State vs. U.S. Citizenship... (text-to-speech)

2 years ago
1.02K

DESCRIPTION: The underlying strategy used for the systemic chipping away at the foundations of American Sovereignty is not simple, brief, or easy to explain. Constitutional Commando has, in my opinion, penned one of the best, most accurate overviews of the uphill battle faced by American Patriots in the twenty-first Century to reclaim control of their country and recapture their sovereignty!

original article:
http://constitutionalcommando.com/state-citizenship-vs-us-citizenship/

Over two days, I've read the article once top to bottom, and spent nearly 15 hours editing the text to be read phonetically by a text-to-speech translating program. I felt the effort worth it because I feel Constitutional Commando's work on this information was good enough to make an audio version, so this body of good information is readily available to more people.

I hope our combined efforts benefit both you, and those close to you.

A guide to the method and means to stop the fraud and injustice can be found on the Process page at We the People, UnInc.
https://wtpuninc.wordpress.com/ and click [LEARN MORE]

Please visit our sponsors, merch sites, & special offers on our RECOMMENDATIONS page at:
https://wtpuninc.wordpress.com/recommendations/

We would recommend seeking assistance with this information from those in your own country who are familiar with the laws in that country.

References and Citings:

- Lansing versus Smith, 21 D. 89.
- Chisholm Exp v. Georgia (US) 2 Dale 419, 454; I L Ed 440, 445 @DALL 1793 pp 471-472.
- In Re Newman (1925), 71 C.A. 386, 235 P. 664.
- In re Merriam, 36 N.E. 505, 141 N.Y. 479, affirmed 16 S.Ct. 1073, 163 U.S. 625, 41 L.Ed. 287; 20 C.J.S., Section 1785.
- Title 28, USC §297
- U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 17
- U.S. v. Bevans, 16 U.S. (3 WHEAT) 336 (1818), reaff. 19 U.S.C.A., section 1401(h)
- Hepburn & Dundas v. Ellzey, 6 US. 445(1805);
- Glaeser v. Acacia Mut. Life Ass’n., 55 F. Supp., 925 (1944);
- Long v. District of Columbia, 820 F.2d 409 (D.C. Cir. 1987);
- Americana of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Kaplus, 368 F.2d 431 (1966),
- Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244, supra.
- Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 71,
- McKay v. Cambell, 2 Sawy. 129,
- U.S. v. Anthony, 24 Fed. Cas. 829, 830,
- Slaughter-House Cases, supra; cf. U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542, 549 (1875)
- Cunard S.S Co. v. Mellon, 262 US 100, 122
- Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt, 324 US 652, 672-73
- Crosse v. Bd. of Supervisors, 221 A.2d 431 (1966)
- U.S. v. Cruikshank, supra.
- U.S. v. Slater, 545 Fed. Supp. 179,182 (1982)
- State v. Phillips, 540 P.2d. 936; Dyett v. Turner, 439 P.2d. 266. (Utah Supreme Court.)
- Title 18 U.S.C. 242
- United States v. Otherson, 480 F.Supp. 1369, 1373 (1979)
- Frost & Frost Trucking v. Railroad Commission of California, 271 U.S. 583, 70 L.Ed. 1101 (1925)
- Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
- cf. United States v. Darby, 312 U.S. 100, 124 (1941)
- Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 (1958)
- The Luisitania, 251 F.715, 732
- Cook v. Tait, (1924) 265 U.S. 37,44 S.Ct 447, 11 Virginia Law Review, 607
- the 7th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
- Walker v. Sauvinet, 92 U.S. 90
- Presser v. Illinois, 116 U.S. 252
- the 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
- Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516),
- the 6th Amendmentto the U.S. Constitution
- West v. Louisianna, 194 U.S. 258.
- Article Four, section 2 of the Constitution
- Nickell v. Rosenfield, (1927) 82 CA 369, 375, 255 P. 760.
- Title 42 of the United States Code: Civil Rights laws
- Wadleigh v. Newhall (1905, CC Cal) 136 F 941
- Title 4 U.S. Code, Sections 105-113; subsections: 110(e), 111. 110(d), and 105
- Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773.
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Calvert, 464 SW 2d. 170 (1971), affd (Tex) 478 SW 2d. 926, cert. den. 409 U.S. 967, 34 L.Ed. 2d 234, 93 S.Ct. 293.
- Springfield v. Kenny, 104 N.E. 2d. 65 (1951 app.)
- Howard v. Sinking Fund of Louisville, 344 U.S. 624, 73 S.Ct. 465, 476, 97 L.Ed. 617 (1953);
- Schwarts v. O’Hara TP School District, 100 A 2d. 621, 625, 375, Pa. 440. Compare also 31 C.F.R. Parts 51.2 and 52.2
- Domestic Mail Service Regulations, Section 122.32
- Postal Reorganization Act, Section 403
- (Public Law 91-375)
- Federal Register, Volume 51, Number 53, Wednesday March 19, 1986.
- Bank v. Moore, 201 Ala. 411, 78 So. 789
- (Miller v. Miller, 296 SW.2d 648)
- Volume 1, Section 207 of the Uniform Commercial Code, 207.7, 207.4
- 1 Rules for Common Law, (or R.C.L.) 31, p. 422.
- 1 R.C.L. 40, p. 432
- 1 R.C.L. 32, p. 423
- 1 R.C.L. 17, p. 416
- CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM (complete restatement of the entire American law) Volume 7, section 4
- Public Law 97, 67th Congress, Session I, Chapter 135, 1921
- The Uniform Trustees’ Powers Act (ORS 128.005(1)
- Second Amendment
- Ninth Amendment

Loading 14 comments...