USCCA Responds to Critics: But Is It the WHOLE Truth?

Enjoyed this video? Join my Locals community for exclusive content at lawofselfdefense.locals.com!
Streamed on:
1.63K

Last Friday USCCA Chairman Tim Schmidt released a YouTube video responding to varied criticisms of that organization. (https://youtu.be/p13X9mIEKS0)

In particular, Tim spoke to criticism of how USCCA managed its legal defense obligations to two of its members--Kayla Giles (later found guilty of murder at trial and sentenced to life) and Alan Colie (found guilty on a mixed verdict, and ironically sentenced the day prior to the release of this USCCA video).

Full disclosure--some of that criticism has come from me, and can be found here: https://lawofselfdefense.com/uscca

Having watched Tim's video, however, I can't help but note that it fails to actually address key concerns about how USCCA handled the Giles and Colie cases, and therefore fails to address concerns about how much trust USCCA members can confidently place in the organization to "have their backs," as USCCA marketing materials proclaim.

Today's Law of Self Defense Show will be a response to this USCCA video, explaining my remaining concerns and where I see Tim's explanations of the Giles and Colie cases to fall short.

Join me LIVE at Noon ET to discuss!

LEARN THE LAW OF SELF-DEFENSE TODAY! FOR FREE!
Grab your own copy of our best-selling guide to self-defense law for FREE! "The Law of Self Defense: Principles" is our best-selling plain-English explanation of your legal privilege to use even deadly force in defense of yourself, your family, and others!

Get your copy for FREE here: lawofselfdefense.com/freebook

Disclaimer - Content is for educational & entertainment purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Loading 3 comments...