InnerLight

Produced and presented by alternative historian Michael Tsarion, the "Origins and Oracles" series delves deeply into ancient mysteries and forbidden knowledge. In the tradition of Joseph Campbell, Michael Tsarion leaves no stone unturned in the quest for truth. Atlantis Alien Visitation And Genetic Manipulation - Michael Tsarion https://archive.org/details/atlantis-alien-visitation-and-genetic-manipulation/mode/2up • Who were the Atlanteans? Were they tutors or tyrants? • How did the phenomena of evil come into our world and into the consciousness of human beings? • Who, or what, are the "Fallen Angels?" • Is Homo Sapiens a hybrid created by beings from another galaxy? • Was the science of genetics known in ancient times? • Are you “Homo Sapiens” or “Homo Atlantis?” • What is the difference between Atlantis and Lemuria? • Are we being told the truth about our origins and destiny? • What do the Biblical terms "Immaculate Conception," "Forbidden Fruit," and "Tree of Life" refer to? • Why do some modern scientists believe that the so-called "Ice-Age" never happened? • Did Eve really cause the fall of man? • Why have women and indigenous races been slaughtered and suppressed through the centuries? • Who built the great cyclopean megaliths, and why? • Why has our technological expertise far outreached our psychological and spiritual development? • What do “Atomic” and “Nuclear” war really mean? Who, or what, are the "Reptilians?" Do they really come from outer space? • Is the “New World Order” really something new? • What is the purpose of the many "black budget" projects, like HAARP? • Who really governs from behind the thrones of government and religion? • Why are so many US Presidents “bloodline” related to Europe’s elite royal dynasties? • Why is the US really involved in wars and "Crusades" in the Middle East? • Is 2012 really the end of our world, as the Maya predicted? • What can we do to actively rid ourselves and this planet of its evil? In Program One, of the “Origins & Oracles” series, Michael Tsarion takes us on a vivid journey back to the time of the lost continents of Atlantis and Lemuria. On this journey, timeless mysteries are unraveled and explained like never before. Masses of disinformation concerning pre-history and the origins of humanity, which have duped scholars and researchers for generations, are eradicated and we are finally able to connect the dots and comprehend how the innumerable idioms of our modern world came into being. In the tradition of Immanuel Velikovsky, Zechariah Sitchin, Jordan Maxwell, Graham Hancock and Michael Cremo, Michael Tsarion investigates the true origins of mankind and throws open doors which have been sealed for many an age. Enriched with a plenitude of rare source-material, Michael’s scholarly work investigates the records of our ancient forbearers. Michael also reveals to us the secrets of his own Celtic ancestors who, behind the veil of folklore, had much to say about alien visitation, genetic manipulation, wars of the gods, the coming of evil, the Anti-Christ, and the degradation of spirit. It is doubtful whether you will watch and hear anything more lucid concerning the fascinating mysteries of occultism, genetics, Darwinism, ufology, the paranormal, the phenomena of evil, secret-society intrigue, the “New World Order” and the future the human race.

Produced and presented by alternative historian Michael Tsarion, the "Origins and Oracles" series delves deeply into ancient mysteries and forbidden knowledge. In the tradition of Joseph Campbell, Michael Tsarion leaves no stone unturned in the quest for truth. • 2012 and the "Age of Revealing" • The Destruction of Atlantis • The War of the Gods • The Genetic Manipulation of Humankind • The Fall of Man • The True Origins of Evil • The "Armageddon" Factor • The Decline of Politics and Religion • The Reasons for & Significance of the Present World Crises • The Occult History of America • The Subversion of the Spiritual Destiny of America • The Rise of the Anti-Christ (who is it?) • Why Iraq, and the “War on Terror?” • The Rising of the Nephilim • The Final Days of the Age of Pisces • What the "Prophecies" of Nostradamus Don't Tell Us • The "Photon Belt," the "Earth Grid" and the galactic alignments of the Next 10 years In Program Two, of the “Origins & Oracles” series, Michael Tsarion explains exactly why the world is in the present state of decay, and who it is that really rules from the top of the “power pyramid.” We discover that earth’s crime-soaked history has been manipulated by powerful secret societies with bloodline connections to ancient alien visitors who crossed their own DNA with that of earth’s indigenous inhabitants. According to Michael Tsarion’s astonishing thesis, some of these original “Fallen Angels” are secretly interred beneath the ground in Iraq, Afghanistan, and in other locations around the globe. These “undead” vampiristic kings of old have been feeding off the death and mayhem, the pain and fear of human beings for millennia and their servants, upon the earth’s surface, have orchestrated wars, assassinations, and a climate of perversity and debauchery to feed their dark masters soon to arise again from their unholy repose. This arising is forced due to the approach of powerful constellational alignments and the coming of an “Age of Revealing” referred to in ancient Maya texts, and in the Book of Revelations. It is of paramount importance that each and every human being discovers what these alignments will mean, what the future holds, and what the world’s ancient scriptures are warning us about. This riveting investigation into the occult history of the world will open your eyes and allow you to make sense of the agendas of government and religion, the strange preoccupations of the media, and much of what will transpire in future years. Additionally, Michael also reminds to us of the importance of cleansing the “inner temple.” He reminds us that a toxic mind creates a toxic society. It is schizoid people who inevitably create a schizogenic society, and who are responsible for raising-up the sadistic “Orwellian” regimes which prey over the good and the free. Michael delineates for us the age-old connections between mind and world, between microcosm and macrocosm, so that we are again empowered with proactive and sustainable solutions. Michael insists that we must re-learn how to put our own inner houses in order before our efforts at overcoming our inhuman adversaries can be successful. Other stratagems are merely akin to “re-arranging the furniture on the Titanic,” and have not been working. Therefore, it is time for humanity to show zero-tolerance for all the false paths and leads, and to have the truth about change.

Produced and presented by alternative historian Michael Tsarion, the "Origins and Oracles" series delves deeply into ancient mysteries and forbidden knowledge. In the tradition of Joseph Campbell, Michael Tsarion leaves no stone unturned in the quest for truth. “The women who once ruled on Earth, now seem content to be ruled by its destroyers” - Michael Tsarion • Who were the Gnostics, and what did they believe and teach? • Who created Astrology and the high arts of Hermetic Divination? • What is the "Inner Zodiac?" • Do rocks floating in space really affect our character and fate? • Why does the prohibition against making "graven images of god" come before that against killing? • Why is the female cycle connected to the heavens? • Are women superior to men? • Why do men fear and hate women? • Why have women been marginalized and massacred down through time? • What or who is "Holy Mother Church?" • Do religions and governments have occult agendas? • Why is prophecy legitimate? • Why did human beings become sedentary and begin living in artificial city environments? • What is the real drive behind technology and the Technotronic Age? • What are the solutions to the world’s crises and to the spiritual vacuity of mankind? In Program Three, of the “Origins & Oracles” series, Michael Tsarion investigates the real history of religion and reveals its Egyptian origins. In the tradition of Joseph Campbell, Michael reveals the origins of the enigmatic Book of Genesis, and the actual hidden significance of religion, yoga, magick, ritual and science. This true meaning has been concealed so that humans remain disempowered and removed from their source. Prayers go unanswered, people remain lost, and humanity heads toward the precipice of oblivion, raping the planet and fighting endlessly. We might ask if it is God or Lucifer who presides over the world, and over the minds of men. Regardless of the miasma and debauchery, the truth of man’s existence remains within the secret traditions. It is now time for ordinary people to have the facts which will make sense of their lives and beliefs. Michael specifies the forces (from within and without) which weigh us down and impede our natural rise, our advancement on all levels. In this captivating and informative presentation, Michael also delves deeply into the gender divide and exposes why it is that the elites within the orthodox religions have debarred women from assuming positions of authority. He also investigates the real reasons for the criminality of mankind, as well as for the rise of technology and science. We learn what it is that really separates man from the primates, and why man is distinguished by his penchant for sadism, cruelty and violence upon members of his own species and upon others. Additionally, we are introduced to the “Western Magical Tradition,” and to the meta-sciences employed by the Magi of old to engender psychic hygiene, moral rectitude, and spiritual empowerment. We discover the true hidden connections between the Tarot, the Zodiac, the Kabalistic “Tree of Life” and sacred Numerology.

Produced and presented by alternative historian Michael Tsarion, the "Origins and Oracles" series delves deeply into ancient mysteries and forbidden knowledge. In the tradition of Joseph Campbell, Michael Tsarion leaves no stone unturned in the quest for truth. “Government is an association of men who do violence to the rest of us” - Count Leo Tolstoy We must all face the fact that our leaders are certifiably insane, or worse - W. S. Burroughs It is a “no-brainer” for veterans within the research-community to understand that the US Government was deeply complicit in the September Eleventh tragedy. However, it has taken quite a bit of book-writing, in-depth journalism and documentary-making to get this rather simple message across to the masses of people in America and the world. Those who have so labored are to be accoladed for their revisionism and bravery. However, veterans of alternative history know that such exposure is merely the tip of the ice-berg. They know that the masses of mankind need to dig a lot deeper to know the real extent of the treachery and guile of the world’s so-called “Democratic” politicians. The roots of today’s atrocities lie in the ancient past, and in the agendas of powerful secret-societies who are moving ever nearer to their “end-game.” What lies ahead for mankind is not freedom, peace nor prosperity. Time is short, and if the human race is to end evil and survive it must first have the WHOLE TRUTH. "Solution-Think," must replace "Problem-Think." In Program Four of the “Origins & Oracles” series, Michael Tsarion conducts his own investigation into the history of the very real “New World Order,” detailing for us its founders and their real purpose. He reveals, in some depth, the magnitude of the occult agendas behind the furtherance of the draconian “New Imperialism,” and lets us see just how those arch-enemies of America have slowly and vampiristically hypnotized an entire continent’s historically-amnesiac inhabitants into selling off their sovereign power, prosperity and freedom. Using the September 11th attack as a back-drop, Michael’s investigation into unseen and sinister stratagems involves warnings regarding the future. Michael insists that it is not by chance that we have conjured such evil in our midst. Overcoming our enemy involves re-learning better ways of being, not new ways to fight. As Michael warns, there can be no victory over an evil which strengthens itself due to our futile, anti-spiritual and self-defeating rivalry. As he reminds us: “Evil does not take our power...we give it up ourselves.” Michael opens the book of the world’s secret history and focuses on the ancient European dynastic powers - the all-powerful “Black Venetians” (Guelph, Saxe Coburg Gotha, House of Hanover Dynasties), whose agents operate throughout the US, in media, healthcare, big-business, law, and politics. He covers the English secret organizations, such as the Rhodes “Round Table” groups, the “Club of the Isles,” the “Fabians“ and the Tavistock Institute. He also deals with their lieutenant orgs in the US, namely the “Illuminati,” the Scottish Rite Freemasons, the corrupt Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. Importantly, Michael’s research indicates that these bastions, and their controllers, are motivated by more than simple physical domination of the earth. Although most under-informed researchers believe the machinations of political and religious elites to be motivated by simple greed and power-mania, Michael shows us that there are far more sinister reasons for the policies that lead our world toward the precipices of want and tragedy. We find out the real reasons why the vanguard of the West is back in the Middle East, and why our world has been engulfed in ages of crime and cruelty. Michael reminds us that the real "Intelligence Community" are those in America (and the world) who are not afraid to face the facts and intelligently and eloquently expose those who have no legal or moral right to dominate humanity. Although "We the People" are not respected, protected, served or free, there is something that can be done about it once we realize where the real power lies and how to use it. This one of a kind presentation will inform and inspire veterans and beginners alike, giving each viewer a comprehensive, no-nonsense, yet sane and balanced expose into the real history of the world. As Michael says: “The subject of history as taught in schools is surely boring, but the study of how history has been manipulated...is one of the most interesting of all.”

Produced and presented by alternative historian Michael Tsarion, the "Origins and Oracles" series delves deeply into ancient mysteries and forbidden knowledge. In the tradition of Joseph Campbell, Michael Tsarion leaves no stone unturned in the quest for truth. “As long as you consider the stars as something above the head, you will lack the eye of knowledge” - Fredrick Nietzsche • What connection do the symbols of government, religion, royalty and the corporate world have with the constellations and zodiac? • Who was Jesus Christ? What he really the son of god and founder of Christianity? • Is our culture Judeo-Christian or Egytpo-Christian? • Why did the orthodox Church suppress the Gnostics and massacre women? • What did Jesus mean when he said the Temple of God is within and that others could do what he did? • Why did Jesus refer to himself as the “Morning Star” and ask his disciples to be as wise as “serpents.” • Why was astrology and divination prohibited? • In the commandments, why does the edict against “making graven images” come before the edict against killing? • What do the symbols on flags, on heraldry, money, corporate logos, and ads, mean? • Why do the world's different cultures employ similar symbolism? • What are the solutions to the economic, political, social and psychological challenges of the future? In Program Five, of the “Origins & Oracles” series, we learn about the real origins and meaning of the term - “Holy Spirit,” and we learn what humanity must do to secure its survival in the following years. We discover the actual roots of Christianity and find out what religious hierarchs have been hiding for over 2,000 years. Michael Tsarion investigates the suppression of women, the ecocidal tendency and the corruption in high places. Since, as Michael Tsarion says, the world elites have allegiances to hidden cults and secret societies, how can we expect them to honor their professed duties to humanity? In this all-revealing presentation we discover that the modern religions and political ideologies morphed out of seven great cults of power which ruled the world for millennia. The most powerful of these Cults was the “Stellar Cult,” dominant for over 10,000 years. Christ and the other Magi were initiates of this Cult, which gave mankind such sciences as astrology, astromancy, and the Tarot. Known as “Serpents,” they were the architects of the great temple structures such as the pyramids and the Sphinx. After the great Cults became corrupted they eventually gave rise to the modern exploitative religious and political hierarchies that prey off society today. We are still controlled by the elite bloodlines of these secret orders which continue to lead the world toward ruin and chaos. In this astounding presentation, Michael Tsarion demonstrates how religion and politics work to shape both the events around you, and the thoughts within you. “Astro-Theology” reveals the nature of the psychic and spiritual desecration which covertly operates upon us daily, and unlike the majority of other experts and researchers, Michael offers provocative solutions to our social and psychic predicaments.

Produced and presented by alternative historian Michael Tsarion, the "Origins and Oracles" series delves deeply into ancient mysteries and forbidden knowledge. In the tradition of Joseph Campbell, Michael Tsarion leaves no stone unturned in the quest for truth. “Signs and symbols control the world, not phrases and laws” - Confucius (551-479 BC) - Astrotheology and Sidereal Mythology - Michael Tsarion https://www.ivantic.info/Ostale_knjiige/astro-theology.pdf Symbols - Michael Tsarion & Jordan Maxwell https://ia902505.us.archive.org/27/items/jordan-maxwell-collection_202203/Michael%20Tsarion%20-%20Jordan%20Maxwell%2C%20Symbols%20-%2041%20pages.pdf - • Why are the youth so delinquent, in these days of affluence and plenty? • Why do over 70 percent of the products we buy have names that mean nothing in English? • What are the occult techniques used by corporations and governments to manipulate thought and control behavior? • In this so-called Age of Amnesia and Infotainment, are we owning our own thoughts? • If we are under “psychic hypnosis” would we know it? • How to we get back to being a "symbol literate" culture, and offset the worst effects of mind-control, addiction, delinquency and crime? • What are the techniques that are used by the media to dumb-down, and influence the youth? • Why are television programs, called "programs?" What do words like Lexus, Nissan, Coke, Visa, Nike, Fila, and Acura, etc., actually mean? • Why do corporations such as Levi Strauss and MTV screen girls as young as 5 and 6 years of age? • Why are banks and franchises designed to subliminally represent churches. • Can a corporation be psychotic? Have you ever wondered whether the billion-dollar artifice of the media, and of the advertising conglomerates, has any lasting negative effect on your mind and behavior, or whether the young are particularly affected by the all-pervasive presence of ads? Is it rational to expect large ad-corporations to jeopardize their vast monopolies by becoming more responsible in the future? Can Madison Avenue agencies and other “Hidden-Persuaders” ever be held accountable, if it is discovered and proven that the glamorous creations of their industry do indeed have lasting negative effects on our minds and behavior? Is the new designer disease of our age “Affluenza,” and is the consumer the consumed, in these times of excess and chronic commercialism? Can there be positive psychological, spiritual or social advancement, in a “symbol-illiterate” culture, more and more dependent on image, brand-logos and chimeras of the perfect, happy life, based on chronic competitiveness, material affluence and technical proficiency? Is there a connection between the rising levels of crime, substance abuse, inner psychological dysfunction, emotional disassociation, and the subversive use of power images and words in our culture? In this the sixth of the “Origins and Oracles” series, Michael Tsarion reveals the occult meaning behind many of the brand-names and logos that infest our think- and mind-space. This thoroughly engrossing expose is compulsory viewing for members of the younger generation, who are under daily assault from a deadly arsenal of psychic weaponry designed to eradicate their moral sensibility and willpower. Michael’s scathing expose leaves the vague warnings of most media-critics far behind, and delves into areas were few others care, or even dare, to venture.

What "In Plane Site" accomplishes that no other video expose' on September 11th has to date, is it exposes the viewer to a barrage of news clips from a majority of the mainstream news outlets. The official story of that day was told on live TV by reporters, policemen, firefighters, and other on-the-scene eyewitnesses, however, that footage was shown only once on live television broadcasts in the first hours of the attacks and then... it was never repeated. The stories changed, information was enigmatically omitted, and what can only be described as officially prescribed propaganda took the place of indisputable reality. THE PENTAGON: Some of the most damning evidence surrounding the attack on the Pentagon centers about substantial and incontrovertible video and photographic evidence which insights viewers to ask crucial and essential questions. After all, the laws of physics cannot be suspended or can they? One question many viewers ask is, "why was America and the rest of the world not shown the video footage and the photographs of the Pentagon, BEFORE the outer wall had collapsed?" Many people do not realize that the outer wall of the Pentagon did not collapse until 20 minutes after the initial impact of what we were told was a Boeing 757. Upon examining these photographs, one can clearly see a hole, which is only 16 feet in diameter. This begs the question: "How can a Boeing 757 which is over 44 feet in height and 124 feet in width simply disappear without a trace into a hole that is only 16 ft. in diameter? Also, why is there no external damage to the Pentagon where the wings and the tail section would have impacted with the outer wall? Contrary to the video footage shown to the American public, photographs taken only moments after the impact show no wreckage on the lawn of the Pentagon. Where is the plane? Where are the wings, the tail, the luggage, the seats, the landing gear, and the engines? Most importantly, what happened to the passengers who were aboard that plane? America remembers the photographs that they were shown of tiny, indiscernible fragments, which were described as pieces of a Boeing 757. Were these fragments of a Boeing 757? Internal photographs of the Pentagon taken by Jocelyn Augustino, a FEMA photographer, do not show engine parts matching the description of a 757's engine turbofan according to John W. Brown, a spokesperson for Rolls Royce. Both Pratt & Whitney and Rolls Royce manufacture the engines used on these jetliners. The turbofans themselves are approximately 7 feet in diameter. The FEMA photos show what appears to be a single turbofan that is approximately 3 feet in diameter. This better fits the descriptions of eyewitnesses who claim that they saw what could only be described as a commuter plane capable of holding only 8 to 12 passengers. This single piece of evidence also helps support other reports from witnesses such as Lon Rains, editor for "Space News," who was quoted as saying "I heard a very loud, quick whooshing sound. I was convinced it was a missile. It came in so fast -- it sounded nothing like an airplane." Don Parkal said, "A bomb had gone off. I could smell the cordite. I knew explosives had been set off somewhere." Tom Seibert said, "We heard what sounded like a missile." https://nwosurvivalguide.com/VideoDetails.aspx?id=1c699483-9a41-48cf-b88d-7e4abbf0ab3b

Produced by Michael Tsarion and Blue Fire Film. Architects of Control: Program One explores humankind’s future and the posthuman world. Will the “perfect” human be a dumbed down, regimented inhabitant of a cyber purgatory created by unseen elites? Will the children of tomorrow be smiling depressives of a technocratic dystopia? “The real war is the war on consciousness. It’s very important to always remember that …Mind control is ubiquitous. It’s almost a question of who is not mind controlled, as opposed to who is mind controlled. It’s just a difference in degree. The whole question of what is consciousness and how it can be manipulated is one of the most crucial questions of our time.” _______________________________________ Physical Control of the Mind - Toward a Psychocivilized Society By Jose M. Delgado Publication date: 1969 https://archive.org/details/jose-delgado-physical-control-of-the-mind-compressed/mode/2up https://archive.org/details/pcotmbydrjosed/mode/2up

What "In Plane Site" accomplishes that no other video expose' on September 11th has to date, is it exposes the viewer to a barrage of news clips from a majority of the mainstream news outlets. The official story of that day was told on live TV by reporters, policemen, firefighters, and other on-the-scene eyewitnesses, however, that footage was shown only once on live television broadcasts in the first hours of the attacks and then... it was never repeated. The stories changed, information was enigmatically omitted, and what can only be described as officially prescribed propaganda took the place of indisputable reality. THE PENTAGON: Some of the most damning evidence surrounding the attack on the Pentagon centers about substantial and incontrovertible video and photographic evidence which insights viewers to ask crucial and essential questions. After all, the laws of physics cannot be suspended or can they? One question many viewers ask is, "why was America and the rest of the world not shown the video footage and the photographs of the Pentagon, BEFORE the outer wall had collapsed?" Many people do not realize that the outer wall of the Pentagon did not collapse until 20 minutes after the initial impact of what we were told was a Boeing 757. Upon examining these photographs, one can clearly see a hole, which is only 16 feet in diameter. This begs the question: "How can a Boeing 757 which is over 44 feet in height and 124 feet in width simply disappear without a trace into a hole that is only 16 ft. in diameter? Also, why is there no external damage to the Pentagon where the wings and the tail section would have impacted with the outer wall? Contrary to the video footage shown to the American public, photographs taken only moments after the impact show no wreckage on the lawn of the Pentagon. Where is the plane? Where are the wings, the tail, the luggage, the seats, the landing gear, and the engines? Most importantly, what happened to the passengers who were aboard that plane? America remembers the photographs that they were shown of tiny, indiscernible fragments, which were described as pieces of a Boeing 757. Were these fragments of a Boeing 757? Internal photographs of the Pentagon taken by Jocelyn Augustino, a FEMA photographer, do not show engine parts matching the description of a 757's engine turbofan according to John W. Brown, a spokesperson for Rolls Royce. Both Pratt & Whitney and Rolls Royce manufacture the engines used on these jetliners. The turbofans themselves are approximately 7 feet in diameter. The FEMA photos show what appears to be a single turbofan that is approximately 3 feet in diameter. This better fits the descriptions of eyewitnesses who claim that they saw what could only be described as a commuter plane capable of holding only 8 to 12 passengers. This single piece of evidence also helps support other reports from witnesses such as Lon Rains, editor for "Space News," who was quoted as saying "I heard a very loud, quick whooshing sound. I was convinced it was a missile. It came in so fast -- it sounded nothing like an airplane." Don Parkal said, "A bomb had gone off. I could smell the cordite. I knew explosives had been set off somewhere." Tom Seibert said, "We heard what sounded like a missile." https://nwosurvivalguide.com/VideoDetails.aspx?id=1c699483-9a41-48cf-b88d-7e4abbf0ab3b

This is a segment of part 3 of Mark Passio's 4-part What On Earth Is Happening presentation. Mark Passio - What On Earth Is Happening Recorded December 2008 Full: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jV-ts7t2xBs Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnzMmEt4pIb93SV3Nahud1X_NSsY3kXIg Mark Passio's website - http://whatonearthishappening.com/ Mark Passio's Youtube channel - http://www.youtube.com/WhatOnEarth93 _______________________________________________________ Hegelian Dialectic: a step by step guide to controlling an outcome. A dialectical (Divided) method of argument by 19th Century German philosopher, G.W.F. Hegel. It is a method Comprised of Thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. The Hegelian Dialectic. A process where the contradiction between the Thesis and Antithesis resolves to a higher level of truth, the synthesis. Also knows as the Problem, Reaction, Solution. Its getting to the truth by exchange of logical arguments. When manipulating this method a person or group of people are swayed to chose a desired outcome. Understanding is the first step to controlling. This formulaic trick moves groups of people. It is how we get many major changes in our society.

An in-depth study into how western propaganda became so effective, and so profitable. This seminal documentary film explores the analysis of political economy and mass media presented in the 1988 book, Manufacturing Consent, written by scholars Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman. Noam Chomsky. Here Canadian filmmakers Mark Achbar and Peter Wintonick expand on Chomsky and Herman’s propaganda model thesis that corporate media, as profit-driven institutions, tend to serve and further the agendas and interests of dominant, elite groups in the society. Incredibly informative and an essential building block to any study and understanding of modern propaganda in the West. Run time: 2 hrs 47 min Directed and Written By: Mark Achbar and Peter Wintonick Production: Zeitgeist Films (Australia) _________________________________ Manufacturing Consent [The Political Economy Of The Mass Media] by Chomsky, Noam https://archive.org/details/pdfy-NekqfnoWIEuYgdZl https://files.libcom.org/files/2022-04/manufacturing_consent.pdf - Public Opinion by Lippmann, Walter https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.126489/ https://d1lexza0zk46za.cloudfront.net/history/american-documents/documents/wlippmann-public-opinion-1922.pdf

Interview between Noam Chomsky and British journalist Andrew Marr BBC ‘The Big Idea’ One of the most illuminating exchanges during the interview was the following: Marr: “How can you know I’m self-censoring?” Chomsky: “I’m not saying you’re self-censoring. I’m sure you believe everything you say. But what I’m saying is if you believed something different you wouldn’t be sitting where you’re sitting.” Source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjENnyQupow _____________________ Propaganda Model of the Media January 19, 2020 by Matthew Greenwood https://matthewgreenwood.us/propaganda-model-of-the-media/ In an environment when one is blasted at all sides with distorted, biased, and invented news, it is more important than ever to be an educated consumer of information. In communication theory, there is a powerful model of the media that explains how market forces shape the news we receive. This concept was proposed by Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky in their tome, “Manufacturing Consent: Political Economy and the Mass Media” and termed the “Propaganda Model of the Media.” First and foremost, the model is not a conspiracy theory. It does not suggest that some shady elites directly control what we see and hear. Instead, it is a model that explains the structural factors that influence the output of the mainstream media. It clarifies what critical thinkers easily observe—that the media works within restricted assumptions, depend heavily and uncritically on elite information sources, and participates in propaganda campaigns helpful to elite interests. The central insight behind the Propaganda Model is that there are filters through which the “raw material of the news” must pass through before being transmitted to the consumer. The filters decide if an event can be considered news, how it would be covered, the amount of coverage, and how it is placed within the media. The original five filters are ownership of the medium, media’s funding sources, sourcing, flak, and fear ideology. Filter One: Ownership of the Medium Filter one is pretty self-explanatory. Running a profitable national media franchise requires enormous capital, and only the immensely wealthy can do it. The mainstream media is composed of a handful of giant conglomerates who are also involved in many other enterprises other than news divisions. It only makes sense that because of conflict of interests, the media will be biased to avoid harming corporate financial interests. Filter Two: Advertising as Primary Source of Income Filter Two: Relying on advertisers for revenue makes the media accountable to their advertisers, not the public. Advertisers support programming that caters to the richest because they are the ones with the most to spend. Publications that represent the interests of the working class are at a disadvantage in the advertising competition because their audience has less money to spend. An example of how market forces silence voices provided by the authors of the Propaganda Model is the case of when the British Socialist-democratic paper, the Daily Herald, went out of business in the 1960s. It actually had twice the readership of the Times, the Financial Times, and The Guardian combined. According to surveys, its readers were more loyal to it than readers of the other papers, but it lacked advertisers. The demise of the Herald has been listed as a factor of the general decline of the Labor Party because they lost a significant voice in the public debate. Filter Three: Sourcing of Experts The news business requires a constant flow of information, so they can pass it on. Reporters go where news breaks all the time, like the White House, Pentagon, and Congress. This is news that doesn’t have to be checked since they are deemed reliable due to the source. Government bureaucracies cater to the needs of news organizations, creating a symbiotic relationship by making the work of gathering news easier, less expensive, government-sanctioned, corporate blessed, and sanitized Experts are usually co-opted by big corporate or government interests, by funding them, sponsoring them, or simply putting them on payrolls. Experts can generally be categorized as government officials, academics coming from think tanks sponsored by corporate interests, corporate consultants, or journalists. Filter Four: Flak Flak is the term used to describe punitive action taken towards media statements when particular interests object. Flak comes in many forms from letters, phone calls, lawsuits, speeches, congressional bills, and more. Direct flak would phone calls from the White House to anchormen or producers, demands from the FCC to produce documents, or threat from ad agencies to pull their ads or sue. Indirectly, flak can take several forms that can include when the government or corporations complain about the media to its employees or shareholders or when they fund think tank operations or hire public-relation firms to attack the press or to counter adverse coverage. Filter Five: Fear Ideology. When Manufacturing Consent was written, the central noble cause and unquestioned value in American culture was anti-communism. Communism became the malevolent presence by which everything was justified. Communism gave the population an enemy against which to mobilize. Today we do not have Communism to fear, but since 9/11, a new enemy just as useful arose: terrorism. Today we have an open-ended, vague war that can justify anything. To quote William Greider writing in the Nation: The war on terror “overwhelmed the country, in fact, deranged society’s normal processes and purposes with a brilliantly seductive political message: Terror pre-empts everything else. What this President (George W. Bush) effectively accomplished was to restart the cold war, albeit under a new rubric. The justifying facts are different and smaller, but the ideological dynamics are remarkably similar–a total commitment of the nation’s energies to confront a vast, unseen and malignant adversary. Fanatical Muslims replaced Soviet Communists, and, like the reds, these enemies could be anywhere, including in our midst (they may not even be Muslims, but kindred agents who likewise “hate” us and oppose our values). Like the Cold War’s logic, this new organizing framework can be compelling to the popular imagination because it runs on fear—the public’s expanding fear of potential dangers. The political commodity of fear has no practical limits. The government can manufacture more. Nor is there any obvious ceiling on what the nation must devote–in JFK’s famous phrase–“to pay any price, bear any burden” in defense of liberty and homeland.” Filter Six: Miracle of the Market The principal author of Manufacturing Consent, Edward Herman, suggested in 2000 that an additional filter called “the Miracle of the Market” be included in the Propaganda Model. The new filter recognizes how many Americans hold a near-religious faith in the free market, regardless of evidence. An excellent reference to what Herman was referring to is explained by Eugene McCarraher in his book, The Enchantments of Mammon: How Capitalism Became the Religion of Modernity. McCarraher posits that “Capitalism, is the new religion, a system full of enchanted superstitions and unfounded beliefs and beholden to its own clerisy of economists and managers, its own iconography of advertising and public relations, and its own political theology—a view of history and politics that is premised on the inevitability of the capitalist system spreading across the world.” Such an ideological package makes for an immensely powerful filter that pre-sorts any raw news before being delivered. Additional Filters While not in the original work or revised essays Chomsky and Herman discuss other unofficial filters through which news must pass in their other writing. The Myth of the Liberal Media There are many well-funded think tanks whose purpose it is to perpetuate the myth that there is a liberal bias in the media… even though the press is demonstrably pro-business, pro-government, and pro-status quo. The accusation of liberal bias ensures that the media steers conservative. The myth of the liberal media also works to discredit any news that is deemed “liberal.” As long as the media can be called liberal, the conservative establishment sets a limit on what is acceptable discussion. Consumers might say today that they watch FOX News and then CNN news for a balanced outlook (Right and Left). However, by objective standards, FOX news represents far right, and CNN represents center-right, leaving no voice for truly leftist views. The limit has been set and drawn for discussion. Concision Concision is the name of the concept academics give of cutting everything to its bare minimum to make it fit with the format of “news.” The news is formatted around commercial breaks every few minutes by sponsors who pay for programming and take about a third of all viewing time. Time limitations prevent news coverage from going into any real depth. The format of news assures that only conventional ideas pass through the media filter, because ideas everyone knows by heart, require no support. For example, one can say that the USSR invaded Afghanistan, but not that the USA invaded Vietnam—even though they were both invasions in precisely the same way. It is simply not in the American vocabulary that the US has ever been an invading force. When someone contradicts conventional myths, it requires time to back up their statements. Intellectuals challenging commonly held ideas often come across as long-winded since they take a long time to get to their point as they are contradicting whole narratives that everyone else already “knows.” They must preamble since they may be saying things that are uncomfortable to hear. Because the structure of mainstream media is designed with short segments around commercial breaks, it is nigh impossible to make a reasoned analysis. The very format of the news ensures only ideas that are simple and already commonly accepted are transmitted. Patriotism The news media is constrained in what and how they tell the news to avoid the consequences of appearing too un-patriotic. For example, in the American context, it is terrorism when “they” do it. American foreign policy in general and government agencies specifically are responsible for terrible atrocities and crimes, but when it is covered, it is done within a narrative that protects the pride of patriotic Americans. Bibliography Herman, Edward S. The Propaganda Model: A Retrospective, 2003 https://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/hj/hermanretro.pdf - Herman, Edward S.; Chomsky, Noam (2010). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Random House. https://archive.org/details/pdfy-NekqfnoWIEuYgdZl https://files.libcom.org/files/2022-04/manufacturing_consent.pdf

Michael Moore's political documentary uses humor and connect-the-dots investigative journalism to question the Bush administration's motives for wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The film argues that President George W. Bush and his inner circle used the media to further an agenda that exploited the 9/11 attacks. The close ties of the Saudis to the Bush family, the cynical profiteering of corporations and a political elite beholden to special interests are all cited as elements of a corrupt system. Release Date (Theaters): Jun 23, 2004 __________________________________________________ Fahrenheit 9/11: superior propaganda. David Edelstein Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 9/11 is unfair and outrageous. You got a problem with that? 9/11: Bias and bullying for a good cause Back in the ‘80s—the era of Reagan and Bush 41, when milquetoasts Walter Mondale and Michael Dukakis were the ineffectual Democratic candidates and Jimmy Carter was off building houses for poor people, when Anthony Lewis was writing oh-so-temperately in the New York Times, which was then leaning neoconward under the stewardship of Abe Rosenthal, when there was an explosion of dirty Republican tricksters like Lee Atwater and trash-talking right-wingers, from Morton Downey Jr. to the fledgling Rush Limbaugh—I found myself wishing, wishing fervidly, for a blowhard whom the left could call its own. Someone who wouldn’t shrink before the right’s bellicosity. Someone who would bellow back, mock unashamedly, and maybe even recapture the prankster spirit of counterculture figures like Abbie Hoffman. Yeah, I know: Be careful what you wish for. In 20 years of writing about film, no movie has ever tied me up in knots the way Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit9/11 (Lions Gate) has. It delighted me; it disgusted me. I celebrate it; I lament it. I’m sure of only one thing: that I don’t trust anyone—pro or con—who doesn’t feel a twinge of doubt about his or her responses. What follows might be broadly labeled as “waffling,” but I hope, at least, that it is bold and decisive waffling. Needless to say, Fahrenheit 9/11 never waffles. The liberals’ The Passion ofthe Christ, it ascribes only the most venal motives to the other side. There is no sign in the filmmaker of an openness to other interpretations (or worldviews). This is not quite a documentary—which I define, very loosely, as a work in which the director begins by turning on the camera and allowing the reality to speak for itself, aware of its complexities, contradictions, and multitudes. You are with Moore, or you are a war criminal. The film is part prosecutorial brief and part (as A.O. Scott has noted) rabid editorial cartoon: a blend of insight, outrage, and sniggering innuendo, the whole package threaded (and tied in a bow) with cheap shots, some of them voiced by Moore, some created in the editing room by intercutting stilted images from old movies. Moore is largely off-screen (no pun intended), but as narrator he’s always there, sneering and tsk-tsking. Here are the salient points: that Bush stole the presidency from Al Gore (who, in one of the film’s best scenes, must certify his opponent’s election and quell a movement to stall that certification); that Bush and his family had been in bed with the Saudis, which made him less responsive to the danger of al-Qaida terrorism; that a pipeline in Afghanistan promised billions if the Taliban was on board, which was one reason that the threat of Osama Bin Laden (black sheep of a family with whom daddy did business) was swept under the rug. Better to concentrate on Iraq, the administration felt—it had unfinished Saddam business, it was rich in oil, and it was a potential goldmine for U.S. corporations. Moore ranges far and wide: He apes Apocalypse Now (1979) with footage of bucolic Baghdad before the bombings, then cuts to soldiers explaining the way they hook their iPods to the tank speakers: “You have a good song playing in the background, it gets you really fired up.” (I’m surprised he didn’t go ahead and play “Ride of the Valkyries.”) Then there’s graphic footage of dead Iraqi women and small children killed in what the Pentagon said were surgically precise bombings. A grieving old woman shrieks curses at the United States, while U.S. soldiers with missing limbs rail at the administration. On the home front, Moore suggests that the Patriot Act was unread by the legislators who passed it and harps on its absurd applications, like the agent who infiltrated a septuagenarian cookie-baking peace collective in Fresno, Calif. Then he chases hawkish congressmen outside the Capitol. Would they send their own sons and daughters to fight in Iraq? he asks—often to their backs, as they flee. As I watched California Congressman John T. Doolittle take off from Moore’s camera, arms and legs bobbing spastically, I was troubled by the cheapness of Moore’s interviewing techniques. But I laughed my ass off anyway. And I felt better about laughing when I checked the warlike congressman’s Web site, which mentions his graduation from high school * in 1968 but, predictably, no Vietnam service. All right, you can make anyone into a goofball with a selection of unflattering shots and out-of-context quotations, but it is so very easy to make George W. Bush—with his near-demonic blend of smugness and vacuity—look bad. Or is this in eye of the beholder? Perhaps when Bush speaks of hunting down terrorists, then gets down to the real, golfing business—”Stop these terrorist killers. Thank you. Now watch this drive”—you see an honest, plainspoken leader unfairly ridiculed. But what can even Bush partisans make of those seven minutes in the elementary school classroom after he received the news that a second plane had hit the World Trade Center and the nation was under attack? In one of the few lapses in an otherwise virtuoso rant, Christopher Hitchens argues that Moore would have made sport of a martial, Russell Crowe-like response. Nice try, but that blow wouldn’t have landed, and this one does, spectacularly. It is downright spooky to watch the nominal commander in chief and “leader of the free world” behave, in a moment of crisis, like a superfluous man. Moore is best when he doesn’t stage dumb pranks (like broadcasting the Patriot Act in D.C. out of an ice-cream truck) but provokes with his mere presence. When he interviews the author of House of Bush, House of Saud in front of the Saudi embassy and the Secret Service shows up to ask what he’s doing, it’s a gotcha moment: What’s the Secret Service doing protecting non-U.S. government officials? He has a light touch there that’s missing from the rest of the Fahrenheit 9/11. In one scene, his camera homes in on a Flint, Mich., woman weeping over a son killed in Iraq, and the effect is vampirish. After the screening, a friend railed that Moore was exploiting a mother’s grief. When I suggested that the scene made moral sense in the context of the director’s universe, that the exploitation is justified if it saves the lives of other mothers’ sons, my friend said, “When did you become a relativist?” I’m troubled by that charge—and by the fact that we nearly came to blows by the end of the conversation. But when it comes to politics in a time of war, I think that relativism is, well, relative. Fahrenheit 9/11 must be viewed in the context of the Iraq occupation and the torrent of misleading claims that got us there. It must be viewed in the context of Rush Limbaugh repeating the charge that Hillary Clinton had Vince Foster murdered in Fort Marcy Park, or laughing off the exposure of Valerie Plame when, had this been a Democratic administration, he’d be calling every day for the traitor’s head. It must be viewed in the context of Ann Coulter calling for the execution of people who disagree with her. It must be viewed in the context of another new documentary, the superb The Hunting of the President, that documents—irrefutably—the lengths to which the right went to destroy Bill Clinton. Moore might be a demagogue, but never—not even during Watergate—has a U.S. administration left itself so open to this kind of savaging. Along with many other polite liberals, I cringed last year when Moore launched into his charmless, pugilistic acceptance speech at the Academy Awards. Oh, how vulgar, I thought—couldn’t he at least have been funny? A year later, I think I might have been too hard on the fat prick. Six months before her death in 1965, the great novelist Dawn Powell wrestled in her diary with the unseemliness of political speech during an “artistic” event: “Lewis Mumford gave jolt to the occasion and I realized I had gotten as chicken as the rest of America because what he said—we had no more right in Vietnam than Russia had in Cuba—was true but I did not think he should use his position to declaim this. Later I saw the only way to accomplish anything is by ‘abusing’ your power.” Exactly. Fahrenheit 9/11 is not a documentary for the ages, it is an act of counterpropaganda that has a boorish, bullying force. It is, all in all, a legitimate abuse of power. Addendum, June 25, 2004: It is now apparently part of the Secret Service’s mandate to protect foreign diplomats in the nation’s capital. Why they’d have dispatched an agent to quiz Michael Moore on camera is a mystery, though. They knew who he was. Did Prince Bandar just want to let him know he was being monitored? https://slate.com/culture/2004/06/fahrenheit-9-11-superior-propaganda.html

Published on April 27, 2020 Internet web-casting pioneer Richard A Siegel, of OnlineTV fame, captured both of the World Trade Towers collapsing and a lot more. See the raw footage and listen to Rick's eyewitness testimony of the daring helicopter rescue on the roof of the south tower, WTC2, only moments before it collapsed into "a pile of dust." For the first time, see and hear the massive explosions at the base of the towers causing clouds of dust to rise up from street level before each tower fell. This documentary focuses on the events recorded by Richard A. Siegel at the Hoboken pier during the September 11, 2001 destruction of the World Trade Center complex. https://altcensored.com/watch?v=VYt0wJBzP8s

911: The Greatest Lie Evers Sold – By Anthony Hilder Only by “Exposing the Creators” of the first World Trade Center bombing in (1993), could we have prevented the creation of the second bombing of the World Trade Center on 9-11! We failed to make it … “PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE” that the 1993 bombing was – Encouraged by “AGENT PROVOCATUERS” of the FB-LIE The fact is U.S. taxpayers “bought the bomb.” Worse still, since September 11, 2001 most of America’s sheeple “BOUGHT THE LIE” that 19 angered Arabs & Osama bin Laden carried out the greatest act of terror in U.S. history The stark, raw reality is that the 9-11 “story” is THE GREATEST LIE EVER SOLD. American’s are being prepped for the next “staged event” Agents of the CIA, FBI, NSA, and the propaganda press will then white-wash “USAMA BIN BUSH!” Rumsfeld, Cheney, Ashcroft, Kissinger & crew will blame the innocent to protect the guilty What’s it all about? Bush & zee Boys from der “Brotherhood of Death,” “Skull & Bones” are preparing us for a POLICE STATE. Bush will try to surrender the Constitution & Bill of Rights. His goal? – establish a “New World Order” WARNING: This video contains no lies, or “White House” spin! https://www.conspiracydocumentaries.com/911conspiracy/911-greatest-lie-ever-sold/ ___________________________________ Project For a New American Century: "Rebuilding Americas Defenses" https://archive.org/details/ProjectForANewAmericanCenturyRebuildingAmericasDefenses/page/n45/mode/2up

Israel did 9/11, ALL THE PROOF YOU NEED http://web.archive.org/web/20110207215357/http://800pg.co.cc/ - “[The Israeli Mossad is] ruthless and cunning, with the capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian-Arab act.” -Report issued by the U.S. Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS); September 2001 http://web.archive.org/web/20110917232655/http://800pg.co.cc/Israel_did_911.pdf - Figuring out exactly how 9/11 was done is the work of crime investigators or conspiracy hobbyists who will endlessly go on discussing and debating every minuscule and intricate detail of the event to no avail. It doesn't take a structural engineer to tell you that two 110 story buildings and a 47 story steel skyscraper plummeting to the ground at nearly free-fall speed requires the assistance of explosives. All you need is two eyes that can see and a brain that thinks to come to that sound conclusion. This is why it is of my opinion that more emphasis should be placed on the "who" instead of the "how". It should be obvious to anyone that discovering 'who did 9/11' is infinitely more important than discovering how they did it. http://web.archive.org/web/20091209113217/http://theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5367&sid=c0a36af75dcbb552eb91f3b9b3a751cb ______________________________________ John F. Kennedy speech at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel that likely led to his assassination - April 27, 1961 https://rumble.com/v2489j8-john-f.-kennedy-speech-at-the-waldorf-astoria-hotel-april-27-1961.html

Del Bigtree starts to talks about how he got to this point in his life from childhood onwards. Later on about Big Pharma and efforts being made to expose the truth. But first, Dr. Paul encourages viewers to stand up for justice, despite the pushback. Science and medicine are at a crossroad and courageous health practitioners are standing up to ensure that humanity and integrity aren’t left behind in the name of ‘progress.’ Dr. Paul Thomas is one of those leading the way and amplifying the voice of brave scientists and health care practitioners who are willing to put their careers on the line to make sure ‘health’ and ‘care’ are restored to healthcare. Host: Dr. Paul Thomas Source: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/with-the-wind-with-dr-paul-thomas/exclusive-interview-with-del-bigtree/ Children's Health Defense Latest Episodes: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/browse-all/latest-episodes/ ______________________________________________ CDC children's immunization schedule: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/parents/schedules/index.html

Laurens Buijs is an interdisciplinary social scientist at the UvA, publicist and entrepreneur in the field of Diversity & Inclusion (D&I). Threats, attacks, possible dismissal and cancelling happened when Laurens Buijs, social scientist and professor at the University of Amsterdam spoke out about his field of expertise and made a report of the cancel culture at the UvA. Buijs talks to Rico Brouwer of Follow the Science about how diversity policies have turned into a threat to Academic Freedom to the point where he's now called on Whistle-blower protection. In this 50 minute interview Laurens explains what is woke culture and the concept of non binary and talks about what happened to him after he published an opinion piece about it last week. On Follow the Science: https://followthescience.nl/interviews/woke-culture-threatens-academic-freedom-laurens-buijs Originele Youtube link: https://youtu.be/tbOZN_sEJaQ Source https://odysee.com/@devrijeomroep:6/Woke-culture-threatens-academic-freedom---Laurens-Buijs:d Laurens Buijs https://laurensbuijs.org - Higher Education is for Free Minds. Viewpoint Diversity is an online network that aims to protect our educational institutions from dogma, cancel culture and intellectual purification. “As totalitarianism is rising, free speech and free thought are under attack in higher education thoughout the world. Whether it concerns debates on gender, religion, climate, health, vaccinations, energy or international conflicts: staff and students should be able to talk and think freely, always. Radical pluralism in the form of viewpoint diversity is essential for quality education and research.“ — Laurens Buijs, founder of Viewpoint Diversity https://viewpointdiversity.net/ ___________________________________________________________ Bruno Latour (1947–2022) - French philosopher and anthropologist https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-03796-0 - Hannah Arendt (1906–1975) - German-American philosopher https://contemporarythinkers.org/hannah-arendt/ Books by Hannah Arendt: The Human Condition https://monoskop.org/images/e/e2/Arendt_Hannah_The_Human_Condition_2nd_1998.pdf The Origins of Totalitarianism https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/hannah-arendt-the-origins-of-totalitarianism.pdf

VAXXED II — anti-vax movie with a devoted following shown at the State Theatre By ChrisAnna Mink Read more at: https://www.modbee.com/living/health-fitness/article238989403.html#storylink=cpy Few stories are more compelling than parents talking about the death of their child. Those stories in the movie, “VAXXED II: The People’s Truth, captivated more than 300 people at The State Theatre on Saturday evening. “This was different than the first movie,” said Destiny Avila of Manteca, “It was heart-wrenching because it was the parents’ stories.” Avila is the mother of a 10-year-old boy whom she describes as vaccine-injured. She said that two days after her son received his pre-kindergarten vaccines, he started having seizures, which are still uncontrolled. She and her husband, Dominic, attended with their 3-month-old son, whom they are not vaccinating. “VAXXED II” showed many parents sharing stories, similar or scarier than the Avilas, about their children with severe physical and developmental disabilities or death that they attributed to the vaccines. The stories are deeply moving. But the film is missing scientific data, undermining its credibility. The film is the follow-up to “VAXXED: From Cover-up to Catastrophe,” the controversial movie released in 2016, which critics deemed anti-vaccine propaganda. The first movie was directed by Andrew Wakefield and alleges that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) covered up a study proving a link between the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism. Wakefield is a British physician who published the original study stating that MMR vaccine caused autism. The paper was retracted because the data were fraudulent and Wakefield’s medical license was revoked. He also appears in “VAXXED II.” Subsequently, multiple large studies in several countries have shown no link between measles vaccine and autism. The research has done little to alleviate mistrust of vaccines among the anti-vaccine community. _________________________________________________________ BEHIND OUR REPORTING - Why we did this story Some people continue to debate the value of vaccinations. A recent law passed in California restricting medical exemptions for vaccines has a challenge from a group of protesters who want voters to overturn it. The law authorizes the California Department of Public Health to review vaccine medical exemptions that doctors issue for children enrolling in school. What you should know Reporter ChrisAnna Mink is a pediatrician who early in her career was a vaccine researcher. _______________________________________________________ “I educated myself and vaccines are not worth the risk,” said Rachel Williams from Riverbank, the mother of two unvaccinated boys, ages 9 and 11. She and Jessica Van Hille-Hart, who also has two unvaccinated teen boys, have an informal local group that invited the “VAXXED II” crew to Modesto and arranged for the movie’s showing. “Our friends in Modesto asked us to come, because there is so much injury and death in Modesto” said Polly Tommey, the film’s executive producer. She has an adult son with autism whom she describes as vaccine-injured due to the MMR vaccine when he was 13 months old. A recurring theme from parents in the movie was they weren’t informed that vaccines could have risks. For nearly three decades, Vaccine Information Sheets are required by law to be given to vaccine recipients. Like all medications, no vaccine is risk-free. Tommey said the problems are more intense in California since passage of SB277, the law mandating vaccines for children to attend daycare or school. By “problems,” it was unclear if she was referring to more perceived vaccine injuries or infringement of parental rights. In Stanislaus County, 95.9% of children starting kindergarten are immunized. Data are not available about the number of vaccine-injured children in the county. However, nationwide, there was about one injury claim for every 1 million doses of the 3.4 billion doses of adult and pediatric vaccines distributed from 2006 through 2017. The federal government maintains the database as part of Vaccine Injury Compensation court, which adjudicates injury claims. Robert Kennedy Jr. is an executive producer of the docu-commentary and he speaks in the film about the risks of vaccines, though he has no medical background. The movie includes physicians and nurses who describe their perception of the risks of vaccines and the diseases they are meant to prevent. One doctor describes measles as a rash, a cough and a cold that children get over in a few days, which she contrasts with autism, a lifelong devastating affliction. That measles description is inconsistent with medical experts who describe the infection as serious with complications such as pneumonia, brain damage and death. In 2019, a record number of measles cases occurred globally, killing 140,000 people. More than 1,250 cases occurred in the U.S. with 70 of those in California. The CDC considers vaccine refusal as a major contributor to the outbreak. VAXXED II Touring Tommey and the crew have been on a bus tour of the U.S. and Canada in a black, modified RV, with VAXXED painted on the sides since release of the first movie in 2016. Families with a child whom they consider to be vaccine-injured are recorded telling their stories and they can write their names on the bus. Nearly 9,000 names have been inscribed. Neither VAXXED movies have been allowed to stream on services, such as Amazon or Netflix, because of concerns that they spreading inaccurate information and threaten public health. After the movie, a panel discussion with the filmmakers and three local anti-vaccine parents and an electric candlelight vigil in honor of the injured and deceased were held. No pro-vaccine representatives were on the panel or asked questions during the discussions. An audience member asked, “How do we stop the pestilence of our government? When does Pan get the death wish? What’s our future?” State Senator Richard Pan (D-Sacramento) is a pediatrician and he authored SB277, as well as SB276 requiring public health officials review of vaccine exemptions. Sandi Olsen, panel member who was introduced as a local home school mother and vaccine law expert, responded: “Senator Pan was hired to do the job he’s doing. The legislation was already written by the pharmaceutical industry. We need people voting. They’re not listening to us. It’s up to us to refuse laws that are immoral, unnatural and infringe upon our God-given rights.” The audience responded with rousing applause. Last December, The State Theatre sent an email to their board stating that the theater had been rented by a private group and this was “not a film endorsed or selected by the State Theatre staff or its Board.” This story was produced with financial support from The Stanislaus County Office of Education and the Stanislaus Community Foundation, along with the GroundTruth Project’s Report for America initiative. The Modesto Bee maintains full editorial control of this work. This story was originally published January 7, 2020, 2:41 PM. ChrisAnna Mink is pediatrician and health reporter for The Modesto Bee. She covers children’s health in Stanislaus County and the Central Valley. Her position is funded through the financial support from The Stanislaus County Office of Education and the Stanislaus Community Foundation, along with The GroundTruth Project’s Report for America initiative. The Modesto Bee maintains full editorial control of her work. https://www.modbee.com/living/health-fitness/article238989403.html

American Thought Leaders JAN JEKIELEK Previously, in part one of my interview with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., founder and chief legal counsel of the Children’s Health Defense, we discussed glaring conflicts of interest in our health agencies and what he describes as a coup-d’état against American democracy and the Bill of Rights. Now in part two, he explains how U.S. government tools developed for influencing overseas populations were deployed on Americans. We also take a look at the string of pandemic simulations conducted in the last few decades—detailed in his book “The Real Anthony Fauci”—and the eerie similarities he discovered. What does Kennedy think about allegations the CIA was involved in the assassination of his uncle, John F. Kennedy? And at a time when many have lost faith in the American system, how do we restore power to the American people and rekindle American ideals? https://www.theepochtimes.com/robert-f-kennedy-jr-part-2-from-event-201-to-dark-winter-the-pandemic-simulations-that-foreshadowed-our-new-reality_5116490.html

American Thought Leaders JAN JEKIELEK https://www.theepochtimes.com/robert-f-kennedy-jr-part-1-the-dark-secrets-of-the-childhood-immunization-schedule-and-the-vaccine-approval-process_5114709.html “You have scientists who are supposed to be regulators who are actually making money on the product that they’re supposed to be regulating.” Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the founder and chief legal counsel of Children’s Health Defense and author of “The Real Anthony Fauci,” shares his journey from environmental activist to a fierce critic of the vaccine approval process in this comprehensive two-part interview. Not a single vaccine on the childhood immunization schedule has been tested against a true saline placebo, he argues. - How did we get to where we are today? - How is it that the Bill of Rights was essentially suspended during the pandemic? - And what role did America’s intelligence agencies and military-industrial complex play in all this? ___________________ “THE REAL ANTHONY FAUCI” by RFK JR. (DOCUMENTARY 2022) https://www.bitchute.com/video/E5L6c4vgR9WY/ The Real Anthony Fauci (Part 2) https://www.bitchute.com/video/ltpABSde3fLr/ _________________________ FULL TRANSCRIPT Jan Jekielek: Robert F. Kennedy Jr., such a pleasure to have you on American thought leaders. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: Thank you for having me. Mr. Jekielek: You wrote The Real Anthony Fauci, which I started listening to as an audio book, and it’s actually 27 hours long. This is quite the opus. Mr. Kennedy: I apologize. Mr. Jekielek: It’s a remarkable book, and it’s actually much more than just about Dr. Anthony Fauci, but about the whole development of what’s been dubbed the biopharmaceutical industrial complex. In the subtitle, you describe a global war on democracy and public health, and you chart that as well. Tell me about the genesis of this expansive tome. Mr. Kennedy: I was in a unique position because I spent almost 40 years as an environmental advocate, and I had seen and written about extensively and litigated on this issue of agency capture, which is on the product of a conspiracy of mechanisms or panoply of mechanisms by which regulatory agencies become captured by the industries that they’re supposed to regulate. Instead of continuing to protect public health or financial integrity or the environment, they become sock puppets for the industry that they’re supposed to regulate. When I began litigating and advocating on the vaccine issue in 2005, I was immediately dumbstruck by not only the level of agency capture within the public health agencies, but the financial entanglements, which were unprecedented in other agencies that basically put agency capture on steroids. For example, the FDA [U. S. Food and Drug Administration] received 75 percent of its drug approval budget from the pharmaceutical industry. Almost 45 percent of its total budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry. Not only NIH [National Institutes of Health] as an agency, but individual scientists within NIH are allowed to patent drugs that they work on and then turn over to the pharmaceutical industry and collect royalties on them. Those scientists over the past decade or so have collected some $300 million in royalties. You have scientists who are supposed to be regulators who are actually making money on the product that they’re supposed to be regulating. They’re paying their mortgage, they’re paying their children’s tuition, they’re buying boats or whatever they’re doing, and financing their retirement based upon products that they’re supposed to be looking for problems with. There’s an incentive for them to not find problems with those products, but rather to push them out, and to expand their reach. The regulatory function of these agencies becomes subsumed by the mercantile ambitions of the pharmaceutical companies that they regulate. To give you another example, the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] has a $12 billion annual budget. Almost $5 billion of that goes to purchasing vaccines in secretive sweetheart deals with the big vaccine companies, and then compelling or persuading large numbers of people to take those vaccines, mainly children. It is 74 million children that CDC essentially has the power to mandate that they take vaccines. Many of them receive restrictions about attending the school and exercising other kinds of rights. With the metrics at that agency, if you want a promotion or if you want a salary increase, you don’t get that by finding a problem with a vaccine. You get that by showing that you’ve contributed to the expanded coverage of vaccine use. It’s a perverse incentive for a regulatory agency, because it really makes them an arm of the industry rather than a functioning regulatory agency that’s protecting public health. Anthony Fauci was really the embodiment of that institutional and systemic corruption. You can look at the NIH or FDA, and there are famous scientists like Frankie Kelsey at FDA, the woman who blocked Thalidomide from coming to the United States when it was devastating European children. Bernice Eddie at NIH discovered that there was a carcinogenic virus called SV40 in 98 million polio vaccines and tried to raise the alarm about that. John Anthony Morris realized that the flu vaccine was actually counterproductive and was making people more likely to get flu-related infections and other respiratory infections, and it was also causing neurological injuries. When Bernice Hadie, Frankie Kelsey and Morris reported those problems, instead of being given medals, they were punished. Their careers essentially ended. If you want to function and flourish at NIH or any of these regulatory agencies, the way to do that is by carrying water for the pharmaceutical industry. The reason that Anthony Fauci has lasted for 50 years is not because he’s done a good job at protecting public health. It is because he’s done a good job at protecting industry profits. If you look at public health during that 50-year term, when he came into office about 6 percent of Americans had chronic disease. By chronic disease, I mean not only obesity, but neurological disease, allergic disease, and autoimmune disease. Fauci came on in 1968. By 1986, 11.8 percent of American children had chronic disease. By 2006, that number had risen to 64 percent. That’s his track record. What he claims is that he’s protecting Americans from infectious disease, but he rarely talks about the impact of chronic disease, which is much more devastating than infectious disease. The vaccines scheduled during that period went from the three vaccines that I took when I was a kid, and I was fully compliant, to 72 doses that are mandated today from 16 vaccines. The question is, how has that made Americans healthier? In 2000, the CDC did a study with Johns Hopkins University, the principal author named Guyer, G-U-Y-E-R. They looked at this question, “Did vaccines have anything to do with a decline in mortalities from infectious diseases with this momentous decline, a 70 or 80 percent decline in mortality from infectious diseases between 1900 and the present?” The question is, “Did vaccines have anything to do with that?” The CDC study found that the vaccines had almost nothing to do with it. Instead of physicians and scientists being responsible for that reduction, it had been engineers. It was greater sanitation, the roads that brought food like oranges and citrus to northern cities, better nutrition, better sewage treatment plants, chlorination of water and a number of other engineering advances that were really responsible for the decline in death and mortality from infectious disease. That doesn’t mean that vaccines did not reduce the occurrence of infectious disease. A measles vaccine can stop you from getting measles, at least when you’re a child, but it isn’t making you healthier, and it isn’t making you more likely to live a long and healthy life. That question is a question that Anthony Fauci has never answered. There’s a lot of evidence that vaccines are not likely to give you an extended life. In fact, they are likely to shorten your life and make it less enriching and make you a less effective human being. Mr. Jekielek: What you’re describing here stands in the face of what everybody is supposed to know. Vaccines in general save 2 to 3 million lives a year, is what’s typically said. Then of course, there’s the question of these new genetic vaccine products. How do they fit into the picture? Mr. Kennedy: Let me answer your first question first. There are a lot of claims about vaccines and how many lives they have saved. There is very, very little science to support that. I’ll give you an example. Vaccines themselves are exempt from pre-licensure safety testing. Vaccines are not tested for safety against placebos in any kind of functioning trial prior to being approved. And the reason for that is because vaccines are regulated differently than other medicines. It really has to do with the CDC’s legacy as the public health service. The United States Public Health Service is a military organization. It’s one of the five uniform military services, and it’s the predecessor of the CDC. The Public Health Service originally launched the vaccine program as a national security defense against biological attacks on our country. They wanted to make sure if the Russians attacked America with anthrax or some other biological or pathogenic weapon, that we could quickly formulate a vaccine and deploy it to 200 million American civilians without any regulatory impediments. They originally said, “If we call it a medicine, we’re going to have to do a placebo-controlled trial, and that will take five years.” Why do they take five years? Because many of the injuries that come from vaccines, like all medicines, are long-term injuries. You may say that the vaccine prevented the infection, but then you don’t count the cancers, the neurological disorders, the ADHD, and the autoimmune diseases that pop up five years from now. You need long-term studies. But they didn’t want to do those because they felt there was an urgency to deploying them quickly. They said, “If we call it a medicine, we’re going to have to do a long-term study. Instead, we’ll call it a biologic, and we’ll make biologics exempt from long-term safety studies.” None of the 72 doses of vaccines that are currently mandated for children have ever been tested in a pre-licensing safety study against a true placebo. I said that for many, many years. Tony Fauci was publicly saying that I was inaccurate and that was vaccine misinformation. So, we sued them, me and Aaron Siri, who is one of my colleagues who’s an attorney. After a year of stonewalling us on that lawsuit, we said, “Show us one placebo-controlled study for any vaccine.” After a year of stonewalling and sandbagging us, they acknowledged on the courthouse steps that there were none and they put that in writing. We have that writing posted on CHD’s website now. Here’s an example, and this is what I worry about. For many years Bill Gates and the WHO [World Health Organization] have pushed children to receive DTP [Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis] vaccine. It is the most popular vaccine in the world because of their efforts, because of Bill Gates’ efforts. In 2016, he went to the Danish government with this vaccine and said, “You should give us money.” Incidentally, we withdrew that vaccine in the 1980s in this country because it was killing so many children. It was causing brain damage according to a NIH study that was done by UCLA. We ended it in the United States. We replaced it with a DTaP vaccine, an attenuated version, which is safer, but less effective. They did the same thing in Europe. While it was essentially banned for white children all across the world, Bill Gates and the WHO were giving it to African and Asian children. The Danish government, knowing that they were not using this vaccine in Denmark, said, “Can you show us a study that shows this is actually saving lives?” Bill Gates was unable to do that. Then, the Danish government said, “We’re going to do this study.” They went to Africa where the Danish have these extensive, very good clinics across Western Africa. They had 30 years of vaccination records. They brought in the best scientists in the world; Peter Aaby, who’s a kind of a deity of the African vaccine program, the Sigrid Morgan Center, and a number of other very famous, highly respected pro-vaccination scientists. They did a study looking at 30 years of records. What they found was that children, that girls who had received that vaccine were 10 times more likely to die than unvaccinated children. They were dying not of things that anybody had ever associated with the vaccine. Incidentally, they were protected hints against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis which were the target pathogens. But they were dying of anemia and bilharzia and malaria and dysentery and pulmonary respiratory issues like pneumonia. Nobody had ever connected the dots. It was not until these Danish scientists came in and actually looked at the data over 30 years that they realized, “Holy cow, this vaccine is killing more people than diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis did prior to the introduction of the vaccine. That’s the danger. You could have a vaccine for 30 or 40 years and nobody actually notices that the kids who are taking it are worse off from a health perspective, because you have never done the placebo-controlled trials. That is a big problem, and it’s a problem that’s endemic. In the whole field of vaccinology, they never do that trial. Mr. Jekielek: It strains credulity that such an obvious type of test wouldn’t be done. There is safety information on every vaccine in the insert. We hear that it takes 10 years to develop a vaccine. Joseph Lalapo, whose book you have here I noticed, writes that the way that vaccines are taught to medical students is with a kind of reverence. Having been in the midst of the COVID pandemic and looking at the response to it has caused a whole lot of us to start looking more deeply at these things that you’ve been looking at for a lot longer. Mr. Kennedy: Medical students are taught very briefly about vaccines. Dr. Meryl Nass told me that in medical school she had less than an hour about vaccines, and it was all about how to administer them and the timing of administering them. There was no mention of vaccine injuries or how to recognize vaccine injuries or that we ought to be looking for vaccine injuries and that you need to report vaccine injuries. That was never taught. If you look at a vaccine insert, it could have, for example, the MMR [Measles, Mumps, Rubella] vaccine probably has 60 or 70 injuries listed. At one point, because of a lawsuit, I actually had to go through all of the vaccine inserts for the mandatory vaccines that are now given to children between birth and 18 years old. There were 420 listed side effects, including deaths and paralysis and brain damage, and even autism is listed now. That is the one place where they tell the truth, the vaccine companies. The 1986 Vaccine Act made it illegal to sue a vaccine company for negligence. Today, the law is that, no matter how grievously injured you are, no matter how reckless the conduct, no matter how negligent the conduct, you cannot sue that company. The one place that you can sue them is if they knew about an injury and they failed to list it on their manufacturer’s insert. The manufacturer’s inserts actually tell the truth there. By the way, one of the things the industry likes to say is that we just throw everything and the kitchen sink in there to protect us from liability. But that’s not true. The federal law says that they’re not allowed to list the vaccine injury on that manufacturer’s insert unless the FDA makes a determination that the vaccine is the probable cause of that injury. You have all these really atrocious industry injuries that most doctors never read, and they certainly don’t read them to the patients before giving them the vaccine. Doctors basically are told that these are miracle technologies. They’ve saved millions, tens of millions, hundreds of millions of lives, but there is no science that supports that. There just simply is no science that supports that. There is a lot of science that supports the fact, the supposition that most of these vaccines, not all of them, but most of them, are causing more injuries and deaths than they are averting. Mr. Jekielek: Before we continue, I want to chart how you got to where you are today. This is your main issue, it would seem, because once upon a time, your main issue was environmental pollution. The regulatory capture you were looking at was the oil industry’s capture of agencies. Maybe just chart a bit earlier how you got into this, and what you saw and then how that eventually led you to today. Mr. Kennedy: I got into this unwillingly, kicking and screaming. It has not been a good career choice for me for social life or friendships. It has cost me a lot in terms of my family relationships, friend relationships, business deals and political relationships, which, by the way, I’m not complaining about, but it’s a fact. I ran the biggest water protection group in the world, and it is a group that I helped to build. It’s called the Waterkeeper Alliance. We have 350 water keepers on waterways in 46 countries, including about seven in China. We patrol them in boats, and we look for polluters and then we litigate against the polluters. We’re really a law enforcement organization. We have really good environmental laws in most countries. The problem is that the industry captures the regulators. The laws are never enforced, but a lot of the laws allow individuals, when the government fails to act, to step into the shoes of the prosecutor and prosecute the polluters themselves. Those are the laws that we take advantage of. Around 2003, the report said that every freshwater fish in North America had dangerous levels of mercury in its flesh, and that one out of every six American women had enough mercury in her core blood to essentially guarantee that her children would suffer some kind of brain damage, at least a couple of permanent IQ point losses. This was an environmental problem and a public health problem. My group originally represented fishermen. This struck me at the time and many others that we were living in a science fiction nightmare where my children and the children of every other American could now no longer engage in the seminal, primal activity of American youth, which is to go fishing with their mom or dad and then come home and safely eat the fish. We started suing the contributors to this pollution, the culprits, which were mainly coal burning power plants and cement kilns. Those were the biggest contributors. There is the mining industry as well that contributes to mercury in fish in the western states, but mainly in the U.S. and the provinces of Canada, it was the power plants. At that point, I had almost 40 lawsuits from different water keepers and I was going around the U.S. and Canada. We were pushing legislation to reform it and to get rid of the mercury. I was speaking regularly as an advocate, oftentimes to large groups of people. What I noticed is that these women started showing up at all my speeches. They would occupy the front row, and then they would come up to me afterward. They were the mothers of intellectually disabled children, and they all believed that mercury vaccines had caused their child’s injuries. Mr. Jekielek: Mercury in vaccines. Mr. Kennedy: Yes. There are certain vaccines that had mercury in them, and some vaccines don’t. But the dead virus vaccines mainly had mercury in them, like Hepatitis B, DTP, Hip vaccines and some of the others had mercury in them. They believed that those vaccines had caused their child’s injuries. They would say to me, in a kind of very respectful, but vaguely scolding way, “If you’re genuinely interested in mercury exposure to children, you need to look at vaccines.” It was not something that I wanted to do. I did not want to get into a public health issue. My family had been deeply involved in the area of intellectual disabilities and public health, and I had chosen a different path for myself, which was this water protection. One of these women was a psychologist from Minnesota named Sarah Bridges, who showed up at my house in the summer of 2005 in Hyannis, Massachusetts. I had a little bungalow there and she found me. She took out of her trunk a stack of published scientific studies, about 10 inches deep. She put them on my front stoop and said, “I’m not going to leave here until you read these.” Her son had been a healthy child who had gotten a mercury vaccine when he was two and was permanently disabled very badly, and was non-verbal and non-toilet trained. At that time, he was about 16 or 17 years old, and he had received $20 million from the vaccine court. The vaccine court had recognized that his autism came from the vaccine. This was early on before the ideology clamped down and you weren’t allowed to say that anymore. She didn’t want that to happen to other children. So, I sat there. I grew up loving science. I wanted to be a scientist when I was a kid or a veterinarian. My job is about reading science because I bring environmental cases. I brought up many hundreds of them. In almost every one of those cases there’s a scientific controversy. I have to be able to read science, and I know how to read it critically. I began reading just the abstracts for these studies that she put there. They were dumbfounding, and they were breathtaking. I was just immediately dumbstruck by the huge delta between what the public health agencies were saying about vaccine safety, and what the actual published peer reviewed science was saying. I spent the next week calling high-level health officials. One of the advantages I have because of my name, my relationships, my family and my uncle Teddy Kennedy who was my godfather, was that he ran the health committee for 50 years in the United States Senate. He wrote the budget, he created some of these agencies, and he wrote the budgets for them every year. He knew Tony Fauci, Francis Collins, and everybody else. My uncle and father had written a lot of the legislation that created those agencies. There are institutions within NIH, the Eunice Shriver and Rose Kennedy Institutes that are named for members of my family. I was able to get these people on the phone and I began asking them specifically about the studies. I recognized the top regulators were simply not conversant with the science. They just simply had not read it. A couple of them actually lied to me and I caught them in the lies. The weird thing was that the regulators, like Francis Collins, Kathleen Stratton from the Institute of Medicine, and Marie McCormick said to me, “I don’t know the answer to those questions, you should call Paul Offit.” Paul Offit is a vaccine maker who’s a partner at Merck. I was baffled by that. Because if I called the EPA and said to the EPA, “Tell me why you passed this regulation, which doesn’t seem to make sense in light of the science I’m looking at,” they would answer that question. They wouldn’t tell me, “Go talk to a coal official, a coal company CEO.” But that’s what the health regulators said. They sent me to Paul Offit, who was a vaccine maker and insider. At that point I was kind of getting sucked down a wormhole, because I was getting angry as I could tell the regulators were doing. I was reading the science that said, “This is entering children, it’s killing their brains.” I was talking to regulators who had no explanation or excuse. That was the beginning of my journey. Mr. Jekielek: I have to ask what it was like growing up in the Kennedy family? Mr. Kennedy: That’s a switch. To me, I had the greatest childhood. I’ve written about my childhood in a book called American Values. My childhood was exciting. From when I was little I felt fully engaged with what was happening in this country. We knew that what we were seeing on a day-to-day basis was part of the history of our country. My parents talked to us about history and literature and values every day. We were all raised with this notion that our lives would be consumed by some great controversy, and that we would be very privileged if we got to take some meaningful part in it. Mr. Jekielek: It seems that that came true. Mr. Kennedy: For better or worse. Mr. Jekielek: One of the things I’ve been discussing with a few of our editors and contributors about what to talk to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about is that there was this social contract in the U.S. where the distance between the people in charge of the country and the people wasn’t that far apart. There was an ability to dialogue. What we’ve been learning lately is that distance seems to be a lot further apart than many of us had expected. We’ve also been learning, going back to your uncle’s assassination in the 1960s, that U.S. agencies may have been involved way back then. There are people even asking, “Do we even live in a democracy today?” The Global War on Democracy is the subtitle of The Real Anthony Fauci book. I want to get your thoughts on what has happened over this time? Did something change at that time that we weren’t aware of? Is this still the country that most of the world is clamoring to get into, because it represents freedom and democracy and a bright future? Mr. Kennedy: Yes, I think something did change when my uncle died. When I was seven years old on January 17th, 1961, my birthday, President Eisenhower made what was probably, and what I look at today, as the most important speech in American history. It was his farewell speech to the nation. Speaker: “To the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought by the military industrial complex.” Mr. Kennedy: Three days later, my uncle John Kennedy would take the oath of office and I would be there attending that. But Eisenhower gave this wonderful speech in which he warned America against the emergence of a military industrial complex, a permanent war industry, and an associated federal science technocracy, which he specifically mentioned, that would soon emerge if we did not constrain it, and dominate American democracy and rob us of all of our values and all the things that are important about our country. My uncle quickly realized that Eisenhower had captured the most important issue of our time. He realized this during the Bay of Pigs invasion. In the middle of that invasion, he realized that his joint chiefs of staff, Curtis LeMay and Louis Lemnitzer, plus the CIA, particularly Alan Dulles and Charles Cabell and Richard Bissell, had lied to his face about the invasion. They had made a series of lies in order to trick him two-and-a-half months into his presidency into making that invasion when they knew that it would fail. They believed that he would be embarrassed. He would be a young president. In order to avert the humiliation of that failure, he would call in the United States Navy, and in particular the aircraft carrier Essex, and he would order air support to topple Castro. My uncle refused to do that. That afternoon, he said to one of his aides, while he stood in the Oval Office, “I want to take the CIA and crush it into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.” Over the next several months, he fired all of the heads of the CIA, Charles Cabell, Richard Bissell, and Alan Dulles, who ironically, would later sit on the Warren Commission and run it. He spent the next three years of his presidency in hand-to-hand combat with his own military industrial complex and his intelligence apparatus trying to keep our country out of war, which they wanted us to get into because that’s their business. He refused to send combat troops into Laos. They already thought he was a traitor. He refused to confront the Russians. He organized a withdrawal of the Russians by contacting Krushchev directly from the Berlin Wall for the Checkpoint Charlie conflict. He refused to send combat troops to Vietnam, despite being surrounded by virtually everybody on his cabinet, all of the joint chiefs, all the intelligence agencies and the senior bureaucrats like Dean Acheson who were telling him, “We need to send 250,000 to 500,000 US troops in Vietnam.” He said, “It’s their war. We can support them, we can train them, but we’re not going to send combat troops.” By the end of his presidency, despite this extraordinary pressure, he had sent 16,000 advisors who were not technically allowed. They were not allowed to participate in combat, although many of them did illegally. Just before he died, in October of 1963, he issued a national security order ordering all the troops home from Vietnam, with the first thousand coming home prior to December, 1964, and the other 15,000 home by the end of 1965. That may be the order that sealed his fate. He was asked one time by one of his best friends, Ben Bradley, who ran the Washington Post, what he wanted on his gravestone, the epithet he wanted on his gravestone. He said that he had kept the peace. He said, “The primary job of an American president is to keep the country out of war,” which is exactly what President Eisenhower said. And he did that. And of course, as soon as he died, the intelligence agencies in the Navy concocted a false flag, essentially, called the Tonkin Gulf incident and used that as a pretext for Americanizing the Vietnam War. Immediately after that, President [Johnson] sent 250,000 U.S. troops and it became an American war. My father then ran against [Johnson] on the war issue, and against the military industrial complex, and he was killed in the process. Martin Luther King also came out against the war. Martin Luther King was surrounded by other civil rights leaders who said that we shouldn’t get involved in the Vietnam War. “It’s not a civil rights issue.” He said the thing that my father repeatedly said, and that my grandfather had said, “America cannot be an imperial state abroad and continue to be a constitutional democracy at home. If you are imperial, you cannot be a democracy at home.” King took the position that our primary objective must be ending the Vietnam War because as long as the military industrial complex was running our country, we would not have a system of justice at home. We’d have an excuse to turn America into a police state, a surveillance state, a national security state. He was killed two months before my father. As soon as my dad died, Nixon doubled the amount of people who were involved in the war and kept it going. Most of the people who died in Vietnam died after that. When my uncle was killed, there had been 73 Americans who were killed over there and he said, “That’s it.” That’s when he died, after the national security order. We lost 53,000 people. The Vietnamese lost millions, and Cambodians lost millions in that conflict. My father’s death was also a turning point. Again, the military industrial complex increased its power. We became more and more of a surveillance state at home, and a national security state. The next really big change occurred on 9/11. The Cold War was over. We were supposed to get a peace dividend. In 1992, the Cold War ended, and we were supposed to get a peace dividend. We were supposed to beat our swords into plow shares. We would stop making Stealth bombers that cost a billion dollars and couldn’t fly in the rain. We would put that money into schools, into roads, into police protection, into the environment, and into rebuilding the gutted middle class in this country and rebuilding the structures and institutions of American democracy. In the next year, we had the first World Trade Center attack. The next thing that happened was 9/11. By the end of that decade, we had 888 military bases abroad. That’s an imperial nation. I would say the final blow in this coup d’etat against democracy by the military medical industrial complex and by the biosecurity agenda was Covid19, when America really got rid of our Bill of Rights. The government began censoring speech for the first time in American history. Once you censored speech, Jefferson, Madison, Hamilton and Adams all said the same thing; “We put free expression in the First Amendment, because all of the other amendments and rights depend on it. If a government has the right to censor its critics and silence its critics, it has license for every atrocity.” They asserted that power successfully to suppress dissent. They closed all the churches for a year with no scientific citation and no regulatory process. There were no hearings, there was no environmental impact statement, there was no rationale that anybody could see or challenge in any way that they could do that. They got rid of freedom of assembly, which is also in the First Amendment, by the social distancing dictates. They went after property rights for the Fifth Amendment, shutting down 3.3 million businesses with no due process and no just compensation, in total violation of the Constitution. They then went after jury trials, the Seventh Amendment. They made it so that if you are one of thousands of companies providing vaccines, masks, PCR tests, or other countermeasures, no matter how negligent or reckless they behave, you cannot sue them. Here’s what the Seventh Amendment says; “No Americans shall be deprived of the right to a trial before a jury of his peers in cases or their controversies exceeding $25 in value.” There is no pandemic exception. It says if a corporation hurts you, you get to sue them. But suddenly, we couldn’t do that anymore. By the way, the framers of the Constitution knew all about pandemics. There were two pandemics in the Revolutionary War, one of them that decimated the army of Virginia, a malaria epidemic. Then, there was a smallpox epidemic that disabled and froze the army of New England at a critical time when we fought in Montreal. Benedict Arnold’s army took Montreal, and Canada today would be part of the United States except for that smallpox epidemic. Between the time of the end of the revolution and the passage of or the approval of the Bill of Rights and the U.S. Constitution, there were epidemics in every city in our country that killed tens of thousands of people. There was smallpox, yellow fever, and cholera in all of the cities. And yet, the framers decided not to put an epidemic exception into the Constitution. We’ve had much worse tragedies than Covid19. We had this civil war that killed 669,000 Americans, the equivalent of 10 million today, that almost destroyed our country. Our country was this close to being decimated. And yet, when Lincoln tried to suspend Habeas Corpus, the Supreme Court said he couldn’t do it. The Spanish flu epidemic, which killed 50 million people around the world, dwarfs the COVID pandemic. We still did not suspend the Constitution. Suddenly, it became okay to suspend the Constitution. That’s pretty hard to explain. Coming up next on American Thought Leaders. Mr. Kennedy: If you look at these simulations, and again and again, they’re practicing one thing. Mr. Jekielek: In part two of my interview with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., founder and chief legal counsel of Children’s Health Defense, he explains how U.S. government tools developed for influencing overseas populations were deployed on Americans. Mr. Kennedy: The CIA has become a government within our government and really a tumor on our system. Mr. Jekielek: What does he think about allegations the CIA was involved in the assassination of his uncle, John F. Kennedy? At a time when many have lost faith in the American system, how do we restore power to the American people and rekindle American ideals? This is American thought leaders and I’m Jan Jekielek. This interview has been edited for clarity and brevity.

Mark explains how Dark Occult symbolism is used to ritualistically mock the members of Police and Military institutions. Recorded April 10, 2011 by Tim Smith at the Free Your Mind Conference, Philadelphia, PA https://www.whatonearthishappening.com/videos/195-mark-passio-on-occult-mockery-of-police-a-military http://web.archive.org/web/20110804061207/http://www.freeyourmindconference.com/

Mark was interviewed by Logan Hart and Bryan Easterday on The Wizard Factory on February 18, 2023. The main topic of discussion was Human Nature - what it IS and what it IS NOT. What IS the nature of human beings? Is there such a thing? And what of free will? Can our nature be changed? Joined by philosophical titan Mark Passio, we dive deep into this profound and ever important topic, and much more Chapters: - 03:17 Setting The Stage - 04:22 Defining Our Terms - 08:42 Conditions vs Nature - 10:40 The Importance of Understanding Human Nature - 13:14 The Dialectic About Human Nature - 19:14 The Human Mind Is LIKE A Computer - 26:42 The Current Human Condition - 29:53 The Value of Freedom - 33:33 Our Programmability Determines Our Condition - 37:13 Taking Responsibility For Your Role In The Current Condition - 39:57 We Can Change Our Own Programming - 54:57 The Real Meaning of Nature (NTR) - 57:39 Why People Struggle With Understanding This - 58:26 Finding Your Power In Becoming The Causal Factor - 01:03:42 The Importance of Principles - 01:06:16 Human Nature Is Psychology - 01:10:01 Technology’s Role In The Human Condition - 01:24:53 Final Thoughts & Outro https://www.thewizardfactory.com Mark's Website: https://www.whatonearthishappening.com Mark’s Presentations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASUHN3gNxWo&list=PL4vbJSfPOHf-6F324i8j6I47Dy2fQB_oT&index=1&t=0s Mark Passio & The Science of Natural Law Documentary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bP5sk5xp9WM&t=0s Source https://www.whatonearthishappening.com/news/854-mark-interviewed-on-the-wizard-factory-february-18-2023 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgMtKvNYU_c __________________________________________ The human condition by Hannah Arendt https://monoskop.org/images/e/e2/Arendt_Hannah_The_Human_Condition_2nd_1998.pdf The Origins of Totalitarianism by Hannah Arendt https://archive.org/details/TheOriginsOfTotalitarianism/mode/2up https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/hannah-arendt-the-origins-of-totalitarianism