Pfizer is 'deeply sorry'
Pfizer, bringing discredit to pharmaceutical industry
https://www.pmcpa.org.uk/media/cwvkqvyz/3741-case-report-28-march-2024.pdf
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/04/06/pfizer-breached-regulatory-code-five-times-watchdog-finds/
Senior executives used social media to promote an “unlicensed” Covid vaccine.
Pfizer found to have breached the regulatory code five times,
Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA)
Pharmaceutical watchdog,
relates to a complaint about a message posted on twitter
November 2020 by senior Pfizer employees.
COMPLAINT
the complainant alleged that it turned out that such misbehaviour was even more widespread than they had thought, extended right to the top of their UK operation and was apparently continuing to this very day.
PANEL RULING
The Panel noted Pfizer’s submission that on further investigation into this complaint four other Pfizer UK colleagues, including another senior colleague in the UK organisation, had re-tweeted the same post.
The Panel queried whether a social media platform, such as Twitter was the appropriate forum to share such information.
The Panel noted the tweet contained limited information regarding the efficacy of the vaccine candidate with no safety information provided.
On the balance of probabilities, it was likely that the Pfizer UK employee’s connections would include UK members of the public as well as UK health professionals.
The Panel noted that the tweet clearly referred to the outcome of the Pfizer and BioNTech’s vaccine being developed to protect against COVID-19.
The Panel noted that Clause 3.1 prohibited the promotion of a medicine prior to the grant of its marketing authorisation.
They must not mislead either directly or by implication, by distortion, exaggeration or undue emphasis. Material must be sufficiently complete to enable the recipient to form their own opinion of the therapeutic value of the medicine.
It must not be stated that a product has no adverse reactions, toxic hazards or risks of addiction or dependency. The Panel noted the tweet made no reference to adverse events and was therefore concerned that important safety information relating to the vaccine candidate was not provided and ruled a breach of Clause 7.9 of the 2019 Code as acknowledged by Pfizer.
The Panel noted Pfizer stated that the senior employee whose re-tweet was the subject of this complaint had completed the social media training module in October 2019.
Activity which was clearly outside of company policy had not been taken down or deleted.
‘Unlicensed medicine proactively disseminated’
“unlicensed medicine being proactively disseminated on Twitter to health professions and members of the public in the UK”.
37.1K
views
223
comments
Vit D research, definitive and significant
Vitamin D supplementation has a protective effect, against the incidence of COVID-19 in RCT studies,
OR 0.403, (95% IC 0.218, 0.747)
In the RCTs performed on HCWs, the overall reduction in risk in the population supplemented with vitamin D was approximately 80%
Against the incidence of COVID-19 in analytical studies
OR = 0.592, (95% IC 0.476–0.736)
Against the incidence of COVID-19 ICU admission
OR 0.317, (95% IC 0.147–0.680).
Our meta-analysis suggests a definitive and significant association between the protective role of vitamin D and COVID-19 incidence and ICU admission.
Preventive Vitamin D Supplementation and Risk for COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/16/5/679
(28th Feb 2024)
Vitamin D, crucial roles
Bone homeostasis, muscle function, oncogenesis, immune response and metabolism.
In the context of the COVID-19
Numerous researchers have tried to determine the role vitamin D in the immune response to the virus.
Systematic review and meta-analysis, 15th May 2023
Preventive vitamin D supplementation, 16 publications
N = 1,262,235 participants,
A protective role in
Incidence of COVID-19
Mortality
Admission to intensive care units (ICUs).
We calculated the Odds Ratios
The assessment of potential bias and the evaluation of study quality will be conducted independently by two researchers.
Extra information
The majority of the effects of vitamin D are mediated by the VDR, which promotes the expression of genes containing specific DNA sequences and is expressed in almost all nucleated cells
Approximately 3 percent of the human genome is under the control of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D
Vitamin D has been observed to contribute to the synthesis of defensins,
to be pivotal for enhancing the phagocytic activity,
and to modulate the immune system response by regulating the inflammatory cascade
24.6K
views
100
comments
Doctor diagnoses vaccine adverse events
Dr. Melissa McCann is a general practitioner in Queensland, Australia
Crowdfunding page- https://www.nomoresilenceau.com/campaigns/covid-vaccine-class-action-injuries/
The speech that caused all my Medical Board woes - https://rumble.com/v2bk5mw-dr-melissa-mccann-speech-covid-vaccines-and-effects-tour-sydney-australia-2.html
A video summary of the class action claims- https://youtu.be/1i1RlGqKRlY?feature=shared
The class action website including link to join – www.covidvaxclassaction.com.au
29.6K
views
95
comments
Global cancer concern
Professor Angus Dalgleish, mRNA Vaccines Must Be Banned Once and For All
https://dailysceptic.org/2023/10/01/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
At the end of last year I reported that I was seeing melanoma patients who had been stable for years relapse after their first booster (their third injection).
The number of my patients affected has been rising ever since.
Other oncologists have contacted me from all over the world including from Australia and the U.S.
After boosters
The consensus is that it is no longer confined to melanoma but that increased incidence of:
After boosters
Lymphomas, a cancer of the lymphatic system
Leukaemias, a group of cancers that affect the blood
Kidney cancers
My colorectal cancer colleagues report an epidemic of explosive cancers (those presenting with multiple metastatic spread in the liver and elsewhere).
Those of us who knew from the beginning that the sequence of SARS-CoV-2 contained inserts which could not have possibly occurred naturally, and were similar to ones that had already been published from the Wuhan laboratory
The ‘vaccine’ did not stay at the site of injection as promised
Batch-to-batch variability
These alarming concerns seem to have been brushed off by the regulators when they should have immediately begun investigating them in depth.
Yellow Card and U.S. VAERS adverse event reports to be nothing to be worried about.
DNA contamination
So why are these cancers occurring?
T cell suppression was my first likely explanation.
However we must also now consider DNA plasmid and SV40 integration in promoting cancer development,
Reports that mRNA spike protein binds p53 and other cancer suppressor genes.
To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence.
No ifs or buts any longer. All mRNA vaccines must be halted and banned now.
Eurostat
Circulatory diseases, cancer: 54% of all EU deaths in 2021
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-eurostat-news/w/DDN-20240325-2
In 2021 there were 5.3 million deaths in the EU
Circulatory diseases, 1.71 million (32% of all deaths).
Cancer, 1.14 million (22%).
Respiratory diseases (0.32 million; 6%)
Diseases of the digestive system (0.21 million; 4%)
Eurostat, Excess deaths 2022
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20220916-1
April, + 12%
May, +7%
June, +7%
July, + 16%
Eurostat, 2023
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/DDN-20230616-3
Excess mortality continued
Eurostat, Jan 2024, + 3.6%
In January 2024, the highest excess mortality rates were in the Netherlands (15.3 %), Denmark (11.5 %) and Germany (9.9 %).
In January 2024, excess mortality continued to vary across the EU.
Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Lithuania, Croatia, Luxembourg, Slovakia, Poland, Latvia and Czechia recorded no excess deaths.
47.2K
views
250
comments
Vit D research, definitive and significant
Vitamin D supplementation has a protective effect, against the incidence of COVID-19 in RCT studies,
OR 0.403, (95% IC 0.218, 0.747)
In the RCTs performed on HCWs, the overall reduction in risk in the population supplemented with vitamin D was approximately 80%
Against the incidence of COVID-19 in analytical studies
OR = 0.592, (95% IC 0.476–0.736)
Against the incidence of COVID-19 ICU admission
OR 0.317, (95% IC 0.147–0.680).
Our meta-analysis suggests a definitive and significant association between the protective role of vitamin D and COVID-19 incidence and ICU admission.
Preventive Vitamin D Supplementation and Risk for COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/16/5/679
(28th Feb 2024)
Vitamin D, crucial roles
Bone homeostasis, muscle function, oncogenesis, immune response and metabolism.
In the context of the COVID-19
Numerous researchers have tried to determine the role vitamin D in the immune response to the virus.
Systematic review and meta-analysis, 15th May 2023
Preventive vitamin D supplementation, 16 publications
N = 1,262,235 participants,
A protective role in
Incidence of COVID-19
Mortality
Admission to intensive care units (ICUs).
We calculated the Odds Ratios
The assessment of potential bias and the evaluation of study quality will be conducted independently by two researchers.
Extra information
The majority of the effects of vitamin D are mediated by the VDR, which promotes the expression of genes containing specific DNA sequences and is expressed in almost all nucleated cells
Approximately 3 percent of the human genome is under the control of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D
Vitamin D has been observed to contribute to the synthesis of defensins,
to be pivotal for enhancing the phagocytic activity,
and to modulate the immune system response by regulating the inflammatory cascade
41.5K
views
226
comments
Excess deaths, MPs request data
Health Secretary urged to release data that ‘may link Covid vaccine to excess deaths’
MPs and peers criticise ‘wall of silence’
Tweet from Andrew Bridgen
https://twitter.com/ABridgen
Health Secretary urged to release data that ‘may link Covid vaccine to excess deaths’
MPs and peers criticise ‘wall of silence’
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/03/02/health-secretary-release-data-covid-vaccine-excess-deaths/
MPs and peers have accused the Health Secretary of withholding data that could link the Covid vaccine to excess deaths
A cross-party group
“growing public and professional concerns” UK’s rates of excess deaths since 2020
Demand to be shown the underlying data for to support the Government’s assertion, “no evidence” linking excess deaths to the vaccines for Covid-19.
21 MPs and peers
“If those data do indeed exist, please share them; if thorough investigations have already ruled out such a link, please share the relevant reports,”
“There is no place here for blind faith.”
Written to
Health Secretary
Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC)
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)
UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA)
Potentially critical data, which maps the date of people’s Covid vaccine doses to the date of their deaths,
have been released to pharmaceutical companies but not put into the public domain.
Data should be released “on the same anonymised basis that it was shared with the pharmaceutical groups, and there seems to be no credible reason why that should not be done immediately”.
“Questions about these trends, however, have to date been met by a relative wall of silence from your organisations and other public health officials.”
A DHSC spokesman
“We are committed to data transparency and publish a wide range of data on excess mortality. The datasets published are kept under constant review.”
56.5K
views
151
comments
Original vitamin D researcher
Buy Dr David Grimes' bok here, https://yorkbookshop.com/health-and-personal-development/307-vitamin-d-deficiency-and-covid-19-its-central-role-in-a-world-pandemic.html
36.3K
views
162
comments
MHRA has indeed become an enabler for the pharmaceutical interests
We feel compelled to conclude that the MHRA has indeed become an enabler for the pharmaceutical interests or patient safety
industry, with patient safety no longer being its primary concern.
Medicines regulator failed to flag Covid vaccine side effects,
and must be urgently investigated.
All-party parliamentary group, (APPG) on Pandemic Response and Recovery,
believe MHRA were aware of heart and clotting issues,
in February 2021,
but did not highlight the problems for several months
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/02/27/mhra-covid-vaccine-side-effects-mps-all-party-parliamentary/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/03/05/esther-mcvey-covid-inquiry-lockdown-files-matt-hancock-baroness/
https://www.medscape.co.uk/viewarticle/uk-medicines-regulator-serious-risk-patient-safety-2024a10003cd?ecd=wnl_ret_240220_mscpmrk-GB_daily_etid6322343&uac=188254MN&impID=6322343&sso=true\
https://appgpandemic.org/news/mhra-letter-health-select-committee
We write regarding serious concerns about the approach of the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA),
to patient safety and also problems in a system that,
far from protecting patients,
continues to put them at serious risk.
Primodos, sodium valproate and pelvic mesh
We also believe that the MHRA is at the heart of these far wider endemic failings,
and that those cited in this letter merely represent the tip of a sizeable iceberg of failure.
The Yellow Card Scheme
The Yellow Card Scheme … is failing patients.
Hospital admissions are caused or complicated by ADRs (16.5%),
while analysis of in patient stays has shown that 15% of patients experience one or more ADRs, with half being either definitely or possibly avoidable.
Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review Review, report First Do No Harm:
We heard about a system that cannot be relied upon to identify promptly significant adverse outcomes arising from a medication or device,
it is clear that there is gross under-reporting,
and our complaints systems are both too complex and too diffuse to allow early signal detection.
Under-reporting hinders the ability to detect signals and assign causation.
The cost to patient safety of such an unreliable system can be measured in the needless fatalities,
the considerable burden on the quality of life for survivors,
and a £2.2 billion strain on NHS England alone.
Only one in 12 patients are aware that they can report a suspected ADR.
A 2006 systemic review
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16689555/
The rate of under-reporting of adverse events was, on average, 94% and possibly as high as 98%,
meaning possibly only two in every 100 ADRs were reported to the MHRA.
For example, a survey of UK pharmacists suggested they lack interest in, and do not promote, direct patient reporting.
Only 19% of the respondents displayed a poster promoting the Yellow Card Scheme in their pharmacy.
2023, analysis of anticoagulants
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37269441/
Reporting of gastrointestinal bleeds
North West of England Hospital Trust recorded 12,013 bleed-related emergency admissions.
Of these, 1,058 were taking DOAC anticoagulants.
Only six DOAC Yellow Card reports (0.56% of the possible) were made by the Trust during the period.
Conflicts of Interest and Transparency
From FDA to MHRA: are drug regulators for hire?
https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj.o1538
The regulator-industry revolving door
Proportion of covid-19 vaccine committee members that declared financial COIs
UK, HMRA, 32%
Australia, TGA, 50%
March 2022, Dame June Raine, Chief Executive of the MHRA
agency’s transition from “the watchdog to the enabler”
does little to quell suspicions of conflicts and the implications for patient safety and cannot be overlooked.
MHRA’s responses to Freedom of Information (FOI) requests.
Between 2008 and 2017,
only 41% of requests were successful.
Since 2019, the number of requests has seen a substantial increase from 609 to 1,609 in 2021,
likely due to concerns about the regulation of Covid-19 vaccinations,
with 76% of these requests answered outside the 20 working days statutory response time.
Often exemptions were applied or vague or evasive responses were received.
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
from regulatory approval to post marketing pharmacovigilance the MHRA has a history of failing patients
The MHRA does not attempt to assess or compare the safety of different vaccines
MHRA “does not hold a process for the investigation and follow up of individual Yellow Card reports”
MHRA only followed up some 54% of deaths reported in yellow cards as possibly linked to exposure to one of the Covid-19 vaccines.
Two months later, 7 May, (2021) the MHRA withdrew AZ for under 40s, but only after further needless deaths
What conclusions are we to draw about the seeming unwillingness of a regulator, largely funded by those it regulates, to disclose data to the same public it professes to protect?
We feel compelled to conclude that the MHRA has indeed become an enabler for the pharmaceutical industry, with patient safety no longer being its primary concern.
36.5K
views
125
comments
The 4 Lighthouse declarations
https://lighthousedeclaration.org/declaration/
Ros Nealon-Cook, a psychologist from Australia, had her license suspended for sounding the alarm about the harms to children from government pandemic policy. Ros has joined forces with a number health professionals from around the world who were similarly censored and silenced. Together, they have created The Cape Byron Lighthouse Declaration to raise awareness about the widespread propaganda and censorship of expert scientific opinion. You can read and sign the declaration here: www.lighthousedeclaration.world – adding your signature will take less than a minute.
In the coming months, the Lighthouse Declaration team will host a series of webinars and roundtables to further expand the conversation on these critical issues.
Ros and the Lighthouse Declaration team, can be contacted through their social media channels or via the website:
Twitter: @Lighthouse_Dec
Twitter: @rosalina_nc
Facebook: LighthouseDeclaration
Instagram: @lighthouse_dec
26.4K
views
63
comments
Change in death stats
Massive APPARENT reduction in excess deaths in 2023 as UK ONS change how they calculate excess deaths.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/causesofdeath/articles/estimatingexcessdeathsintheukmethodologychanges/latest
OECD, UK
https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=104676
Excess deaths in 2022, 52,514 (9.26%)
OECD, UK, weeks 1 – 44, 2023
Excess deaths, 49,389 (9.44%)
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/office-for-health-improvement-and-disparities/about/statistics
https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiYmUwNmFhMjYtNGZhYS00NDk2LWFlMTAtOTg0OGNhNmFiNGM0IiwidCI6ImVlNGUxNDk5LTRhMzUtNGIyZS1hZDQ3LTVmM2NmOWRlODY2NiIsImMiOjh9
Early heart disease deaths rise to 14-year high
https://www.bhf.org.uk/what-we-do/news-from-the-bhf/news-archive/2024/january/early-heart-disease-deaths-rise-to-14-year-high
Over 100,000 excess deaths involving cardiovascular conditions in England since February 2020
Heart and circulatory diseases cause around a quarter of all deaths in England – over 140,000 deaths each year or one death every four minutes.
In 2022
Over 39,000 people in England died prematurely of cardiovascular conditions,
heart attacks, coronary heart disease and stroke,
an average of 750 people each week.
It is the highest annual total since 2008.
41.2K
views
279
comments
Vitamin D deficiency pandemic
Detailed conversation with Professor David Anderson, one of the seminal research doctors on vitamin D
27.6K
views
96
comments
COVID Psychological Manipulation: Unpacked
Ros Nealon-Cook, a psychologist from Australia, had her license suspended for sounding the alarm about the harms to children from government pandemic policy. Ros has joined forces with a number health professionals from around the world who were similarly censored and silenced. Together, they have created The Cape Byron Lighthouse Declaration to raise awareness about the widespread propaganda and censorship of expert scientific opinion. You can read and sign the declaration here: www.lighthousedeclaration.world – adding your signature will take less than a minute.
In the coming months, the Lighthouse Declaration team will host a series of webinars and roundtables to further expand the conversation on these critical issues.
Ros and the Lighthouse Declaration team, can be contacted through their social media channels or via the website:
Twitter: @Lighthouse_Dec
Twitter: @rosalina_nc
Facebook: LighthouseDeclaration
Instagram: @lighthouse_dec
40.4K
views
251
comments
White clots and sudden death
Thank you to Mr. John O’Looney of Milton Keynes Family Funeral Services, https://www.mkffs.co.uk/
69.2K
views
461
comments
Autopsy after myocarditis
With Dr. Peter McCullough and Nicolas Hulscher (paper authors).
Autopsy findings in cases of fatal COVID-19 vaccine- induced myocarditis
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ehf2.14680
Myocarditis autopsy paper: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ehf2.14680
VAERS myocarditis paper: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20420986241226566
preprint autopsy paper: https://zenodo.org/records/8120771
Spike protein detoxification paper: https://www.cureus.com/articles/207654-clinical-approach-to-post-acute-sequelae-after-covid-19-infection-and-vaccination#!/
We will also cite the Nakahara paper and the Krausen paper
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37724969/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37758751/
Nic’s linkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicolas-hulscher-3683b1274/
46.6K
views
174
comments
Covid vaccines are safe
Watch on parliament TV, about 13.30 pm, Wednesday 31st January 2024
https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/5bfca061-5df1-4f4e-9e9b-92ca5e2c5e5a?agenda=True
Read the officially recorded text in Hansard
https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-01-31/debates/FB2712E7-763B-4DF4-8158-AC8CDA3DBE78/Engagements
Andrew Bridgen
(North West Leicestershire) (Ind)
Q3. More than two decades ago, the then Prime Minister, Tony Blair, misled this House by promoting and endorsing the Post Office Horizon IT system as perfect, protecting the large corporation that created it and causing untold harm, damage and misery to innocent people. Can the current Prime Minister think of anything he has promoted, in partnership with huge businesses, as safe and effective that has ultimately harmed the British people? Will he use this opportunity to correct that safe and effective statement, or will he choose the same line as Tony Blair and sit back, do nothing and let the misery continue to pile up?
The Prime Minister
We have been clear that the Horizon scandal is a terrible miscarriage of justice, and we are doing everything we can to make it right. To what the hon. Member was more broadly insinuating, let me be unequivocal from this Dispatch Box that covid vaccines are safe.
Apologies and correction.
In this video I wrongly say the scabies mites (Sarcoptes scabiei) are insects, they are not and are correctly classified as Arachnida. This is because the adult mites have 8 legs, so are in the same group as spiders. Insects of course have 6 legs.
They are 0.2 to 0.45 mm in size, not 10 times bigger as I said, always important to put the decimal point in the correct place.
I hope to resume normal service in the next video.
55.9K
views
280
comments
Decisions, overwhelmingly wrong
Direct link to parliament TV, https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/5e1f14d2-72b3-488f-a53c-fc94fee92dac
Link to Hansard full transcript, https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-01-16/debates/152B485D-812D-43CC-9D25-C2B651564810/ExcessDeathTrends?highlight=westminster%20hall#contribution-46059AFE-9A03-472B-9364-0BF972E2E7D8
Miriam Cates
(Penistone and Stocksbridge) (Con)
I will be brief, because it is clear that there is far more demand to speak in the debate than there is time. That shows that we absolutely need a longer debate; we need a debate on the Floor of the House, because it is not just Members present who want to speak, and members of the public have shown enormous interest.
I will not go over the excellent points that have been made and the data that has been shared. We know we have a problem in this country with excess deaths, particularly among younger people and particularly from cardiovascular disease. That, in itself, is a huge challenge. We need medical experts and statisticians to address those issues—I am not qualified to do so.
What I will say is this: lockdown changed everything. Our response to covid changed everything. Just as we look back on different periods of history—before the war; before the industrial revolution—I believe we will look back at before and after lockdown. Lockdown has changed our economy and how we relate to each other. It has changed our health and our understanding of children’s development.
The conditions under which those decisions were made—decisions that were overwhelmingly wrong, in my opinion, although I do not blame any individuals, given the pressure they were under—have not changed. The conditions under which we suspended the precautionary principle, ignored the fact that interventions may cause harm, suspended the importance of children’s education, suspended the safeguarding of children, suspended the need for medical trials and suspended all sorts of safeguards that have stood society in good stead for a long time have not changed.
The conditions in Government, the media and wider society under which those decisions were made have not changed because, unfortunately, we have not yet got to the heart of the matter. Why did that pressure come from the media? Why did we have to follow what other countries were doing? Why were we obsessed with particular points of data, such as deaths from covid, rather than considering the wider impact on society?
My concern about the covid inquiry is that it is asking all the wrong questions. It is concerned with who swore at whom on WhatsApp, and not the wider conditions under which decisions were made. When, several Education Secretaries ago, the former, former, former Secretary of State for Education, my right hon. Friend the Member for South Staffordshire (Sir Gavin Williamson), stood up in the House of Commons and said that he would close schools, I remember, as a mother, shouting at the television, “Don’t do it! Don’t do it!”. I could see the impact it would have—not just on my own children, but across all the wider components of society. Society is like a big machine; we cannot just take out one part and assume that the rest will continue to operate. We have seen that clearly over the past three years.
We must address the reasons why these decisions were made. We cannot do that in three minutes each—we must have a longer debate.
35.2K
views
103
comments