will hide it. And by hiding it, they will now favor the immunogenicity of other epitopes that have even lower potency to induce neutralizing antibodies. And because these epitopes that have now lower potential capacity to induce neutralizing antibodies, they are of course going to be able to recall memory B cells that secrete antibodies that have even lower neutralizing capacity. Again, hidden antigenic sin. And because this lower neutralization capacity will exert huge pressure immune pressure on this epitope, this epitope will now easily evade these antibodies and mutations will be selected that can overcome the immune pressure exerted by these antibodies. And it continues, of course, like this. Because, again, now the situation is that these preexisting antibodies will not well recognize yet another antigen with even lower neutralizing capacity. And this will lead in fact to a situation where breakthrough infections are causing an increased proportion of poorly neutralizing to even non neutralizing antibodies. And that is the system that will expedite and accelerate immune escape as never seen before. So, what is the conclusion of this? Well, in fact, the conclusion, if you think about this, is that the emerging omicron variants, by virtue of causing breakthrough infections, are putting themselves under growing immune pressure because they are recalling vaccine-induced antibodies with decreasing neutralizing capacity. So, the Omicron variants themselves are eliciting immune responses by virtue of recalling vaccine-induced antibodies with decreasing neutralizing incapacity. The Omicron variants are themselves eliciting immune responses that will put immune pressure on the very variant that has caused the recall of these immune responses with low neutralizing capacity. So, you can already imagine that when these Omicron variants circulate and you get these breakthrough infections over and over again, that this will lead to a vicious circle which is going to escalate the rate of immune escape. It already explains, of course, why also updated vaccines, so to say adapted to Omicron, are a complete nonsense. This is an insult to the science. How can you be so stupid? It can only be if you have no clue about this mechanism of immune refocusing. And there are now many, many publications that describe the evolution of how the immune response is getting enriched in poorly neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibodies. And all of these data are completely compatible with this theory of immune refocusing and hidden antigenic sin. So, because of that, we are seeing now converging receptor-binding domain mutations, so, mutations in the receptor binding domain that are now even enhancing the infectiousness of the virus. So, you first have poorly neutralizing antibodies that are promoted, so to say, or that are recalled, then they are less and less neutralizing, even non-neutralizing. And at the end, what is going on right now as we speak, is that we see in all these variants converging mutations in the receptor-binding domain that are now even enabling enhanced infectiousness of the virus. These are typically the mutations that we now see that provided strains like the gamma and delta variant with enhanced infectiousness. So, as I was saying, it is a complete nonsense. And even the idea of the updated Omicron vaccines is just going to make things much, much worse for the reasons that I was sharing with you: the immune refocusing. So I cannot believe this, that there are professors, leaders of institutes for molecular biology, genetics, et cetera, et cetera who come up with the type of statements shown in this slide. And when I see their argumentation or their reasoning, what could possibly be the pluses and the minuses, the pros and cons of these Omicron-adapted vaccines, these updated vaccines, I mean, this is a shame. None of this has anything to do with the science. This is not a scientific rational. There is no immunology in this. I mean, this is just, you know, the type of things they shared on Twitter, on all kinds of platforms and it is a complete nonsense. How can somebody, even being a professor, not understand the immune biology of the virus and start to make these kind of statements while making people believe that they are the experts and that what they are saying is something that is completely compatible in fact, with what is published in the literature. It is not! I mean, this is completely worthless. So what will be the consequences now of this enhanced immune escape in vaccines, how will these consequences of this enhanced immune escape evolve? And I would say to the fact checkers, please wait. If you want to vilify me or ridicule me, that's fine. But just wait for the next few weeks or months to see what is happening because I am going to predict what is happening. I'm going to tell you what is going to happen because I do understand what is the driving force behind this fulminant explosion of Sars-Covid-2 variants that we are observing right now. This was the previous slide where I was saying this is now promoting receptor-binding domain mutations, enabling enhanced infectiousness. So we are now ending up with variants that are not only exhibiting enhanced resistance to neutralizing antibodies, it's not just neutralizing antibodies against the receptor-binding domain, but even to the epitopes within the N-terminal domain. And so this neutralization-resistant, more infectious variants are now triggering stimulation of low affinity, non-neutralizing polyreactive antibodies. And I'm writing an article where I expand on this and discuss this in more detail. But basically these are the non-neutralizing polyreactive antibodies that are now putting suboptimal humoral pressure, immune pressure on viral virulence. So in other words, these are the non- neutralizing polyreactive antibodies that are so far still protecting vaccinees from severe disease, but they cannot protect them from disease, only from severe disease. They are putting tremendous pressure on viral virulence. And there is no doubt that the virus, as it has done all the time along, will also overcome yet another humoral immune pressure. For a virus this is just another humoral immune pressure as it has been seeing humoral immune pressures all along and has overcome them all along. So if that happens, at that moment we will see that immune escape will cause what we call ‘antibody dependent – (because it's depending on those antibodies)- enhancement of severe disease’. And that is going to be a real catastrophe. If you look at the COVID-19 hospitalizations and you compare the unvaccinated versus the vaccinated. So, at some point the hospitalizations for the unvaccinated were in higher numbers than for the vaccinated. I mean, this evaluation has never been fair because I always the unvaccinated, they needed hospitalization because of underlying diseases and those underlying diseases were predisposing them of course to Covid-19 whereas the vaccinated, they needed hospitalization because of the vaccination, because of the side effects but because of the vaccination they were of course also protected against severe disease. So, it was never fair to compare unvaccinated and vaccinated just within hospitalized population. But nevertheless, so what we will see is that, and it is going on already, the numbers of the (hospitalized) unvaccinated will drop and will continue to drop, whereas for the (hospitalized) vaccinated, the number of hospitalizations will strongly increase (and it's already starting to increase), but it will have an exponential course. And of course people say, yeah, that's logical because most of the people are vaccinated. So, there's more people landing in hospitals that have severe disease. Oh, wait a minute, we can do also the ratios, we can do the ratio of hospitalizations in the unvaccinated versus the vaccinated, right? And if we build that ratio and then we compare how this ratio is changing for example between T2 versus T1, i.e., an earlier time point. Well what we will see is that we will have a very dramatic decrease in this ratio, indicating -again that the rate of hospitalization for severe disease in the vaccinated will dramatically increase; we will be able to follow this evolution very easily. So what does it mean in fact for vaccinees? Well first of all we have already seen that they have enhanced susceptibility to infection and we first see this of course with the elderly, the people who have been vaccinated first, who have gotten all their booster shots: third, the fourth, the fifth, you name it. What we will see thereafter, and this is starting to begin right now, is that we will see enhanced susceptibility to COVID-19 disease, not whatever other disease but COVID-19 disease. Of course first in the elderly and then what will follow is enhanced susceptibility of these vaccinees to severe C-19 disease. And so how this will translate practically speaking is that vaccinees who get infected will get C-19 disease but upon reinfection the very same vaccinees will now get severe disease. So, the situation will dramatically deteriorate. And you don't hear me saying that this will be the case for all of the vaccinees because some vaccinees have gotten much more injections, for example the elderly, than others. Some may have been injected with placebo, who knows? Others have been injected with mRNA vaccines where the mRNA got already largely degraded, others were simply maybe non-responders and so on. But this will definitely be a very clear trend and so I'm saying it's 5 past 12 in the highly vaccinated countries. So, this is my desperate call for taking drastic and immediate action. So, what could we do? What could we still do? Well of course I was explaining we need to avoid this immune refocusing because this is just going to throw additional fuel on the fire because this is going to escalate and accelerate the immune escape in a direction that is really very detrimental, that will end up in enhanced virulence of a highly infectious virus. So, we cannot give new booster doses like Omicron-updated booster doses. This is just going to make the situation much worse. Obviously we need to avoid vaccine breakthrough cases, breakthrough disease, because vaccine breakthrough disease is of course going to enable immune refocusing. So how can we avoid vaccine breakthrough disease? Of course, by diminishing the infection rate! When we diminish the infection rate we avoid breakthrough diseases. We will avoid recall of these less to non-neutralizing antibodies. But we need to do better. We not only need to avoid vaccine breakthrough disease. We would need to reduce the infection level to an extent that we can even avoid vaccine breakthrough infection because as soon as we will have an infection the virus will break through the innate immune response and - in previously vaccine-primed individuals- automatically recall antibodies that are completely obsolete; antibodies that have no longer neutralizing capacity. So how can we do this? Of course, the infection rate can only be reduced via chemoprophylaxis with safe and effective antivirals that on top are broadly accessible and affordable. So, I don't care which antivirals but they need to comply with those criteria. And we know that there are only very, very few drugs that have these properties that are really safe, can do the job, are effective, broadly accessible and affordable. And I tell you, I think this will need to be done in a prophylactic way. We will need to do it right now in highly vaccinated countries and start providing people massively with antivirals. And the reason I'm saying this is that preventing these vaccine breakthrough infections is almost like generating herd immunity. If we can avoid these vaccine breakthrough infections we can start to build herd immunity. And please remember: the only way, the only way to control and terminate a pandemic is by generating herd immunity. So then, how long would we need to give these antivirals? Forever? No, we would not do this because that would also have a risk of, for example, inducing (drug) resistance. We would need to do this till we have achieved full herd immunity. And so of course not everyone will take antivirals. But let's say you would reach, for example 70 or 80% of the vaccinees; then there is always a certain percentage of the population that did not get those antivirals despite the fact that they were vaccinated. Well, if we see that at a certain antiviral coverage rate in the vaccinees, we do no longer observe severe cases of COVID-19 disease, then we can reasonably conclude that we have reached herd immunity in a sense that the residual transmission rate is obviously low enough for preventing those who got vaccinated but didn't get the antivirals to not contract severe disease. Because remember, if the virus is completely resistant to any protective effect of the vaccine, then any kind of vaccine breakthrough infection would automatically lead to severe disease. So if that is no longer the case then you conclude reasonably that people who have not gotten the antivirals despite being vaccinated, that they are all of a sudden protected and then of course we can stop the antivirals in the vast majority of the remaining part of the vaccinated population. Of course, for the unvaccinated it's much easier. They have trained their natural immunity. I keep saying the unvaccinated will do better and better, will ultimately become resistant to this virus. And the people who are probably best protected against Sars-Covid-2 and all the upcoming variants are those that are unvaccinated and live in highly vaccinated countries. So, we have a choice. Really? Yes, we have a choice. Please remember only herd immunity can terminate the pandemic. So, you have the choice. You can either reduce this transmission by enhancing the virulence in the vaccinees, what the virus tends to do. If the virulence of the virus increases in the vaccinees, yeah, then of course you are going to have plenty of vaccinees who do no longer transmit. Even if they don't die, they will at least develop severe disease and, therefore, be hospitalized; they will be out of society and this will dramatically diminish the transmission rate. Do we want to let this happen given the high risk of death, of mortality, or severe morbidity? The only alternative is to provide these people with antivirals, antiviral chemoprophylaxis. These are the only two options that we have to diminish this fulminant transmission rate in the population that we see right now and that could lead to this miraculous target that was in fact the purpose of the mass vaccination campaign, which miserably failed, and which is herd immunity. So, what about the side effects and all post mortality rates in the vaccinees that we have seen have been going up? It's appalling if you see the rates and the kind of side effects, the kind of increase in excess deaths, etc. I have no words to describe it; really. It's appalling, it is unacceptable, it blows me away. But nevertheless, whether you believe me or not, I'm always saying: if one puts all these side effects and all this excess death rate together, it is still going to be peanuts compared to the kind of losses that we are going to face when the virus evolves as I'm predicting, and which I'm 200% certain of, that it will evolve in that way. And what about early treatment? Well, that is why I'm recommending to do chemoprophylaxis even before people get infected, because there is a high risk that early treatment will be ‘too little’ and that it will come ‘too late’. Why? Because I was just telling you that the virus is now evolving not only to become completely resistant to neutralizing antibodies, but also to become more infectious. It's basically collecting all these successful mutations that enabled gamma and delta, et cetera, to become more infectious. So, the infection will be so fast and since there is no protection against severe, disease anymore and that we will have antibody-dependent enhancement of severe disease, my fear is that early treatment will come too late. And what about the updated Omicron adapted vaccine? Well, I told you that in the unvaccinated it will enable immune refocusing and in the vaccinees, it will enhance it, so it will make the situation dramatically worse. Here is one of the slides that I presented at the recent Better Way conference in Vienna; it shows how I see the current situation. Two parties are obviously fighting for a bone, for the same bone; there are the underdogs, I consider myself being part of that club so to say, where you have people that have a passion for the truth, that are independent critical thinkers and that strongly believe that we as human beings are just part of a big environment with other living beings in harmony with our environment. The principle and the concept of One Health and where we have an obligation to solidarity, right? In difficult times we have to hold together. That we help each other no matter whether somebody is vaccinated or unvaccinated. And then you have the other party who is now in charge, so to say, the stakeholders of the mass vaccination and the technocracy and that are, of course heavily supported by the media and that continue to propagate the narrative and that is causing a lot of, well, I call it ‘herd’ psychosis instead of a ‘mass formation’ psychosis. Why do I call it herd psychosis? Because it nicely contrasts with herd immunity. I'm saying these two parties are fighting for the same bone where the third party, the third dog is running away with it. And so what is happening is that what will end this mass formation psychosis, the ‘herd’ psychosis, is the lack of herd immunity. The lack of herd immunity will eventually stop the herd psychosis because the lack of herd immunity will give, we call this in French 'carte blanche' to the virus. The virus, if there is no herd immunity, can do whatever it wants and will overcome the kind of ridiculous immune pressure that we are trying to put on it. It will escape. And the winning party is not going to be the technocrats, it's not, let's say, the megalomania of mankind, but it's simply the biology. And these experts, these scientists have forgotten about biology. They are blinded by technologies, whether it's for diagnostics, whether it's for surveillance, whether it's for therapeutic purposes, whether it's for preventive purposes. They have forgotten about the essentials of biology. And that is also why I'm saying, with regard to the COVID-19 battle, the country or the continent that will win is Africa. Because they will build herd immunity. So, with that, as I was saying, my desperate last video message to call on people who are in charge to still intervene in a way that we can limit the losses and the kind of humanitarian crisis that I think we are now really, really facing very closely. And so with that, I wish you, all of you, strength and courage and I sincerely hope that we will survive this humanitarian crisis in dignity, with integrity and thanks to a community spirit, as Robert Malone was also saying. Thank you. source: https://rumble.com/v1n5274-it-is-5-past-12.html https://rumble.com/c/VoiceForScienceAndSolidarity