Constitutional Law Scholar Explains Standing & Why Texas Election Lawsuit Was Anti-Constitutional
Categorical Imperatives - Episode # 28
"Legal standing, Texas v Pennsylvania addendum & why people who believe themselves to be the one true defender of Constitutional government have begun to be more destructive of Constitutionalism then the very people they believe they are protecting it from."
After my last episode breaking down the Texas election lawsuit and why SCOTUS made the right call Constitutionally, it became clear from the responses I got that I should have spent some time explaining what Standing is. So I made a whole video about it. This video is also something of an appeal to Trump supporters out there. This is partly a response to many misconceptions widely held by Trump supporters still about this election and especially their reaction to the Supreme Court's dismissal of the Texas Election Lawsuit. It is also meant to be an olive branch as well. I don't mean to attack anyone. I am making a direct appeal as a Constitutional Conservative to others who consider themselves Constitutional Conservatives.
These responses ran the gamut from people asking what standing mean ? And how does it work? How does it relate to citizens and government? To people under the impression standing is not actually a legal doctrine. People who didn't understand the difference between a State and a citizen (seriously), people who mistakenly believed the Supreme Court was the right venue to handle election suits are meant to be decided in the Supreme Court, People who didn't understand that the reason the Supreme Court didn't take the case had to do with limiting our ability to seek redress of grievances (rather than a limit on the Court's ability to hear the case), and people who thought that even if Texas didn't have standing the Supreme Court should have taken the case anyway, and ruled on the merits. Which would be a vast and unprecedented expansion of Federal power. And a violation of some of our Country's most important principles. Separation or Powers, Federalism, rule of law & limited government itself must be cast aside for them to get the outcome they want. These are values that I hope fellow Constitutional conservatives still actually value and still want to protect.
.
Amicus brief - https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163237/20201209155924009_2020-12-9%20Texas%20Scotus%20Amici%20Brief-%20FINAL.pdf
Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events, law, politics & culture.
Categorical Imperatives On Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives
Categorical Imperatives on LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives
Lockean Liberal On Parler - https://parler.com/profile/Lockeanliberal
-
3:39:06
SonnyFaz
10 hours agoNYC WITH SNEAKO & CAS
55.6K50 -
1:39:33
Glenn Greenwald
13 hours agoIsrael Massacres Rafah Refugees as Speech Crackdowns Escalate in the US; GOP Obsession with Israel; Alan Dershowitz Debate on Iran Recap | SYSTEM UPDATE #272
97.3K353 -
1:13:21
The Anthony Rogers Show
1 day agoEpisode 316 - St. Louis Battlehawks
34.8K -
1:20:14
Donald Trump Jr.
20 hours agoExclusive Interview with British Special Forces Hero Christian Craighead, the Man Who Saved Lives During Al-Shabaab Terror Attack | TRIGGERED Ep.140
137K170 -
4:16:54
TheGetCanceledPodcast
3 days agoThe GCP Ep 6 | Ryan Bensen Tells Us How UHNI's Stay Rich After Divorce, New Book Release & More
76.2K7 -
2:21:22
WeAreChange
12 hours agoREAL George Floyd Revealed! NEW Summer Of Love Coming?
76.3K109 -
1:58:00
The Quartering
15 hours agoLibertarian BACKFIRE, Israeli Attack On Tent Camp, Memorial Day Cringe w/Styxhexenhammer
83.9K65 -
1:35:58
2 MIKES LIVE
12 hours ago#71 2ML The Memorial Day Show!
46.5K6 -
1:28:17
RealitySurvival
11 hours agoPREPPER SITREP - Weekly News Wrap Up Of Prepper Centric News Stories
37K2 -
58:49
Kimberly Guilfoyle
20 hours agoRevolver News Exclusives: Major J6 Developments w/ Darren Beattie | Ep. 129
70.6K115