A Video Explaining the False Swearing Defense to an Insurance Claim
FALSE SWEARING
See the full video at Video link https://youtu.be/HzbP3Nqdmi4
In common language the “false swearing” provision of an insurance policy merely means that if the insured lies under oath the policy is void whether the lie is in a proof of loss or at an examination under oath. In Texas and Oklahoma, false swearing is explained this way:
Where an insured knowingly and willfully overestimates the value of property destroyed or damaged, the policy is voided and the insured’s right to recover is defeated.[1]
The reason for the false swearing defense can be explained because it would be unjust to allow a claimant to misrepresent facts under oath that might lead to a valid defense and then allow him to escape the consequences of the falsehood simply because he had succeeded so well that the company was unable to establish the defense.
The Mississippi Supreme Court explained the reason for the "false swearing" defense that "[i]t would be unjust to allow a claimant to misrepresent facts which might lead to a valid defense and then to allow him to escape the consequences of the falsehood simply because he had succeeded so well that the company was unable to establish the defense," Edmiston v. Schellenger, 343 So. 2d 465, 467 (Miss. 1977), cited with approval in Duke v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co., 617 F.2d 509, 510 (8th Cir. 1980) (per curiam) (applying Arkansas law).
False swearing is a crime in all states. An insured that is guilty of false swearing is subject to the possibility of criminal liability. The person swearing falsely also destroys the right to recover under a policy of insurance.
An insurer can assert false swearing as an affirmative defense to an action brought by an insured. To constitute such a defense, the false statement must have been made under oath with the knowledge that it is false and with the intent that the person to whom the statement is made will rely on it. Actual reliance is not necessary. To support a defense to a claim or a suit on a policy, the statement must be: false; and material to the claim.
Almost every policy that insures against the risk of loss of property requires the insured to submit a sworn proof of loss. The proof of loss must provide complete details regarding the property insured, the origin of the loss, and the value of the property claimed destroyed. A policy usually also requires the insured to give the insurer access to books and records to prove the claim. Where fraud is suspected, the insurer may demand that the insured be examined under oath. Significant deviations between the sworn proof of loss and the facts developed at an examination under oath can be the basis of a defense of fraud or false swearing. If false swearing is found to exist, it will normally constitute a complete defense to any claim under a property insurance policy.
© 2020 – Barry Zalma
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He also serves as an arbitrator or mediator for insurance related disputes. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 52 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and zalma@zalma.com.
Mr. Zalma is the first recipient of the first annual Claims Magazine/ACE Legend Award.
Over the last 53 years Barry Zalma has dedicated his life to insurance, insurance claims and the need to defeat insurance fraud. He has created the following library of books and other materials to make it possible for insurers and their claims staff to become insurance claims professionals.
Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921
Read posts from Barry Zalma at https://parler.com/profile/Zalma/posts
Listen to the Podcast: Zalma on Insurance https://anchor.fm/dashboard/episodes Zalma on Insurance
Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg/
Go to the Insurance Claims Library –https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library/
-
15:07
Barry Zalma, Inc. on Insurance Law
3 years agoA Video Explaining the Disbarment of the Naive Lawyer and Insurance Fraud
107 -
17:00
Barry Zalma, Inc. on Insurance Law
3 years agoA Video Explaining the Three Major Responses to Insurance Fraud
126 -
14:51
ProjectVeritas
1 year agoNYT Attorneys Claim Words Don't Have "Meaning" In Attempt to Avoid Discovery in PV Defamation Case
7.24K110 -
23:07
We The People - Constitutional Conventions
3 months agoInformation to End the Fraud Fines/tickets -template in Description
87513 -
6:24
Info Worm
6 months ago"Picture Pages" Cast Member Claims Bill Cosby DRUGGED and SEXUALLY ASSAULTED Her When 15! - 2014
3364 -
28:24
Law Enforcement Talk Show
1 year agoCop Fired For Yelling At Female Driver On Video! LEO Round Table S08E03b
267 -
16:50
Anna Von Reitz Article Videos
2 months agoArticle Video - Full Information for Attorneys by Anna Von Reitz
6832 -
10:07
Lad From The Woods
2 months ago03-14-24 | New Insurance And Supplies | The Lads Vlog-002
24 -
5:56
Mr. Beat
1 year agoWhy Most People Lose Defamation Lawsuits | New York Times v. Sullivan
1.73K5 -
12:53
Hook Worm
10 months ago'Sandy Hook Medical Examiner H Wayne Carver FRAUD EXPOSED' - 2013
9041