The Inconvenient Truth!

The Bombastic Hypocrisy of The US War Machine US Accuses Russia of Violating UN Charter, While Violating UN Charter.. The US Has Never, EVER Adhered Or Been Held Accountable To The 'UN Charter', The International Criminal Court (ICC), The Geneva Convention (Standards of International Law for Humanitarian Treatment in War), The Nuremberg Code, The Helsinki Accords, and, and, and.. However, The US Hypocrites NEVER miss an opportunity to point their finger! Oh And Nevermind NAZI Ukraine's Ongoing Heinous Atrocities, War Crimes, Terrorism, Genocide & Crimes Against Humanity, Murdering +14k Ethnic Russian Ukrainian Citizens (prior to 2-24-2022), Using Civilians as Human Shields, Use of Prohibited Petal Mines (on Civilians) Violation: Overthrowing Ukraine's Sovereign Government in 2014 Violation: US State Sponsored Terrorism (ongoing) in Ukraine (among several countries), since 2013 Violation: Invading Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Syria, Haiti, Yugoslavia, Serbia, and, and, and Violation: Currently Occupying 1/3 of Syria Violation: 78 Days of US/NATO Bombing Yugoslavia Violation: US/NATO Using Depleted Uranium (Nuclear) Weapons on Serbs Violation: US/NATO Using White Phosphorus on Serbs What about that Drone Attack Murdering 12 Afghanistan Civilians, an entire family, amid Biden's BOTCHED Retreat From Afghanistan that Nobody's Been Held Accountable? VIOLATION!

Alexander Dugin wrote a book against the Great Reset. Here's Michael Millerman's review of it, originally published at europeanconservative.com/reviews/the-great-awakening-vs-the-great-reset/ Visit MillermanSchool.com for online courses on some the thinkers mentioned in this video (Plato, Aristotle, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Strauss, Dugin). Michael Millerman teaches there. Michael Millerman's Social Media: YT: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCp19_tJlXTN8kXoHJx7mIXQ Twitter: https://twitter.com/M_Millerman Website: https://www.michaelmillerman.ca/

Inside Russia’s Military Operation ‘We are trying to preserve the civilian infrastructure and the lives of civilians who’ve been forced to live under the Neo-Nazi Kiev regime.’ Military expert Yury Knutov explains the tactics of the Russian military in their special operation. He believes that Moscow does not use the American methods of fighting, for example, as demonstrated in Iraq: ‘The Americans conducted some 4,000 flights, almost wiping Iraq off the face of Earth. <…> Оnly after that did the land forces attack.’ How do military experts assess the course of the military special operation in Ukraine? Watch the premiere Inside Russia's Military operation to find out. #premiere @rtdocfilms

What Is The Root Cause Of The Ukraine Proxy-War vs. Russia? Kim Dotcom just may have answered this question in a Twitter thread he posted yesterday (November 5th). Credit to him for the information, I only compiled it into this video. Kim Dotcoms Twitter Thread: https://mobile.twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/1588970921272172544 Follow Me On Truth Social: bit.ly/3dOW453

Lloyd Austin advises Ukraine to advance on Kherson, I believe Ukrainians are able to take back Kherson 11-3-2022

Journo: As We're Set To Run Out Of Diesel In Just 25 Days, WTF Is Biden's Regime Doing About OUR Diesel Crisis? WH Muppet: We're Doubling OUR Commitments & Doubling EXPORT's To 'Our European Friends'.. WOW! UnFrigginBelievable!

▪ The UK is in too deep in the conflict in Ukraine. Russia has the proof. ▪ Evidence of British participation in training Ukrainian troops for the attack against Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol has been presented to Ambassador Deborah Bronnert and the UK military attaché in Moscow. ▪ Dangerous UK actions lead to escalation of the conflict in Ukraine. ▪ Russia has been trying to avoid a military conflict in Ukraine for eight years, calling upon Ukraine to implement the Minsk Agreements. Regrettably, our calls had been ignored. ▪ A nuclear war cannot be won and should never be fought. Russia strongly sticks to this statement. We will not use nuclear weapons in this conflict. They were developed for different aims. ▪ We need a negotiated outcome of the Ukrainian conflict, and Russia is not hiding from the talks, unlike Ukraine which legally made talks impossible now. #Russia #UK #Ukraine

Moscow, Russia 11-4-2022 Russia MFA: President Vladimir Putin met with historians and representatives of Russia’s traditional religions on the occasion of the National #UnityDay. Excerpts from the President's remarks 🇷🇺 Our common heartfelt devotion to Russia, our love for it, the unity of the multiethnic people of this country both in times of trial and in resolving large-scale development goals – these have always been the key moments in our history. • Our position on the preservation of historical memory and thus our sovereignty irritates some countries in the West. As a matter of fact, this has been the case for centuries. • For decades after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Ukraine experienced direct, overt interference from Western countries in its internal affairs. ❗️ The clash with the neo-Nazi regime – Russia's clash with the neo-Nazi regime that developed in Ukraine – was inevitable. • It is Ukraine and the Ukrainian people that have become the first and the main victims of breeding hate towards Russians and Russia. Meanwhile, everything is exactly the opposite in Russia, and you are well aware of that – we have always treated the Ukrainian people with warm respect. • Today the foreign powers are absolutely ruthless to the Ukrainian people as they send non-stop supplies of weapons and mercenaries there. They are promoting their geopolitical objectives at the expense of the Ukrainian people with goals that have nothing to do with the interests of the Ukrainian people.

US Secretary of Deepstate, Antony Blinken walked on past as protesters shouted he is 'arming neo-Nazis' and dragging the US into 'nuclear war' 10-29-2022

Hussein Got Heckled: "You Overthrew Ukraine In 2014!"

Christine Anderson of the EU Parliament: "I will do whatever I can to make it known to the world that your once free and liberal democracy has been transformed into a totalitarian regime which tramples on human rights, civil liberties, and the rule of law... I am a German and we once asked our grandparents how they could have just stood by in silence allowing a horrific totalitarian regime to come about. Anyone could have known, all they had to do was open their eyes, and take a look. The vast majority chose not to. So what will you tell your grandchildren? Will you tell them you did not know? Will you tell them you were just following orders? You need to understand it is not about breaking the fourth wave. It is about breaking people... We need to stop our governments from transforming our free and democratic societies into totalitarian regimes. We need to do it now. We need to stand up now."

Russian MFA Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova Weekly Briefing 11-2-2022

25th Amendment This Vegetable, STAT! Preferably before he gets us All Killed, please!

Russian MFA Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova on the Ukrainian crisis and Kiev's preparations to staging a “dirty nuclear bomb” provocation. On October 25 of this year, in New York, the UN Security Council discussed, at Russia’s request, the Kiev regime’s preparations to stage a provocation with the use of a “dirty” nuclear bomb on the territory under its control. The Russian representatives cited convincing arguments pointing to the serious nature of this problem. In our comment on October 24, we noted that the aim of the provocation prepared by the Ukrainian authorities and their Western curators is to blame Russia for allegedly using a weapon of mass destruction and lead a powerful anti-Russia campaign that will undermine trust in Russia among its numerous partners. For those who doubt this logic of the Kiev regime, I will recall Vladimir Zelensky’s words about the need to deliver a preventive nuclear strike on Russia rather than waiting around. He urged NATO to do this. When everyone noted this monstrous statement that shocked even the fans of the Kiev regime that appease and support it in every possible way, attempts were made to justify his words. Zelensky said that he was misunderstood, that he ostensibly was talking about economic strikes. We know what he meant. Somehow these strikes are supposed to be a prelude or a response to nuclear strikes by another country. He was willing to start a nuclear confrontation. His unhealthy ambition does not let him stop at the damage that his regime had already inflicted on his country, the region and the world as a whole. His message demands even more victims. Now the President of Ukraine is holding out his hand for nuclear arms. Luckily, he doesn’t have them. In 2014, public figures holding liberal views saw the horrors happening on Maidan Square, the streets of Kiev. There was not a single Russian soldier or a person associated with our government there – only Ukrainian citizens, mercenaries and militants from Western countries, which were trained with Western money in the Baltic countries and Poland. These Western-oriented people said unanimously – it is sheer luck that a country ruled by these people, who overthrow the government by these methods, does not possess nuclear weapons. Apparently, back then they had no idea how far this unbridled ambition – generously backed by ample amounts of money and weapons – could go. Now, they need more than just nuclear weapons, which Vladimir Zelensky demanded the international community to provide in February speaking at the Munich Security Conference. They are sparing no effort to show their readiness to use nuclear technology as they see fit, which is nothing short of nuclear blackmail, but on a different level. The Kiev regime is showing its sponsors (the Washington-London Anglo-Saxon duo, Brussels and everyone else who made a political, militarily or financial investment) that if they do not continue to provide and increase their help, it will move on to Plan B. The Russian Defence Ministry told us about Plan B and cited hard facts. It did so openly, without using any “leaks” or “sources.” Our military held a briefing and expressed, through the Foreign Ministry and our Permanent Mission to the UN, among others, Russia’s concern, which the entire international community, primarily the sponsors of the Kiev regime, which chose to press ahead with its destructive ideology on a different level, should share as well. This can be backed up by indirect (although, I think, it has already become pretty much direct) evidence: for several months now, the Zelensky-led regime has been firing missiles into the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant. They cared little about the fact that it was a civilian facility. All they cared about was the fact that it was a nuclear energy site. The way Kiev saw it, this shelling attack was supposed to trigger a series of actions and steps on the part of the West that would push the world to the brink of a nuclear disaster. This is exactly what President of Ukraine was talking about. They need a pretext. This “pretext” didn’t work in the case of the Zaporozhye NPP owing to Russia’s efforts. That took them to the next phase of the terrible, extremist and destructive logic which was the “dirty nuclear bomb.” Those in the West who are now, officially or through the media, saying that things are not what they appear and Kiev has no plans of “rigging up” anything, would benefit from a reminder of what Vladimir Zelensky said to NATO about a preventive nuclear strike. The people in the Western or non-Western countries, who understand what nuclear war and radiation are all about, will never understand their governments if they choose to support the President of Ukraine’s line of thinking. You need a convincing reason and Vladimir Zelensky came up with one. First, it was Zaporozhye NPP and now it’s a “dirty bomb.” He let it slip. I’m not sure why or what condition he was in. But Zelensky let out the plans they are discussing among themselves. We urge the West to use its influence with its Ukrainian underlings and tell them to turn back from this dangerous and reckless idea and all actions stemming from nuclear blackmail. It could have irreversible consequences, including possible mass loss of innocent civilian lives. We regularly make it clear that radiation has no boundaries. It does not need passports, visas or permits to travel. It cannot be put on the sanctions list or stopped when trying to cross the border pillar mark. Radiation is insidious. It does not ask anyone for permission to go anywhere and has critical consequences for human health and life. I would like to once again draw your attention to Vladimir Zelensky’s address to the Lowy Institute in Australia on October 6. His was perfectly frank about the use of nuclear weapons. Not by Russia but by NATO, I should stress. He urged the alliance to deliver preemptive strikes at our country before Russia uses nuclear weapons itself. Who believes this was not exactly what he said, please read the transcript. Why does the Kiev regime want this? It seemed like Ukrainian officials defined themselves as modern, young and future-oriented people. Perhaps there is no contradiction here. They are oriented towards their own personal future. Maybe one reason Kiev uses nuclear blackmail is to extort more Western financial aid (including the large amounts of money that settle in their own bank accounts) and military assistance (to protect themselves rather than the people of Ukraine, and destroying more of Ukraine Excerpt https://mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/1835524/) from weekly briefing of 27.10.22

Interview by Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the International Organizations in Vienna Mikhail Ulyanov to Rossiya 24 [EN CC] 10-26-2022 Main topics: 🔵 IAEA 🔵 Zaporozhskaya NPP 🔵 Kakhovskaya HPP

10-28-2022 Triennial Congress of Ukrainian Canadians Event "Well, we want to give all Canadians a chance to directly support Ukraine. So today, we are announcing that Canada will be offering a new government backed Ukrainian sovereignty bond," Trudeau continued. "Canadians will now be able to go to major banks to purchase their sovereignty bonds, which will mature after five years with interest… These funds will go to support the Government of Ukraine so they can continue to support the Ukrainian people."

Yaakov Kedmi, Former Head of Israel Government's Nativ Lishkat Hakesher, said "Zelensky is a disgrace to the Jewish people!" "I treat him as the most disgusting, the most sneakiest representative of my people, who builds his career supporting those who are the successors of those who were destroying our people" -Yaakov Kedmi "If he was Ukrainian, I would treat him in the same way as I treat Stepan Bandera, Petlura or others, but as he is Jewish, I have another requirements of him" "This is a disgrace to my people, a disgrace that will never be wiped out neither from himself, nor from his family" "He spat on the grave of his people murdered by those who supports him now" "He spat on the grave of his grandfather who was fighting against the Nazi's" "That's why I have my scores with him to settle, nor as with a politician, but as Jew to Jew, to Jew who helped to the murders of my people and who is standing now on their side" "We have with it our own scores to settle!"

10-27-2022 MOSCOW Russian President Vladimir Putin Meets with Members of the Valdai Discussion Club Transcript of the Plenary Session of the 19th Annual Meeting Vladimir Putin took part in the 19th Annual meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club. The plenary session was held by Valdai Club Research Director Fyodor Lukyanov. Moderator of the Valdai Club’s plenary session Fyodor Lukyanov: Good afternoon, Mr President, We look forward to seeing you every year, but this year, perhaps, we were more impatient than usual, since there are lots of issues to discuss. President of Russia Vladimir Putin: I suppose so, yes. Fyodor Lukyanov: The forum mainly focused on matters related to the international order, such as how the world is changing and, most importantly, who, in fact, is at the helm of the world, who runs it, and whether the world is amenable to being run at all. However, we are discussing this as observers, but you have power, so please share your thoughts with us. Vladimir Putin: Thank you very much. Ladies and gentlemen, friends, I had a chance to get a sense of what you discussed here during the last few days. It was an interesting and substantive discussion. I hope you do not regret coming to Russia and communicating with each other. I am happy to see you all. We have used the Valdai Club platform to discuss, more than once, the major and serious shifts that have already taken place and are taking place around the world, the risks posed by the degradation of global institutions, the erosion of collective security principles and the substitution of “rules” for international law. I was tempted to say “we are clear about who came up with these rules,” but, perhaps, that would not be an accurate statement. We have no idea whatsoever who made these rules up, what these rules are based on, or what is contained inside these rules. It looks like we are witnessing an attempt to enforce just one rule whereby those in power – we were talking about power, and I am now talking about global power – could live without following any rules at all and could get away with anything. These are the rules that we hear them constantly, as people say, harping on, that is, talking about them incessantly The Valdai discussions are important because a variety of assessments and forecasts can be heard here. Life always shows how accurate they were, since life is the sternest and the most objective teacher. So, life shows how accurate our previous years’ projections were. Alas, events continue to follow a negative scenario, which we have discussed more than once during our previous meetings. Moreover, they have morphed into a major system-wide crisis that impacted, in addition to the military-political sphere, the economic and humanitarian spheres as well. The so-called West which is, of course, a theoretical construct since it is not united and clearly is a highly complex conglomerate, but I will still say that the West has taken a number of steps in recent years and especially in recent months that are designed to escalate the situation. As a matter of fact, they always seek to aggravate matters, which is nothing new, either. This includes the stoking of war in Ukraine, the provocations around Taiwan, and the destabilisation of the global food and energy markets. To be sure, the latter was, of course, not done on purpose, there is no doubt about it. The destabilisation of the energy market resulted from a number of systemic missteps made by the Western authorities that I mentioned above. As we can see now, the situation was further aggravated by the destruction of the pan-European gas pipelines. This is something otherworldly altogether, but we are nevertheless witnessing these sad developments. Global power is exactly what the so-called West has at stake in its game. But this game is certainly dangerous, bloody and, I would say, dirty. It denies the sovereignty of countries and peoples, their identity and uniqueness, and tramples upon other states’ interests. In any case, even if denial is the not the word used, they are doing it in real life. No one, except those who create these rules I have mentioned is entitled to retain their identity: everyone else must comply with these rules. In this regard, let me remind you of Russia's proposals to our Western partners to build confidence and a collective security system. They were once again tossed in December 2021. However, sitting things out can hardly work in the modern world. He who sows the wind will reap the whirlwind, as the saying goes. The crisis has indeed taken on a global dimension and has impacted everyone. There can be no illusions about this. Humankind is at a fork in the road: either keep accumulating problems and eventually get crushed under their weight, or work together to find solutions – even imperfect ones, as long as they work – that can make our world a more stable and safer place. You know, I have always believed in the power of common sense. Therefore, I am convinced that sooner or later both the new centres of the multipolar international order and the West will have to start a dialogue on an equal footing about a common future for us all, and the sooner the better, of course. In this regard, I will highlight some of the most important aspects for all of us. Current developments have overshadowed environmental issues. Strange as it may seem, this is what I would like to speak about first today. Climate change no longer tops the agenda. But that fundamental challenge has not gone away, it is still with us, and it is growing. The loss of biodiversity is one of the most dangerous consequences of disrupting the environmental balance. This brings me to the key point all of us have gathered here for. Is it not equally important to maintain cultural, social, political and civilisational diversity? At the same time, the smoothing out and erasure of all and any differences is essentially what the modern West is all about. What stands behind this? First of all, it is the decaying creative potential of the West and a desire to restrain and block the free development of other civilisations. There is also an openly mercantile interest, of course. By imposing their values, consumption habits and standardisation on others, our opponents – I will be careful with words – are trying to expand markets for their products. The goal on this track is, ultimately, very primitive. It is notable that the West proclaims the universal value of its culture and worldview. Even if they do not say so openly, which they actually often do, they behave as if this is so, that it is a fact of life, and the policy they pursue is designed to show that these values must be unconditionally accepted by all other members of the international community. I would like to quote from Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s famous Harvard Commencement Address delivered in 1978. He said that typical of the West is “a continuous blindness of superiority”– and it continues to this day – which “upholds the belief that vast regions everywhere on our planet should develop and mature to the level of present-day Western systems.” He said this in 1978. Nothing has changed. Over the nearly 50 years since then, the blindness about which Solzhenitsyn spoke and which is openly racist and neocolonial, has acquired especially distorted forms, in particular, after the emergence of the so-called unipolar world. What am I referring to? Belief in one’s infallibility is very dangerous; it is only one step away from the desire of the infallible to destroy those they do not like, or as they say, to cancel them. Just think about the meaning of this word. Even at the very peak of the Cold War, the peak of the confrontation of the two systems, ideologies and military rivalry, it did not occur to anyone to deny the very existence of the culture, art, and science of other peoples, their opponents. It did not even occur to anyone. Yes, certain restrictions were imposed on contacts in education, science, culture, and, unfortunately, sports. But nonetheless, both the Soviet and American leaders understood that it was necessary to treat the humanitarian area tactfully, studying and respecting your rival, and sometimes even borrowing from them in order to retain a foundation for sound, productive relations at least for the future. And what is happening now? At one time, the Nazis reached the point of burning books, and now the Western “guardians of liberalism and progress” have reached the point of banning Dostoyevsky and Tchaikovsky. The so-called “cancel culture” and in reality – as we said many times – the real cancellation of culture is eradicating everything that is alive and creative and stifles free thought in all areas, be it economics, politics or culture. Today, liberal ideology itself has changed beyond recognition. If initially, classic liberalism was understood to mean the freedom of every person to do and say as they pleased, in the 20th century the liberals started saying that the so-called open society had enemies and that the freedom of these enemies could and should be restricted if not cancelled. It has reached the absurd point where any alternative opinion is declared subversive propaganda and a threat to democracy. Whatever comes from Russia is all branded as “Kremlin intrigues.” But look at yourselves. Are we really so all-powerful? Any criticism of our opponents – any – is perceived as “Kremlin intrigues,” “the hand of the Kremlin.” This is insane. What have you sunk to? Use your brain, at least, say something more interesting, lay out your viewpoint conceptually. You cannot blame everything on the Kremlin’s scheming. Fyodor Dostoyevsky prophetically foretold all this back in the 19th century. One of the characters of his novel Demons, the nihilist Shigalev, described the bright future he imagined in the following way: “Emerging from boundless freedom, I conclude with boundless despotism.” This is what our Western opponents have come to. Another character of the novel, Pyotr Verkhovensky echoes him, talking about the need for universal treason, reporting and spying, and claiming that society does not need talents or greater abilities: “Cicero’s tongue is cut out, Copernicus has his eyes gouged out and Shakespeare is stoned.” This is what our Western opponents are arriving at. What is this if not Western cancel culture? These were great thinkers and, frankly, I am grateful to my aides for finding these quotes. What can one say to this? History will certainly put everything in its place and will know whom to cancel, and it will definitely not be the greatest works of universally recognised geniuses of world culture, but those who have for some reason decided that they have the right to use world culture as they see fit. Their self-regard really knows no bounds. No one will even remember their names in a few years. But Dostoevsky will live on, as will Tchaikovsky, Pushkin, no matter how much they would have liked the opposite. Standardisation, financial and technological monopoly, the erasure of all differences is what underlies the Western model of globalisation, which is neocolonial in nature. Their goal was clear – to establish the unconditional dominance of the West in the global economy and politics. To do that, the West put at its service the entire planet’s natural and financial resources, as well as all intellectual, human and economic capabilities, while alleging it was a natural feature of the so-called new global interdependence. Here I would like to recall another Russian philosopher, Alexander Zinoviev, whose birth centenary we will celebrate on October 29. More than 20 years ago, he said that Western civilisation needed the entire planet as a medium of existence and all the resources of humanity to survive at the level it had reached. That is what they want, that is exactly how it is. Moreover, the West initially secured itself a huge head start in that system because it had developed the principles and mechanisms – the same as today’s rules they keep talking about, which remain an incomprehensible black hole because no one really knows what they are. But as soon as non-western countries began to derive some benefits from globalisation, above all, the large nations in Asia, the West immediately changed or fully abolished many of those rules. And the so-called sacred principles of free trade, economic openness, equal competition, even property rights were suddenly forgotten, completely. They change the rules on the go, on the spot wherever they see an opportunity for themselves. Here is another example of the substitution of concepts and meanings. For many years, Western ideologists and politicians have been telling the world there was no alternative to democracy. Admittedly, they meant the Western-style, the so-called liberal model of democracy. They arrogantly rejected all other variants and forms of government by the people and, I want to emphasise this, did so contemptuously and disdainfully. This manner has been taking shape since colonial times, as if everyone were second-rate, while they were exceptional. It has been going on for centuries and continues to this day. So currently, an overwhelming majority of the international community is demanding democracy in international affairs and rejecting all forms of authoritarian dictate by individual countries or groups of countries. What is this if not the direct application of democratic principles to international relations? What stance has the “civilised” West adopted? If you are democrats, you are supposed to welcome the natural desire for freedom expressed by billions of people, but no. The West is calling it undermining the liberal rules-based order. It is resorting to economic and trade wars, sanctions, boycotts and colour revolutions, and preparing and carrying out all sorts of coups. One of them led to tragic consequences in Ukraine in 2014. They supported it and even specified the amount of money they had spent on this coup. They have the cheek to act as they please and have no scruples about anything they do. They killed Soleimani, an Iranian general. You can think whatever you want about Soleimani, but he was a foreign state official. They killed him in a third country and assumed responsibility. What is that supposed to mean, for crying out loud? What kind of world are we living in? As is customary, Washington continues to refer to the current international order as liberal American-style, but in fact, this notorious “order” is multiplying chaos every day and, I might even add, is becoming increasingly intolerant even towards the Western countries and their attempts to act independently. Everything is nipped in the bud, and they do not even hesitate to impose sanctions on their allies, who lower their heads in acquiescence. For example, the Hungarian MPs’ July proposals to codify the commitment to European Christian values and culture in the Treaty on European Union were taken not even as an affront, but as an outright and hostile act of sabotage. What is that? What does it mean? Indeed, some people may like it, some not. Over a thousand years, Russia has developed a unique culture of interaction between all world religions. There is no need to cancel anything, be it Christian values, Islamic values or Jewish values. We have other world religions as well. All you need to do is respect each other. In a number of our regions – I just know this firsthand – people celebrate Christian, Islamic, Buddhist and Jewish holidays together, and they enjoy doing so as they congratulate each other and are happy for each other. But not here. Why not? At least, they could discuss it. Amazing. Without exaggeration, this is not even a systemic, but a doctrinal crisis of the neoliberal American-style model of international order. They have no ideas for progress and positive development. They simply have nothing to offer the world, except perpetuating their dominance. I am convinced that real democracy in a multipolar world is primarily about the ability of any nation – I emphasise – any society or any civilisation to follow its own path and organise its own socio-political system. If the United States or the EU countries enjoy this right, then the countries of Asia, the Islamic states, the monarchies of the Persian Gulf, and countries on other continents certainly have this right as well. Of course, our country, Russia, also has this right, and no one will ever be able to tell our people what kind of society we should be building and what principles should underlie it. A direct threat to the political, economic and ideological monopoly of the West lies in the fact that the world can come up with alternative social models that are more effective; I want to emphasise this, more effective today, brighter and more appealing than the ones that currently exist. These models will definitely come about. This is inevitable. By the way, US political scientists and analysts also write about this. Truthfully, their government is not listening to what they say, although it cannot avoid seeing these concepts in political science magazines and mentioned in discussions. Development should rely on a dialogue between civilisations and spiritual and moral values. Indeed, understanding what humans and their nature are all about varies across civilisations, but this difference is often superficial, and everyone recognises the ultimate dignity and spiritual essence of people. A common foundation on which we can and must build our future is critically important. Here is something I would like to emphasise. Traditional values are not a rigid set of postulates that everyone must adhere to, of course not. The difference from the so-called neo-liberal values is that they are unique in each particular instance, because they stem from the traditions of a particular society, its culture and historical background. This is why traditional values cannot be imposed on anyone. They must simply be respected and everything that every nation has been choosing for itself over centuries must he handled with care. This is how we understand traditional values, and the majority of humanity share and accept our approach. This is understandable, because the traditional societies of the East, Latin America, Africa, and Eurasia form the basis of world civilisation. Respect for the ways and customs of peoples and civilisations is in everyone’s interest. In fact, this is also in the interest of the “West,” which is quickly becoming a minority in the international arena as it loses its dominance. Of course, the Western minority’s right to its own cultural identity – I want to emphasise this – must be ensured and respected, but, importantly, on an equal footing with the rights of every other nation. If the Western elites believe they can have their people and their societies embrace what I believe are strange and trendy ideas like dozens of genders or gay pride parades, so be it. Let them do as they please. But they certainly have no right to tell others to follow in their steps. We see the complicated demographic, political and social processes taking place in Western countries. This is, of course, their own business. Russia does not interfere in such matters and has no intention of doing so. Unlike the West, we mind our own business. But we are hoping that pragmatism will triumph and Russia’s dialogue with the genuine, traditional West, as well as with other coequal development centres, will become a major contribution to the construction of a multipolar world order. I will add that multipolarity is a real and, actually, the only chance for Europe to restore its political and economic identity. To tell the truth – and this idea is expressed explicitly in Europe today – Europe’s legal capacity is very limited. I tried to put it mildly not to offend anyone. The world is diverse by nature and Western attempts to squeeze everyone into the same pattern are clearly doomed. Nothing will come out of them. The conceited aspiration to achieve global supremacy and, essentially, to dictate or preserve leadership by dictate is really reducing the international prestige of the leaders of the Western world, including the United States, and increasing mistrust in their ability to negotiate in general. They say one thing today and another tomorrow; they sign documents and renounce them, they do what they want. There is no stability in anything. How documents are signed, what was discussed, what can we hope for – all this is completely unclear. Previously, only a few countries dared argue with America and it looked almost sensational, whereas now it has become routine for all manner of states to reject Washington’s unfounded demands despite its continued attempts to exert pressure on everyone. This is a mistaken policy that leads nowhere. But let them, this is also their choice. I am convinced that the nations of the world will not shut their eyes to a policy of coercion that has discredited itself. Every time the West will have to pay a higher price for its attempts to preserve its hegemony. If I were a Western elite, I would seriously ponder this prospect. As I said, some political scientists and politicians in the United States are already thinking about it. In the current conditions of intense conflict, I will be direct about certain things. As an independent and distinctive civilization, Russia has never considered and does not consider itself an enemy of the West. Americophobia, Anglophobia, Francophobia, and Germanophobia are the same forms of racism as Russophobia or anti-Semitism, and, incidentally, xenophobia in all its guises. It is simply necessary to understand clearly that, as I have already said before, two Wests – at least two and maybe more but two at least – the West of traditional, primarily Christian values, freedom, patriotism, great culture and now Islamic values as well – a substantial part of the population in many Western countries follows Islam. This West is close to us in something. We share with it common, even ancient roots. But there is also a different West – aggressive, cosmopolitan, and neocolonial. It is acting as a tool of neoliberal elites. Naturally, Russia will never reconcile itself to the dictates of this West. In 2000, after I was elected President, I will always remember what I faced: I will remember the price we paid for destroying the den of terrorism in the North Caucasus, which the West almost openly supported at the time. We are all adults here; most of you present in this hall understand what I am talking about. We know that this is exactly what happened in practice: financial, political and information support. We have all lived through it. What is more, not only did the West actively support terrorists on Russian territory, but in many ways it nurtured this threat. We know this. Nevertheless, after the situation had stabilised, when the main terrorist gangs had been defeated, including thanks to the bravery of the Chechen people, we decided not to turn back, not to play the offended, but to move forward, to build relations even with those who actually acted against us, to establish and develop relations with all who wanted them, based on mutual benefit and respect for one another. We thought it was in everyone’s interest. Russia, thank God, had survived all the difficulties of that time, stood firm, grew stronger, was able to cope with internal and external terrorism, its economy was preserved, it began to develop, and its defence capability began to improve. We tried to build up relations with the leading countries of the West and with NATO. The message was the same: let us stop being enemies, let us live together as friends, let us engage in dialogue, let us build trust, and, hence, peace. We were absolutely sincere, I want to emphasise that. We clearly understood the complexity of this rapprochement, but we agreed to it. What did we get in response? In short, we got a ”no“ in all the main areas of possible cooperation. We received an ever-increasing pressure on us and hotbeds of tension near our borders. And what, may I ask, is the purpose of this pressure? What is it? Is it just to practice? Of course not. The goal was to make Russia more vulnerable. The purpose is to turn Russia into a tool to achieve their own geopolitical goals. As a matter of fact, this is a universal rule: they try to turn everyone into a tool, in order to use these tools for their own purposes. And those who do not yield to this pressure, who do not want to be such a tool are sanctioned: all sorts of economic restrictions are carried out against them and in relation of them, coups are prepared or where possible carried out and so on. And in the end, if nothing at all can be done, the aim is the same: to destroy them, to wipe them off the political map. But it has not and will never be possible to draft and implement such a scenario with respect to Russia. What else can I add? Russia is not challenging the Western elites. Russia is simply upholding its right to exist and to develop freely. Importantly, we will not become a new hegemon ourselves. Russia is not suggesting replacing a unipolar world with a bipolar, tripolar or other dominating order, or replacing Western domination with domination from the East, North or South. This would inevitably lead to another impasse. At this point, I would like to cite the words of the great Russian philosopher Nikolai Danilevsky. He believed that progress did not consist of everyone going in the same direction, as some of our opponents seem to want. This would only result in progress coming to a halt, Danilevsky said. Progress lies in “walking the field that represents humanity’s historical activity, walking in all directions,” he said, adding that no civilisation can take pride in being the height of development. I am convinced that dictatorship can only be countered through free development of countries and peoples; the degradation of the individual can be set off by the love of a person as a creator; primitive simplification and prohibition can be replaced with the flourishing complexity of culture and tradition. The significance of today’s historical moment lies in the opportunities for everyone’s democratic and distinct development path, which is opening up before all civilisations, states and integration associations. We believe above all that the new world order must be based on law and right, and must be free, distinctive and fair. The world economy and trade also need to become fairer and more open. Russia considers the creation of new international financial platforms inevitable; this includes international transactions. These platforms should be above national jurisdictions. They should be secure, depoliticized and automated and should not depend on any single control centre. Is it possible to do this or not? Of course it is possible. This will require a lot of effort. Many countries will have to pool their efforts, but it is possible. This rules out the possibility of abuse in a new global financial infrastructure. It would make it possible to conduct effective, beneficial and secure international transactions without the dollar or any of the so-called reserve currencies. This is all the more important, now that the dollar is being used as a weapon; the United States, and the West in general, have discredited the institution of international financial reserves. First, they devalued it with inflation in the dollar and euro zones and then they took our gold-and-currency reserves. The transition to transactions in national currencies will quickly gain momentum. This is inevitable. Of course, it depends on the status of the issuers of these currencies and the state of their economies, but they will be growing stronger, and these transactions are bound to gradually prevail over the others. Such is the logic of a sovereign economic and financial policy in a multipolar world. Furthermore, new global development centres are already using unmatched technology and research in various fields and can successfully compete with Western transnational companies in many areas. Clearly, we have a common and very pragmatic interest in free and open scientific and technological exchange. United, we stand to win more than if we act separately. The majority should benefit from these exchanges, not individual super-rich corporations. How are things going today? If the West is selling medicines or crop seeds to other countries, it tells them to kill their national pharmaceutical industries and selection. In fact, it all comes down to this: its machine tool and equipment supplies destroy the local engineering industry. I realised this back when I served as Prime Minister. Once you open your market to a certain product group, the local manufacturer instantly goes belly up and it is almost impossible for him to raise his head. That’s how they build relationships. That’s how they take over markets and resources, and countries lose their technological and scientific potential. This is not progress; it is enslavement and reducing economies to primitive levels. Technological development should not increase global inequality, but rather reduce it. This is how Russia has traditionally implemented its foreign technology policy. For example, when we build nuclear power plants in other countries, we create competence centres and train local personnel. We create an industry. We don’t just build a plant, we create an entire industry. In fact, we give other countries a chance to break new ground in their scientific and technological development, reduce inequality, and bring their energy sector to new levels of efficiency and environmental friendliness. Let me emphasise again that sovereignty and a unique path of development in no way mean isolation or autarky. On the contrary, they are about energetic and mutually beneficial cooperation based on the principles of fairness and equality. If liberal globalisation is about depersonalising and imposing the Western model on the entire world, integration is, in contrast, about tapping the potential of each civilisation for everyone to benefit. If globalism is dictate – which is what it comes down to eventually, – integration is a team effort to develop common strategies that everyone can benefit from. In this regard, Russia believes it is important to make wider use of mechanisms for creating large spaces that rely on interaction between neighbouring countries, whose economies and social systems, as well as resource bases and infrastructure, complement each other. In fact, these large spaces form the economic basis of a multipolar world order. Their dialogue gives rise to genuine unity in humanity, which is much more complex, unique and multidimensional than the simplistic ideas professed by some Western masterminds. Unity among humankind cannot be created by issuing commands such as “do as I do” or “be like us.” It is created with consideration for everyone’s opinion and with a careful approach to the identity of every society and every nation. This is the principle that can underlie long-term cooperation in a multipolar world. In this regard, it may be worth revising the structure of the United Nations, including its Security Council, to better reflect the world’s diversity. After all, much more will depend on Asia, Africa, and Latin America in tomorrow’s world than is commonly believed today, and this increase in their influence is undoubtedly a positive development. Let me recall that the Western civilisation is not the only one even in our common Eurasian space. Moreover, the majority of the population is concentrated in the east of Eurasia, where the centres of the oldest human civilisations emerged. The value and importance of Eurasia lies in the fact that it represents a self-sufficient complex possessing huge resources of all kinds and tremendous opportunities. The more we work on increasing the connectivity of Eurasia and creating new ways and forms of cooperation, the more impressive achievements we make. The successful performance of the Eurasian Economic Union, the fast growth of the authority and prestige of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, the large-scale One Belt, One Road initiatives, plans for multilateral cooperation in building the North-South transport corridor and many other projects, are the beginning of a new era, new stage in the development of Eurasia. I am confident of this. Integration projects there do not contradict but supplement each other – of course, if they are carried out by neighbouring countries in their own interests rather than introduced by outside forces with the aim of splitting the Eurasian space and turning it into a zone of bloc confrontation. Europe, the Western extremity of the Greater Eurasia could also become its natural part. But many of its leaders are hampered by the conviction that the Europeans are superior to others, that it is beneath them to take part as equals in undertakings with others. This arrogance prevents them from seeing that they have themselves become a foreign periphery and actually turned into vassals, often without the right to vote. Colleagues, The collapse of the Soviet Union upset the equilibrium of the geopolitical forces. The West felt as a winner and declared a unipolar world arrangement, in which only its will, culture and interests had the right to exist. Now this historical period of boundless Western domination in world affairs is coming to an end. The unipolar world is being relegated into the past. We are at a historical crossroads. We are in for probably the most dangerous, unpredictable and at the same time most important decade since the end of World War II. The West is unable to rule humanity single-handedly and the majority of nations no longer want to put up with this. This is the main contradiction of the new era. To cite a classic, this is a revolutionary situation to some extent – the elites cannot and the people do not want to live like that any longer. This state of affairs is fraught with global conflicts or a whole chain of conflicts, which poses a threat to humanity, including the West itself. Today’s main historical task is to resolve this contradiction in a way that is constructive and positive. The change of eras is a painful albeit natural and inevitable process. A future world arrangement is taking shape before our eyes. In this world arrangement, we must listen to everyone, consider every opinion, every nation, society, culture and every system of world outlooks, ideas and religious concepts, without imposing a single truth on anyone. Only on this foundation, understanding our responsibility for the destinies of nations and our planet, shall we create a symphony of human civilisation. At this point, I would like to finish my remarks with expressing gratitude for the patience that you displayed while listening to them. Thank you very much. To be continued.

Russian Armed Forces Army General Sergei Surovikin—Full Interview [EN Subtitles] 10-19-2022

Presentation of The Shahed-136 / Geran-2 Attack UAV by Slavyangrad LOITERING MUNITIONS Thanks to all who watched and enjoyed our Shahed-136 / Geran-2 presentation video (https://t.me/Slavyangrad/16121) yesterday. Questions appeared in comments about Geran-2 loitering functionality. This follow up is to expand on the subject and clarify what we know. TLDR Quick Summary We don't know if Geran-2 has loitering capability and it probably doesn't. Islamic Republic Shahed-136 drones may have loitering capability using a radiation seeker, however this has not been publicly demonstrated. My working hypothesis is Geran-2 doesn't have loitering capability. Why? Because we have seen Russian use of camera-guided UAVs for the loitering mission, in videos reported to be "Lancet" UAVs (which I allege are actually Iranian Samad-3 modified with Russian Lancet optics, HERE (https://t.me/Slavyangrad/14711) and also HERE (https://t.me/Slavyangrad/15262)). DETAIL Loitering munitions are attack UAVs which fly to a target area, then remain in a holding pattern until a target is identified. Once identified, the UAV attacks the target. The advantage of this is the ability to attack non-static targets such as vehicles, even while in motion. Several targeting methods are used by loitering munitions: 1) Laser target designation. A laser is pointed at a target by ground spotters, or by a second, remotely piloted observer UAV such as the Russian Orlan-10. The attack UAV would need to have a device called a laser spot tracker, to lock onto and attack the target. In theory, the drone could do this autonomously or by remote command. While this may seem very complicated, laser target designation and tracking is a mature technology. For example, Russia uses Orlan-10 UAVs as laser target designators for the 152mm Krasnopol laser-guided artillery shell. Similar guidance of laser-tracking attack UAVs is a logical progression. There is one downside to laser tracking UAVs and that is high cost. 2) Camera guidance. The UAV sends a live camera feed to the ground station. It flies to the target area, then the pilot uses the UAV's camera to seek out targets. Once a target is identified and "locked", the UAV attacks it. The UAV's terminal dive may be manually piloted, or may be autonomous once the target is locked. This is also mature technology - even consumer-grade camera drones can be set to follow, circle or zoom into a target specified by the user. Camera guidance is used by the several recent "Lancet" UAV attack videos we have seen. 3) Sensor guidance. This method may use an IR-sensor to "lock on" to heat signatures (for example the exhaust of a tank) or a radiation seeker which homes in on electro-magnetic radiation from field radios or radar systems. Radiation seekers are versatile because they can be set to detect very specific frequencies. An autonomous UAV with a radiation seeker could loiter above a target area, waiting until a nearby air defence system activates its radar. As soon as the specific frequency and signal strength of the radar is identified, the UAV would lock on and attack the target autonomously. The Islamic Republic claims Shahed-136 is capable of sensor guidance, using a radiation seeker as an optional feature. However, this capability is yet to be demonstrated in Shahed-136 or any other Iranian UAV. A radiation seeker and the upgrades required to the UAV's flight computer and control unit for autonomous maneuver and AI decision-making would add tens of thousands of dollars to the UAV unit price. CONCLUSION It is unlikely Geran-2 has a loitering function. To Russian forces it is a simple, cheap cruise missile which can be launched in swarms. Geran-2 flies a programmed path to fixed coordinates using inexpensive GLONASS and inertial guidance, then does a terminal dive to hit the target with its 50kg warhead. Despite its lack of "brains", Geran-2 has proven to be a devastating addition to Russia's arsenal. As Pro-Western Russian military commentator Viktor Suvorov put it, "A stupid weapon which works, is not a stupid weapon". Slavyangrad Telegram: https://t.me/Slavyangrad/16174 Follow Me On Truth Social: bit.ly/3dOW453

10-26-2022 - Ned Price, Dept of Deepstate SpokesMuppet - Gaslighting Reporters On 'The Dirty Bomb' Situation

10-26-2022 - John Kirby, NSC Whitehouse SpokesMuppet - BUSTED Pushing Anti-Russia Propaganda

EU Crime Boss Ursula Van Der Crazy said '"Our aim is not only to freeze, but To seize the assets," although cautioning that establishing a legal base for such a move is "not trivial". "The will is there, but legally it is not trivial, there is still a lot of work to reach that goal," she reiterated, noting that the EU adheres to the rule of law, and therefore this process has to be "legally sound."

Senator Gerard Rennick is a Federal Senator for Queensland, Australia 10-25-2022 If the carnage and human tragedy of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars have taught us anything, it's that everyday people are made to suffer at the hands of elites who lack the empathy to understand the true horror of war. Rather than learn from the failure of the Middle East occupations, it seems we are doomed to repeat them. The origins of the war in Ukraine didn't start this year but in late 2013, with the decision by the then Ukrainian President, Viktor Yanukovych, to suspend an association agreement with the EU. As stated by Yanukovych, parts of the EU deal were inadequate, and Ukraine did not have the money to upgrade to European standards. To quote an MP from the Party of Regions, the governing party: If we had signed, we would have opened our borders and killed our own manufacturers. The decision to delay this decision led to riots and the eventual overthrow of the democratically elected president in the early months of 2014. The Party of Regions represented Ukrainians from eastern Ukraine, where significant manufacturing took place. It was quite within the governing party's right to act in the best interests of their constituents. This, however, wasn't enough for the antigovernment protesters, who spent the next four months protesting outside the Ukrainian parliament. The protests turned violent, and many members of the governing party fled the capital and even the country... Read more at: https://gerardrennick.com.au/ukraine-...

Putin, Medvedev, Shoigu, Konashenkov, Gerasimov Lavrov, Zakharov, etc have NOT once, ever directly threatened to use Nuclear Weapons against Ukraine, and have consistently referred strictly to their Nuclear Weapons Doctrine for the very limited situations permitting there use. Of which, Russia's Nuclear Doctrine is much more limited in scope than the United States. Regardless, Zelensky & Biden Retime's, along with the entire Western Corporate Media Complex have been fomenting this 'Putin's Nuclear Threat' Narrative for weeks! Russian MoD Sergey Shoigu called and spoke with US Lloyd Austin, UK Ben Wallace, France & Turkish Defense Ministers Jens Stoltenberg (NATO), US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, Biden, UK Secretary of State for Defence Ben Wallace have all instantly dismissed Russia's claims of Ukraine's possible provocation with a dirty bomb, which doesn't really make any sense.. How could they all instantly know whether Ukraine's building and/or planning on using a dirty bomb in a False Flag? They admittedly don't even know where all the Billions in OUR Taxpayer Dollars and Weapons goes. They 'claim' they didn't know the NAZI's were shelling the Zaporizhzhia NPP for weeks on end, or who blew up the Kersh Bridge, or who fired HIMARS at the NAZI POW Camp, and, and.. They ALL definately knew then and now, and have lied too all of us (and eachother) this whole time and can NOT be trusted! Why did Ben Wallace instantly bolt to the US after Shoigu contacted him regarding evidence of communications from Zelensky's regime obtaining 'dirty bomb' plans from the UK? Kinda strange, right Why would Russia's MoD be frantically in communication with all these country's Military's of not actually concerned? If it were Russia planning the False Flag, it wouldn't be very smart putting everybody on alert like that. Below is the recent Comms Russia MoD claims 23 October 2022: Minister of Defence of the Russian Federation, General of the Army Sergei Shoigu, has held telephone talks with UK Secretary of State for Defence Ben Wallace. They discussed situation in Ukraine. General of the Army Sergei Shoigu conveyed to the British counterpart his concerns about possible provocations by Ukraine with the use of a ‘dirty bomb’. Minister of Defence of the Russian Federation, General of the Army Sergei Shoigu, has held telephone talks with US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin. Russian Defence Minister General of the Army Sergei Shoigu has held telephone talks with his French, Turkish, British, and American counterparts. 24 October 2022: The Chief of General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces – First Deputy Minister of Defence of the Russian Federation General of the Army Valery Gerasimov has held telephone talks with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the U.S. Armed Forces General Mark Milley. 25 October 2022: Chief of Staff of Russian Armed Forces General of the Army Valery Gerasimov held telephone talks with the Chief of UK Defence Staff Admiral Antony Radakin and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the U.S. Armed Forces General Mark Milley. Chief of Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Protection troops Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov held a briefing on threats to radiation security.