Legale§e

Episode #10 In this episode of Legalese, we start a brand no segment I will be doing occasionally moving forward that I am calling "Ignorance Of The Law"... We discuss a recent ruling out of the California Court of Appeals for the Third District that found under the California Endangered Species Act, 4 species of Bumble Bees now qualify as fish to get endangered species protection status. This is a great reminder that while ignorance is no excuse for breaking the law, ignorance is an excuse for writing and enforcing the law. CA Endangered Species Act - https://wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/CESA Court Opinion - https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/C093542.PDF Follow & Support Follow & Support Rumble.com/legalese locals.com/legalese categoricalimperatives.substack.com odysee.com/@Legalese anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23 PayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ Venmo - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request - Legalese@gmx.us Legalese is a podcast that discusses current events in law, politics & culture

If you have not seen part one yet, you should definitely watch that first to fully appreciate my building off of it in this video: https://youtu.be/uMDHCR8Kt80 Today on Legalese we will be discussing the issue dripping from everyone’s lips across the nation. The balancing act between gun rights and stricter gun control. Gun rights and gun control are not a new topic to this channel, In fact I have assembled a playlist of past videos touching on this subjects quite a few times from quite a few different perspectives (See List Below) Today’s video will be the second in a two part series looking at the best arguments for current gun control proposals,. Today's episode if focused on exposing and explaining the myths that constituted Joe Biden's response to the recent Uvalde shooting. In it he makes false claims about so-called "assault weapons", the assault weapon ban, the supposedly evil puppy hating, father raping baby killers that are collectively known as "the gun lobby", makes bogus claims about the frequency of school shootings and of mass shootings in comparison to other countries. and the multi-level deceptive non-argument that any restriction on natural rights and civil liberties are justified if it saves even one single, solitary life. Past Episodes on Gun Rights & Gun Control - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6NjbXOax5B01cxNekIOVZj-PQzyMY17c Why Background Checks Do Not Stymie Mass Shooters - https://reason.com/2022/05/17/why-background-checks-do-not-stymie-mass-shooters/ Public Mass Shootings: Database Amasses Details of a Half Century of U.S. Mass Shootings with Firearms, Generating Psychosocial Histories - https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/public-mass-shootings-database-amasses-details-half-century-us-mass-shootings Follow & Support Rumble.com/legalese locals.com/legalese categoricalimperatives.substack.com odysee.com/@Legalese anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23 Contact the show: Legalese@gmx.us

Today on Legalese we will be discussing the issue dripping from everyone’s lis across the nation. The balancing act between gun rights and stricter gun control. Gun rights and gun control are not a new topic to this channel, In fact I have assembled a playlist of past videos touching on this subjects quite a few times from quite a few different perspectives (See List Below) Today’s video will be the first in a two part series looking at the best arguments for current gun control proposals, such as expanded background checks, assault weapons bans, Red flag laws, Discussing if it is indeed too easy for people with sinister motives to get their hands on a gun legally and more. Where this video will differ from past videos is that while my usual position when it comes to all individual rights, namely that I like my civil liberties the same way I likes my women. Strictly enumerated, vigorously protected and absolute… I will instead be adopting a more middle of the road position. Because this video is a genuine attempt to write an open letter to gun control advocates and meet them halfway. Which is why this video is premised on my uncritically accepting the assumption that: “If a policy for stricter gun control could be shown to have a demonstrable effect on numbers of gun violence and mass shootings, it would be worth curbing gun rights to implement that policy” I am doing it this way because I believe most gun control advocates are arguing their positions in good faith, under the belief their proposals will reduce future gun violence and I also believe it can be demonstrably shown these arguments are made off a lack of information that means their proposals would be entirely unhelpful and in some cases, they are arguing for policies that are already in practice and vigorously enforced. Past Episodes on Gun Rights & Gun Control - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6NjbXOax5B01cxNekIOVZj-PQzyMY17c HR8 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/ 2021 Morning Consult Poll Background Checks - https://morningconsult.com/2021/03/10/house-gun-legislation-background-checks-polling/ Business Insider “I tried to buy a gun at Walmart twice, and roadblocks left me empty-handed both times” - https://www.businessinsider.com/walmart-gun-buying-review-virginia-store-2019-8 Washington Free Beacon “Store Owner: Undercover CBS Purchase of AR-15 Broke Federal Law” - https://freebeacon.com/issues/gun-store-contacts-atf-virginia-police-undercover-cbs-news-purchase-ar-15/ Washington Examiner “Columnist fails gun check, blames store owners” - https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/columnist-fails-gun-check-blames-store-owners 18 USC § 922(d) - https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/922 Meena Harris Tweet - https://twitter.com/meena/status/1529216221266079744 Uvalde school shooting: Teen gunman bought AR-15 style rifle day after he turned 18 - https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/texas/article/uvalde-school-shooting-guns-17196715.php Why Background Checks Do Not Stymie Mass Shooters - https://reason.com/2022/05/17/why-background-checks-do-not-stymie-mass-shooters/ Public Mass Shootings: Database Amasses Details of a Half Century of U.S. Mass Shootings with Firearms, Generating Psychosocial Histories - https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/public-mass-shootings-database-amasses-details-half-century-us-mass-shootings Follow & Support Rumble.com/legalese locals.com/legalese categoricalimperatives.substack.com odysee.com/@Legalese anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23 Contact the show: Legalese@gmx.us

Today on Legalese we will be talking about that one time Thomas Jefferson acted like a true tyrant and Chief Justice John Marshall acted as a true hero in the cause of individual liberty and due process… This is the trial of Aaron Burr… and if you think you know what crime he was being charged with, your may be surprised. Now it was today, May 22nd in 1807 that Aaron Burr was charged with high treason and would go on trial for his life. This case was of fundamental significance to questions of governmental power and individual rights in America. The case is known as the United States versus Aaron Burr. The trial of Aaron Burr turned on the vital question, to what extent can the judicial process and to what extent will it protect an individual who is prosecuted by his own government or putting in more plainly who is supreme, the will of the government or the law? Follow & Support Rumble.com/legalese locals.com/legalese categoricalimperatives.substack.com odysee.com/@Legalese anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23 Contact the show: Legalese@gmx.us ►00:00 Introduction

This video is a remastered re-release of a very old episode I did on the case of Stromberg v California (1931)... This video was the very first in my series of "Today In Supreme Court History"... I noticed this video had started generating a bunch of new views the past few days, and I noticed, like many of my old episodes, the sound quality was absolutely terrible, So this is not a new video, I just did some post-product on work on the original audio track and got it sounding MUCH better than the original episode. This was a pivotal case because it was the very first time the Supreme Court incorporated the First Amendment protection of free expression on a State, rather than Federal level in 14th amendment jurisprudence based on substantive due process. Enjoy! Follow & Support Rumble.com/legalese locals.com/legalese categoricalimperatives.substack.com odysee.com/@Legalese anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23 Contact the show: Legalese@gmx.us

Today on Legalese we will be looking at the best and worst arguments for a robust, if not absolute protection of Freedom of speech, freedom of expression & freedom of association. Including an examination about how the censorious left and corporate media who are most eaher to impose censorship are actually advocating for policies that wil destroy the very things they say we need censorship to protect. We also look at what most free speech absolutists get wrong when they advocate for free speech. Neither group tend to understand its true value. So what is its true value? Link to past episodes we discussed "Julian Assange: and the myth of Constitutional rights" - https://youtu.be/KqgZ24xHujU "Sedition: An American Virtue" - https://youtu.be/1lmkWCgrWIc Follow & Support Rumble.com/legalese locals.com/legalese categoricalimperatives.substack.com odysee.com/@Legalese anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23 Contact the show: Legalese@gmx.us

Today On Legalese We discuss Biden's new Ministry of Truth. The Disinformation Governance Board. We are going to take a deep dive into what this Executive Agency is for, why it's being created, who are the people in charge of it and why it is one of the greatest threats to civil liberties since the PATRIOT Act. Special thanks to "Bull Brand" for creating the "Two Minute Hate" video segment. Watch the Full Original Video "1984 or 2021?" - https://youtu.be/UqHVifp_kjE Check out his channel full of great content - https://www.youtube.com/c/BullBrand/featured Follow & Support Rumble.com/legalese locals.com/legalese categoricalimperatives.substack.com odysee.com/@Legalese anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23 Contact the show: Legalese@gmx.us

Today on Legalese we will be discussing some of the fallout over Elon Musk's purchase purchase of Twitter. A very powerful NGO and think tank called "The Open Markets Institute" put out a public statement calling on the government to block this sale of Twitter because they are afraid the guy who bought Twitter with the almost singular reason of expanding and protecting freedom of expression somehow poses an existential threat to free expression. While many of us saw and appreciated his response to the article with a pair of tweets and damning articles about this organization claiming to respect free expression so much they want to make sure they are the only people who may actually exercise that right. Elon Musk 1st tweet: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1521950798745194496?s=20&t=5kaSiRaNwBonWXSlbk6rtA Elon Musk 2nd tweet: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1521574041814978562?s=20&t=5kaSiRaNwBonWXSlbk6rtA Open Markets Details How US Government Can Block Musk Takeover of Twitter - https://www.openmarketsinstitute.org/publications/open-markets-details-how-us-government-can-block-musk-takeover-of-twitter Simington Comments On Acquisition Of Twitter - https://www.fcc.gov/document/simington-comments-acquisition-twitter Carr Rejects Call for FCC to Block Musk's Purchase of Twitter - https://www.fcc.gov/document/carr-rejects-call-fcc-block-musks-purchase-twitter What few are aware of is that the FCC issued its own response to the suggestion they have and should use the power to block the sale of Twitter to Elon Musk. Usually the kind of flimsy argument that departments of the administrative usually love to use to justify power grabs. Instead we got a couple responses that were every bit as biting as Musk's tweets were. Rejecting what they called an illegal, unconstitutional, unamerican government restrictions on free expression. Link to past episodes we discussed "Julian Assange: Freedom of the press and the myth of Constitutional rights" - https://youtu.be/KqgZ24xHujU "Sedition: An American Virtue" - https://youtu.be/1lmkWCgrWIc "United States v Lopez - https://youtu.be/8wL26DSP_bA "Gonzalez v Raich" - https://youtu.be/gboAUgA-dTs Follow & Support Rumble.com/legalese locals.com/legalese categoricalimperatives.substack.com odysee.com/@Legalese anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23 Contact the show: Legalese@gmx.us

Today on Legalese we will be discussing the consequences of this leaked Supreme Court Opinion in their upcoming case Dobbs v Whole Women's Health of Jackson. The leaked draft written by Samuel Alito allegedly shows a majority opinion to essentially overturn Roe. This leak should not necessarily be taken as the Court's final opinion. Drafts of decisions like these often make the rounds among the Justices and they often end up getting changed by the time the actual opinion is given to the public. But there is no doubt that this leak shows a Court dealing with potentially its greatest crisis in the history of the Court. We also discuss some options about who may be responsible and what some of the likely fallout will be. Abortion Cases & Law Playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6NjbXOax5B1c2OGCbJwEW0NeFP67RkRH Follow & Support Rumble.com/legalese locals.com/legalese categoricalimperatives.substack.com odysee.com/@Legalese anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23 Contact the show: Legalese@gmx.us

Today on Legalese we discuss the recent district Court ruling that the CDC's mask mandate policy exceeded their constitutional and statutory authority. The Biden administration's failure to seek a stay and the true meaning behind their delay in taking this matter before an appellate court. We also discuss how the response we have seen to this ruling from the White Hpuse, the CDC and most especially, Dr. Fauci, constitute a complete misunderstanding of Constitutional government and the rule of law and demonstrate an outright contempt for federalism and judicial review.

Today on Legalese, we are going to be discussing the confirmation hearings for Ketanji Brown Jackson to look at the plethora of reprehensible attacks made against her by Republicans in one of the most petty Borkings of all time. We all also be discussing the one Republican who actually gave a valid reason for voting against Judge Jackson's nomination and what that reason was. Follow & Support Rumble.com/legalese locals.com/legalese categoricalimperatives.substack.com odysee.com/@Legalese anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23 Contact the show: Legalese@gmx.us

Episode # 0 Follow & Support Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month Patreon: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives PayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ Venmo - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a Odysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/ Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/ Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/ Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best made E-mail the Show: CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request - CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Today On Categorical Imperatives we are discussing some new developments around SB 8 - This is the Fetal Heartbeat Bill out of Texas currently facing a number of legal challenges. FPC Amicus Brief - https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/21/21-463/197205/20211021195907665_Firearms%20Policy%20Coalition%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf Gorsuch's Majority Opinion in Jackson v Whole Women's Health - https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/595/21-463/ Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson, 595 U.S. ___ (2021) Full Case Brief - https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/595/21-463/ Columbia Missourian Abortion Legislation Article - https://www.columbiamissourian.com/news/missouri-lawmakers-fight-to-restrict-abortion/article_300b4a2c-a001-11ec-956b-2b13933b8b72.html SB 753 - https://www.senate.mo.gov/22info/BTS_Web/Bill.aspx?SessionType=R&BillID=71259698 SJR 34 - https://www.senate.mo.gov/22info/BTS_Web/Bill.aspx?SessionType=R&BillID=71259672 SB 778 - https://www.senate.mo.gov/22info/BTS_Web/Bill.aspx?SessionType=R&BillID=71259887 HB 2810 - https://www.house.mo.gov/Bill.aspx?bill=HB2810&year=2022&code=R Texas Occupational Health & Safety Code §164.055(a) - https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/OC/htm/OC.164.htm Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908) Full Case Brief- https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/209/123/ Related Episodes Of Categorical Imperatives: If The Court Reaffirms Roe (The Future Of The Legal Conservative Movement) - https://youtu.be/J_Av2bWkJzU What Happens if SCOTUS Overturns Roe? - https://youtu.be/QfP_KHqTt-Q Covis Travel Bans - https://youtu.be/05rOqs4dMvw OSHA Vaccine Mandate - https://youtu.be/4PFkAbSLkEw Texas Abortion Law & The Supreme Court - https://youtu.be/KKIELHjNBuA A Tale Of American Sovereignty (11th Amendment, Chisolm v Georgia & Popular Sovereignty) - https://youtu.be/q1qqUXVkJLM Today In Supreme Court History Episodes: Roe v Wade (1973) - https://youtu.be/Y6yb3H54Y7A Planned Parenthood v Casey (1992) - https://youtu.be/6OB_ehOL6Uc Cooper v Aaron (1958) - https://youtu.be/5PM4cEzkxzc Follow & Support Brand new website with blog, past episodes, show notes , podcast archive, articles, support the show: https://categoricalpodcast.wordpress.com/ Patreon: - https://www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives PayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ Venmo - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a Odysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/ Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/ Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/ Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request - CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Today on Categorical Imperatives I am joined by Dave DeCamp the news editor at antiwar.com We are discussing the war in Ukraine. What has happened, what will likely come next? What possible resolutions could bring an end to this conflict and what barriers are being put up by Ukraine and Russia to impede a peaceful resolution. We also try to discern the motives of major players such as Putin, Bide & Zelinsky. Also, Dave has some stellar advice on how non-experts in foreign policy like myself and most people can begin to sift through the deafening noise of useless and incorrect information from the political class and corporate media and much more. You can find Dave's work over at http://www.antiwar.com Follow & Support Brand new website with blog, past episodes, show notes , podcast archive, articles, support the show: https://categoricalpodcast.wordpress.com/ Patreon: - https://www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives PayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ Venmo - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a Odysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/ Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/ Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/ Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request - CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Kyle Rittenhouse recently went on Tucker Carlson to announce he will be starting a non-profit group called the "Media Accountability Project" as well as announcing a series of defamation lawsuits against numerous individuals in corporate media, celebrities and politicians. Today we discuss why, while the corporate media's smears against Kyle may be reprehensible. But they are not defamatory. How Kyle is being miscounseled and why we probably won't win a dime in court Find Doctor Randomercam on YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/DoctorRandomercam Common Law Courts In A Civil Law System (PDF) - http://fs2.american.edu/dfagel/www/Class%20Readings/Scalia/Scalia_Common%20Law%20Courts%20In%20A%20Civil%20Law%20System.pdf My Episode on Consttutional Interpratation and Statutory Construction - https://youtu.be/QnEq4rAh9aw My Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Coverage Playlist - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6NjbXOax5B3G7yiuH88jJzWApqQq8vyM Follow & Support Brand new website with blog, past episodes, show notes , podcast archive, articles, support the show: https://categoricalpodcast.wordpress.com/ Patreon: - https://www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives PayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ Venmo - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a Odysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/ Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/ Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/ Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request - CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Today On Categorical Imperatives we complete our exploration of the massive influence the Roman Republic had on our Republic's Constitution and System of government. In Part 1 we looked at the way this Roman Republican influence manifested in the Founders individually. In Part 2 we looked at the Enlightenment era rediscovery and reinterpretation of the Ancient Roman Republic and the resulting political philosophy of classical republicanism and we examine the way it influenced different groups of people during the founding and especially those who wrote and ratified the US Constitution. In this 3rd and final video we look at the ways that the enlightenment era classical republican tradition differed from the Greco-Roman Republics of antiquity and we examine how those Ancient Republics themselves influence the creation of our constitution, and or mixed government. And we explore the origins of the concepts of virtue and liberty as they were understood at the time of the founding, how they are understood today and how they relate to similar, but distinct concepts in the Ancient Roman philosophy of people like Cicero and Tacitus as the concepts of 'Virtus' and 'Libertas' Watch Part 1 - https://youtu.be/REN7ljH8vGc Watch Part 2 - https://youtu.be/E9jnL51rpyA The Failure to Reform: Rome's Institutions Slide Into Crisis - https://youtu.be/GKPMpWyqSZs Collected works of Greco-Roman philosophers and historians of Classical Republicanism Thucydides - https://oll.libertyfund.org/people/thucydides Aristotle - https://oll.libertyfund.org/people/Aristotle Tacitus - https://oll.libertyfund.org/people/publius-cornelius-tacitus Plutarch - https://oll.libertyfund.org/people/plutarch Livy - https://oll.libertyfund.org/people/titus-livius-livy Cicero - https://oll.libertyfund.org/people/marcus-tullius-cicero Follow & Support Brand new website with blog, search past episodes, browse show notes page, , links to audio/video podcast, articles, resources to support the show and more coming soon! https://categoricalpodcast.wordpress.com/ Patreon: - https://www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives PayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ Venmo - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a Odysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/ Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/ Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/ Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request - CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Today On Categorical Imperatives we are looking at the second part in what what is quickly becoming a 4 part video series on the influence of The Roman Republic and the philosophy of Classical Republicanism on America's Founding. In Part 1 we looked at the way this influence manifested in the Founders individually Today we look at the Enlightenment era rediscovery and reinterpretation of the Ancient Roman Republic and the resulting political philosophy of classical republicanism and we examine the way it influenced different groups of people during the founding and especially those who wrote and ratified the US Constitution and what influence the Roman Republic had on our very system of government embodied in the Constitution Watch Part 1 - https://youtu.be/REN7ljH8vGc The Failure to Reform: Rome's Institutions Slide Into Crisis - https://youtu.be/GKPMpWyqSZs Collected works of Greco-Roman philosophers and historians of Classical Republicanism Thucydides - https://oll.libertyfund.org/people/thucydides Aristotle - https://oll.libertyfund.org/people/Aristotle Tacitus - https://oll.libertyfund.org/people/publius-cornelius-tacitus Plutarch - https://oll.libertyfund.org/people/plutarch Livy - https://oll.libertyfund.org/people/titus-livius-livy Cicero - https://oll.libertyfund.org/people/marcus-tullius-cicero Follow & Support Brand new website with blog, search past episodes, browse show notes page, , links to audio/video podcast, articles, resources to support the show and more coming soon! https://categoricalpodcast.wordpress.com/ Patreon: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives PayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ Venmo - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a Odysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/ Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/ Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/ Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request - CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Today on Categorical Imperatives we will be looking at the massive influence the Roman Republic had on our Founders and is part of a series that will be looking at the influence of Classical Republicanism on our Founders and our Constitution's framers and ratifiers. *Part 2 Now Available https://youtu.be/E9jnL51rpyA * The Failure to Reform: Rome's Institutions Slide Into Crisis - https://youtu.be/GKPMpWyqSZs Collected works of Greco-Roman philosophers and historians of Classical Republicanism Thucydides - https://oll.libertyfund.org/people/thucydides Aristotle - https://oll.libertyfund.org/people/Aristotle Tacitus - https://oll.libertyfund.org/people/publius-cornelius-tacitus Plutarch - https://oll.libertyfund.org/people/plutarch Livy - https://oll.libertyfund.org/people/titus-livius-livy Cicero - https://oll.libertyfund.org/people/marcus-tullius-cicero Follow & Support Brand new website with blog, search past episodes, browse show notes page, , links to audio/video podcast, articles, resources to support the show and more coming soon! https://categoricalpodcast.wordpress.com/ Patreon: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives PayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ Venmo - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a Odysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/ Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/ Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/ Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request - CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Today On Categorical Imperatives we will be discussing the Supreme Court case every leftist loves to hate: Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (2010) In my last video I briefed 3 landmark Supreme Court cases dealing with issues of money and speech, including Citizens United. Today I want to go further in exploring this case and it's legacy. My previous video was part of my “Today in Supreme Court History” Series which means what you got was a purely objective and scholarly explanation of those cases in their background, the facts of the case, the primary holding and the precedent they set. Today’s video is meant to be an open letter of sorts to people who think citizens united is a case that ruled corporations are people and money is speech. Does Money Equal Speech? Episode - https://youtu.be/EdWApA0q93U Mentions links and articles: Corporations Are People, And They Have More Rights Than You - https://www.huffpost.com/entry/corporations-are-people-a_b_5543833 12 Years After Citizens United, the Supreme Court's Right-Wing Revolution Continues Thomas Massie Interview on the REAL money in politics problem - https://reason.com/video/2018/07/25/thomas-massie-congress-washington-gop/ Getting Big Money Out of Politics and Restoring Democracy, Friends of Bernie Sanders -https://berniesanders.com/issues/money-in-politics/ Citizens United v. Federal Election Comm'n, 558 U.S. 310 (2010) - https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/558/310/ Amicus Curiae Brief Of The ACLU In Support Of Appellant - https://www.fec.gov/resources/legal-resources/litigation/citizens_united_sc_08_tsac_aclu.pdf

Today on Categorical Imperatives we have a new video in my "Today In Supreme Court History" series. This weeks marks the 12 year anniversary of the Supreme Court's opinion in the case of Citizen's United v Federal Election Commission. So I have briefed three landmark Supreme Court cases concerning the relationship between money and speech as a matter of law. We will be starting with: Buckley v Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976) - https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/424/1/ which set the precedent upon which the second case is constructed: McConnell v F.E.C. 540 U.S. 93 (2003) - https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/540/93/ which is the case Citizens United overturned: Citizens United v F.E.C. 558 U.S. 310 (2010) - https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/558/310/ Citizens United and Twelve Years of Unjustified Resentment - https://libertarianinstitute.org/articles/citizens-united-and-twelve-years-of-unjustified-resentment/ Follow & Support Brand new website with blog, search past episodes, browse show notes page, , links to audio/video podcast, articles, resources to support the show and more coming soon! https://categoricalpodcast.wordpress.com/ Patreon: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives PayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ Venmo - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a Odysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/ Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/ Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/ Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request - CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Episode #79 In this episode I am joined by Dave Decamp, writer and news editor for antiwar.com With escalating tensions between the United States and Russia over the future of Ukraine it always feels their is vital, but missing, information and context in the official explanations our governments gives and in the way corporate media talks about the subject . Dave has been following these events and writing about them over the last few months, so I brought him on the show to talk about what is being left out by our government and by the mainstream press in their coverage. It was a great discussion, and I have no doubt you'll walk away at the end with a much better understanding of what is actually going on. Follow & Support Brand new website with blog, search past episodes, browse show notes page, , links to audio/video podcast, articles, resources to support the show and more coming soon! https://categoricalpodcast.wordpress.com/ Patreon: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives PayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ Venmo - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a Odysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/ Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/ Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/ Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request - CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Today on Categorical Imperatives I will be responding to some feedback I got from a viewer on a past video about American Constitutional Republicanism. This episode will be the first of three videos covering the topics I am responding to. Today, that topic is the Electoral College and what role it plays in our elections as well as discussing faithless electors, gerrymandering and redistricting and I give my own personal take on what we can do to make Presidential elections matter and put power back in the hands of the people as opposed to the 2 major political parties. ►Related Links From Viewer Feedback Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/AllRoadsLeadToTheTruth/ Facebook Article On My American Constitutional Republicanism Video: https://www.facebook.com/groups/AllRoadsLeadToTheTruth/posts/4737729229599106/ What Is The Electoral College: https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college/about Faithless Electors Article: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10515 Redistricting Article: https://www.ocfl.net/OpenGovernment/Redistricting2011/FrequentlyAskedQuestionsRedistricting.aspx ►My Links American Constitutional Republicanism: https://youtu.be/R8cPu7GFPTY Electoral College Part One: https://youtu.be/aQ3PXuJJRmc Electoral College Part Two: https://youtu.be/jbWAoW1FZmo Follow & SupportTo find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media: LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a Odysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/ Anchor.fm - https://anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/ Substack-- https://categoricalimperatives.substack.com/ Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/ How to support the channel: Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month -: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives PayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ Venmo Donations - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best made E-mail the Show: CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

In this episode of Categorical Imperatives we look at the likely outcome and consequences if the Supreme Court was to reaffirm Roe next June in it's opinion on the case for Dobbs v Jackson Whole Women's Health. Why this outcome is more likely than most people believe it is and what it will mean for the future of the legal conservative movement. Follow & Support Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month as a Citizen Producer Patreon: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives PayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ All PayPal Donation Options - https://www.paypal.com/donate?business=4G3R7WQTR7T58&currency_code=USD Venmo Donations - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/ LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a Odysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/ Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/ Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best made E-mail the Show: CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request - CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Episode #76 In this episode we discuss what I think some of the most likely and moat interesting possibilities if the Supreme Court does, in fact, overrule Roe v Wade in the recent case of Dobbs v Whole Women's Health The future of state and federal abortions laws, the role of implied powers, it's affect on Federalism, the Commerce Clause, State's Rights and much, much more... Related Episodes Roe v Wade Overview - https://youtu.be/Y6yb3H54Y7A Texas SB 8 Abortion Legislation - https://youtu.be/KKIELHjNBuA Originalism and Textualism - https://youtu.be/QnEq4rAh9aw Gonzalez v Raich - https://youtu.be/gboAUgA-dTs Property Rights - https://youtu.be/MxmYhQKRxjs Planned Parenthood v Casey - https://youtu.be/6OB_ehOL6Uc US v Lopez - https://youtu.be/8wL26DSP_bA Right To Privacy - https://youtu.be/8wL26DSP_bA Related Articles Implied Powers In The Founding Era - https://libertarianinstitute.org/articles/constitutional-sleight-of-hand-implied-powers-during-the-founding-era/ The Irrepressible Myths of Whole Women’s Health v. Jackson - https://libertarianinstitute.org/articles/the-irrepressible-myths-of-whole-womens-health-v-jackson/ A Right To Your Property & A Property In Your Rights - https://libertarianinstitute.org/articles/a-right-to-your-property-and-a-property-in-your-rights/ Constitutional Sleight of Hand: The Evolution of Implied Powers - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2021/11/19/constitutional-sleight-of-hand-the-evolution-of-implied-powers/ Three Supreme Court Cases that Twisted the Commerce Clause - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2020/07/17/three-supreme-court-cases-that-twisted-the-commerce-clause/ Follow & Support Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month as a Citizen Producer Patreon: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives PayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ All PayPal Donation Options - https://www.paypal.com/donate?business=4G3R7WQTR7T58&currency_code=USD Venmo Donations - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/ LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a Odysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/ Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/ Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best made E-mail the Show: CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request - CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Today on Categorical Imperatives we discuss the unavoidable fact that experience shows that what little good travel bans may do is outweighed by the immensely cruel harm. Follow & Support To find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media: LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a Odysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/ Anchor.fm - https://anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/ Substack-- https://categoricalimperatives.substack.com/ Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/ Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/ How to support the channel: Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month -: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives PayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ Venmo Donations - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best made E-mail the Show: CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.