Revisiting 9/11

A Collapse / Demolition Thought Experiment Put on your thinking caps students Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/a-911-thought-experiment

Secret Super Weapons and Sept 11, 2001 Scalar, Electromagnetics, RF Weapons and Weather modification Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/us-army-col-tom-bearden-ret

Find the full presentation here: https://911revision.substack.com/p/refutation-of-the-911-truther-narratives

You decide, but also read the following important article; The controlled demolition of the thermite & nuke theory? Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf

"Official" Plane anomalies on 9/11 The Telemetry data of Flights AA11, UA175, AA77 & UA93 tell a strange story Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/official-plane-anomalies-on-911 9/11 Planes Research - https://substack.com/@911planesresearch

Excerpt from a very well done documentary "Sept 11 - The New Pearl Harbor", just over 10 years ago... *Only a few issues with it though, the destruction mechanism of the towers they go through is fatally flawed and explained by a 9/11 investigative scientist that actually took the results of an independent forensic investigation in 2007 to NIST for a request for correction (RFC). It allowed the scientist to file a whistleblower case for science fraud against 23 NIST subcontractors and the case was filed as high up as the US Supreme court in 2009 and none of the "9/11 truther celebrities" want you to know about it. Read the court papers here: https://drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/ Then they theorise about the flights being switched for drones / military planes, which has been proven not to be the case by other researchers, since this documentary came out. Mention of the so called molten metal has also been shown to be something completely different, as to what was sold to the public. The theories of "thermite", "molten metal" sold to truth seekers by architects for an engineered truth and Richard Gage, has never been filed as a request for correction against NIST either.

There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11 1. Problem solving skills 2. Group Think 3. They just can't handle the implications Official narrative – Jet fuel. Option behind door no 1 – explosives, door no 2 – thermite, door no 3 – buried or mini nukes. Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.

Secret Super Weapons, UFO's & 9/11 Scalar, Electromagnetics, RF Weapons and Magnetic Electro Gravitic Nuclear Reactions Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/secret-super-weapons-ufos-and-911

The cover picture is one of the indisputable proofs that everything that has been said about the twin towers is false The footprint of the Imperial Japanese Zero kamikaze plane on the side of HMS Sussex, 1945. And it would be the same with the twin towers without magic... A plane does not fit in an entire round... even though the thousands of metals are much thicker than this boat hull And above all the wings do not fit So it's all wrong... And it gets worse and worse... 9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html Jerm Warfare: https://jermwarfare.com/ 9/11 Plane research: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/

The controlled demolition of the thermite & nuke theory Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf Expanded: The controlled demolition of the 9/11 thermite theory People are so easily led by perceived "experts". Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/expanded-the-controlled-demolition

If you wanted to survive the disintegration of the towers on 9/11, you had to be a piece of paper.

Just don't mention the 2007 independent forensic investigation filed in a lawsuit against NIST after a RFC, request for correction, against 23 NIST subcontractors for science fraud!

Sent anonymously on 03 May 2024 Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/mysterious-flashes-at-the-wtc-complex

Secret Super Weapons and Sept 11, 2001 Scalar, Electromagnetics, RF Weapons and Weather modification Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/us-army-col-tom-bearden-ret

A red herring is something that distracts attention from the real issue. The term comes from the practice of drawing a red herring across a trail to confuse hunting dogs. It may be either a logical fallacy or a literary device that leads readers or audiences toward a false conclusion.

If you think that, then you're a tinfoil hat wearing, basement dwelling conspiracy nut in need of therapy.

Mom, Alice Hoglan Is "Delighted" On The Sept 12, Today Show

AA11, UA175, AA77 & UA93 - Power Point Presentation of "Official" Evidence & Telemetry Data Source: https://youtu.be/rZX3l766Dls 9/11 Plane Research: https://911planesresearch.blogspot.com/ 9/11 Plane Research: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/

James Corbett has been dismissive for over 14 years. Will he apologise?

In 2006 NIST was asked about the damage and seismic impacts from 2 x 500 000 ton buildings slamming onto Liberty Plaza, especially the pipes underground leading to Building 7 - What do you think did NIST have to say? Then in 2023, I asked the "9/11 truther celebrities" What do you think they had to say? What is the truth? What was the seismic readings recorded?

2004 by Darren Williams, Signs-of-the-times.org Discussion of 9/11 with Darren Williams the creator of the Pentagon Strike Flash 2005. Link: https://www.podchaser.com/podcasts/sott-radio-network-221426/episodes/sott-podcast-911-interview-wit-81822196

(Hint - Don't notice the guy in the black suit) Repeat after me - My perception will NEVER be managed. I will never allow my thinking to be outsourced during a traumatic event. False flags DO NOT happen. Fake "truthers" do not infiltrate the truth movement to lead truth seekers astray. There is no need for me to do my own research. I just need to listen to other people who claim to know the truth. My government loves me and will never lie to me. There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11. 1. Problem solving skills 2. Group Think 3. They just can't handle the implications Official narrative – Jet fuel. 🤔 Option behind door no 1 – explosives, door no 2 – thermite, door no 3 – buried or mini nukes. Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to. FREE E-BOOK: 9/11 Finding the Truth - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/pdf/9-11%20-%20Finding%20the%20Truth.pdf

Adam Eisenberg on there being no plane at the Pentagon on 9/11 Full interview: https://jermwarfare.com/conversations/adam-eisenberg-no-plane-pentagon

Pilot episode titled Somewhere Out There by Dominique Radwanski in which she and Rob Simone interview zero point energy researcher John Hutchison, flying saucer technician Ralph Ring, and electrotherapy museum founder Jeff Behary. According to Dominique Radwanski, the pilot episode was originally going to be aired on the Discovery Channel but they wanted to edit out much of it and remove the message about rising consciousness. The show starts off by visiting John Hutchison in his then Vancouver apartment lab where he recreates his famous Hutchison Effect. The second interview is with Ralph Ring, whom is a technician for Otis Carr (protégé of Nikola Tesla) while they were allegedly building flying saucers. The last interview is with Jeff Behary, the founder of the famous electrotherapy museum in Riviera Beach, Florida. This pilot episode is rare footage that I had not seen until John Hutchison himself sent me the video. Dominique Radwanski, the creator of the Somewhere Out There series, was found dead inside the waters of Georgian Bay in Ontario on January 6, 2016 after she went missing the night before. Her family said she had a medical condition, and the cause of death is still uncertain. She was only 36 years old when she died and was 27 when she made the documentary. The pilot episode was supposed to be aired on the Discovery Channel but they wanted to edit much of it out so that the need for raising consciousness was lost. She had interviewed 33 guests in total but the show was never given a chance... Dominique Radwanski was well ahead of her time...

What do hurricanes have to do with the 9/11 attacks? Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/hurricanes-and-september-11-2001