TRUTH SCIENCE151

In this video we have a sovereign citizen in Detroit 36th district court. Previous court date: https://youtu.be/nbpVWPrumsM Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #COURT #COURTCAM #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #DETROIT #DETROIT36DISTRICT #DETROITDISTRICT434 #BODYCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

This video features the same sovereign citizen who was held in contempt by a strict Kansas Judge. Previous court date: https://youtu.be/7uP0Xf06jm0 Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #COURT #COURTCAM #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #GEORGIA #BODYCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

In this video we have a Moorish sovereign citizen who thinks that he is "traveling and not driving". Second traffic stop: https://youtu.be/wDn3HssfT4U Third traffic stop: https://youtu.be/fmruEWMVKF4 Fourth traffic stop: https://youtu.be/9aGzHek9z7Q "The inhabitants of Africa," averred the Moorish Holy Koran, "are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites from the land of Canaan" (ancient Palestine, presumably located in West Asia). The eventual founders of the Moroccan empire, the Moabites from the land of Moab in turn "received permission from the Pharaohs of Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa, and were joined by "their Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren seeking new homes." Hence, claimed the Koran Questions for Moorish Americans, "Moroccans" was the modern name for the ancient Moabites. But how had biblical Moabites, who inhabited what is seems, was now the nationstate of Jordan, become modern-day Moroccans occupying the northwest corner of the African continent? Noble Drew Ali's intention, to lay claim to the grandeur of the former Moorish empire while at the same time grounding Moorish American identity in biblical antiquity. From the scriptures Prophet Ali extracted a Moabite identity for African Americans, but his real goal, or so it appears, was to appropriate the more recently arrived and decidedly non-biblical Morabites, or Almoravids —an error no doubt attributable to post-vocalic -r deletion in African-American speech patterns (Ebonics be praised!). The term Morabite was derived from the Arabic word murabti, meaning "bound," as in a religious order. Murabti was the name assumed by North African Muslims who submitted to a purified Islamic doctrine during the period spanning the mid-eleventh to the mid-twelfth centuries. After conquering North Africa, the Murabtin (Almoravids) traversed the Straits of Magellan (Gibraltar?) and gave renewed impetus to the Moorish empire in Spain. Hence Morabites were indeed Moors who inhabited the northwestern shores of Africa and beyond. And were it actually possible for Moorish Americans to trace their ancestry directly to the Moors of Morocco, Morabite —but not Moabite—ancestors likely would be found among them. The word "Moor" has its origin in 46 B.C. when the Romans invaded North Africa. They called the inhabitants they met there Maures from the Greek word mauros, meaning dark or black. The word indicated more than one ethnic group. To Shakespeare "Moor" simply meant "black African." It is important to point out that the medieval Moors who conquered Europe should not be confused with the modern Moors aka "Moorish Americans". In Ross Brann's article "The Moors?" he considers the meaning and significance of Moorish identity in literary works, film, and scholarship. Brann notes that even today the figure is "employed regularly in academic circles and in popular culture without much question or reflection" and "without clarification of who precisely the Moors are". Recounting a history of the uses of the term Moor, he explains that "Andalusi Arabic sources—as opposed to later mudéjar and morisco sources in Aljamiado—neither refer to individuals as Moors nor recognize any such group, community or culture". Moor is a term applied from the outside, by Europeans, yet "unlike relatively stable terms of Roman provenance inherited by Christians such as Arab, Ishmaelite and Saracen," the significance of the term varies in particular historical moments and shifts over time. Early in the history of al-Andalus, Moor signified "Berber" as a geographic and ethnic identity. Later writing, however, from twelfth- and thirteenth-century Christian kingdoms, demonstrates the "transformation of Moor from a term signifying Berber into a general term referring primarily to Muslims (regardless of ethnicity) living in recently conquered Christian lands and secondarily to those residing in what was still left of al-Andalus". Moors are not a distinct orself-definedpeople. The 1911Encyclopædia Britannicaobserved that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value." Europeans of theMiddle Agesand theearly modern periodvariously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans. The term has also been used in Europe in a broader, somewhat derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general, especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVEREIGN #FLORIDA #SOVCIT #COURT #BODYCAM #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

In this video we have a Moorish sovereign citizen attempting the right to travel on a motorbike. First traffic stop: https://youtu.be/v-aNyZcO5xk Second traffic stop: https://youtu.be/wDn3HssfT4U Fourth traffic stop: https://youtu.be/9aGzHek9z7Q "The inhabitants of Africa," averred the Moorish Holy Koran, "are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites from the land of Canaan" (ancient Palestine, presumably located in West Asia). The eventual founders of the Moroccan empire, the Moabites from the land of Moab in turn "received permission from the Pharaohs of Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa, and were joined by "their Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren seeking new homes." Hence, claimed the Koran Questions for Moorish Americans, "Moroccans" was the modern name for the ancient Moabites. But how had biblical Moabites, who inhabited what is seems, was now the nationstate of Jordan, become modern-day Moroccans occupying the northwest corner of the African continent? Noble Drew Ali's intention, to lay claim to the grandeur of the former Moorish empire while at the same time grounding Moorish American identity in biblical antiquity. From the scriptures Prophet Ali extracted a Moabite identity for African Americans, but his real goal, or so it appears, was to appropriate the more recently arrived and decidedly non-biblical Morabites, or Almoravids —an error no doubt attributable to post-vocalic -r deletion in African-American speech patterns (Ebonics be praised!). The term Morabite was derived from the Arabic word murabti, meaning "bound," as in a religious order. Murabti was the name assumed by North African Muslims who submitted to a purified Islamic doctrine during the period spanning the mid-eleventh to the mid-twelfth centuries. After conquering North Africa, the Murabtin (Almoravids) traversed the Straits of Magellan (Gibraltar?) and gave renewed impetus to the Moorish empire in Spain. Hence Morabites were indeed Moors who inhabited the northwestern shores of Africa and beyond. And were it actually possible for Moorish Americans to trace their ancestry directly to the Moors of Morocco, Morabite —but not Moabite—ancestors likely would be found among them. The word "Moor" has its origin in 46 B.C. when the Romans invaded North Africa. They called the inhabitants they met there Maures from the Greek word mauros, meaning dark or black. The word indicated more than one ethnic group. To Shakespeare "Moor" simply meant "black African." It is important to point out that the medieval Moors who conquered Europe should not be confused with the modern Moors aka "Moorish Americans". In Ross Brann's article "The Moors?" he considers the meaning and significance of Moorish identity in literary works, film, and scholarship. Brann notes that even today the figure is "employed regularly in academic circles and in popular culture without much question or reflection" and "without clarification of who precisely the Moors are". Recounting a history of the uses of the term Moor, he explains that "Andalusi Arabic sources—as opposed to later mudéjar and morisco sources in Aljamiado—neither refer to individuals as Moors nor recognize any such group, community or culture". Moor is a term applied from the outside, by Europeans, yet "unlike relatively stable terms of Roman provenance inherited by Christians such as Arab, Ishmaelite and Saracen," the significance of the term varies in particular historical moments and shifts over time. Early in the history of al-Andalus, Moor signified "Berber" as a geographic and ethnic identity. Later writing, however, from twelfth- and thirteenth-century Christian kingdoms, demonstrates the "transformation of Moor from a term signifying Berber into a general term referring primarily to Muslims (regardless of ethnicity) living in recently conquered Christian lands and secondarily to those residing in what was still left of al-Andalus". Moors are not a distinct orself-definedpeople. The 1911Encyclopædia Britannicaobserved that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value." Europeans of theMiddle Agesand theearly modern periodvariously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans. The term has also been used in Europe in a broader, somewhat derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general, especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVEREIGN #FLORIDA #SOVCIT #COURT #BODYCAM #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

This video features a Moorish sovereign citizen attempting the right to travel on a motorbike again. First traffic stop: https://youtu.be/v-aNyZcO5xk Second traffic stop: https://youtu.be/wDn3HssfT4U Third traffic stop: https://youtu.be/fmruEWMVKF4 "The inhabitants of Africa," averred the Moorish Holy Koran, "are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites from the land of Canaan" (ancient Palestine, presumably located in West Asia). The eventual founders of the Moroccan empire, the Moabites from the land of Moab in turn "received permission from the Pharaohs of Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa, and were joined by "their Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren seeking new homes." Hence, claimed the Koran Questions for Moorish Americans, "Moroccans" was the modern name for the ancient Moabites. But how had biblical Moabites, who inhabited what is seems, was now the nationstate of Jordan, become modern-day Moroccans occupying the northwest corner of the African continent? Noble Drew Ali's intention, to lay claim to the grandeur of the former Moorish empire while at the same time grounding Moorish American identity in biblical antiquity. From the scriptures Prophet Ali extracted a Moabite identity for African Americans, but his real goal, or so it appears, was to appropriate the more recently arrived and decidedly non-biblical Morabites, or Almoravids —an error no doubt attributable to post-vocalic -r deletion in African-American speech patterns (Ebonics be praised!). The term Morabite was derived from the Arabic word murabti, meaning "bound," as in a religious order. Murabti was the name assumed by North African Muslims who submitted to a purified Islamic doctrine during the period spanning the mid-eleventh to the mid-twelfth centuries. After conquering North Africa, the Murabtin (Almoravids) traversed the Straits of Magellan (Gibraltar?) and gave renewed impetus to the Moorish empire in Spain. Hence Morabites were indeed Moors who inhabited the northwestern shores of Africa and beyond. And were it actually possible for Moorish Americans to trace their ancestry directly to the Moors of Morocco, Morabite —but not Moabite—ancestors likely would be found among them. The word "Moor" has its origin in 46 B.C. when the Romans invaded North Africa. They called the inhabitants they met there Maures from the Greek word mauros, meaning dark or black. The word indicated more than one ethnic group. To Shakespeare "Moor" simply meant "black African." It is important to point out that the medieval Moors who conquered Europe should not be confused with the modern Moors aka "Moorish Americans". In Ross Brann's article "The Moors?" he considers the meaning and significance of Moorish identity in literary works, film, and scholarship. Brann notes that even today the figure is "employed regularly in academic circles and in popular culture without much question or reflection" and "without clarification of who precisely the Moors are". Recounting a history of the uses of the term Moor, he explains that "Andalusi Arabic sources—as opposed to later mudéjar and morisco sources in Aljamiado—neither refer to individuals as Moors nor recognize any such group, community or culture". Moor is a term applied from the outside, by Europeans, yet "unlike relatively stable terms of Roman provenance inherited by Christians such as Arab, Ishmaelite and Saracen," the significance of the term varies in particular historical moments and shifts over time. Early in the history of al-Andalus, Moor signified "Berber" as a geographic and ethnic identity. Later writing, however, from twelfth- and thirteenth-century Christian kingdoms, demonstrates the "transformation of Moor from a term signifying Berber into a general term referring primarily to Muslims (regardless of ethnicity) living in recently conquered Christian lands and secondarily to those residing in what was still left of al-Andalus". Moors are not a distinct orself-definedpeople. The 1911Encyclopædia Britannicaobserved that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value." Europeans of theMiddle Agesand theearly modern periodvariously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans. The term has also been used in Europe in a broader, somewhat derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general, especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVEREIGN #FLORIDA #SOVCIT #COURT #BODYCAM #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY #TRUTHSCIENCEEL

In this video we have a sovereign citizen detained at a traffic stop. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVEREIGN #WASHINGTON #SOVCIT #COURT #BODYCAM #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

This video features a Sovereign Citizen in court. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #COURT #COURTCAM #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #UNITEDSTATES #BODYCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

In this video Judge Simpson quickly dismantles the El Bey defense. 14A-1 District Court "The inhabitants of Africa," averred the Moorish Holy Koran, "are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites from the land of Canaan" (ancient Palestine, presumably located in West Asia). The eventual founders of the Moroccan empire, the Moabites from the land of Moab in turn "received permission from the Pharaohs of Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa, and were joined by "their Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren seeking new homes." Hence, claimed the Koran Questions for Moorish Americans, "Moroccans" was the modern name for the ancient Moabites. But how had biblical Moabites, who inhabited what is seems, was now the nationstate of Jordan, become modern-day Moroccans occupying the northwest corner of the African continent? Noble Drew Ali's intention, to lay claim to the grandeur of the former Moorish empire while at the same time grounding Moorish American identity in biblical antiquity. From the scriptures Prophet Ali extracted a Moabite identity for African Americans, but his real goal, or so it appears, was to appropriate the more recently arrived and decidedly non-biblical Morabites, or Almoravids —an error no doubt attributable to post-vocalic -r deletion in African-American speech patterns (Ebonics be praised!). The term Morabite was derived from the Arabic word murabti, meaning "bound," as in a religious order. Murabti was the name assumed by North African Muslims who submitted to a purified Islamic doctrine during the period spanning the mid-eleventh to the mid-twelfth centuries. After conquering North Africa, the Murabtin (Almoravids) traversed the Straits of Magellan (Gibraltar?) and gave renewed impetus to the Moorish empire in Spain. Hence Morabites were indeed Moors who inhabited the northwestern shores of Africa and beyond. And were it actually possible for Moorish Americans to trace their ancestry directly to the Moors of Morocco, Morabite —but not Moabite—ancestors likely would be found among them. The word "Moor" has its origin in 46 B.C. when the Romans invaded North Africa. They called the inhabitants they met there Maures from the Greek word mauros, meaning dark or black. The word indicated more than one ethnic group. To Shakespeare "Moor" simply meant "black African." It is important to point out that the medieval Moors who conquered Europe should not be confused with the modern Moors aka "Moorish Americans". In Ross Brann's article "The Moors?" he considers the meaning and significance of Moorish identity in literary works, film, and scholarship. Brann notes that even today the figure is "employed regularly in academic circles and in popular culture without much question or reflection" and "without clarification of who precisely the Moors are". Recounting a history of the uses of the term Moor, he explains that "Andalusi Arabic sources—as opposed to later mudéjar and morisco sources in Aljamiado—neither refer to individuals as Moors nor recognize any such group, community or culture". Moor is a term applied from the outside, by Europeans, yet "unlike relatively stable terms of Roman provenance inherited by Christians such as Arab, Ishmaelite and Saracen," the significance of the term varies in particular historical moments and shifts over time. Early in the history of al-Andalus, Moor signified "Berber" as a geographic and ethnic identity. Later writing, however, from twelfth- and thirteenth-century Christian kingdoms, demonstrates the "transformation of Moor from a term signifying Berber into a general term referring primarily to Muslims (regardless of ethnicity) living in recently conquered Christian lands and secondarily to those residing in what was still left of al-Andalus". Moors are not a distinct orself-definedpeople. The 1911Encyclopædia Britannicaobserved that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value." Europeans of theMiddle Agesand theearly modern periodvariously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans. The term has also been used in Europe as a derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general, especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #COURT #COURTCAM #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #MICHIGAN #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #BODYCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

This video features a sovereign citizen attempting the right to travel in Indiana. Other traffic stops: https://youtu.be/uHWCH902g6s https://youtu.be/2EzJHot8rbo https://youtu.be/-5fnJ2P687I Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #COURT #INDIANA #BODYCAM #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

In this video we have a sovereign citizen in Detroit 34th district court. Previous court dates: https://youtu.be/vbilAMLjl8Y?si=ajJJUIIplHM1xK-6 https://youtu.be/CylB-XwPUOY https://youtu.be/njpPJLdZwLw Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #COURT #COURTCAM #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #DETROIT #34TH #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #BODYCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

In this video we have a sovereign citizen in court. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #COURT #COURTCAM #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #DETROIT #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #BODYCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

In this video we have a sovereign citizen in court. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #COURT #COURTCAM #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #DETROIT #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #BODYCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

In this video we have a sovereign citizen in Detroit 34th district court. Previous court date: https://youtu.be/CylB-XwPUOY Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #COURT #COURTCAM #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #DETROIT #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #BODYCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

In this video we have a sovereign citizen in court facing some very serious charges. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #COURT #COURTCAM #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #DETROIT #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #BODYCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

In this video we have a Moorish sovereign citizen making the most ridiculous motion in court. "The inhabitants of Africa," averred the Moorish Holy Koran, "are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites from the land of Canaan" (ancient Palestine, presumably located in West Asia). The eventual founders of the Moroccan empire, the Moabites from the land of Moab in turn "received permission from the Pharaohs of Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa, and were joined by "their Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren seeking new homes." Hence, claimed the Koran Questions for Moorish Americans, "Moroccans" was the modern name for the ancient Moabites. But how had biblical Moabites, who inhabited what is seems, was now the nationstate of Jordan, become modern-day Moroccans occupying the northwest corner of the African continent? Noble Drew Ali's intention, to lay claim to the grandeur of the former Moorish empire while at the same time grounding Moorish American identity in biblical antiquity. From the scriptures Prophet Ali extracted a Moabite identity for African Americans, but his real goal, or so it appears, was to appropriate the more recently arrived and decidedly non-biblical Morabites, or Almoravids —an error no doubt attributable to post-vocalic -r deletion in African-American speech patterns (Ebonics be praised!). The term Morabite was derived from the Arabic word murabti, meaning "bound," as in a religious order. Murabti was the name assumed by North African Muslims who submitted to a purified Islamic doctrine during the period spanning the mid-eleventh to the mid-twelfth centuries. After conquering North Africa, the Murabtin (Almoravids) traversed the Straits of Magellan (Gibraltar?) and gave renewed impetus to the Moorish empire in Spain. Hence Morabites were indeed Moors who inhabited the northwestern shores of Africa and beyond. And were it actually possible for Moorish Americans to trace their ancestry directly to the Moors of Morocco, Morabite —but not Moabite—ancestors likely would be found among them. The word "Moor" has its origin in 46 B.C. when the Romans invaded North Africa. They called the inhabitants they met there Maures from the Greek word mauros, meaning dark or black. The word indicated more than one ethnic group. To Shakespeare "Moor" simply meant "black African." It is important to point out that the medieval Moors who conquered Europe should not be confused with the modern Moors aka "Moorish Americans". In Ross Brann's article "The Moors?" he considers the meaning and significance of Moorish identity in literary works, film, and scholarship. Brann notes that even today the figure is "employed regularly in academic circles and in popular culture without much question or reflection" and "without clarification of who precisely the Moors are". Recounting a history of the uses of the term Moor, he explains that "Andalusi Arabic sources—as opposed to later mudéjar and morisco sources in Aljamiado—neither refer to individuals as Moors nor recognize any such group, community or culture". Moor is a term applied from the outside, by Europeans, yet "unlike relatively stable terms of Roman provenance inherited by Christians such as Arab, Ishmaelite and Saracen," the significance of the term varies in particular historical moments and shifts over time. Early in the history of al-Andalus, Moor signified "Berber" as a geographic and ethnic identity. Later writing, however, from twelfth- and thirteenth-century Christian kingdoms, demonstrates the "transformation of Moor from a term signifying Berber into a general term referring primarily to Muslims (regardless of ethnicity) living in recently conquered Christian lands and secondarily to those residing in what was still left of al-Andalus". Moors are not a distinct orself-definedpeople. The 1911Encyclopædia Britannicaobserved that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value." Europeans of theMiddle Agesand theearly modern periodvariously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans. The term has also been used in Europe as a derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general, especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #COURT #COURTCAM #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #BODYCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

In this video we have an entitled woman who thinks that laws dont apply to her and because of that she turns a citation into an arrest. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #BODYCAM #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #CHICAGO #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #COURT #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

In this video we have a very tough Michigan judge completely destroying a sovereign citizen in court. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #COURT #COURTCAM #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #MICHIGAN #BODYCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

In this video we have a sovereign citizen making some of the most ridiculous arguments in a Michigan court. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #COURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #MICHIGAN #BODYCAM #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

This video features a Moorish sovereign citizen facing some very serious charges in a Michigan court. "The inhabitants of Africa," averred the Moorish Holy Koran, "are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites from the land of Canaan" (ancient Palestine, presumably located in West Asia). The eventual founders of the Moroccan empire, the Moabites from the land of Moab in turn "received permission from the Pharaohs of Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa, and were joined by "their Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren seeking new homes." Hence, claimed the Koran Questions for Moorish Americans, "Moroccans" was the modern name for the ancient Moabites. But how had biblical Moabites, who inhabited what is seems, was now the nationstate of Jordan, become modern-day Moroccans occupying the northwest corner of the African continent? Noble Drew Ali's intention, to lay claim to the grandeur of the former Moorish empire while at the same time grounding Moorish American identity in biblical antiquity. From the scriptures Prophet Ali extracted a Moabite identity for African Americans, but his real goal, or so it appears, was to appropriate the more recently arrived and decidedly non-biblical Morabites, or Almoravids —an error no doubt attributable to post-vocalic -r deletion in African-American speech patterns (Ebonics be praised!). The term Morabite was derived from the Arabic word murabti, meaning "bound," as in a religious order. Murabti was the name assumed by North African Muslims who submitted to a purified Islamic doctrine during the period spanning the mid-eleventh to the mid-twelfth centuries. After conquering North Africa, the Murabtin (Almoravids) traversed the Straits of Magellan (Gibraltar?) and gave renewed impetus to the Moorish empire in Spain. Hence Morabites were indeed Moors who inhabited the northwestern shores of Africa and beyond. And were it actually possible for Moorish Americans to trace their ancestry directly to the Moors of Morocco, Morabite —but not Moabite—ancestors likely would be found among them. The word "Moor" has its origin in 46 B.C. when the Romans invaded North Africa. They called the inhabitants they met there Maures from the Greek word mauros, meaning dark or black. The word indicated more than one ethnic group. To Shakespeare "Moor" simply meant "black African." It is important to point out that the medieval Moors who conquered Europe should not be confused with the modern Moors aka "Moorish Americans". In Ross Brann's article "The Moors?" he considers the meaning and significance of Moorish identity in literary works, film, and scholarship. Brann notes that even today the figure is "employed regularly in academic circles and in popular culture without much question or reflection" and "without clarification of who precisely the Moors are". Recounting a history of the uses of the term Moor, he explains that "Andalusi Arabic sources—as opposed to later mudéjar and morisco sources in Aljamiado—neither refer to individuals as Moors nor recognize any such group, community or culture". Moor is a term applied from the outside, by Europeans, yet "unlike relatively stable terms of Roman provenance inherited by Christians such as Arab, Ishmaelite and Saracen," the significance of the term varies in particular historical moments and shifts over time. Early in the history of al-Andalus, Moor signified "Berber" as a geographic and ethnic identity. Later writing, however, from twelfth- and thirteenth-century Christian kingdoms, demonstrates the "transformation of Moor from a term signifying Berber into a general term referring primarily to Muslims (regardless of ethnicity) living in recently conquered Christian lands and secondarily to those residing in what was still left of al-Andalus". Moors are not a distinct orself-definedpeople. The 1911Encyclopædia Britannicaobserved that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value." Europeans of theMiddle Agesand theearly modern periodvariously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans. The term has also been used in Europe in a broader, somewhat derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general, especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #COURT #COURTCAM #SOVEREIGNCITIZEN #MOORISHAMERICAN #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #MICHIGAN #ZOOM #SOVCIT #NewMoorOrder #RISEOFTHEMOORS #SOVEREIGN #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITSARRESTED #CanaanlandMoors #FACTS #OWNED #FRAUDS #FAIL #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

This video features a Sovereign Citizen getting schooled in judge Perkins court room. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #COURT #COURTCAM #SOVEREIGNCITIZEN #MOORISHAMERICAN #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #MICHIGAN #ZOOM #SOVCIT #NewMoorOrder #RISEOFTHEMOORS #SOVEREIGN #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITSARRESTED #CanaanlandMoors #FACTS #OWNED #FRAUDS #FAIL #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

In this video we have a sovereign citizen attempting the right to travel in Oregon. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #COURT #OREGON #BODYCAM #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

In this video we have a sovereign citizen who refuses to comply with police officers at a traffic stop so they are forced to break the sovereigns car window. Same stop Police bodycam: https://youtu.be/Z_gsTB1hG4Q Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #COURT #UNITEDSTATES #BODYCAM #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

In this video we head to Detroit Michigan where a Moorish sovereign citizen is in court and objecting to just about everything the judge is saying. Previous court date: https://youtu.be/ZGmbOVopSsM "The inhabitants of Africa," averred the Moorish Holy Koran, "are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites from the land of Canaan" (ancient Palestine, presumably located in West Asia). The eventual founders of the Moroccan empire, the Moabites from the land of Moab in turn "received permission from the Pharaohs of Egypt to settle and inhabit North-West Africa, and were joined by "their Canaanite, Hittite and Amorite brethren seeking new homes." Hence, claimed the Koran Questions for Moorish Americans, "Moroccans" was the modern name for the ancient Moabites. But how had biblical Moabites, who inhabited what is seems, was now the nationstate of Jordan, become modern-day Moroccans occupying the northwest corner of the African continent? Noble Drew Ali's intention, to lay claim to the grandeur of the former Moorish empire while at the same time grounding Moorish American identity in biblical antiquity. From the scriptures Prophet Ali extracted a Moabite identity for African Americans, but his real goal, or so it appears, was to appropriate the more recently arrived and decidedly non-biblical Morabites, or Almoravids —an error no doubt attributable to post-vocalic -r deletion in African-American speech patterns (Ebonics be praised!). The term Morabite was derived from the Arabic word murabti, meaning "bound," as in a religious order. Murabti was the name assumed by North African Muslims who submitted to a purified Islamic doctrine during the period spanning the mid-eleventh to the mid-twelfth centuries. After conquering North Africa, the Murabtin (Almoravids) traversed the Straits of Magellan (Gibraltar?) and gave renewed impetus to the Moorish empire in Spain. Hence Morabites were indeed Moors who inhabited the northwestern shores of Africa and beyond. And were it actually possible for Moorish Americans to trace their ancestry directly to the Moors of Morocco, Morabite —but not Moabite—ancestors likely would be found among them. The word "Moor" has its origin in 46 B.C. when the Romans invaded North Africa. They called the inhabitants they met there Maures from the Greek word mauros, meaning dark or black. The word indicated more than one ethnic group. To Shakespeare "Moor" simply meant "black African." It is important to point out that the medieval Moors who conquered Europe should not be confused with the modern Moors aka "Moorish Americans". In Ross Brann's article "The Moors?" he considers the meaning and significance of Moorish identity in literary works, film, and scholarship. Brann notes that even today the figure is "employed regularly in academic circles and in popular culture without much question or reflection" and "without clarification of who precisely the Moors are". Recounting a history of the uses of the term Moor, he explains that "Andalusi Arabic sources—as opposed to later mudéjar and morisco sources in Aljamiado—neither refer to individuals as Moors nor recognize any such group, community or culture". Moor is a term applied from the outside, by Europeans, yet "unlike relatively stable terms of Roman provenance inherited by Christians such as Arab, Ishmaelite and Saracen," the significance of the term varies in particular historical moments and shifts over time. Early in the history of al-Andalus, Moor signified "Berber" as a geographic and ethnic identity. Later writing, however, from twelfth- and thirteenth-century Christian kingdoms, demonstrates the "transformation of Moor from a term signifying Berber into a general term referring primarily to Muslims (regardless of ethnicity) living in recently conquered Christian lands and secondarily to those residing in what was still left of al-Andalus". Moors are not a distinct orself-definedpeople. The 1911Encyclopædia Britannicaobserved that "The term 'Moors' has no real ethnological value." Europeans of theMiddle Agesand theearly modern periodvariously applied the name to Arabs, North African Berbers, as well as Muslim Europeans. The term has also been used in Europe in a broader, somewhat derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general, especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #COURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZEN #MOORISHAMERICAN #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #COURTCAM #MICHIGAN #ZOOM #SOVCIT #NewMoorOrder #RISEOFTHEMOORS #SOVEREIGN #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITSARRESTED #CanaanlandMoors #FACTS #OWNED #FRAUDS #FAIL #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

In this video we head over to Pinal County where a Sovereign Citizen is challenging deputy Frank. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #COURT #PINALCOUNTY #BODYCAM #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY

In this video a sovereign citizen refuses to show an officer a drivers license then acts surprised when they are getting arrested. Sovereign citizen: Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent. Sovereign citizens clog up the courts with indecipherable filings and, when cornered, many of them lash out, retaliating through acts of paper terrorism and, in the most extreme cases, acts of deadly violence – usually directed against government officials. In May 2010, for example, a father-son team of sovereigns murdered two police officers with an assault rifle when they were pulled over on the interstate while traveling through West Memphis, Arkansas. The Sovereign belief system The contemporary sovereign belief system is based on a decades-old conspiracy theory. Sovereigns believe that the American government set up by the founding fathers, under a common-law legal system, was secretly replaced. They think the replacement government swapped common law for admiralty law, which is the law of the sea and international commerce. Some sovereigns believe this perfidious change occurred during the Civil War, while others blame the events of 1933, when the U.S. abandoned the gold standard. Either way, they stake their lives and livelihoods on the idea that U.S. judges and lawyers, who they believe are foreign agents, know about this hidden government takeover but argue against it, denying the sovereigns’ motions and filings out of treasonous loyalty to hidden and malevolent government forces. Most sovereign citizens base their actions on a bogus U.S. history lesson, which goes as follows: Since 1933, the U.S. dollar has been backed not by gold, but by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government. (In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ended private ownership of gold in large amounts in 1933; governments could still sell gold for dollars to the U.S. Treasury for a fixed amount after that, until that practice was ended by President Richard Nixon in 1971.) According to sovereign citizen researchers, the government has pledged its citizenry as collateral, by selling their future earning capabilities to foreign investors, effectively enslaving all Americans. This sale, they claim, takes place at birth. When a baby is born in the U.S., a birth certificate is issued, and the hospital usually advises the parents to apply for a Social Security number. Sovereigns say that the government then uses that birth certificate to set up a corporate trust in the baby’s name – a secret Treasury account – which it funds with amounts ranging from $600,000 to $20 million, depending on the particular variant of the sovereign belief system. By setting up this Treasury Direct Account (TDA), every newborn’s rights are split between those held by the flesh-and-blood baby and the ones assigned to his or her corporate shell account. Sovereign citizens believe the evidence for their theory is found on the birth certificate itself. Since most certificates use all capital letters to spell out a baby’s name, JOHN DOE, for example, is actually the name of the corporate shell identity, also called a “straw man,” while John Doe is the baby’s “real,” flesh-and-blood name. As the child grows older, most of his legal documents will utilize capital letters, which means that his state-issued driver's license, his marriage license, his car registration, his criminal court records, his cable TV bill and his correspondence from the IRS all will pertain to his corporate shell identity, not his real, sovereign identity. To separate from their corporate shell, sovereign citizens use a series of convoluted steps, often shared with them by more veteran sovereigns. This can include actions such as filing documentation with their secretary of state’s office declaring themselves sovereign, signing it with red blood or ink thumbprints, and then having their new sovereign identity published in the newspaper. To tap into the secret Treasury account that they believe exists, they file a series of complex, legal-sounding documents. For decades, sovereigns have attempted to perfect the process by packaging and promoting different combinations of forms and paperwork. DONATIONS: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=T4Y47U3246CE6 Cash App: https://cash.app/$Kspray175 #RIGHTTOTRAVEL #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVEREIGN #SOVCIT #CANADA #COURT #BODYCAM #COURTCAM #MOORISHAMERICAN #ZOOM #REALITYCOURT #SOVEREIGNCITIZENS #SOVCITS #SOVCITSARRESTED #FACTS #FRAUDS #TRUTHSCIENCE151 #TRUTHSCIENCE #TRUTHSCIENCEBEY